# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A:
In criteria A the link to the global context is explained in great depth. It explains its importance, significance in the required context. It gives an example of how it can be used by a variablized student. It follows on by adding the problem and explaining it in a depth view. It then proceeds to add a Research plan which strands across several pages. The table includes the research, its importance, priority list and its source. Further on it lists all the gathered primary research and the secondary research which is all concluded with a bibliography.
7/8 in Criteria A
The information is too thinned out. It’s in a sense exaggerated and it can be summed up in a paragraph rather than in an entire page.
Criteria B:
In criteria B a function for the solution is listed. The final product is explained, the creation process and what tools will be used. It follows this up with the target audience and the ergonomic factors. Ergonomic means design efficiency and an aesthetic factor. The aesthetic factor is repeated and followed up by the cost, functionality specifications, the finished product and its final design.
8/8 in Criteria B
Everything was done perfectly and involved all strands. Unlike in Criteria A the information was not thinned out.
Criteria C:
The criteria C begins with an extremely detailed production plan. Afterwards there is Gantt chart which involves the ideal process the student wants to follow. The development process is then displayed with several screenshots. The criteria then ends with the student explaining what modifications had to be made to suit the time and resources he/she had available.
7/8 in Criteria C
In the development process the student involves a lot of screenshots some of which are unnecessary and just repeated information.

# data[].attributes.headline
Assessment Evaluation Muhannad Khan 10AA

# data[].attributes.subject
Assessment Evaluation Muhannad Khan 10AA

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student shows very detailed infromation and identifies the problem showing a good research plan.

Criteria B: 6/8
Comment: Student shows design and gives evidence and anotates the final design . showing what final product will be and very detailed information showing justification.

Criteria C: 4/8
Comment: Student has shown limited effort when coming. shows pciture of product and tables. Needs more detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A 6/8
Comments
Good explanation but lacks some knowledge of the subject. It is all based on the specific opinion of the person, which is not good enough. A formal document should be based on knowledge and information, not on an opinion.
Criteria B 5/8
Comments
Good explanation of the plan, but there should be more information on how to proceed with the plan and could improve grammar in formal writing
Criteria C 5/8
Comments
Table is clear and good, but it would be better if it was more organized and more aesthetically correct
Criteria D 6/8
Comments
It has a very good explanation and

# data[].attributes.headline
Assessment Evaluation  Emaan Hajara 10DD

# data[].attributes.subject
Assessment Evaluation  Emaan Hajara 10DD

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student has identified the overall problem and has given a solution. There is a good amount of detail provided although the essay could have been more formal and grammatically correct.

Criteria B: 6/7
Comment: The student has done a lot of research and has completely thought through the product idea and solution. however, his design ideas aren't that clear as he has a has not written it clearly so it doesn't give a clear idea of what he is planning to do.

Criteria C: 6/8
Comment: The action plan has been decided out really well, but the gnatt chart could have been made better. he has also provided a moderately detailed plan of what he is doing and how it will be carried out.

Criteria D: 5/
Comment: There is a fair amount of Detail on the success of the test of the solution. he has used many different visual ways to represent it and has provided proof of his work. he could have probably asked for more people opinions.

# data[].attributes.headline
Assessment Evaluation Rohan Thacker 10CC 

# data[].attributes.subject
Assessment Evaluation Rohan Thacker 10CC 

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
The student has included all the necessary things and has justified clearly the need for a solution the problem that has been identified. There are some errors but the rest of the document is done very well.

Criteria B: 6/8
The student has done well to outline the main ideas and has made drawings for each of the ideas, but the things that the person missed out on was that the drawings weren't colored and so it was hard to differentiate. To improve the marks they should write in a little more detail about why they selected the design that they did.

Criteria C: 7/8
The person has made a good production plan and has clearly stated what they are planning on doing.  The development process is very good and detailed and the inclusion of pictures also helps to determine what the person is doing. They have also stated what are the modifications they are making. To improve they could maybe include why they are making the modifications.

Criteria D: 6/8
The person has included all the evidence about the testing of the solution, but to improve they could include pictures and other videos to support their evidence. They could also say how the solution can improved through the use of graphs and other things.

# data[].attributes.headline
Assessment Evaluation Ahmed Hassan 10DD 

# data[].attributes.subject
Assessment Evaluation Ahmed Hassan 10DD 

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student overall identify and justified the need for the solution to the problem and has identified primary and secondary research. And also explained the solution better than the problem but there is a lot of errors in grammar.

Criteria B: 5/8
Comment: The design specifications in detail but the design sometimes didn't make sense and was very confusing, the designs are achievable however it wasn't designed enough but the requirements for the creation of the chosen solution.

Criteria C:6/8
Comment:

# data[].attributes.body
A

# data[].attributes.body
- Ali Khan 10cc
Criteria A: 4/8
comment:
The student has explained the problem in a very brief way. He could still explain alot of information as the document is written informally.
Criteria B: 5/8
Comment:
He has written His design specification in detail but his designs

Criteria C:
Comment:

Criteria D:
Comment:

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 6
Comment: The overall problem has been identified and a solution has been given. A sufficient amount of detail and information on the design brief and analysis has been written, but there are a lot of grammatical errors.

