# data[].attributes.headline
Rabia Nurten A. / Rwanda genocide: 100 days of slaughter

# data[].attributes.subject
Rabia Nurten A. / Rwanda genocide: 100 days of slaughter

# data[].attributes.body
In just 100 days in 1994, about 800,000 people were slaughtered in Rwanda by ethnic Hutu extremists. They were targeting members of the minority Tutsi community, as well as their political opponents, irrespective of their ethnic origin.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In just 100 days in 1994, about 800,000 people were slaughtered in Rwanda by ethnic Hutu extremists. They were targeting members of the minority Tutsi community, as well as their political opponents, irrespective of their ethnic origin.

Warning: Contains graphic images.

How did the genocide start?

About 85% of Rwandans are Hutus but the Tutsi minority has long dominated the country. In 1959, the Hutus overthrew the Tutsi monarchy and tens of thousands of Tutsis fled to neighbouring countries, including Uganda.

A group of Tutsi exiles formed a rebel group, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), which invaded Rwanda in 1990 and fighting continued until a 1993 peace deal was agreed.

On the night of 6 April 1994 a plane carrying then-President Juvenal Habyarimana, and his counterpart Cyprien Ntaryamira of Burundi - both Hutus - was shot down, killing everyone on board.

Hutu extremists blamed the RPF and immediately started a well-organised campaign of slaughter. The RPF said the plane had been shot down by Hutus to provide an excuse for the genocide.

With meticulous organisation. Lists of government opponents were handed out to militias who went and killed them, along with all of their families.

Neighbours killed neighbours and some husbands even killed their Tutsi wives, saying they would be killed if they refused.

At the time, ID cards had people's ethnic group on them, so militias set up roadblocks where Tutsis were slaughtered, often with machetes which most Rwandans kept around the house.

Thousands of Tutsi women were taken away and kept as sex slaves.

Why was it so vicious?

Rwanda has always been a tightly controlled society, organised like a pyramid from each district up to the top of government. The then-governing party, MRND, had a youth wing called the Interahamwe, which was turned into a militia to carry out the slaughter.

Weapons and hit-lists were handed out to local groups, who knew exactly where to find their targets.

The Hutu extremists set up a radio station, RTLM, and newspapers which circulated hate propaganda, urging people to "weed out the cockroaches" meaning kill the Tutsis. The names of prominent people to be killed were read out on radio.

Even priests and nuns have been convicted of killing people, including some who sought shelter in churches.

By the end of the 100-day killing spree, around 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus had been killed.

The UN and Belgium had forces in Rwanda but the UN mission was not given a mandate to stop the killing.

A year after US troops were killed in Somalia, the US was determined not to get involved in another African conflict. The Belgians and most UN peacekeepers pulled out after 10 Belgian soldiers were killed.

The French, who were allies of the Hutu government, sent a special force to evacuate their citizens and later set up a supposedly safe zone but were accused of not doing enough to stop the slaughter in that area.

Paul Kagame, Rwanda's current president, has accused France of backing those who carried out the massacres - a charge denied by Paris.

How did it end?

The well-organised RPF, backed by Uganda's army, gradually seized more territory, until 4 July 1994, when its forces marched into the capital, Kigali.

Some two million Hutus - both civilians and some of those involved in the genocide - then fled across the border into the Democratic Republic of Congo, at the time called Zaire, fearing revenge attacks. Others went to neighbouring Tanzania and Burundi.

Human rights groups say RPF fighters killed thousands of Hutu civilians as they took power - and more after they went into DR Congo to pursue the Interahamwe. The RPF denies this.

In DR Congo, thousands died from cholera, while aid groups were accused of letting much of their assistance fall into the hands of the Hutu militias.

What happened in DR Congo?

The RPF, now in power in Rwanda, embraced militias fighting both the Hutu militias and the Congolese army, which was aligned with the Hutus.

The Rwanda-backed rebel groups eventually marched on DR Congo's capital, Kinshasa, and overthrew the government of Mobutu Sese Seko, installing Laurent Kabila as president.

