# data[].attributes.body
The social worker clearly does not understand what boundaries should be in place between a service user and social worker, whether practising or not. The social worker knowingly caused further distress to the service user without remorse. This shows the social worker does not hold the values that is needed to be an effective social worker.

# data[].attributes.body
The social worker abused her power and breached confidentiality which is out of the professional values of social work .She also proceeded to puncture the trust the service users had in her by taking money out of a vulnerable child's bank account. She didn't act or show any behaviour any professionalism at all.

# data[].attributes.body
In the 3 cases, the social workers no only have acted irresponsible putting others at risk, but also have broken the law. Firstly, they did not follow the code of conducts and professional standards. Secondly, they were not professional and thirdly, they were breaking the law.
Their behaviours and ways to act, is a clear abuse of power in case 1 and 2, as well as breaching confidentiality and taking advantage. In the 3 case, clearly the social worker needed help herself, and i wonder whether instead of letting this happen for 5 times, it would not been better to approach her and try to help her, not letting her to drive while colleagues knew she was under the effect of alcohol.

# data[].attributes.body
This SW showed gross professional misconduct, with no regards to the professional standards. SW put her service users at risk. As a SW we have a duty to protect, even if it means to whistle blow on other professionals. If their conduct puts others at risk, or if they do not meet professional standards.  this situation would've caused conflict in the workplace. As the previous case studies this case would bring the local authority into disrepute and the cause previews case
reviews.

# data[].attributes.body
is breach of confidentiality and taken advantage of their situation as well as abuse of power.

# data[].attributes.body
Breach of confidentiality , abuse of power, financial abuse , her actions have brought the local authority into disrepute , Lose of trust.

# data[].attributes.body
SW acted unprofessionally by establishing inappropriate communication with a vulnerable person. There is evidence of abuse of power, breach of trust and confidentiality which is against the profession's ethics. Sw was also found to be dishonest. His behaviour left the service user in a bad state.

# data[].attributes.body
There were many aspects here that were inappropriate. The SW should never have continued or allowed discussions with the woman, by doing so he breached confidentiality. This is evidence of an abuse of power, also with the woman's mother as he allegedly had sexual contact which also is inappropriate which caused stress and psychological impact. The SW showed no regret of his actions and repeatedly broke professional boundaries with his suggestions. This case study does not evidence any practice of the professional standards. The SW should have reported the message from the woman to another professional and not responded, in order to safeguard himself.

# data[].attributes.body
Its obvious that being drunk at work is unprofessional and puts service users at risks. The social worker would know this is wrong and inapropriate. It is a risk and could worsen the situation of the service user if they witness the service user drunk. This should have been reported by her colleagues sooner due to the risks involved.  But on the other hand its important to look at why they are drinking and offer support or rehabilitation as this could be a result of an overwhelming case load or personal issues.

# data[].attributes.body
These articles portray how easy it can be to lose your career when you think you are doing something right to protect a friend. Professionals should always follow practice and laws, and should understand the damaging affects of conflicts of interest. When approached on social media by a previous service user, you should always consult management first to help cover yourself. You should never respond, or just politely tell the service user that they will need to contact social services and that they cannot message you again.

# data[].attributes.body
What is inappropriate here is that the social worker is not taking her role seriously by drinking at work. Also neglecting her responsibility to go to the hearing. Her colleagues are also in the wrong for not reporting her behaviour earlier and speak up about her mal practice. Not just writing it off because she was good at  her practice.
We learn from this that it is important to take your responsibility seriously and to not drink at work. It is also important for social workers to be aware of their colleagues behaviour. The social worker herself should also of recognised when she needed self-care and not let herself result to alcohol to cope with her workload.

# data[].attributes.body
There was an obvious breach of confidentiality. It was inappropriate of the social worker to mix her personal life with her professional life, as she was too involved in the case to make  un biased decisions. Also stealing from the family in need was in appropriate and un lawful. We learn from this that when you are aware of a conflict on interest you should speak up about it and not get involved personally.

# data[].attributes.body
We discussed how we thought his behaviour was inappropriate for several reasons, such as being unaware of her wellbeing and still going ahead, breaching confidentiality, using inappropriate language and abusing his power over her. This is an example to social workers to not engage in confidential discussions, especially with someone you held power over at all or when they were young.

# data[].attributes.body
Puts the social worker at risk and the service user at risk as well. Professional values are not shown here.
Does not set a good example to service users, if dealing with a case of substance misuse it wouldnt be good to turn up to the case in a state under influence.
Decision making will be effected as cognitive functions will be slowed.

