# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UL0ip5M89po

# data[].attributes.headline
Lakshita-- Mia, Salma, Malak and Aljoory.

# data[].attributes.subject
Lakshita-- Mia, Salma, Malak and Aljoory.

# data[].attributes.body
You should comment on the following:
Content: (3 points)
The overall content if the video is good. The group was able to provide the listener with an ample amount of information.

Relevance:
The information in the video was sufficient and they were able to give a lot of reasoning for the statements that they made.

Presentation:
The overall presentation was good. There was a good amount of information and the information was backed up by facts. To improve the members of the group could speak a bit louder in the video.

Evidence of Effort:
It is evident that the group put effort into the making of this video because of all the information they were able to provide.

Evidence for understanding the task:
The group members were able to explain the genocide which proves that they understood the topic.

Why do you feel those behind the crimes might not have been justly punished? Give a reason for your answer

# data[].attributes.body
Content:

The content was quite general to the topic and there weren't any detailed facts or statistics about the genocide. They briefly mentioned the main statistics, and were scratching the surface of the genocide. (1/3)

Relevance:

Their video was slightly relevant as there were very few facts and statistics from which the video could be judged and reflected upon. Had they included more facts and information, they would have achieved a higher score. (1/3)

Presentation:

The presentation was not that great as it seemed as if they were just forced to talk about something, and not necessarily reporting about the horrendous genocide. Also the video ended abruptly and through the transitions we could see that one of the presenters was laughing. (1/3)

Evidence of effort:

Their effort was quite prominent as there was little to no editing, with no pictures, and the information that they had gathered lasted only 55 seconds long. (1/3)

Evidence for understanding the task :

The task was understood but not at all executed to a good level. They were scratching the surface, and could have shown more depth in understanding the genocide, rather than just generalizing the genocide. (1/3)

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflection on Mia, Salma, Aljoory, and Malak

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflection on Mia, Salma, Aljoory, and Malak

# data[].attributes.body
Content:

The news report contained good content and made good use of facts as they showcases the horrors faced during the Guatemalan Government. There was good usage of facts, and their overviews of the information were commendable. (3/3)

Relevance:

Their video was quite relevant to the genocide as they gave background information on the genocide, explained what happened during the genocide and made us experience what was happening in Guatemala at the time. (3/3)

Presentation:

The presentation was remarkable as everyone reported the genocide in a formal, and they made their tone clear on where they stood in terms of the genocide. However, there was background noise that was slightly disturbing but overall the presentation of the video made it feel like a proper news report. (2/3)

Evidence of effort:

Their effort was quite prominent as they knew what they were talking about and the statistics showed a greater understanding of the crimes that took place in Guatemala. Their editing was also remarkable and it showed just how much time and effort they put into their video. (3/3)

Evidence for understanding the task :

The task was understood really well by all the members of the group as there were little to no signs of fumbling during the video, and it didn't look like they were just reading off. (3/3)

# data[].attributes.headline
Katie, Anna, Marta, Lucky, Danae video reflection By: Ana                       Content:The content was good as they had a lot of in depth info on the Genocide which was very informative and helpful. Relevance:The information in their video was relevant as they did not go of topic and they clearly stated how the Guatemalan people were affected by the genocide. Presentation:The presentation was very well put together, it was also very formal like a real news report, and the audio was clear                  Evidence of Effort:It is evident that they put a lot of effort into making the video and collecting the information on the Guatemalan genocide.                            Evidence of Understanding:Their video showed good understanding of the Guatemalan genocide as they had a lot of in depth info which they could talk about and explain. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Katie, Anna, Marta, Lucky, Danae video reflection By: Ana                       Content:The content was good as they had a lot of in depth info on the Genocide which was very informative and helpful. Relevance:The information in their video was relevant as they did not go of topic and they clearly stated how the Guatemalan people were affected by the genocide. Presentation:The presentation was very well put together, it was also very formal like a real news report, and the audio was clear                  Evidence of Effort:It is evident that they put a lot of effort into making the video and collecting the information on the Guatemalan genocide.                            Evidence of Understanding:Their video showed good understanding of the Guatemalan genocide as they had a lot of in depth info which they could talk about and explain. 

