# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
- prompt students thinking by giving pictures and short questions at the beginning

-giving their students a brief overview of the topic to make sure everyone has a basic knowledge about the topic being discussed

-encouraging students to voice their opinion and promote collaboration

-getting students to discuss with one another before giving out the answers

# data[].attributes.headline
Watch the video on a micro-teaching episode.

# data[].attributes.subject
Watch the video on a micro-teaching episode.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Identify the key characteristics of collaborative learning in this episode.
2. How do you know if it is working well? Describe 2 examples.
3. Any questions you have about the episode.

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
- Participant regulation by the TA herself at the start (arrowing 'students' to answer, controlling breakout rooms and when they close)
- Participants also assumed to self/co-regulate each other in their breakout rooms, but is not shown in the recording

- Educator role: introduced the concept of poverty, case study, added on to students' thoughts on reasons for poverty

- Learner role: think of and present on reasons causing poverty

- Activity structure: low-medium cognitive demand - requires 'students' to bring in past experience/knowledge into the topic

- Learning Objectives made somewhat clear at the end: About poverty and its possible reasons

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
1. She did tried to split the group into two and allowed them to discuss.

3. There were several activity such as an open discussion, and there were also split up of the groups for separate small group discussions.

4. She consistently asked for participants reactions and also tried to prompt them for answers when the responses were not as active.

5. Students tried to come up with potential reasons for the supposed outcome of poverty.

6. She summarized and also elaborated on the "broader" and theoretical reasonings for proverty.

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Students trying to give their idea about the figures and provide their impression about these figures.

# data[].attributes.body
The TA should have any authorities to encourage the students or punish the student who doesn't say anything?

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
- Participant regulation by the TA herself
- Working because the expectations and time allocated was clear, and students' answers are short as expected by the TA

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Students were able to complete the task satisfactorily.

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
-Students used google docs to show the ideas and have a discussion.
-students are trying to answer her questions

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
- Answers provided by the participants are highly relevant
- Answers tie in well to the theme of the lesson: Poverty

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Students were engaged and contributed to the learning/teaching process.

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
1. Group composition

2. Learning outcomes

3. Activity structure

4. Participation regulation

5. Learner role

6. Educator role

# data[].attributes.body
- What's the learning outcome? Not exactly clear, we think it's poverty and its reasons.
- This seems to be a convergent lesson, whereby the presenter goes back to her points that she has presented. Would it be better for the discussion to flow as what the students presented?
- Regarding the introduction to the topic, was it redundant to ask people on the topic title?
- How do you know 1 person came out with the answer or the team discussed and came up with the answers?
- Why didn't the TA assign different question to each group? Seems redundant.

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
Participation Regulation : By asking questions regarding the pictures to individual students. Dividing the class into groups for discussion.
Learning Outcomes: By asking them to do their research about  poverty.
Learner Role: Discussion in the groups regarding the reasons of Poverty.
Activity Structure: Beginning the class with the identification of what the picture depicts, as low cognition to a high cognition activity of identifying the reason behind poverty.
Educator Role: Starting with definition of poverty and then including a Case Study to reinforce the material of discussion.

# data[].attributes.body
Students answered the first set of question. There was some reluctance but they were prompted to think

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Students seemed reluctant to answer the first set of questions, but after the discussion they seemed more engaged.

The students edit the google doc and had a discussion of the lines

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning:

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning:

# data[].attributes.body
Participation regulation:
- Engaging students by asking questions; Calling out specific names.
- Allocating time for discussion and presentation by students

Group composition:
3 - 4 students in a group

Activity structure:
- See Picture,
- Google, Group Discussion
- Review Definition
- Review Reasons

Educator role:
- Introduce the concept of poverty and her view on why poverty exists.
- Building on the points brought up by students.
- Case study to elaborate
- Scaffold the discussion
- Teach concept (give vague definition)
- Micro-introduction to poverty

Learner role:
- Allowing students to bring up their own opinions

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
See Picture, 1 word answer

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Case Study, share google doc

Student give answers
Student actually say something?

# data[].attributes.body
Too simple content for 10+ minutes?
No learning involved? what are the learning outcomes?
Reasons/Factors too vague?

# data[].attributes.headline
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.subject
Key characteristics of collaborative learning

# data[].attributes.body
-Learning outcomes ：
Understand the concept of poverty

-Activity structure：

Group discussion and presentation
-Participation regulation ：

-Learner role ：

Facilitate interactions and thought processes; feedback on their answers.

-Educator role ：
Define the topic of discussion.
Taught them about poverty, case study example.
Got them to list their own examples
Positive feedback
Confident

-Participant Regulation:
Called them by name to share. (Co-regulation)

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 1: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
Students gave answers, asked for student participation. Nudging students towards an answer (she had an answer in mind).

# data[].attributes.headline
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.subject
Example 2: How do you know if it is working well?

# data[].attributes.body
The students gave answers in alignment with her answers.

# data[].attributes.body
Could she have asked more in-depth discussion questions?

Could she expand on her examples to explain why those examples lead to poverty?

Maybe she could wrap up her session with a summary of key points?