# data[].attributes.body
Miranda Warning

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, all suspect should be informed of their rights before they are questioned by police

# data[].attributes.body
Miranda was arrested and questioned by police without a warning of his rights

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B34TDZtHXA

# data[].attributes.body
Does the fifth amendment's protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?

# data[].attributes.body
Chief Justice Earl Warren had the final opinion for the 5-4 majority.  Justice Tom C. Clark wrote a dissenting opinion  of the Fifth Amendment that curtails the ability of the police to effectively execute their duties. Justice White wrote a separate dissent the Fifth Amendment only protects defendants from giving self-incrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
On March 13,1963,Ernesto Miranda was arrested and questioned by police officers because of a connection between kidnapping and rape. He was not informed of his fifth amendment rights during an interrogation. After two hours of interrogation,the police obtained a written confession from Miranda.  His written confession was admitted into evidence. Police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found him guilty and got put on appeal.  On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel.

# data[].attributes.body
This case made all police have to tell the criminal or the person they are bringing in that the have the right to remain silent (Fifth amendment). This also showed that any evidence that was taken illegally will not be used during the trial.