# data[].attributes.body
Reflection on Amiras video

Content - 2/3
The video contains a lot of information and facts about the civil war but not the genocide. They made good use of facts to enhance they point they were making.

Relevance - 2/3
The video was unfortunately irrelevant to the Guatemalan genocide as there were often facts relating to the civil war that took place.

Presentation 2/3
The presentation of the video was average and very normal for most parts of the video. However there was on instance of the use of costumes which ended the video on a better note.

# data[].attributes.body
Aryans group
content:
The content that was given was very detailed as it explained a lot of what happened in the genocide and having a person speak as a survivor shows your understanding of the genocide and helps the viewer understand it

Relevance:
The information in the video was very detailed and showed a lot of understanding and many points were made which were later backed up

presentation:
The presentation was very good as i had no trouble hearing the audio and the pictures helped me understand more about the topic

Evidence of effort:
It was obvious from watching the video that a lot of effort was put into this video as the editing was done very well and the pictures matched the topic and what the speaker was talking about at the time.

Evidence for understanding the task:
It was very clear that the group understood the task by explaining fluently what the issue was and how it was handled

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflection on Alicia, Ana, Amira, Dannah's group and George, Pietro and Ryan's group by Sehyun

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflection on Alicia, Ana, Amira, Dannah's group and George, Pietro and Ryan's group by Sehyun

# data[].attributes.body
Alicia's group
Content-3/3
The video contains a lot of information and details about the civil war and genocide. Also they made some good use of facts to support their point that they were making. The video made good usage of facts and figures about the genocide.

Relevance-2/3
Their video contains good information, however some of the information they mentioned are not really relevant to Genocide

Presentation-2/3
The presentation of their video was good for almost every part of the video. But there were some information that was not really clear. Overall they did great

Pietro's group
Content- 2/3
The content in the video was given very clear and detailed as it explains what happend in the genocide and they speak as a suriviors perspective which shows good understanding of genocide

Relevance- 3/3
The information in the video was clear and detailed which is relevant to the genocide. There was no irrelevant information in their video.

Presentation- 2/3
Their presentation was good since there was no trouble from audio and pictures/videos which helped me understand better.

# data[].attributes.body
Anna, Danae, Katie, Lakshita and Marta
Content - The content presented in this video is very good and detailed and gives the audience a basic summary of the genocide. 3/3

Relevance - The video mostly contained relevant information to the topic and there were valuable pieces of information. 2/3

Presentation - The presentation was not as good as the information presented. The starting of the video was interesting but otherwise, the editing was fairly bad. 1/3

Evidence of Effort - This video does show good evidence of effort and hard work as a lot of content put into the video was relevant and interesting shows effort from the creators. 2/3

Evidence for Understanding - Their understanding could have improved but there was enough to explain the topic well. 2/3

# data[].attributes.body
Ana, Amira, Alicia and Dannah
Content - The video contains a lot of information and facts about the civil war but not the genocide. They made good use of facts to enhance they point they were making. 2/3

Relevance - The video was at times irrelevant to the Guatemalan genocide as there were often facts relating to the civil war that took place. 1/3

Presentation - The presentation of the video was average and very normal for most parts of the video. However, there was on instance of the use of costumes which ended the video on a better note. 2/3

Evidence of Effort - The video showed a good amount of effort and hard work. There was some good ideas and bits that show that there was good effort put into the video. 3/3

Evidence for Understanding - There was a decent showing of understanding for the topic while presenting the video. They showed and talked about good facts and made key points. 3/3

# data[].attributes.body
Danae,Anna,Katie,lakshita and marta

Content:
The content was done well where the group talked about a lot of detailed information helping the viewer understand more about the topic

Relevance:
This video had a lot of good detailed information where everyone had a job to do and managed to do it well.

Presentation:
The presentation was done well however a few voices and echos can be heard which can be distracting at times but other than that it was a well done presentation

evidence of effort:
It is clear to see that effort was put in as they talked about a lot of beneficial information and the video was well edited

evidence of understanding:

The group seemed to understand what they were talking about and managed to explain clearly and in detail about the genocide

# data[].attributes.body
Aryan, Aryan, Pietro, George

Content (3/3) :The video is very detailed and informative. It showed a survivor. They could have added more witnesses or politicans. Otherwise it was very informative and done well.