But the new president's reluctance to tackle Hutu militias led to a new war that dragged in six countries and led to the creation of numerous armed groups fighting for control of this mineral-rich country.

An estimated five million people died as a result of the conflict which lasted until 2003, with some armed groups active until now in the areas near Rwanda's border.

Has anyone faced justice?

Instead, the UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in the Tanzanian town of Arusha to prosecute the ringleaders.

A total of 93 people were indicted and after lengthy and expensive trials, dozens of senior officials in the former regime were convicted of genocide - all of them Hutus.

Within Rwanda, community courts, known as gacaca, were created to speed up the prosecution of hundreds of thousands of genocide suspects awaiting trial.

Correspondents say up to 10,000 people died in prison before they could be brought to justice.

For a decade until 2012, 12,000 gacaca courts met once a week in villages across the country, often outdoors in a marketplace or under a tree, trying more than 1.2 million cases.

Their aim was to achieve truth, justice and reconciliation among Rwandans as "gacaca" means to sit down and discuss an issue.

What is Rwanda like now?

President Kagame has been hailed for transforming the tiny, devastated country he took over through policies which encouraged rapid economic growth. He has also tried to turn Rwanda into a technological hub and is very active on Twitter.

But his critics say he does not tolerate dissent and several opponents have met unexplained deaths, both in the country and abroad.

The genocide is obviously still a hugely sensitive issue in Rwanda, and it is illegal to talk about ethnicity.

The government says this is to prevent hate speech and more bloodshed but some say it prevents true reconciliation.

Charges of stirring up ethnic hatred have been levelled against some of Mr Kagame's critics, which they say is a way of sidelining them.

He won a third term in office in the most recent election in 2017 with 98.63% of the vote.

All photographs belong to the copyright holders as marked

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In just 100 days in 1994, some 800,000 people were slaughtered in Rwanda by ethnic Hutu extremists - how did the genocide happen?

# data[].attributes.headline
Z. Ecrin Z./Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.subject
Z. Ecrin Z./Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.body
Nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan have fought two wars and a limited conflict over Kashmir. But why do they dispute the territory - and how did it start?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
They fought two wars over it and are now nuclear armed - but what’s at the root of the dispute?

# data[].attributes.body
we will discuss the ethnic cleansing of the muslims in Myanmar

# data[].attributes.headline
We will talk about the Jews' persecution during fifteenth to seventeenth centuries in Portugal.

# data[].attributes.subject
We will talk about the Jews' persecution during fifteenth to seventeenth centuries in Portugal.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1492 the kings Isabel and Fernando of Castela decreed the expulsion from Spain of Jews who did not convert to Christianity. Jews who did not convert fled to Portugal.

King João II allowed these refugees to enter Portugal, indicating the places where they could enter: Olivença, Arronches, Figueira de Castelo Rodrigo, Bragança and Melgaço. At the border, Jews paid a fee in exchange for a safe pass. Most of these people went to the big cities like Lisbon, Porto and Évora, while others stayed close to the border, with the hope of one day returning to Spain. João II's authorization to stay here intended to last for a period of 8 months. However, the Jews ended up by staying in Portugal for a much longer time.

When King João II died, in 1495, the Portuguese crown was inherited by Manuel. In the early years of King Manuel's reign, the Jewish community lived in peace, with the king choosing a Jew as his private physician. King Manuel married Isabel, the kings of Castela’s daughter. They agreed to the marriage, but Manuel would have to expel the Jews from the country. After the wedding, King Manuel decreed the order to expel the Jews, forcing them to leave the country. If they did not, they would be condemned to death and all their property would be confiscated by the crown. However, as the Jews possessed wealth and when they depart, they would leave the country poorer, Manuel allowed them to stay, but on the condition that they convert to Christianity. They decided that all the Jews would be baptized at the Easter of 1497.

There were applied tragic measures for Jews who refused the conversion. Jews under the age of 14 were taken out of their families and handed over to Christian families, to be raised as Christians. The consequences were terrible, and many parents killed their own children. Other Jews were baptized by force while others, who managed to escape, committed suicide.