# data[].attributes.body
In reading all three articles, I realised that they highlight the breech of standards in the social work practice. It is important to maintain professional boundaries at all times whether in practice or out of practice. It is very important for the social worker to critically reflect on their behaviour and actions and how they might impact them or  SU in the future.
So moving forward, I would ensure I adhere to all codes and standards on practice, critically reflect on my actions and maintain professional boundaries .

# data[].attributes.body
We discussed the impact of drinking on the job, we related this back to ethics and values and the idea of what is morally right to do. we talked about the risks to service users working with them under the influence, we also talked about driving under the influence. It was discussed about the emotional impact the situation on the social worker, and support for her or lack of support for her during this extended period of her drinking. It would be important for this to be investigated, because there may be an underlying issue.
We discussed accountability, and the consequences of misconduct.

# data[].attributes.body
Whilst reading the 3 articles, i do feel the social workers involved have behaved inappropriately and are in breech of their standards and contracts. i have an understanding that if maintaining appropriate language and records it will not come back on yourself. moving forward i would ensure i maintain professional and personal boundaries, if a service user needed access to their past life events, then i will point them in the right direction to ensure they receive the information needed in the correct manor.

# data[].attributes.body
We discussed the breach of confidentiality of the social worker in looking at files that were not directly involved in her role. We also discussed the fraudulent behaviour with the money. The social worker should not agree to testify in court for someone she knows as this is a conflict of interests with her role as a social worker.
In practice we will respect the right to confidentiality and not over step the boundaries where we are not involved in a case.

# data[].attributes.body
In all three cases the SW worked in an unethical way putting themselves and the service users at risk. By not respecting the SW codes of conduct they put the service user and themselves at risk. A SW needs to be mindful at all times to respect boundaries and professional relationships even after some time has passed since working with a service user.

# data[].attributes.body
The articles highlight the imortance of appropriate behaviour, vocabulary, communication and reporting mis conduct. It also highlights the importance of upholding the standards of the profession and creating boundaries and professional relationships with colleagues and service users.

# data[].attributes.body
The social worker clearly behaved in appropriately-  due to allowing and kind of contact with the service user over social media, with the language used such as sweetie. Also he showed no remorse or self reflection.
Moving forward into practice the group agreed that we would maintain professional boundaries, will not share personal details, be honest about issues that arise, reporting issues, not engaging on social media,

# data[].attributes.body
While reading these articles I wondered how these social workers had found themselves in these positions which were so highly in breach of the standards they knew they had to uphold. It just shows that a social worker must be constantly mindful of their actions even years down the line from their engagement with the service user. Within my own practice I will learn to check each action against the professional standards, especially if my personal views are not aligned with them. I've learned that it can be an easy mistake to think that a minor breach of the rules is no breach at all, for example in the case of the ex-social worker being in contact with a service user from yeas ago. Having a chat may seem harmless but it clearly snowballed into a highly unprofessional situation that had legal ramifications. Professional boundaries could have stopped this before it had really started. Self care in my own practice will also be important as alcohol is an easily accessible tool for dealing with stress than can lead to a slippery slope of dependency.

# data[].attributes.body
we have learnt it is not appropriate to be under the influence at work. It is a concern that colleagues had noticed she had smelt like alcohol at work and even been in a vehicle collision at work. This would obviously impair her judgment as a social worker and also make the SU reluctant to trust her decision making abilities. Again, this reflects badly on her employer as they have not dealt with her alcohol abuse. this reflect on her as a person and shows she is unable to uphold a standard of self care.

# data[].attributes.body
We have learnt from reading this article how important confidentiality is and understanding the impact it has on vulnerable families lives. It doesn’t just make you as a social work look bad and upset the lives of the families involved but it also doesn’t help the bad ‘stigma’ that social workers have. It also makes it less likely for other individuals to trust social workers. We have learnt that this is type of financial abuse.

# data[].attributes.body
to not have personal relationship following a professional relationship. It could be seen as harmless but it states in the article that this has caused SU significant emotional distress. Even though he is no longer a practising social worker, the consequences will still be the same. the language he used was inappropriate . He suggested inappropriate activities for them to do. He is treating their relationship as if he was never her social worker and that there was never a professional relationship. It states in the article he showed no remorse and did not seem sorry or even agree he did anything wrong. In our own practise we have agreed we would act very differently from the start, we agree we would maintain professional boundaries and if a SU wanted to know anything about previous life events or communication we had we would follow standards and deal with it in a appropriate manor.