# data[].attributes.body
Martin Luther king Jr and Malcolm X both have many things they disagree on but also agree on many other things Martin Luther king and Malcolm X both had some things to do with the civil rights movement and both did many protest but MLK is more peaceful and doesn't like the violence and would rather talk it out and Malcolm X likes the violence and wants to kill anyone that get in his way instead of talking it out like MLK would do and leaving the violence aside and I believe that Martin Luther King belief system would have work better because violence is never the answer and it would always have some consequences

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mx and MLK are different because at one point Mx did resolve to violence but MLK dosen't belive that violence is the answer for the situation that they are in. They are the same because they are both fighting to have the same thing to have peace and for them to have equal rights. I support MLK because his stratages to me are a little bit better than Mx because he resumed to violence and he did not do as many protest and marches as MLK did so i think that MLK way of thinking is a little bit better than MX way of trying to solve the issue.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X and MLK are different in a huge way, and that was shown in their point of views and how they handled them. Malcolm said "Be peaceful" and then "but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery." Malcolm is saying be respectful and obey the laws, but if someone is to hurt you, kill him. MLK said "We were aware of the difficulties involved, so we decided to start having workshops on nonviolence to control anger" nonviolence.  Malcolm is saying use violence if someone lays a hand on you, while MLK is saying don't use violence, be peaceful, we are aware of the obstacles ahead of us, but we won't use violence to get our way.

They are both the same because they both have the same goal in mind: Freedom. They were both trying to get freedom for all of the African Americans. They are also the same because their supporters expected them to get freedom for everyone.

I think that Marin Luther King Jr.'s idea was to make more change. He kept pushing through all the obstacles in life so he could gain freedom for everyone, no one would be separated anymore. MLK showed justice and changed the world for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
martin Luther king Jr talked about being able to take a hit or a lose and be able to go on it doesn't really matter how hard you hit it matters how many hits can you take it a great way to live in peace most people will also respect someone who can take a lot of hits and still never give up even if they win or lose but people don't really respect someone who can only hit hard and stop when they win or lose martin Luther king  jr thought that if someone can keep going after a hard hit they deserve to win even after death.Malcolm X was still right but all of these speeches are presented to peace and equal rights but he isn't wrong if someone puts a hand on you, they deserve to be put in the grave but martin just gives a better perspective on this situation with peace and non-violence.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X is saying to follow the laws and do whats right, but then if someone slows you down, or assaults you, then you kill them. Martin Luther King Jr. wants you to fight for what you think is right, but he wants you to do that without anger and violence. They are the same because they are both getting at the same message in a way, but they are also very different because, Malcolm X doesn't care if you get violent with that, but all Martin Luther King Jr. wants to get rid of segregation with no violence, and no anger.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they are different because Mx had a different way to talk to the people but he did not believe that violence was the answer. Neither did MLK he did not think that violence was the answer for anything he thought if he started protest and Marches then a little bit of change would come.

# data[].attributes.body
In malcolm speech he talks about respecting everyone but if someone puts their hands on you send them to the grave . but dr kings speech is talking about peace and never hitting back. i agree with malcolms way because if you are not hitting back or showing that you will stop at nothing for the things you believe in then they will keep pushing you over and it will keep going on forever. if we all fought back i think that they would have brought the military guards out and lots of weapons.and in the end it all is a bloody mess

# data[].attributes.body
They are different because they had different strategies. MLK wanted there to be no violence and to control your anger but Malcom X wanted to respond in violence and anger. They are the same because they both had the same goal for civil rights I think MLK's system would evoke more change because there would be less of a chance to get in trouble and they can work it out instead of only fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK had a more peaceful approach to protesting. He used Non-Violence and Boycotts. Malcolm X was a little more violent. He said "but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery." Which meant kill them.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X and Martin Luther kings speech were different because Malcolm  X believed that even though you should respect everyone that if they do something to you kill them. In Martin Luther Kings speech he said that killing or violence is not the answer is someone is doing something to you. The quotes are the same because in both of them they mentioned  how everyone should be in peace and respect everyone. I think that MLK's belief system would work better because even though people would get killed that does not mean that people would stop violence. I think it would be better to try to stop this by non violence.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King are both fighting for equality, just have different strategies to achieve that goal. Malcolm X does believe in peace and respect for others, even if they don't agree with you, but he also believes that if someone tries to hurt you physically, you should not just take the beating, you should fight back. Martin Luther King believes that violence is never the right answer. He thinks that the best thing is to be the better person and stay peaceful. He is not shy on making his point and putting his opinion out there, but does not think violence can do any help and will just make things worse. I think MLK's strategy is better because people are more safe and respectful of other but at the same time they are still fighting for their equality.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm X and Martin Luther king's speech were different, Malcolm X is more of a hostile person he was less of a peaceful protester and Martin Luther king was a peaceful protester he was not violent person.

# data[].attributes.body
In Malcolm X's speech he talked about if someone was mean or disobeyed the law you should kill them. In Martin Luther King's speech he said that you should never hit back. Both speeches talk about how you should follow the law and be nice to everyone. I think Martin Luther Kings system is better because he is telling everyone that even if someone is mean to you, you have to show peace and not fight back at them.