Some who stayed in Portugal as slaves to the king and did not convert, proposed the conversion to the king in exchange for the restitution of their children, with the guarantee that their religious practices would not be questioned. Thus, inquiries of recent converts to Christianity were prohibited. The King also decreed that New Christians should not be treated any differently than the rest, since they were converted to the Holly Faith. Even so, many decided to leave the country taking their goods with them, that is, a part of the country's wealth ran away.

(Lígia Silva; Margarida Martins; Marta Jacinta Silva; Matilde Martins)

# data[].attributes.headline
Genocide of native Americans by the white Man

# data[].attributes.subject
Genocide of native Americans by the white Man

# data[].attributes.body
We will discuss the eradication of the aboriginal Americans who lived first in the continent and were threatened to extinguish because of the trials and persecutions of the new settlers

# data[].attributes.body
We will talk about the genocide in Bosnia.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Slobodan Milosevic

In the aftermath of World War II, the Balkan states of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Slovenia and Macedonia became part of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia. After the death of longtime Yugoslav leader Josip Broz Tito in 1980, growing nationalism among the different Yugoslav republics threatened to split their union apart.

This process intensified after the mid-1980s with the rise of the Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, who helped foment discontent between Serbians in Bosnia and Croatia and their Croatian, Bosniak and Albanian neighbors. In 1991, Slovenia, Croatia and Macedonia declared their independence.

During the war in Croatia that followed, the Serb-dominated Yugoslav army supported Serbian separatists there in brutal clashes with Croatian forces.

Radovan Karadzic

In Bosnia, Muslims represented the largest single population group by 1971. More Serbs and Croats emigrated over the next two decades, and in a 1991 census Bosnia's population of some 4 million was 44 percent Bosniak, 31 percent Serb, and 17 percent Croatian.

Elections held in late 1990 resulted in a coalition government split between parties representing the three ethnicities (in rough proportion to their populations) and led by the Bosniak Alija Izetbegovic.

As tensions built inside and outside the country, the Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic and his Serbian Democratic Party withdrew from government and set up their own "Serbian National Assembly." On March 3, 1992, after a referendum vote (which Karadzic's party blocked in many Serb-populated areas), President Izetbegovic proclaimed Bosnia's independence.

Struggle for Control in Bosnia

Far from seeking independence for Bosnia, Bosnian Serbs wanted to be part of a dominant Serbian state in the Balkans-the "Greater Serbia" that Serbian separatists had long envisioned.

In early May 1992, two days after the United States and the European Community (the precursor to the European Union) recognized Bosnia's independence, Bosnian Serb forces with the backing of Milosevic and the Serb-dominated Yugoslav army launched their offensive with a bombardment of Bosnia's capital, Sarajevo.

They attacked Bosniak-dominated towns in eastern Bosnia, including Zvornik, Foca, and Visegrad, forcibly expelling Bosniak civilians from the region in a brutal process that later was identified as "ethnic cleansing." (Ethnic cleansing differs from genocide in that its primary goal is the expulsion of a group of people from a geographical area and not the actual physical destruction of that group, even though the same methods-including murder, rape, torture and forcible displacement-may be used.)

Though Bosnian government forces tried to defend the territory, sometimes with the help of the Croatian army, Bosnian Serb forces were in control of nearly three-quarters of the country by the end of 1993, and Karadzic's party had set up their own Republika Srpska in the east. Most of the Bosnian Croats had left the country, while a significant Bosniak population remained only in smaller towns.

Several peace proposals between a Croatian-Bosniak federation and Bosnian Serbs failed when the Serbs refused to give up any territory. The United Nations refused to intervene in the conflict in Bosnia, but a campaign spearheaded by its High Commissioner for Refugees provided humanitarian aid to its many displaced, malnourished and injured victims.

Srebrenica Massacre

By the summer of 1995, three towns in eastern Bosnia-Srebrenica, Zepa and Gorazde-remained under control of the Bosnian government. The U.N. had declared these enclaves "safe havens" in 1993, to be disarmed and protected by international peacekeeping forces.

