# data[].attributes.headline
Add a sticky with your state and the activities (related to your why) that you want to evaluate

# data[].attributes.subject
Add a sticky with your state and the activities (related to your why) that you want to evaluate

# data[].attributes.body
We need to evaluate/assess the LEA role, responsibilities and requirements for school improvement in a meaningful way especially with LEAs that are about to have an increase in CSI schools - conversely we need to really understand what the LEA did for schools that exited

# data[].attributes.body
We have tasked our data and research personnel to measure effectiveness of school improvement. Some pieces include what schools return after exiting, how long after, which schools do not return, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Effectiveness (intended impact) of state support being provided to identified schools

# data[].attributes.body
Leading the district leaders (Asst. Super, Instructional Super, CSFO) in meaningful conversations around funding:

Posing questions to include sustainability and relation to goals of district/school

Guiding long-term planning

Facilitating collaboration between the academic district supports vs. the financial district supports.

Essentially - a 'teach them how to fish' model to assist with effective program evaluation.

# data[].attributes.body
To what extent are the federal investments WI is leveraging through our regional continuous improvement support providers impacting federally identified districts/schools? Are our TA Network and other projects (esp those focused on improving outcomes for SWDs and students of color) resulting in districts/schools:

-meeting improvement requirements?

-engaging in monitoring processes as expected?

-selecting high-quality EBIS

-achieving SMARTE goals

-exiting

# data[].attributes.body
In agreement with my Utah friends, we need to evaluate the LEA's effectiveness to lead school turnaround efforts, especially in the high-risk districts. We recently went through Federal Monitoring, and the focus was on what the LEA is providing the identified schools.

# data[].attributes.body
We are wanting to learn from schools what they consider have been best practices in their school improvement efforts (and why) and be able to share this information with other schools/LEAs.

Also wanting to create meaningful Resource Allocation Review process that will support LEA work on continuous improvement at both district and school level.

# data[].attributes.body
Washington uses three years of data for its accountability system (WSIF). That means the data is very lagged and schools can see changes slowly. This is an advantage and a challenge for evaluation. It becomes difficult to identify which initiatives were enacted at which point in time (overlay that challenge with turnover in leadership) we struggle to collect real time data.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at if the goals/strategies that LEAs/schools are implementing being based on identified needs that increase and sustain student outcomes. Are the goals/strategies what they want to work on instead of what they need to?

# data[].attributes.body
A. SEA Support Effectiveness (personnel, specifically leadership coaching and funding use by schools)

B. LEA Intervention Effectiveness - we currently conduct focus groups with exited schools to identify specifically to what they are attributing their exit.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluation of all school programs and processes and whether they align with the school's overall mission/goals.

# data[].attributes.body
As many know, DoDEA has an uncommon amount of SEA control over our districts and schools, so some of the evaluation wants might seem more aligned with an LEA.

Implementation of practices from system-wide PL v impacts of those practices

educational/career outcomes for former students to age 24

impact of discipline practices on students and families

quality of SEA/LEA/school leadership and impact on culture and effectiveness

# data[].attributes.body
Take a closer look at whether the goals/strategies that LEAs/schools are implementing are based on needs that will increase and sustain student outcomes.