Presentation (1/3) : They had many pictures, but could have actually did it more of  a news broadcast as it felt as a radio news broadcast with pictures just there.

Evidence of Effort (2/3): I felt as their effort was average. As they could have actually recoreded themselves. Other than that it was well done and presented.

Evidence for understanding the task (2/3) : They understood the task in terms of information and what was given yet they were supposed to record a tv news report broadcast.

I feel that some of the people responsible for the crimes during the genocide not being punished might leave an opportunities to other governments to do the same.

Mia, Aljoory, Salma and Malak

Content (3/3) :The video is very detailed and informative. It showed a survivor. They could have added more witnesses or politicans. Otherwise it was very informative and done well.

Presentation (3/3) : I felt that they were able to properly understand the idea of the task and edited effectively in order to show that it was a newsreport.

Evidence of Effort (2/3): I felt as their effort was average. Their effort was well shown as the information was detailed and done well.

Evidence for understanding the task (3/3) : They understood the task in terms of information and what was given. They also understood that it was a news report broadcast

I feel that some of the people responsible for the crimes during the genocide not being punished might leave an opportunities to other governments to do the same.

# data[].attributes.body
Aryan,Aryan,Pietro and George
content:
The content that was given was very detailed as it explained a lot of what happened in the genocide and having a person speak as a survivor shows your understanding of the genocide and helps the viewer understand it

Relevance:
The information in the video was very detailed and showed a lot of understanding and many points were made which were later backed up

presentation:
The presentation was very good as i had no trouble hearing the audio and the pictures helped me understand more about the topic

Evidence of effort:
It was obvious from watching the video that a lot of effort was put into this video as the editing was done very well and the pictures matched the topic and what the speaker was talking about at the time.

Evidence for understanding the task:
It was very clear that the group understood the task by explaining fluently what the issue was and how it was handled

# data[].attributes.headline
Anna, Katie, Danae, Lucky, Marta                  by Jaeu and nigel and levi

# data[].attributes.subject
Anna, Katie, Danae, Lucky, Marta                  by Jaeu and nigel and levi

# data[].attributes.body
Content:
Their video had a good amount of helpful information and it was straight to the point.

Relevance:
the information that their video had was very relevant because it talked about the genocide and how it effected people.

Presentation:
the presentation for the video was very good as it wasn't to long but it wasn't to short.

Evidence of Effort:
the video looks like there was good enough of effort but there wasn't
any editing in the video as there is some noice that came at the start of the video.

Evidence for understanding the task:
there is a lot of evidence that shows that they understood the task.

# data[].attributes.headline
Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro ,Ryan  by Jaeu, levi and Nigel

# data[].attributes.subject
Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro ,Ryan  by Jaeu, levi and Nigel

# data[].attributes.body
Content:Their video had a lot of helpful information and it didn't include things that are not necessary. it also consisted of images which would help on understanding the things the people had to go through.

Relevance:
the information that their video had was very relevant because it talked about the genocide and how it effected people.
Presentation:
the presentation for the video was very good as it wasn't to long but it wasn't to short.

Evidence of Effort:
the video proves that there was a lot of evidence put in to make it because of the images and the editing and voice over.

Evidence for understanding the task:
there is a lot of evidence that shows that they understood the task.

# data[].attributes.body
Alicia, Ana , Amira and Dannah's group.

Content : They did a very good job in their content, as their content was very well detailed and had all the information that was required for us to  know as watchers of the news report.

Relevance :  Their information was very relevant as it was in complete detail and they focused on what actually happened in the genocide.

Presentation:
Their presentation looked very well organised and very well planned. They were talking in a way that they were expressing the things they understood.

Evidence of Effort :

They showed great evidence of effort as they were dressed up as if they were reporters. They also seemed to have memorized some of the information that they were required to broadcast.

Evidence For Understanding The Task :

Their group seemed to understand the task very well as they did a very good job expressing all their knowledge about the genocide.

Second Group :

Anna, Katie and Marta

Content
They did a very good job in their content, as they had everything explained in full detail.