On July 11, 1995, however, Bosnian Serb forces advanced on Srebrenica, overwhelming a battalion of Dutch peacekeeping forces stationed there. Serbian forces subsequently separated the Bosniak civilians at Srebrenica, putting the women and girls on buses and sending them to Bosnian-held territory.

Some of the women were raped or sexually assaulted, while the men and boys who remained behind were killed immediately or bussed to mass killing sites. Estimates of Bosniaks killed by Serb forces at Srebrenica range from around 7,000 to more than 8,000.

After Bosnian Serb forces captured Zepa that same month and exploded a bomb in a crowded Sarajevo market, the international community began to respond more forcefully to the ongoing conflict and its ever-growing civilian death toll.

In August 1995, after the Serbs refused to comply with a U.N. ultimatum, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) joined efforts with Bosnian and Croatian forces for three weeks of bombing Bosnian Serb positions and a ground offensive.

With Serbia's economy crippled by U.N. trade sanctions and its military forces under assault in Bosnia after three years of warfare, Milosevic agreed to enter negotiations that October. The U.S.-sponsored peace talks in Dayton, Ohio, in November 1995 (which included Izetbegovic, Milosevic and Croatian President Franjo Tudjman) resulted in the creation of a federalized Bosnia divided between a Croat-Bosniak federation and a Serb republic.

International Response

Though the international community did little to prevent the systematic atrocities committed against Bosniaks and Croats in Bosnia while they were occurring, it did actively seek justice against those who committed them.

In May 1993, the U.N. Security Council created the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) at The Hague, Netherlands. It was the first international tribunal since the Nuremberg Trials in 1945-46, and the first to prosecute genocide, among other war crimes.

Radovan Karadzic and the Bosnian Serb military commander, General Ratko Mladic, were among those indicted by the ICTY for genocide and other crimes against humanity.

The ICTY would eventually indict 161 individuals of crimes committed during conflict in the former Yugoslavia. Brought before the tribunal in 2002 on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, Milosevic served as his own defense lawyer; his poor health led to long delays in the trial until he was found dead in his prison cell in 2006.

Butcher of Bosnia

In 2007, the International Court of Justice issued its ruling in a historic civil lawsuit brought by Bosnia against Serbia. Though the court called the massacre at Srebrenica genocide and said that Serbia "could and should" have prevented it and punished those who committed it, it stopped short of declaring Serbia guilty of the genocide itself.

After a trial lasting more than four years and involving the testimony of nearly 600 witnesses, the ICTY found Mladic, who had been dubbed the "Butcher of Bosnia," guilty of genocide and other crimes against humanity in November 2017. The tribunal sentenced the 74-year-old former general to life in prison. Coming on the heels of Karadzic's conviction for war crimes the previous year, Mladic's long-delayed conviction marked the last major prosecution by the ICTY.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In the aftermath of World War II, the Balkan states of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Slovenia and Macedonia became part of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia. After the death of longtime Yugoslav leader Josip Broz Tito in 1980, growing nationalism among the different Yugoslav republics threatened to split their union apart.

# data[].attributes.body
CUBAN REVOLUTION
Cuba's struggle for freedom began on July 26, 1953. A new Cuban state is established under the leadership of Fidel Castro to replace the dictator Fulgencio Batista regime.Fidel Castro and Che Guevara come to mind when talking about socialis and the communist Cuban state.

# data[].attributes.body
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenians began to claim territory against Azerbaijan and attacked, and took action to seize Hocalı, which had the only airport in the region, which they blockaded in the last days of 1991, and which is strategically important. Armenians, who were not satisfied with the occupation, committed one of the bloodiest massacres of the 20th century by massacring civilians and torturing the prisoners if they were brutal. In Hocalı, where 7 thousand people previously lived, 613 Azerbaijani citizens, including 106 women, 70 elderly and 63 children, who were vulnerable, died.