# data[].attributes.body
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are different in a big way, and that was on their point of views and how they wanted to handle them, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to handle problems peacefully, sure, they were protesting, but they still did it in a way where it didn't lead any violence to happen. Malcolm X, on the other hand, thought that if important rights (Like being nice, caring for one another, not discriminating, etc.) were broken by some other person or society, then you should kill them, as this was stated in a quote of his. So, this shows a big difference between them, since Martin Luther King Jr. just wanted to throw peaceful riots, and then make them eventually turn sides, while Malcolm X, wanted the exact opposite to happen if people were not being so generous to them.

They are the same because of one key goal they were both trying to reach: Freedom. They both were trying to have freedom for their followers/ supporters if they could understand the problems that they were both talking about. I don't need to go in depth about what they were individually fighting for, but they were both trying to reach (in short) rights for African American people.

I believe that Martin Luther King Jr.'s ideas would evoke more change, just because he would always keep pushing through, and just put out his ideas with no mean to hurt anybody. He was a person who thought need was changed, so what he did was just give out his idea's about these problems, or his childhood past memory's, and tell/reflect on how they were treated with such inequality, and how it felt like there was no change in diversity, that it was always just the white men who were always in the most control, and in the most power, and etc. But, anyway, I feel that Martin Luther King Jr.'s ideas would have evoked more change.

His ideas would have evoked more change because of him presenting his ideas. And that's because he kept on going no matter what, even if the law would try and stop him, he would still keep on pushing forward with his protests.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcom X is very violent when it comes to what he believes he wont let anyone stop him, but MLK isn't. He does it with peace he doesn't want to make war he wants to solve it without violence. but they are similar because they want Segregation to stop but they have some different points of view but they have that in common.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK and Malcolm X have different ways of going about MLK doesn't think that violence solves problems so he uses protests and boycotts while Malcolm X thinks if violence is needed use it. He believes that if someone physically touches you, the should be killed. But these people and their quotes also have some similarities like their main goal. Both men are fighting for blacks and whites to have equal rights. Both think that being respectful to others is important but they also both believe that something else needs to be done to make all humans equal, which is where they become different. I think that MLK has a better way of evoking change because fighting and killing doesn't always lead to changes it would only work if one person could change something and Human Rights is something many people come together to change, on the other hand, MLK used non-violent protests and boycotts which have the same goal just with a better way to get there. I believe that MLK and Malcolm X made people think about Human Rights but MLK had a better and nicer way of doing it.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK and Malcolm X are different in many ways. MLK believes that you can protest something and bring change without violence. Malcolm X has a very different view on the matter. He believes that you should stand up for yourself and if someone harms you then you should kill them. They have some similarity's as well. They both believe that you should respect one another, obey the law, be courteous, and peaceful. I think MLK belief is better because violence will only turn to anger and won't get you anywhere.

# data[].attributes.body
They both have the same point of view but Malcolm x is violent and king is peaceful. in my opinion i think that a violent protest would enforce the idea more

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm x is different from MLK. He is different because Malcolm eventually resulted in violence where MLK always believed in non-violence.

# data[].attributes.body
They are different because Martin Luther King did not go to jail for drugs but MLK did. They are also same because they both are trying to make the World a better place by having peace by having people united as one and by having love in the air and no violence. What I think I like better is Martin Luther King because he did so much for us Americans he got black and white all race together and united as 1. Martin Luther King made a difference and that kind of difference that no one at that time could. This is why I would choose Martin Luther King.

# data[].attributes.body
They are different because MLK says to endure while Malcolm X says to fight back and not to endure. They are the same because they both give speeches and don't use violence. MlK's system evokes change by making people less scared of colored people making them peaceful.

# data[].attributes.headline
Valerie-Malcolm x is different from Martin Luther king Jr because Malcolm responded with violence first and the king responded with peace first but they both agreed on people should be respected and treat people how you want to be treated but a quote from Malcolm says otherwise-“Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.” --Malcolm X this was meant to say the first sentence but the last one meant hurt me i hurt you king said can they hit and you not hit back which means don't respond with violence just keep moving forward 

# data[].attributes.subject
Valerie-Malcolm x is different from Martin Luther king Jr because Malcolm responded with violence first and the king responded with peace first but they both agreed on people should be respected and treat people how you want to be treated but a quote from Malcolm says otherwise-“Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery.” --Malcolm X this was meant to say the first sentence but the last one meant hurt me i hurt you king said can they hit and you not hit back which means don't respond with violence just keep moving forward 

# data[].attributes.body
MLK is more peaceful and more leaning to non- violence while Malcom X is  more violent. MLK and Malcom X are also similar becuase they both want peace between African- Americans and whites.I think Malcom X is better because people will not want violence so they will have to not have segregation.

# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm is more violent then MLK. Malcolm wants to kill anyone that wants to inter-fear with them/him. MLK wants peace in the land and wants everyone to join together and wants to give each other more chances.  They are the same because they both want this to stop, their way of thinking is just different.  i think that MLK way of thinking is better because it is a better way of living for people instead of killing people if they interfere. Also because this is a better way of getting things solved and

# data[].attributes.body
MLK and Malcolm X are very different in terms of how the fight for what they believe in. MLK believes violence is never the answer and fight back with peace. Where as Malcolm X thinks if someone fights you fight back. They both fight against rights for African American's they both believe they are mistreated and want to stop this. I think MLK's way of thinking is a safer and better approach towards things because more gets solved by killing people with kindness and not violence.

# data[].attributes.body
MLK is peaceful and nonviolent and Malcolm is more violent. MLK and Malcolm are protesters for the Civil rights movement. The Islams provoked Malcolm and Black people getting hurt provoked MLK