Criteria B: 6
Comment:  The student who created this has thought of a lot of important sub categories for the design specification which shows how detailed and well planned out this product will be.  However, the students feasible designs aren't very clear and doesn't provide any unique features, it also doesn't provide a detailed plan of what the product will look like and how it will function.

Criteria C: 5
Comment: The gantt chart doesn't have a label of what the numbers mean. There is a clear structure of how it will be developed. But, the overall document is short

Criteria D: 7
Comment: Very detailed document with the solution being successfully tested. The student used many ways of representing data and information (graphs, tables etc.). But I think more responses should have been gathered.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A:  7/8
Comment:  Includes great understanding of the problem and was explained fully. The overall problem was also identified and explained fully for us as audience to have a clear understanding.

Criteria B: 6/8
Comment:  The idea was explained in detail, however the drawing and hand writing isn't clear to observe. In total the idea was explained fully and who ever reads it will have a good idea of what they are doing.

Criteria C: 6/8
Comment:  The student shows clear understanding of what he/she is doing on the chart. The changes made to the chosen design were not specified and cleared. The production plan was clear and visible to us audience.

Criteria D:  6/8
Comment: The student has identified the solution clearly. Evidence was shown for testing the solution . The student has explained how they could improve the solution by the use of graphs. They could improve by showing more knowledge and go through the bad stuff that have occurred whilst working on a solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student has explained and justified the need for a solution to the problem and has identified in detail the primary and secondary research. There are some errors in grammar.

Criteria B: 5/8
Comment: The design specification is in detail and but the designs are a bit confusing to understand because there is no use of color. The designs are feasible however it is not detailed enough and has not outlined the requirements for the creation of the chosen solution.

Criteria C: 6/8
Comment: The student has constructed a logical plan and Gantt Chart. There is clear evidence of the process of the creation. They have not described changes made to the chosen design and plan when making the solution.

Criteria D: 6/8
Comment: The student has evidence of testing the solution but they could include images to support their evidence. They also explain how the solution could be improved by use of graphs but to improve, they could explain the success of the solution against the design specification.

# data[].attributes.body
Jisang Kim

Criteria A: 6
Comment: the student explained and identified the problem that has to be solved and showed a detailed research plan. and stated the solution very well.

Criteria B: 6
Comment: the student has developed design specification and design ideas well. the student stated a few different designs, however

Criteria C:
Comment:

Criteria D:
Comment:

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student explained and identified the problem and wrote a detailed research plan. Also, he conducted questionnaires in order to understand his problem and gain different ideas from a different point of view. His design brief explained well about the product that he is going to create, which also matches with his design situation.

Criteria B: 6/8
Comment: His design specification and justification are in detail. However, his designs weren't colored so I couldn't really see the detail from the drawings. Also, his handwriting wasn't good enough to make the readers understand the design.

Criteria C: 7/8
Comment: He wrote a detailed production plan, and it included, tasks to be completed, time taken to complete task, materials, and evaluation results. Also, he put development process, which shows how he created his product.

Criteria D: 6/8
Comment: The person has included all the evidence about the testing of the solution. However, he could have included pictures and other videos to support his evidence. They could also say how the solution can be improved through the use of graphs and other things.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 7/8
Comment: The student has put detail in each and everything in the document. The student also justifies the need for the solution very well and he/she understood the problem very well.

Criteria B: 6/8
Comment: The student has developed design specification and design ideas very well. The student also has done many different designs but they are a bit confusing and also don't have colour. The student could just have added a bit more detail when he/she was explaining the final design.

Criteria C: 7/8
Comment: The student has made a very good and detailed production plan which shows each and every step that he/she will take. The student has also shown good technical skills to make the solution.

Criteria D: 7/8
Comment: The student has not explained the testing of the solution very well. The student has conducted surveys which show how the solution was helpful to the audience. He/she has also compared their solution to other designs and solution and that also has been done in detail.

# data[].attributes.body
Criteria A: 6/8
Comment: I think that this entire Criteria A document is written in a very informal way but it still has a lot of detail explaining the problem. The student justifies well why the problem of losing their culture is very important and he wants to try and bring it back. I also like how the person who did the document did a very detailed research plan with all the correct dates and what kind of research he was going to do. The person who made the document also had a very detailed Primary and Secondary research with very informative interviews. His secondary research was also very good as he had three different things that he analysed and looked at to see how he could show the Indian Culture. He also showed a lot of pictures to show his Primary and Secondary research. I also like how he explained how he was going to solve his problem and remind the Indians of their culture. I think that he could have made his work more organised so that it was easier to read and he could have sorted it out into different interviews and like a SWOT analysis so it doesn't look like a bulk of information that no one wants to read.

Criteria B: 6/8
Comment: The student has created a very detailed and developed design specification and his design ideas are also done very well. The student has done many different designs but it is hard to understand with his handwriting and it could have also been improved with more colour.

Criteria C: 2/8
Comment:

Criteria D: 2/8
Comment: