# data[].attributes.headline
I will say the dialogue is super dense. There are a lot of important observations a character makes about society but never revisits again. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I will say the dialogue is super dense. There are a lot of important observations a character makes about society but never revisits again. 

# data[].attributes.body
I really love that this play can operate in multiple registers. It can be read as an articulation of a political idea, criticizing one way of engaging with politics in favor of another. And, at the same time, it can also be read as a multivalent critique of all ways in which we participate/think politically. By stereotyping *everything,* no idea/belief/aspiration/value/opinion has the freedom to deviate from the society within which that idea/belief/etc. is charged with positive and negative energies.

# data[].attributes.headline
The w hyper-pop gays have gone to far this time! I do appreciate the Troll, whom I identified with the most. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The w hyper-pop gays have gone to far this time! I do appreciate the Troll, whom I identified with the most. 

# data[].attributes.body
I'm really intrigued by the change in camera style during the third act and the way that it makes it difficult (impossible?) to follow what's literally happening

# data[].attributes.body
Circle Jerk was  entertaining and funny. Also the political messages were very deep and controversial if i interpreted them correctly. Hated the troll and think the play coulda gone without it, but maybe im missing a deeper meaning here. Also was very in touch and up to date with internet and tik tok culture which was impressive.

# data[].attributes.headline
Circle Jerk was disturbing, but in a way that was playful and maintained its dark undertones. It plays off of current social media and cancel culture in a way I wasn't expecting. In terms of performance, I found myself very involved with the characters when they would face the audience directing, basically speaking to the camera.

# data[].attributes.subject
Circle Jerk was disturbing, but in a way that was playful and maintained its dark undertones. It plays off of current social media and cancel culture in a way I wasn't expecting. In terms of performance, I found myself very involved with the characters when they would face the audience directing, basically speaking to the camera.

# data[].attributes.headline
An Interesting Microcosm of White Gay Life

# data[].attributes.subject
An Interesting Microcosm of White Gay Life

# data[].attributes.body
I don't know where to begin: the Fire Island parody, the Milo Yiannopolous parody, the intention behind the double roles, the reality TV clips, down to the later TikTok-esque incorporations. This portrait of white gay life spanned decades and generations.

# data[].attributes.body
The play was fun if a bit confusing. This is perhaps due to ignorance about the culture but the distinction between what was satire and what wasn`t was a bit unclear.

# data[].attributes.body
I honestly found this play really hard to watch (it was disturbing, concerning, awkward etc.) - and I'm wondering to what extent the audience is meant to feel disturbed/comfortable/awkward? I'm also wondering why the play is so saturated with cultural references/how each of those references contributes to the play's larger message?

# data[].attributes.body
I think I was gripped into the tone of Circle Jerk when the troll was the first character that came onto the screen with a lot of energy. I also want to discuss the role of the troll.......I started to get the impression that the troll is an internet troll?

# data[].attributes.body
I thought it was so cool how the actors played so many different roles and really embraced them all.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the importance of the blue troll. Why does it have plot relevance (turning off the power)? In what ways does the actual troll compare to the metaphorical troll in the play?

# data[].attributes.body
i was disturbed and intrigued at the same time