# data[].attributes.body
using research from a study, looking at how different emojis look across different phones they are able to gather the information about how emojis are misinterpreted.

# data[].attributes.body
The author geared this article towards an audience that is young. This is reliable since the article is published in a professional manner and has an eye appeal to charts.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer bases there argument off of a study made by the ICWSM

# data[].attributes.body
The author uses logos to appeal to younger generations' slow transformation to the use of emojis in the context of texting or messaging. The author simply wants to clarify that the fairly new 'language' of emojis is under-developed and therefore has the potential to be quite confusing for those with minimal experience with emojis. The author proves this through use of data collected by college researchers.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer uses logos to support his argument as he provides fact based evidence and graphs to help explain. This makes his argument more reliable and easier to believe his side.

# data[].attributes.body
the author of this article uses data to solidify their argument. this is important to the understanding and the taking seriously of the article. the intended audience

# data[].attributes.body
This article uses logos becuause it is talking about a study and shows the stats.

# data[].attributes.body
The article in question uses ethos and logos to make its point. It uses data from research and other sources like the Emojipedia to explain the argument it is trying to get across. It appears that they are aiming for a younger audience; one which is much more accustomed to seeing emojis on a day-to-day basis.

# data[].attributes.headline
Appeal to Logos, A Debate presented with importance:

# data[].attributes.subject
Appeal to Logos, A Debate presented with importance:

# data[].attributes.body
This entire article from
NPR is riddled with researchers and studies, as well as hard photo facts and charts. This use of logical easily perceived evidence is intended to leave the reader with little doubt about the intended information. TLDR: Emojis are new, different devices use altered ones for the same thing, here's some charts to back my claim, doth thou even doubt me now?

# data[].attributes.body
The writers selected a topic that focuses more on the younger generation than on everyone that uses phones.

# data[].attributes.body
The writer bases their argument off of a study done about the misinterpretation of emojis. They bring diagrams into the paper to support their analysis and to better connect to their audience. Their audience is most likely the younger generation of probably 13-25 year old people because those will be the ones who actually use emojis on a daily basis.

# data[].attributes.body
They simply revel in the concern that emojis lead to miscommunications between people alot  of the time. To support this concern they provide facts and figures , however their argue Kent is open-ended. The writer is not sporting an opinion, the writer simply observed the affects of emoji interpretation on people of different backgrounds

# data[].attributes.headline
The article talks about how easy misconceptions are with the use of emojis, a relatively new form of communication.

# data[].attributes.subject
The article talks about how easy misconceptions are with the use of emojis, a relatively new form of communication.

# data[].attributes.body
The N

# data[].attributes.body
Miscommunications through emojis

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about the way people may interpret emojis differently. This can be a result of the technological differences when rendering different pictures for the same emoji on different devices, or it can be caused by the way someone may think an emoji means something different than was intended when it was used in the text

# data[].attributes.headline
This article is about how emojis differ across platforms and thus a study showed that the meaning of some can be interpreted differently

# data[].attributes.subject
This article is about how emojis differ across platforms and thus a study showed that the meaning of some can be interpreted differently

# data[].attributes.body
There are a lot of different phone companies out there, but most have smartphones that have emojis. However, the way an emoji looks on one brand, can look different on another. This can lead to a misinterpretation or understanding when communicating with emojis and different phone brands.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about getting lost in translation and how studies finds that interpretation of emojis can vary widely

# data[].attributes.body
This article breaks down the usage of emojis

# data[].attributes.body
this article is about how emojis appear differently depending on the type of phone someone has which can make someone perceive a conversation in a different way than the sender intended it

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about a form of communication getting lost in translation. Whether that be from different interpretations of the emojis, or because they change based off of the source they were used from.

# data[].attributes.body
The article summarizes research which suggests that the wide variety of emojis, many of which have identical meaning but different appearances, has the potential to be misunderstood. This particularly true across language barriers.

# data[].attributes.headline
This article is about how emojis can be interpreted differently across different platforms. 

# data[].attributes.subject
This article is about how emojis can be interpreted differently across different platforms. 

# data[].attributes.body
The article explains how miscommunication and difficulties can arise from the use if different emoji platforms when talking to someone via text

# data[].attributes.body
Emojis can be very different across different platforms, giving off different interpretations

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how emojis can cause miscommunication because people interpret them differently. Also they look different across different platforms.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is about how different emojis are interpreted and that it is likely that there are many different factors that shape the way we translate them.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about how emojis are being miscommunicated and can be interpreted in different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is about miscommunication, specifically with emojis. Many will interpret emojis differently, especially when it is between someone with an IPhone and an Andriod (ugliest emojis)  where they look completely different. The study suggest that because the language is so new, it will often be more confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
It is about how people interpret emojis and how every phone or system is different.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about getting lost in translation and how studies finds interpretation of emojis can vary wildly