Relevance :

All the information that they mentioned in their video was very relevant as they included all the facts that they need to include about the genocide.

Presentation:

Their overall presentation was good, butt it could have been better if they made an effect of a news report or dressed up as news reporters.

Evidence of Effort :

Their group seemed to know what they were talking about when they were explaining. They seemed to understand the knowledge that they were broadcasting.

Evidence For Understanding The Task :

It was very evident that they understood the topic as well as the task , as they didn't have to read off their device the whole time. Their group also seemed to be very well organised.

# data[].attributes.body
content:
The content of Dannah's group = very informative and straight forward. It covered everything and they had clear voices over.

Relevance:
All the information that was included into the video was in detail and was as  well very informative as i can incorporate alot of information from watching it one time.

Presentation:
Slight echo, however the information was useful and in depth.

Evidence of Effort:

It was obvious from watching the documentation that they spent time creating it as there are barely any bumps and the overall flow was perfect.

Evidence for understanding the task:

It was clear that the group were able to understand the task as they were able to create it in a great format and presented it well

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/rTshh9as7CI

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflection on Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro, Ryan video by Ana Content:The video contained a lot of good and in depth info on the Guatemalan genocide. There was also a variety of pictures from the genocide which showed some of the things they had to go through. They also interviewed one of the survivors which helped us understand some of the experiences they had to go through. Relevance:Their video contained many pictures, good explanations and detailed information on the Guatemalan which was relevant as they always stayed on topic. Presentation: The presentation was good because it contained many images from the genocide which were organized in a newspaper report format. Evidence of Effort: It was evident that they put a lot of effort in the video as it was long and contained in depth information regarding the genocide but some parts of the video weren’t very clear. Evidence of Understanding:In their video, they showed good understanding of the genocide when they were talking as well as explaining it.

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflection on Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro, Ryan video by Ana Content:The video contained a lot of good and in depth info on the Guatemalan genocide. There was also a variety of pictures from the genocide which showed some of the things they had to go through. They also interviewed one of the survivors which helped us understand some of the experiences they had to go through. Relevance:Their video contained many pictures, good explanations and detailed information on the Guatemalan which was relevant as they always stayed on topic. Presentation: The presentation was good because it contained many images from the genocide which were organized in a newspaper report format. Evidence of Effort: It was evident that they put a lot of effort in the video as it was long and contained in depth information regarding the genocide but some parts of the video weren’t very clear. Evidence of Understanding:In their video, they showed good understanding of the genocide when they were talking as well as explaining it.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: this video show cased a lot of information about the Cambodian genocide. This would include what happened, why it happened ( the purpose) , who started it and what countries were involved. This is why i give them 3/3.
Content: the content of the video was not the greatest but it was easy enough to to let us know what really happened in the genocide. The camera used to film it could've been a more higher quality camera. This  is why i gave them 2/3.

# data[].attributes.body
Content: (3 points)
The content was good and descriptive and showed a good understanding of the topic.
Their content was very informative and had good structure.
Their information was clear and well produced

Relevance:
Their information was very relevant and detailed and focused lots on what happened to the citizens included in the genocide.

Presentation:
Their presentation looked rushed and through lots of it there was lots of background noise distracting from the actual information.

Katie 9CC

# data[].attributes.body
Alicia ,Ana , Amira and Dannah

Content : They did a very good job in their content, as their content was very well detailed and had all the information that was required for us as watchers to know.

Relevance : Their information was relevant

# data[].attributes.body
Alicia, Ana, Amira and Dannah:

Content:
They were able to show different scenes clearly, as well as be able to I've different aspects clearly, with clear voices and emotion.

Relevance:

Both Alicia and Ana were able to present a variety of different information, of those including the main events of the genocide, alongside statistics and dates of the event, clearly justifying and explaining the events and different aspects of the genocide. This was evident, especially in the explanation of the events, as well as being able to provide the audience with a different point of view of victims and politicians.

Presentations:
They were able to clearly and properly present to the audience a majority of different informations, varying from events, causes and problems. They had a clear representation of they form of explanation, by providing different aspects of the events and people in the situation. It looked very professional.

Evidence of Effort:
They seemed to put a lot of effort and thought into their content, as they

Evidence for understanding the task:

# data[].attributes.body
Aryan, Aryan, George:
Content:
The content that was provided was very detailed and informative as it included a wide variety of useful facts and statistics. The content was also delivered clearly. The pictures reflected on the events that occurred.
Relevance:
The information was all relevant to the events that happened. The pictures were relevant too as they displayed what they were saying.

Presentation:
The presentation was very well put together through the editing and both the images and information went hand in hand to provide an outstanding presentation.
Evidence of effort:
There is evidence of outstanding effort and understanding through the video's information, images, and voiceovers.
We feel that those crimes might not have been justly punished as no the punishment given was mostly minimal.

# data[].attributes.body
content:
The content of Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro, and Ryan is very informative and straight forward. It covered everything and was displayed in the best way possible by including clear pictures and as well a clear voice over.

Relevance:
All the information that was included into the video was in detail and was as  well very informative as i can incorporate alot of information from watching it one time.

Presentation:
The over all presentation was one of the best compared to the rest in my opinion as they included a variety of clear images and aswell clear voiceovers that covered the main topic.

Evidence of Effort:

It was obvious from watching the documentation that they spent time creating it and recording the voce overs as there are barely any mistakes and the overall flow was perfect.

Evidence for understanding the task:

It was clear that the group were able to understand the task as they were able to create it in the best way possible compared to other.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: 3/3 - used different perspectives from the genocide so that we understand it more.

Content: 3/3 content was very informative and clear.

Presentation: 2/3 encho in backgrounds and close-ups were very distracting

Evidence of Effort: 3/3 dressed up, edited, used different scenery as well.

Evidence of understanding: 3/3 showed clear understanding of the topic

George Aryan Rose Aryan Langeh Pietro

Relevance: 3/3 informative was relevant to the genocide

Content: 3/3 the content wasn't informative and have set the information in to different clear parts

Presentation: 1/3 - the speakers were not showed in the video and then microphones kept switching off

Evidence of effort: 3/3 - showed clear effort and research time.

Evidence of understanding: 3/3 - showed that they understood and different perspectives of the genocide

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/kRiiau6e19M

# data[].attributes.body
Content: (3 points)
The content was very descriptive and creative because they included the aspect of the survivor which was very smart.
Although the content was good at the end of the video you could not hear what was being said and the pronunciation at times was not accurate and the speech was not clear.
I also thought that it was a good idea to include pictures from the actual genocide over the voice recordings.

Relevance:
The information was very relevant and the aspect of the biased opinion helped to give more relevance of information.

Presentation:
The presentation was not great because there was a lot of stuttering and mispronunciation which made the information provided not clear at times and not understandable. Although I did like the aspect of adding pictures from the actual genocide.

Evidence of Effort:
It seems as though there was a lot of effort put into the thought of the project, but the execution wasn't great because they could have rerecorded some parts to be clearer.

Katie

# data[].attributes.body
You should comment on the following:
Content: (3 points)
The content present in the video is very detailed and they were able to give statics about the genocide. Overall the presentations were informative and the person watching will be able to learn a lot from this video.

Relevance:
The information in the video was detailed and there were points to backup the statements. There were also a lot of statistics to back p the answers.

Presentation:
The overall presentation was good. There were a lot of perspectives of in the video showing the different sides to the story.

Evidence of Effort:
It is evident that the group put effort into making the video because of the video editing and the fact that they were able to provide the audience with a lot of information.

Evidence for understanding the task:
The understanding level is the group is quite evident because of the way that they were able to explain the information

Why do you feel those behind the crimes might not have been justly punished? Give a reason for your answer

