# data[].attributes.body
Documentary feel, handheld camera work
Complex narrative
Key focus on entertainment values
Surprising commercial success
Limited UK cinema release

# data[].attributes.body
High production values e.g. multiple camera technology.
Traditional presentation
Simplistic predictable single stranded narrative
Commercial success
Safe genre
Set in unfamiliar location
Glossy misery end scene ,studio and location shooting
Star marketing

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream- a big budget blockbuster funded by a big studio for example star wars.

Independent- a low budget movie usually funded by the crew of the movie for example what we do in the shadows.

Niche- A more obscure movie like Scott pilgrim vs the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Independent
Low budget film made by independent companies who are not linked to major companies.
Mainstream
High budget film made by a major film distributer studios.
Niche
A specific type of art film for a small niche audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream- a film that is high budget and highly advertised- avengers, joker. Star Wars
Independent-a small filming company making good yet under budget films
Niche- a serious work of art which is targeted to a small group of people
-Zane

# data[].attributes.body
Independent- a film which isn't made in a major studio, aren't a big company.
Mainstream- a film by a big company/studio which they have more of a variety within budget terms. Films like Harry Potter which have more than one movie but not always.
Niche- ?

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream films are made with big companies with big budgets, usually a blockbusters. An independent film is a low budget usually self funded film. A niche film is a specific type of film in a genre.

# data[].attributes.body
A independent film is a film made outside of a major production company an example is moonlight. Mainstream Movies are movies made by big production company's with a big budget an example is James Bond. A niche film is almost like a sub genre as an example scary movie is a horror also with a comedy twist.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream - something that is expensive to make but is made to hit a large audience and to make profit.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream : movies that are created for profit
Independent: films produced by independent companies
Niche:
Alesia

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream - widely popular and distributed on a large scale
Independent -  a feature film that isn't produced by a  big movie studio
Niche - a film aimed at a smaller more serious less known audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream: Popular with most people (Star Wars)
Independent: feature film produced outside a major film studio (Clerks)
Niche: a film for a specific audience

# data[].attributes.headline
Independent Films are produced outside the major film studio system. Films like Ex Machina, Moonlight and Whiplash

# data[].attributes.subject
Independent Films are produced outside the major film studio system. Films like Ex Machina, Moonlight and Whiplash

# data[].attributes.body
Max.G

# data[].attributes.body
Main stream film is made to create profit and cost a big budget to make. A Niche film is made for small audiences.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream:
large budgets, often sequels, or remakes of other films, large cinema venues will screen them, large publicity drive, large directors usually work on them
e.g Avengers: Endgame
indi:
smaller budgets, usually a single non-franchise film, will usually be filmed "locally", easier logistics compared to mainstream, relatively unknown actors and directors, usually people attempting to climb the ranks of he industry.
pulp fiction
niche films
usually more serious, "art piece"
e.g "art house"
aimed at a "niche" market, rather than a mass marketed, "saturated release" like a mainstream film. There will likely be production value comparable to a lower budget indi film. A lot of the time the actors in these films are not the focus , but a much larger focus on the stories themselves.
Moonlight - arthouse conventions, made by indi production company a24, verges on indi film. 1 million budget, won acedemic award for best picture 2016

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream - movies with a budget over 25 million, made to sell and make money.

Independent - smaller budget films which are made to tell a story more than make money.

niche - very art styled film

# data[].attributes.body
mainstream would be hollywood and other big

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream - Films that everyone goes to see, have huge releases, make loads of money.
Independent - Films that don't have loads of funding from major studies. A24 produces many of the most popular indie films.
Niche - A film made for a small demographic of people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think a Mainstream film is movies that usually are expensive to make and are classes as the stereotypical "Hollywood film" possibly hoping to make a large profit .
Independent film is possibly when a film is created by someone outside of the big studios.
Niche is movies made for a smaller audience like a specific target audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream is when a film is very popular and viewed by a lot of people - Avengers. Independent films are films that are made by an independent company/studio. Niche films are films that are made for a specific type of audience in a specific genre or sub genre.

# data[].attributes.body
i think independent films are films that can’t be continued and are one story as a whole like wolf of wall street, where as a mainstream film is created to make money like hollywood films such as Toystory

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream - A film made by a movie studio, such as paramount or universal, for national release.

Eg. Jurassic Park

Independent - A film made outside of the studio circuit for national release.

Eg. Halloween

Niche - A film made for a specific smaller audience

Eg. Fifty Shades of Grey (Marketed at women)

# data[].attributes.body
Mainstream- Widely accessible and appealing to most audiences. Avengers (2012)
Independent/Indie-  Films made with a small/low budget by a director not being funded by a film production company and often paying for most the production themselves. Basket Case (1982)
Niche- An art indie film made for a very specific audience

# data[].attributes.body
Bradley Cooper and lady gaga were chosen because they look fairly similar to Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson from the 1976 version and I think fans of the 1976 version like this. Alex G

# data[].attributes.body
In the 1976 Trailer it focuses a lot more on the realtionship between the two singers in comparison to the new A Star is Born which shows a lot about the performance elements and singing.
The Cast that played the two main members in the 1976 version are :Kris Kristofferson and Barbra Streisand where as in the remade version they're played by Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that "A STAR IS BORN" was remade for a fresh, modern look to do the original story justice with all the modern day equipment and technology, with remaking this film it opens it up to a whole new generation who may never have seen the original because of how old it is however they gave the new version a chance because it was "new". The movie seems to mainly be about the performing and singing careers of the main characters however a love element is implemented , meaning fans of many genres, for example, romance,drama and just fans of musical films will enjoy this film. The target audiece will be for teenagers and up, i say this because the story has a very love based canvas which most young people will not enjoy and most likely be bored. The intensity of both trailers with the contrast of crazyness to love , sells the movie.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the film was remade to give the fans of the original an updated take of the story. Bradley Cooper not only stars in the film alongside Lady Gaga but also directs it. One of the reasons they were chosen to star in the film is possibly because they are both big stars and would be able to attract new fans to see the movie. The target audience of the film would most likely be teenagers and older
as it is a love story and fans of the original as it is a remake.

# data[].attributes.body
i think Bradley Cooper done a good job remaking “A star Is Born”. It’s a good modernised version of the 1976 version and also includes himself and other big names in the cast such as Lady Ga Ga in the film. This will help with marketing as people are more likely to watch it if there is a well known actor in the cast.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the remake was made maybe because they heard that bohemian rhapsody was being made so they wanted to bank on it by releasing a movie surrounding singers. The also could have been made to give a modern adaptation of a old movie for a new generation to watch.

The cast of the original are Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson they were most likely casted because they were popular at the time, meanwhile in the remake Bradly cooper was most likely casted because he is a big name and he was the director and lady Gaga was most likely casted because she is a big name in the music world and she can actually sing.

Original: Seems to be targeting people who are into romance and people who are around the same age as the characters so people watching would most likley relate to them.

Remake: seems to be targeting people who are into romance practically near the beginning of the trailer, It also seems to be targeting people who like music/lady gaga to try and get them hyped for the movie and tell people about it.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel as though a star is born was remade to introduce the storyline to a new generation. By remaking it decades later attracted new viewers who hadn’t seen the original. Lady gaga who stars in the remake is already a successful artist with a large fanbase, by her being in the film means her fans will watch it making more money.
-Alex L

# data[].attributes.body
To maybe give fans of the original film, a fresh and more modern look at the story. Also to have another chance to use well known and new songs in the film.

# data[].attributes.body
Why it was remade? A Star is Born was possibly remade as they had a fanbase with the original movie and on top of that by casting Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga brings a larger fanbase, this is more of a safe bet for the studios and share holders to make when creating the remake.

# data[].attributes.headline
Bradley Cooper not only directs the 2018 version but he also Stars in it, this is most likely why they remade it because they had someone who would star in it and direct it

# data[].attributes.subject
Bradley Cooper not only directs the 2018 version but he also Stars in it, this is most likely why they remade it because they had someone who would star in it and direct it

# data[].attributes.body
The 1976 version has a lot of different tones and the pacing feels of, it defiantly feels like a love story, they could have remade it to recapture the assents of the first one or they had a new story to tell.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the reason it was remade was so they could re tell the story for a newer audience as well as an audience that have seen the original. The reasoning for the cast of the remake was because the songs would’ve been written easily and since bradly cooper was directing he’d be able to have a strong say in things. I believe that in the first trailer it’s main method of selling was to start of as your classic live story but then near the end the twist becomes sudden and keeps you invested, while the newer versions trailer included the drama from the get go. -Zane

# data[].attributes.body
I think when remaking the film they could have made money, but also make a modern adaptation between the two. when casting for the original between Kris Kristofferson and Barbra Streisand
they choose them both as both being musical artists could play the role naturally as they can both relate and live the life there characters have. I think the only similarities Bradley cooper had with Kris Kristofferson was looks, how ever Lady Gaga with Barbra Streisand was they are both singer/song writers enabling them to play the role naturally. The main methods to selling the film was in the remake they use very identical shots as they do to the classic, giving fans a sense of nostalgia, with the selling points of the original they show more of the plot of the film about to artist meeting and falling in love, the original also mentions the names of the main characters, this could be used as a unique selling point as the audience may want to watch the film as it has a-list celebrities in the film. I think for the original the target audience would have been teenagers and above, and for the remake maybe 25+ as the fans of the original movie.

# data[].attributes.body
A reason why A Star Is Born was remade could be to change the gender norm and stereotypes from the 1976 version.
in the 1976 version Barbra Streisand plays the main character. she was most likely chosen because of her amazing singing voice and her well known role as Fanny Brice in funny girl.
I think a big selling point to this film is the fact that it has been remade 4 times and they all have the same  famous tragedy, rags-to-riches story that people seem to love. Id say the target demographic for both of these films would be middle aged women.

# data[].attributes.body
Despite sharing the same title, the both share similar plots ish, as each star a woman in the spotlight as main character, but the 76 film feels more like a love story where 2018 version feels like a film where u can relate to when it comes to one's confidence, Ally (who is played by the Amazing Lady Gaga one of ma fav icons cause yes) can represent the viewers who probably have low confidence! Well in the 76 film Barbara Streisand (well known for Fanny Brice in Funny Girl) shares the same characteristics as Ally to a certain point of view! The Reason why it was remade for the 4th time, to give it a different viewpoint for fans of the 'A Star is Born' franchise as the other 3 portrayed their version of the film, each film had a different female lead showing her struggles in life! The Target audience in the film would be Teens to Adults as it shows the many struggles in life like Drug and Alcohol addiction

# data[].attributes.body
1976 version seems like much more of a love story focus. The remake somewhat relates still however it seems like there was some 'reimagining' of the storyline. The 1976 version presents the story as it was intended, and it is visible in the trailer.
Although both of the films somewhat employ the same method of selling their film, a music based love story between already-known faces. However, there are some key differences in their approach, the reamke uses a sligtly different love story, and argueable the first trailer seems to portry the storylines as the original beig more female empowering. Two already established performers fall in love, the man irractic drunken behavour causes the relationship to struggle, women takes power, smashing the peev, not standing for it  "well then fight for me". Whereas the remake, the man, already established performing infront of a crowd, women established "ghost writer?" , described as s"truggling artist Ally" but not comfortable on stage, man cliche pick up lines her at the bar, then fall in love, man convinces her to perform on stage "come out of her shell". Seems less prgoressive which doesnt really make sense considering the original, aswell as the demographic that the film was targeting. It was likely remade for money, like most things. High quality and cleaner anormporhi flares is a good enough reason for a reboot i guess.
The actors

# data[].attributes.body
1976: Remake of the first version. Director wanted to bring more attention the the story.  Couple of marketing methods  used was the voiceover  to try and sell  the movie.
2018: Most recent remake of the story. Lady Gaga was cast in the role of Ally. She is a well renowned singer so casting her to play the role of a singer was not a risk as she was known for her singing talent. Target audience for both films are for audiences who prefer romantic and musical movies.

