# data[].attributes.body
- Racism: Only african american participants, no white participants, no experiments with white participants, believe syphilis affected black and white people differently.
- No informed consent: Participants were not told they were involved in an experiment - told they were being treated for 'bad blood'
- Mass deception - participants and family: Lied to participants and the wider community
- No Respect - Lied to participants, no consent, withheld life saving medication, made decisions for participants
- No protection from harm - participants ended up with lifelong health issues and even ended up dying
- Paternalism - Doctors made decisions for participants and even made them believe it was in their best interest

# data[].attributes.body
It shows that when someone is given a certain role and that power they will fulfill that role - self fulfilling prophecey
The benefits greatly outweigh the ethical issues as participants where physically and mentally harmed.

Shows the capabilities of humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
-Informed Consent (Babies can't consent as they don't have a voice. They'll only listen to the parents/guardians)
-Confidentiality (Posting up pictures of the baby)
- Deception (The baby doesn't know what is going on in the experiment and would likely object if he had a say)
-Not protecting the baby from harm (It could mentally hurt their baby, they could feel betrayed by parents/adults around him. Little albert also associates fluffy objects with rats later on in his life and that is mentally damaging him)

# data[].attributes.body
The benefits of this experiment are that it gives us an understanding of humans psychologically.

# data[].attributes.body
Lasting health issues, mental health issues, wider spread of the disease within the participants families.

Lawsuit on behalf of participants and families
Families were given free medical care and funeral care as compensation
$9M

Public apology from the government

National research act - to protect participants rights

Legacy committee created

Creating long lasting scepticism between african americans and the healthcare system

Studies are still not as diverse as they should be - researchers fear being labelled with the same issues, participants lack of trust with the researchers and their intentions

Caused unnecessary and preventable deaths

# data[].attributes.body
- The research demonstrated that people could be persuaded to do harm to others by a person in a position of authority, this could be affected by socialization.
- The participants in the study may lose trust in people in authority and/or those doing research.
- The research gave everyday people the opportunity to have power over others. The advert specifically asked for those who normally would not be in a position of power.

# data[].attributes.body
- Lack of protection from harm ( participants where allowed to harm each others mental condition)

- Deception ( participants were stripped naked without their previous consent. When parents were allowed to visit the 'prison' they made the experiment look benificial and not harmful to the participants

- When screening participants the ones who were not deemed mentally well were made to be the prison guards. This is detrimental as the prisoners were now not protected from harm.

- Right to withdraw was breached because they became emotionally disturbed and were not protected against physical and psychological harm.

No debriefing to protect those who felt like they were harmed either mentally or physically immediately after the experiment. But several years later when they harm was already done.

# data[].attributes.body
-It raises awareness. It created a huge outrage on experimenting with babies.
-We can't really think of anything because the negative impacts outweigh the positive.

# data[].attributes.body
- Deception: Information was withheld from the participants. This misled the participants into believing that they were causing harm. The experiment was rigged. The participants were informed that the study was about memory.
- Protection from harm: participants will have had their mental health affected due to the intense verbal pressures applied by the experimenter. This could leave lasting mental damage on the participants.
- Respect: Researcher did not respect the participants, causing mental aggrevation, guilt and regret, insisting that they disregard the subject's outbursts.
- Confidentiality: The researcher filmed the experiment which included the participants faces, and their names were announced which would lead to them being identified.
- Informed consent: The information that the participants were given was not completely true, which led to distress and trauma.

# data[].attributes.body
Little albert was a baby who was experimenting on whether conditioning processes can be shown in humans. He was places in a room with a rat, a monkey, masks and burning newspapers. They strike a pipe on a hard surface to make a noise. He associated the noise with the rat. Made in 1919.

# data[].attributes.body
Deception, protection from harm, respect, confidentiality, informed consent.

# data[].attributes.body
Breeches

No informed consent- the participants were not informed fully with the details of the research therefore they did not know all about the research they were a part of

No sort of protection from mental harm- the researcher did not do anything in aim of protecting the participants.

No respect- The researcher showed no respect for the participants by not giving them the full details of the nature of the research.

Ethics followed

High confidentiality- The names of details of the participants were not disclosed

There was right to withdraw- Participants were given the choice to remove their results in the experiment as towards the end there were a few less participants than at the start.