# data[].attributes.body
Much of their evidence is based on personal experience, describing their time with the English curriculum and the lack of diversity they encountered.

# data[].attributes.body
The author creates a mystery at the beginning of the essay, when they're trying to build up this idea that they're about to say something scandalous, and then doesn't say what it is for a really long time. This makes the readers curious.

# data[].attributes.body
They use first-person throughout the essay, explaining why his personal experience with this topic makes him think the way he does. He is understanding of both sides of the argument and understands why we learn it still to this day, but doesn’t like that it’s over taught.

# data[].attributes.headline
 GROUP 8 starts with a hook for each section

# data[].attributes.subject
 GROUP 8 starts with a hook for each section

# data[].attributes.body
the writer consistently uses the placement of bold sentences in order to entice the reader into reading the actual explationions. like clickbait.

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses mostly personal and textual evidence. They use their prior knowledge of classic literature via school to emphasize their point.Both body paragraphs reference multiple books that the author has read as opinionated evidence.

They analyze specific books students are asked to read in school and analyze their impact and necessity.

# data[].attributes.headline
group 4 Begins the essay with humor, exaggeration, and addresses the audience, being the writer’s English teachers and the college board

# data[].attributes.subject
group 4 Begins the essay with humor, exaggeration, and addresses the audience, being the writer’s English teachers and the college board

# data[].attributes.body
They use primarily anecdotal and personal evidence in their essay, with the occasional factual evidence clearly taken from common knowledge. The factual evidence was broad and general, and they hinged their argument on the assumption that if they personally couldn't relate to something, that made it not relatable to young people in general, which I thought was interesting.

# data[].attributes.body
The intro grabs the readers attention by addressing the person reading their essay, that they might not like what they are trying to say. The essay has 4 paragraphs --> intro, 2 body paragraphs, conclusion. Within the conclusion the author summarizes the argument, and points out an opposing viewpoint and then brings the attention back to their argument.

# data[].attributes.body
They use several rhetorical questions throughout the essay along with several exclamation points

# data[].attributes.body
Both the introduction and conclusion are significantly shorter than the main body paragraphs. Also the authors passionate and casual tone persuades the audiences.

# data[].attributes.body
They use a pretty casual writing style, with informal words and sometimes multiple exclamation marks and underlined words in a single sentence. They are very clearly not trying to sound formal.

# data[].attributes.headline
They bring up classical literature like Shakespeare, saying that the cultural relevance of his plays have passed and now it's too confusing to read.

# data[].attributes.subject
They bring up classical literature like Shakespeare, saying that the cultural relevance of his plays have passed and now it's too confusing to read.

# data[].attributes.body
we were impressed by how many book title she was able to cite from memory.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer uses 1st person to tell their own experiences and they use their own voice throughout the essay to keep the essay funny and the reader engaged while still arguing their point.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay takes a strong position and supports that position throughout. Overall the tone seems extremely casual and a little aggressive but the writer does a good job at incorporating examples. They also use many dashes throughout.

# data[].attributes.body
group 7

# data[].attributes.body
The writer used their own experiences to support their claim. The writer mentions books they read in their English class which were Lord of the Flies, Brave New World, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Macbeth and Romeo and Juliet. When mentioning these books, they describe their opinion and the impact the books had on them, which strengthen the claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer's tone is humorous, while still keeping professional elements involved. This allows the reader to feel comfortable with the author. The author utilizes a mix of punctuation types to add variation and enthusiasm to their work. They also use a lot of first person.

# data[].attributes.body
The student uses exclamation marks and bolded or underlined words and phrases to express their opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
written in the first person, student underlined many words, and couple words are in bold: shows written is confident about his argument.

# data[].attributes.body
They use evidence on how the author can’t relate to the literature, one being that the books are kept around by a specific viewpoint that these books cater to. Then use the point that these books have outlived their relevancy and so they are no longer the literary masterpieces they once were. About 2 pieces of evidence in each paragraph. They state a piece of evidence and prove the claim through deliberate explanation, but they don’t stick to the same format, they change it up and make it different. They keep the way they introduce information interesting and different, as well as clear and concise.

# data[].attributes.headline
The writer calls out the people reading the essay like the teachers and the college board member.

# data[].attributes.subject
The writer calls out the people reading the essay like the teachers and the college board member.

# data[].attributes.body
The main evidence they use is Shakespeare and how confusing it was. They use examples from several different Shakespeare books. They also use examples of Lord of the Flies and Brave New World.

# data[].attributes.body
The opening lines asserted that the authors message would not be super well received, this added a sense of mystery while preparing the readers for the claim. The intro paragraph is fairly short.

# data[].attributes.headline
really good intro cuz it made you curious what the essay was gonna be about

# data[].attributes.subject
really good intro cuz it made you curious what the essay was gonna be about

# data[].attributes.body
group 7

# data[].attributes.body
Tone:The writer seems very confident about what she is writing. The writer also seems kind of annoyed by classical literature. Writer included words and phrases like, "Damn", and "It's ridiculous". The writer also seems very very well read on other books and cultures.
Syntax:The intro and conclusion are made up of fewer longer sentences. The body paragraph sentences are shorter and small phrases are included to show more personality.
Point of View:The author uses mainly first person. The word “I” is used a couple times in every paragraph.

# data[].attributes.body
Very enthusiastic. They used many exclamation marks, and sometimes they would write certain words really dark so they looked like they were in bold.

# data[].attributes.body
They have a very strong, exaggerated voice. The student uses a lot of underlined words, exclamation marks, and phrases that come off exasperated and annoyed (almost as if they’re yelling).

# data[].attributes.body
There are four paragraphs. There is a introduction two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The two body paragraphs are long, but the conclusion is short. It has a organization of a formal paper. The intro has a great hook that makes the reader want to keep reading.

# data[].attributes.body
There are four paragraphs and they are all pretty long, in particular the body paragraphs are the longest.