# data[].attributes.body
The 1976 one was probably remade just to revive the fanbase of the movie and probably to get more money from the idea.
The cast of the the 1976 movie was Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson. Both these people were really well known with large fanbases individually which would double with the creation of a star is born. The cast of the 2018 one is Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper again these two people were extremely well known in 2018 and most likely brought a large amount of fans from each persons individual  fanbase together for the movie.
The main methods of selling in the 1976 version was definitely the  action and romance  between the characters. From the trailer, the 2018 a star is born feels like it had a more serious heartfelt tone to it and that probably resonated with the fans.
I feel like the target demographic for the 1976 and 2018 ones is teegangers - adults

# data[].attributes.body
Why was it remade?
A star is born has now been created four times over, each time seeing moderate to great success. The story line of a burnt out artist and their muse is universal to anytime and place and A Star Is Born proves that.
Why with this cast?
The cast chosen for the 2018 remake were spot on. The 2018 film mostly nods towards 1976 version featuring Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson because the rock star story was the direction both films went in. Cooper and Kristofferson both have the washed up rock star look required for their character,  while Gaga and Streisand both capture the youth and naivety of their character. They also both have certain usually undesirable facial features (nose) which is important to their story line.
What are the methods of selling?
(1976)
The trailer spends its first two and a half minutes convincing the viewer it is a love story with a happy ending, then chaos ensues, much like in the film. The two sides of the trailer are sort of his and hers style showing us the true inner psyche of the two main characters. This draws us in as it leaves us wondering which side wins the power struggle, good or evil?
What are the methods of selling?
(2018)
The films modern counterpart goes for more of a consistent tone throughout the trailer. It does not lean further to make us see love story any more than it does to show us the chaos. This is because firstly modern trailers tend to give away alot less about the plot. It more so tries to attach us as viewers to the characters, showing us one of their turning points as Gagas character sings on stage. This technique works well in drawing us in as modern viewers to find out how their story ends. This trailer also generally hints far less at the tragedy of the film which could mean that first time viewers who are not familiar with the story line have a better viewing experience.
Who is the target audience?
The 2018 film has a rating of 15, meaning we already know it is for a some what adult audience. The genius of this remake is so many would already be dying to see another "A Star Is Born" remake but by Lady Gaga being cast a different category of viewers and media attention shines over the film.

# data[].attributes.body
Why was this film remade?

I think the decision to remake A Star Is Born, was self explanatory, A Star Was Born. The original was such a huge success, in part due to the wonderful casting and the phenomenal soundtrack which thrust the film to be a household name and one to be regarded as one of the best films of the decade. As explored today, films are remade to piggyback on a film’s success. The film as much as I love it, (it’s one of my favourites! I even have an original one sheet on the wall in my office) I think the film is very dated, and would not stand up to modern audience’s standards. The songs alone are too old to be enjoyed by modern viewers.

Casting

In the Original we see Barbra Streisand and Kris Kristofferson in the leading roles, a marvellous choice I just say. Streisand, a Broadway phenomenon and world famous singer at the time brought the role of Ester alive. Kristofferson too, a singer was a wonderful choice and was considered a ‘Heartthrob’ at the time of release

In the 2018 remake, I feel the casting process mirrored that of the original, in the best possible way. They saw success and copied it. A famous singer, with international appeal, and an attractive leading man.

Methods of selling the film in the trailer

Well as with all dated trailers, this one sees the synopsis of the film narrated to the viewer, a trait we no longer see practiced. But again, tonne both trailers are identical mirror images. They both show key points in the movie, such as the main characters meeting, getting married and facing their demons. The trailers both also preview a good selection of the films soundtrack. Which I think for a film like this, that relies so heavily upon music was a brilliant marketing decision.

Target audience.

Now usually I observe a recurring  tactic with remakes, trying to draw in fans of the original. However in this instance the only draw to this movie was indeed the name. Whilst key points in both films were the same, the plots widely differed. I feel the remake was marketed specifically to new viewers and was pulled as far away from its predecessor as possible. I think in a way this remake tried too hard to be it’s own thing. But this film was very popular with current audiences, as was the Streisand and Garland versions. I think for this film the individuality of the remake worked well, marketing it as a NEW film rather than a remake served well.

# data[].attributes.body
Why was it remade?
1976 - Probably because of money, still relevant.
2018 - It seems like they probably had another idea for an original movie starring Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper but somewhere down the line a producer or executive decided to make it a remake of A Star Is Born since there's less risk.