# data[].attributes.body
Historian/Emirhan M./ Mirror mirror on the wall eTwinning Project

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Historian/Emirhan M./ Mirror mirror on the wall eTwinning Project

# data[].attributes.body
We are going to discuss about : Flag day in Albania.
Flag Day (Albanian: Dita e Flamurit or Festa e Flamurit), or Independence Day, is celebrated every 28 November as a holiday in Albania, Kosovo, and the Albanian diaspora. It refers to the Albanian Declaration of Independence on 28 November 1912 and the rise of the Albanian flag in Vlora, coinciding with the day in which Skanderbeg raised the same flag in Krujë, on 28 November 1443.

# data[].attributes.body
The Romanians and the Gypsies

In my country there was and still is a “fight” between the Romanian people and Gypsies.

The incidents in Hădareni are known in the recent history of Romania as a spontaneous revolt of the Romanian and Hungarian ethnic groups against the gypsies from Hădăreni village, Chețani commune, Mureș county,in autumn 1993, starting from the murder of a Romanian in a pub by some local gypsies. As a result of ethnic clashes, three gypsies were killed.On the evening of September 20, 1993, a 25-year-old man of Romanian origin, C. Chețan, the father of a three-year-old girl, was called to intervene in defense of his father, who had entered into a heated argument with three gypsies from locality - G. Ghețan and the Lăcătuș brothers, RL and AP At one point, RLL stabbed C. Chețan with a knife to the chest, who died shortly after. The news of "Christmas "'s murder spread like wildfire in the village. The anger of the locals was also fueled by the passive attitude of the local police when they heard the tragic event.

This was one event that happened in my country.Stereotypes measured by opinion polls and sociological studies show that 2/3 of Romanians believe that Roma commit the most crimes, and 1/3 believe that Roma will be a danger to the country.

Held in captivity for 500 years, persecuted by the legionary government from 1940-1941, deported by Antonescu in 1942 to Transnistria, from where only half of them returned, the rest, especially children, women and the elderly being gassed, In the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, on the night of August 2, 1944, the Roma were cannon fodder for the iniquities of a history hitherto untouched by its deer. August 2 was declared by the Roma ethnic group the Memorial Day of the Roma Holocaust, rightly called the "Forgotten Holocaust". Sold in the West during the communist period, together with Jews, Swabians and Saxons, but also with many Romanians, against some exorbitant sums, through a network of mafia clans, Security and Militia, exploited by the totalitarian regime by planting them at the lowest jobs, discriminated against by the majority population and, closer to today, chased, beaten and imprisoned in police custody by the bearers of lamps and the ranks of Securitate officers during the mining of June 13-15, 1990, the Roma are still feared today by the atrocities of history, which always seem to point the finger at their relentless status as slaves.

# data[].attributes.headline
Z. Ecrin Z./Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.subject
Z. Ecrin Z./Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.body
Nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan have fought two wars and a limited conflict over Kashmir. But why do they dispute the territory - and how did it start?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kashmir: Why India and Pakistan fight over it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
They fought two wars over it and are now nuclear armed - but what’s at the root of the dispute?

# data[].attributes.body
Bosnia Massacre

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Haçlı Katliamı Rumeysa A. Yıldız kız AİHL

# data[].attributes.body
We are going to discuss"
Kosovo conflict, (1998–99) conflict in which ethnic Albanians opposed ethnic Serbs and the government of Yugoslavia (the rump of the former federal state, comprising the republics of Serbia and Montenegro) in Kosovo. The conflict gained widespread international attention and was resolved with the intervention of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO)

