# data[].attributes.headline
its not that simple because healthcare should be free however its obvious that sometimes the NHS is bombarded with patients and things like nurses being underpaid/ not looked after correctly also because of funding is an issue. 

# data[].attributes.subject
its not that simple because healthcare should be free however its obvious that sometimes the NHS is bombarded with patients and things like nurses being underpaid/ not looked after correctly also because of funding is an issue. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree to an extent as medical care is something that should not exist with the thoughts of making profit off on it. However , some individuals can afford the extra payment and it would relieve the burden for tax payers

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree to an extent as medical care is something that should not exist with the thoughts of making profit off on it. However , some individuals can afford the extra payment and it would relieve the burden for tax payers

# data[].attributes.body
u

# data[].attributes.body
Private sector companies should have no place in the provision of healthcare.  Money always ends up coming before the needs of people and the main objective of care can be lost far too easily.

# data[].attributes.headline
Its not that simple because on one hand, with the NHS being public, everyone will be able to have access to healthcare, however privatisation of NHS services could mean that there will be more financial incentives to offer better services and possibly provision of better working conditions for the workers. Completely crossing off private sector involvement might also burden the government budget in a sense that tax payers will have to pay for the expenses.

# data[].attributes.subject
Its not that simple because on one hand, with the NHS being public, everyone will be able to have access to healthcare, however privatisation of NHS services could mean that there will be more financial incentives to offer better services and possibly provision of better working conditions for the workers. Completely crossing off private sector involvement might also burden the government budget in a sense that tax payers will have to pay for the expenses.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at the USA.

# data[].attributes.body
Healthcare should not exist with the incentive of making money

# data[].attributes.headline
if profit is the incentive, they may begin to reduce the quality of services they provide as they are only concerned about the profit they make

# data[].attributes.subject
if profit is the incentive, they may begin to reduce the quality of services they provide as they are only concerned about the profit they make

# data[].attributes.headline
healthcare should not be used to make profit

# data[].attributes.subject
healthcare should not be used to make profit

# data[].attributes.body
The state is not always the most efficient provider of goods and services meaning some may end up with a poorer quality of health care at greater cost e.g. blood testing going private

# data[].attributes.body
When healthcare is for profit the governing factor of outcome is profit as opposed to benefit to society and that means corners can be cut that endanger peoples lives if its the best decision for business, often the cheapest way is not the best for the health of all people

# data[].attributes.headline
the private sector allows costs to decrease but also allows efficiency of the service to increase-- its a win win situation... however as said previously, if left to the private sector not all things will be done efficiently (the sick kids example)

# data[].attributes.subject
the private sector allows costs to decrease but also allows efficiency of the service to increase-- its a win win situation... however as said previously, if left to the private sector not all things will be done efficiently (the sick kids example)

# data[].attributes.body
Private sector can be beneficial to the NHS and may take some of the strain off of it decreasing costs however too much private sector involvement could lead to increased taxes for users of the NHS or having to pay large amounts for complicated surgeries no longer covered by the NHS

# data[].attributes.body
If you can decrease costs and increase efficiency while not sacrificing quality and accessibility of care, then I see no reason to have some privatisation of NHS. As long as state still has firm grip on management and control over these private companies

# data[].attributes.headline
it takes away the core value and principle of free healthcare.  

# data[].attributes.subject
it takes away the core value and principle of free healthcare.  

# data[].attributes.body
i think there need to have a balance between completely privatise and stae own. pravate will make health care system become too exspansive for household while state own NHS cuase the happening of x-inefficiency

# data[].attributes.headline
You shouldn't be able to pay for a better quality of life

# data[].attributes.subject
You shouldn't be able to pay for a better quality of life

# data[].attributes.body
Capitalism never results in compassion for the poor. Pre-NHS the poor suffered as a result of private doctors trying to make a living. There is a health gradient now where people living in deprivation are much more likely to spend their lives in ill health- increasing privatisation allows doctors to prioritise money (and hence the welfare of the rich) over public health

# data[].attributes.headline
the private sector can relieve the pressure on the public sector -- e.g. those who can afford private healthcare can use those facilities allowing more people to use the public facilities with less waiting times ...etc

# data[].attributes.subject
the private sector can relieve the pressure on the public sector -- e.g. those who can afford private healthcare can use those facilities allowing more people to use the public facilities with less waiting times ...etc

# data[].attributes.body
Privatisation helps create jobs, and it also helps to keep up with demand, however the state has less power over standards

# data[].attributes.headline
Once the government starts privatising certain parts of the NHS it is a slippery slope towards full privatisation. The NHS is valued by too many people - rich and poor - to be turning into something that we have to pay for.

# data[].attributes.subject
Once the government starts privatising certain parts of the NHS it is a slippery slope towards full privatisation. The NHS is valued by too many people - rich and poor - to be turning into something that we have to pay for.

# data[].attributes.headline
If it doesn't effect the free at the point of use principle it eliminates the issue of inequality meaning it doesn't always have negative effects

# data[].attributes.subject
If it doesn't effect the free at the point of use principle it eliminates the issue of inequality meaning it doesn't always have negative effects

# data[].attributes.body
Privatisation and subcontracting compounds bureaucratic and administrative inefficiencies and costs

# data[].attributes.body
You can keep the NHS free at the point of use and give everyone equal access to it but still use private services for cleaners...where's the harm in that?

# data[].attributes.body
The state controlling everything produces inefficiencies which end up costing the taxpayer more. Where's the incentive to save money?

# data[].attributes.body
No one should profit from ill health.