Who are the cast?
1976 - Barbra Streisand and  Kris Kristofferson. I assume they were chosen because they were big stars at the time.
2018 - Bradley Cooper stars because this was his debut as director. It would make sense if he therefore starred in it. Lady Gaga probably decided to star in it to get into the acting business.

What are the main selling points?
1976 - The fact that it's a remake. The trailer focuses a lot on the story and the fact it's a remake.
2018 - Makes little reference it's a remake. Focuses more on the star power of it and the songs, Lady Gaga's singing. Doesn't make much reference to the fact it's a remake, I didn't even realise it was until 50 minutes ago.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the remake was made as the original was successful and they knew that people would watch the remake. The cast for both the films include well known actors and both films have a popular singer. I think that the target audience of the films is young females.

# data[].attributes.body
the original 1976 A star is born, stars made an impressive 80 million on a 6 million budget, however the movie was given mixed reviews and was outdated, the current a star is born was made with a budget of 40 million and made almost 450 million. the new one also brought the story back the new generation.

The original stared Barbra Streisand, and Kris Kristofferson (who, if it wasent for covid, would be performing in the states). The new film starred Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta (Lady Gaga) who is a singer/songwriter today and has won many awards. And Bradley cooper who has already made a name for him self in cinema. this cast will have been chosen to make sure that the film would've made more money
not finished sorry

# data[].attributes.body
I believe A Star Is Born was remade to first of all appeal to the fans of the classic film and try to make money off of their interest in the film as that would be a safe bet that it has a fanbase and audience. However I believe this film was also remade to bring the film more into the modern age and reinvent the film maybe for a more modern day audience to make it more easily accessible for people who haven't seen the original. I'm not too familiar with Bradley Cooper however I am with Lady Gaga as most people are with her being popular and well known which would obviously bring people towards the film which is probably part of the reason she was cast but also because she is known to be a great singer. In the originals trailer the audience is clearly people who enjoy romantic films, music and also drama as we can see from the trailer there's going to be a lot of that in the film both in and out of the relationship. The second trailer is much the same however the story seems to be much more centered around the main female leads rise to fame and her struggles with that and less about the struggles of their relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
Why was it remade?
The film was remade in order to improve the quality as overtime technology has developed. This has  made more people in todays society want to go and watch it as it is visually pleasing. I am pretty sure most if not everyone would rather watch something that is high quality instead of low quality (and something that is editing and filmed better than not better)

Why were the cast chosen?
Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper where chosen to be the cast of the remake as they are famous people the most people would recognise. This would attract their followers to this film as they are they play the main roles and they would most likely want to watch it to bond with the actors or mix in with the celebrities following.

What are the main methods of 'selling' the film?
In both of the trailers a way they sell their audience and hook them is the relationship between the main characters. This hooks the consumer as they want to know what happens to them on their journey in life as from the trailer it seems to be a rollercoaster of emotions.

What is the TA for the movie?
Personally I think the TA for the movie is 18-24 year old women (that are single) as the films show the bond between two people and most people of this category want to feel what the characters feel (so they escape into their lives).

- Matthew

# data[].attributes.body
Good:                    Bad:
Batman Begins   Robocop
Dredd                   TMNT
IT                    Conan the Barbarian

Movies are remade because the people making it assume that it will achieve the same level of success as the original and they think they are going to make money from it

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
massively multiplayer online role-playing game

# data[].attributes.body
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014)
it wasn't inherently bad but high definition cgi teenage turtles were a bit much. It may have been thought revamping the films could benefit the franchise but it was just a disaster of a film.

Robocop (2014)

Un needed, robocop looked stupid and it was impossible  to take the film seriously. They tried to jump on the bandwagon of sci-fi action film success  within the last decade but did not end up creating a masterpiece.

The Lion King (2019)

This remake saw a mixed bag of reviews. Many felt it was brilliant while others (including myself) felt the cgi and animations did not capture the essence of the original. However some feel that it was Disney's intention to bring the classic into the modern realm of film today, and make profit on the realm of film today.

Good

A Star Is Born (2018)

Brilliant remake, captured the essence of the original with a modern twist. It portrayed the emotions perfectly. A star is born has been recreated multiple times now but due to the universal storyline it never fails to amaze.