# data[].attributes.headline
Reflection on Ana, Amira, Alicia and Dannah's Video by Aryan L, Georgios and Aryan R

# data[].attributes.subject
Reflection on Ana, Amira, Alicia and Dannah's Video by Aryan L, Georgios and Aryan R

# data[].attributes.body
Content - 2/3
The video contains a lot of information and facts about the civil war but not the genocide. They made good use of facts to enhance they point they were making. (Aryan R)
The video made good usage of facts and figures about the genocide, however one might wonder where they obtained there facts from. (Aryan L)
The video had key facts but it should of contained a bit more explanation to why the genocide took place. (George)
Relevance - 1/3
The video was unfortunately irrelevant to the Guatemalan genocide as there were often facts relating to the civil war that took place. (Aryan R)
The video was relevant to the civil war in Guatemala as it talked about when the war ended, its causes but failed to explain in detail the horrors during the genocide. (Aryan L)
The video produced was relevant to the Guatemala as facts and explanations where made during the video related to the topic. (George)
Presentation 2/3
The presentation of the video was average and very normal for most parts of the video. However there was on instance of the use of costumes which ended the video on a better note (Aryan R)
The video made good usage of characters and the fact that they got an interview from survivor and a major political figure in the video was a good idea used in the video.  (Aryan L)
Overall the video was well presented as in certain parts the group members wore costumes depending on who there characters are. The group members could of spoke more clearly and slowly so the content is more clear to the viewer. (George)

# data[].attributes.body
Aryan, Aryan, George, Pietro and Ryan:
Content: -  There was a variety of good information and they had different pictures from the time yet not showin any inappropriate photos or videos.

- There was a good use of interviewing as they had a survivor to interview which gave a relateable feeling to the video.

- The video contained good explanations of the event.

Relevance: The video was good and stayed on topic the whole time, it was relevant as it gave detailed information on the topic and had a good interview, with a person who actually experienced it.

Presentation: It was good with the pictures which showed a lot about the project. It was good as it looked like a news report.

Evidence of effort: The video was long and detailed and they had thought and planned it clearly. They knew what they were talking about and they had very good information.

Evidence for understanding the task: They knew what they were working on and showed a good understanding of the topic. The project also looked like a good news report.

Katie, Anna, Lakshit, Danae and Marta's video

# data[].attributes.headline
Anna and Marta:                           

# data[].attributes.subject
Anna and Marta:                           

# data[].attributes.body
Content:

In the video that was made by Mia, Salma, Malak and Aljoory, the content was very informative and included information that was not only interesting but detailed. They included a lot of information about when it started, when it ended, the main features of what happened during the genocide.

Relevance:

The video that they made was very relevant and included a lot of information that related to the topic. They also  included different points of views. The information was clear and understandable.

Presentation:

The presentation was very formal, and they presented it in a way that looked very real, like an actual news report.

Evidence of effort:

It is evident that they put a lot of work into their video, and researched their information very well.

Evidence for understanding the task:

They showed a large understanding of the topic, as they included a lot of proof and factual information

# data[].attributes.headline
Marta and Anna- Alicia, Ana, Amira and Dannah

# data[].attributes.subject
Marta and Anna- Alicia, Ana, Amira and Dannah

# data[].attributes.body
Content:
The content of Alicia, Ana, Dannah and Amira's video is very informative, as they decided to show the genocide from the point of view of reporters, a survivor and politician. This made the news report very interesting.

Relevance:
All information included was in detail and was very informative. Furthermore the different points of views were all relevant to the topic of the Guatemalan Genocide

Presentation:
The presentation was very interesting, due to the different perspectives. They also wore different clothes to make them look more like the character they were taking as.

Evidence of Effort:
The effort put into the video is very evident as they planned very well. They were able to give different points of view, back up all their points with a variety of information and make their information very detailed.

Evidence for understanding the task:
They have clearly undressed the genocide, as they had detailed information and were able to back up all their points.

# data[].attributes.body
https://youtu.be/egPj7uEVxJo

# data[].attributes.body
Attached below is the link to the video. Volume needs to be increased in certain parts of the video. https://youtu.be/KO6Uc_qcjrY

# data[].attributes.body
This is the link to Ana, Amira, Alicia and Dannah's video on the Guatemalan Genocide.

LINK:
https://youtu.be/JoMb0SyKiyk

# data[].attributes.headline
Each member of the class needs to comment after watching at least TWO videos. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Each member of the class needs to comment after watching at least TWO videos. 

# data[].attributes.body
You should comment on the following:
Content: (3 points)

Relevance:

Presentation:

Evidence of Effort:

Evidence for understanding the task:

Why do you feel those behind the crimes might not have been justly punished? Give a reason for your answer