# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did a good job making logical connections because the text said people wanted a opportunity, or chance, to make a better life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the ather did good

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did a good job making logical connections between sentences and paragraphs.  Also I think the author did provide enough examples to support each of the subtopics.

# data[].attributes.body
I taught that he did a good job it was like going back in time

# data[].attributes.body
I thought the author did a great job making the sentences connect to the paragraphs. One reason is in the paragraph "Where They Went" the sentences connected because where they went after Ellis Island. Finally, in the paragraphs for "What Happened at Ellis Island" it told what happened like they needed to be tested for sicknesses.

# data[].attributes.body
i think the author did a good job for making logical connections because he put them in so you can find them. Also he put them in so we could understand the text more. And Elis Island had a lot of connections like if you are sick or had an eye dieses you had to travel back it was a cause and effect relationship. Also, there was a bit of more relationships.

# data[].attributes.body
The author did a good job organizing paragraphs and sentences. In fact,I can not find any mistakes.I think the author did a good job providing examples to support the subtopics.

# data[].attributes.body
i think the author did a grate job of making a logical connection.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author made good logical connections because he used sequintioal order and I was able to reconize the connection.
I think the author gave good examples that support the headings because he gave many examples.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did a good job of using logical connections with saying the differences and simulations.

I think that the author could have added more details to the text.Like on paragraph 4 in what happened to Ellis island.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author provided enough examples to support each of the subtopics. For example, the author told us what happened at Ellis island. The author said people had to get a check up ,but if they were sick, people would have to stay in a hospital. In fact, If people had a eye infection, they went back across the ocean! Lastly, in the heading, Immigrants arrive, the author tells us why people came to America. For instance, some came to avoid war and some came for new jobs. In conclusion, I think the author did a perfect job providing examples in the story.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did a good job using logical connections.I think this because i think he used sequential order . Also the author  did provide enough information because he told about the immigrants and  about what happened when they got to Ellis island.The author also talked about Ellis island and why the immigrants went to New York  in America.I thought the author used sequential order because he tells that they first had to go through Ellis island before they went to new York  to get checked to see if there sick.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did do a good job with logical connections. For example, in the heading,"What happened at Ellis Island,"the paragraphs showed sequential order. Also int he heading," Where they went," told what happened after they went to Ellis Island. Lastly, in, " Immigrants arrive," it shows why the immigrants went to America. In conclusion, the author did really well with logical connections.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the author did a good job of using logical connections. The author used temporal words to describe sequential order.
I also think the author did a good job of proving enough examples to support the subtitles. The author used the country under the first heading "Immigration Arrive".

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the author did a good job making logical connections. First,  the author used different connections like sequential order. Also,  the author  made it seem like a diary just with no name. Lastly, he made it easy to understand the text. In conclusion, I think the author did a good job with logical connections.

I think that the author provided enough information for each subtitle. First, the author had good key details about when the immigrants arrive. Also, for what happened on Ellis island was very interesting. Last, learning about the immigrants and what happened to them was very unique. In conclusion the author did very good with his

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think the author did a good job making logical connections because the paragraphs are connected in sequential order.