Annie (2014)

This 2014 remake set out to make a classic more inclusive to its audience. They revamped classic songs and brought Annie to a new modern audience.

# data[].attributes.body
At its core, one of the biggest problems with remakes is that they can take away from the original "magic" of the film.
Due to the industry being led by what will make money,
what will get people in cinemas, but this means the old classic,
which many people will have a strong nostalgic attachment to, probably aren't going to enjoy a new version,
with a bigger budget, unneeded cgi etc. Although moat remakes end up making a good amount of money,
many do not "stand the test of time" like their classic counterparts.
dw

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Bad:
Batman Begins  Robocop
IT TMNT
Dredd Conan the Barbarian

Movies are remade because the directors assume that they will achieve the same level of success as the originals and that they will make money from it.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
massively multiplayer online role-playing game

# data[].attributes.body
Christian Bale batman trilogy

# data[].attributes.body
Bad
Pet sematary
Psycho
Chucky
Ghost buster
Suspiria

Good
The jungle book
A star was born
Woman in black
Dredd
Superman

Alesia

# data[].attributes.body
good remakes : Parent Trap ,IT , Annie ,Karate Kid ,Star is Born, Alice in Wonderland, Spiderman
Bad remakes : Lion King, Mulan (a lot of the Disney remakes)

# data[].attributes.body
It involved the original story  (good remake) Erin

# data[].attributes.headline
There's a few different versions of The Cloverfield Paradox 

# data[].attributes.subject
There's a few different versions of The Cloverfield Paradox 

# data[].attributes.body
Max G

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
King kong (2005) (made because peter Jackson loves the original)
The fly
The thing
The Fog
It 1&2 (to give Steven kings novel a true adaptation)

Bad:
lion king (to bank on nostalgia)
Robocop
Nightmare on elm street
Halloween
Friday 13th

and as for why they get made:

# data[].attributes.body
Suspiria
Pet semetary
Psycho
Chucky
The wiz

Good remakes
A star is born
Karate kid
Django
The ring
The jungle book
Nosferatu the vampyre

-Rachael

# data[].attributes.body
Luca Smith
i am sorry but nothing beats the Jim Carrey Grinch Film

# data[].attributes.body
good remakes:
a star is born
jungle book
jumanji
little women

bad remakes:
men in black
psycho
mulan

Some films are only remade to make money and to try and achieve the same sucess as the orginal  were as others like the a star is born I feel as though it was remade to introduce the storyline and film to a new generation.
-Alex L

# data[].attributes.body
Remade (yet again) in 2018, serving as Both a sequel and a soft reboot, Halloween served well as both.

Set in real time, 40 years later. Shows how Laurie Strode’s life was changed by the events of Halloween night 1978 and how she is prepared for Michael’s inevitable return.

The decision with the studio behind this was a smart one, both a remake, and sequel, Halloween was able to be marketed at a wider audience. Pleasing older fans, viewers of the original. And current movie goers who would not need to have seen the previous films.

On a whole I found this film amazingly delightful and a great tribute and follow up to the original 1978 film.

# data[].attributes.body
IT
Zak

# data[].attributes.body
Christian Bale Good, Mila Kunis Bad

# data[].attributes.body
Good: Aladdin - live action, Beauty and The Beast- producing a live action of a cartoon can bring more of the new generation into Disney and it keeps the originals alive. The second (remake) of Willy Wonka and the Charlie Factory- stayed quirky but became more modern, is well known so the company definitely benefitted.  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles- the animation was clever and modern.
Bad: A star is Born- too overrated and hard to follow along. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles- was good however I think the originals were better.

# data[].attributes.headline
Beauty and the Beast good remake -libby 

# data[].attributes.subject
Beauty and the Beast good remake -libby 

# data[].attributes.body
Nightmare on Elm Street 2010 - Bad

# data[].attributes.body
Bad-
The Karate Kid
Annie
Suspiria
Psycho
The Step Father
I believe these remakes were only remade really to just try and make easy money piggy backing off of the popularity and fame of the originals just using their names to get people to watch them.