# data[].attributes.headline
Aziza Yazidi/ Soliman preparatory school/ Soliman- Nabeul -Tunisia: Nilson Mandela 

# data[].attributes.subject
Aziza Yazidi/ Soliman preparatory school/ Soliman- Nabeul -Tunisia: Nilson Mandela 

# data[].attributes.body
Nelson Mandela is one of the most prominent anti-racist figures born on July 18, 1918 and died on December 5, 2013 at the age of 95.
Mandela has been married twice in his life and has six children. As for his political and militant career, Mandela went through many events that ended with him becoming South Africa's first black president. Mandela began his political career in 1942, when he joined the ANC and began his opposition to the policy of racial discrimination. The party was active in a campaign known as the Defiant Campaign, during which Mandela moved around the country encouraging resistance to racial discrimination. Mandela was president of South Africa in 1994, mandela was elected president, became South Africa's first black president. After his term ended, Mandela retired, did not run for a second term, and spent his life in charity. During his rule, South Africa experienced a major transition from minority to majority rule, and was also supportive of the Palestinian cause. After his retirement, he received numerous honours and medals from many world leaders, was selected by the United Nations as goodwill ambassador in 2005, a statue was erected in London's Parliament Square in 2007 and he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993.

# data[].attributes.body
The inter-ethnic
relationship between Serbs
and Albanians
A field study in Kosovo
From Jani Vreto High School Leskovik

# data[].attributes.body
Abbreviations
EU - European Union
KLA - Kosovo Liberation Army (Alb. UÇK)
MPs - Member of Parliaments
NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NGO - Non-governmental organization
OSCE - Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
UN - United Nations
UNMIK - United Nations Mission in Kosovo
UNSC - United Nations Security Council

# data[].attributes.body
Abstract
The inter-ethnic conflict between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo have persisted since the
war in Kosovo in 1999, even though it has been improved in recent years. A friendly
relationship between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo is vital for the future of Kosovo, and
for the security in the Balkan region.
The aim with this study is to explain how the relationship between Serbs and Albanians has
changed since Kosovo’s declaration of independence in 2008. Interviews have been
conducted with six Serbs and six Albanians living in Kosovo. The interviews were mainly
based on three key moments which were considered to have had an influence on the interethnic relationship.
The results from the interviews showed that these three key moments have resulted in
antagonism between, but also within the two ethnic groups. However, the growth of
antagonism seems to have been a consequence of how politicians and media on both sides
in Kosovo have handled these key moments, rather than as a consequence of the key
moments per se.

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction
Since the end of the Kosovo war in 1999, the relationship between Serbs and Albanians
have constantly shifted between hostile and peaceful. Various incidents since year 2000
have had different kinds of influence on inter-ethnic relations. The First Agreement of
Principles governing Normalizations of Relations signed by Serbia and Kosovo in year
2013 was, according to EU, UN, NATO and OSCE, “a historic break-through for KosovoSerbia relations and stabilization processes in the rest of Western Balkans”
1
. An incident
with a negative outcome was when Serbian authorities attempted to operate a direct train to
Mitrovica (Kosovo) from Belgrade with nationalist slogans which provoked the Albanians
in Kosovo.
2
. It was considered as one of the most hostile exchanges since the war in 1999
between Serbia and Kosovo. Violence, distrust, segregation, nationalism and claims of
territory are examples of crucial factors that affects the relationship between the two ethnic
groups.
1.1 Research problem
Several studies regarding the relationship between Serbia and Kosovo exists, but not as
much involving the relationship between the two ethnic groups, Serbs and Albanians. A lot
of tension exists between Serbia and Kosovo, Serbia has for example not recognized Kosovo
as an independent state, which is considered to be hampering the possibility for negotiations
and agreements, not to mention peace amongst the two ethnic groups. The study of how and
why the relationship between Serbs and Albanians changes is vital, in order to identify
factors that contributes to a hostile relationship. This study will hopefully contribute to the
reconciliation process between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo.
1.2 Purpose of the study and research questions
The purpose with this study is to analyze how the relationship3
between Serbs and Albanians
in Kosovo has changed over time and why these changes have occurred. The aim is to
explain which factors influence the relationship, in a positive or negative way.
• Which key moments influencing the Serb-Albanian relationship can be identified
during the period 2008 to 2018?
• How have these key moments influenced the Serbian-Albanian relationship?
• In which way has the relationship between Serbs and Albanians changed since the
declaration of independence in

# data[].attributes.body
JANI VRETO HIGH SCHOOL
LESKOVIK ALBANIA