# data[].attributes.body
Good: -A Star Is Born 2018
It 2017
The Departed 2006
Scarface
Bad: Robocop (money)
Physco (made to try and make money)
Robin Hood 2018 (money)

# data[].attributes.body
(Erin Lanty)

# data[].attributes.body
Ben Woodland

Aladdin
Halloween
The Hitcher
King Kong
Friday the 13th
The Texas chainsaw massacre
A nightmare on elm street
Robocop
It

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
Dredd (2012)
Batman Begins (2005)
IT (2017)

Bad:
Conan the Barbarian (2011)
RoboCop (2014)
Fantastic Four (2015)

# data[].attributes.body
Michael Keaton
Ben Affleck
Christian Bale
Batman Bad:
Val Kilmer
George Clooney
Max G

# data[].attributes.body
Charlie and the Chocolate factory

# data[].attributes.headline
Disney remaking all their animated classics

# data[].attributes.subject
Disney remaking all their animated classics

# data[].attributes.body
good for them because big moneys
-dw

# data[].attributes.body
Men in black

# data[].attributes.body
suspiria
pet sematary
psycho
Chucky
the wiz

good remakes
a star is born
karate kid
Django
the ring
the jungle book
Nosferatu the vampyre
- Rachael

# data[].attributes.body
Bad:
RoboCop
Pet Cemetary
Cats
The ring 2
Good:
A star is born
Woman in Black
The jungle book

-Olivia

# data[].attributes.headline
the Poseidon adventure (72, 79, 05, 06) 

# data[].attributes.subject
the Poseidon adventure (72, 79, 05, 06) 

# data[].attributes.body
Luca Smith
In the 72 version, the ship is an old liner from the 1910 era, which they used Queen Mary 1 for the ship! the Sequel didn't do so good, as the author died before the book of the second Poseidon was published, the 2005 version they used RMS Queen Mary II, which made it look more modern, as no one had used Liners like Queen Mary I in years, but For 2006, Poseidon it just felt like 2005, they used Queen Mary II again, but again it felt like the whole film was copied from 2005, but the icon scene from all 3 films is the Ship capsizing as it's ever passenger's worst nightmare on boat!

# data[].attributes.body
Good
Dredd

# data[].attributes.body
good:
superman
spiderman
karate kid
IT
bad:
beauty and the beast
ghost busters

Zak

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
The Thing
The Fly
Suspiria
12 Monkeys
True Grit
Scarface
The Ring

Bad:
Oldboy
Carrie
Robocop
All The Disney Ones

All made because money

(Can't figure out how to add images so pretend I included The Thing poster)

# data[].attributes.body
Clash of the Titans (2010)
Pro:
-  The film has both better effects and better quality (it has overall just had an upgrade)

Con:
- I have not watched the original but scenes will most likely be done differently as there is better technology meaning the original meaning of each scene might change slightly

In this case (like most) the film has been remade to keep it up to date with technology and to make sure that it hits the right audience. Personally I think this is a good remake due to me wanting to watch the remake and not the original.

- Matthew

# data[].attributes.body
The 2007 Remake of the acclaimed Slasher Franchise saw a bold departure from the original storyline. This saw Michael Myers escape from a mental institution but that’s where the similarities ended.

1978
Michael escapes after fifteen years and returns to his childhood home, after a chance encounter he becomes obsessed with babysitter, Laurie Strode and hunts down her friends killing them over the course of Halloween night. Michael Appears to be a normal person, despite wearing a mask. However a twist in the final act depicts him as immoral.

2007
Michael single handedly breaks out of prison, killing any guard in his way. This version depicts him as a large, unstoppable caveman like figure (portrayed by a pro wrestler). He breaks out in order to hunt down his sister, Laurie Strode. In this remake Michael talks, which proved very controversial and serves as the final nail in the coffin for the reboot among fans.

So as a whole, this film is widely considered a failure. However is still enjoyed by die hard Halloween and slasher fans.

# data[].attributes.headline
Superman, Superman Returns and Man of Steel

# data[].attributes.subject
Superman, Superman Returns and Man of Steel

# data[].attributes.body
The Jungle Book
The Wizard Of Oz
Ghostbusters
The woman in black
The woman in black remake was really well done, the creepiness and eerie feel throughout the entirety of the film was very effective, a classic horror, taking place on a foggy moor inside a creepy old house, a basic classic idea however when done correctly like the woman in black it is extremely effective.