# data[].attributes.body
To summarise the article it is about men how decide to drive a holicopter and crashed. After the man called his wife she managed to call someone to send help. They sent the Royal Navy, the RAF and the British coastguards. Form the information these men were trained to drive a holicopter. The emotions were nervous from the family of the men because they were worried. But also a bit of frustration from the British. The reader probably didn’t feel sorry for them as it wasn’t the brightest thing to do. But at the same time they did know what they were doing so that makes it a little better but the taxes we pay, some of the went to save them

# data[].attributes.body
To summaries, this article was about two explorers who were "messing about with a helicopter". In this article, the writer tries to evoke emotions from reader by challenging the idea of paying tax for something which is not even related to them or their life, meanwhile it was used for saving British explorers' lives. It also shows explorer's worries too, which can make the reader to feel sorry for them, however it mainly focuses in the fact that nothing has actually happened to them other than being lost.

# data[].attributes.body
The article is about 2 boys who decided to ride a helicopter and crashed it into the sea leading to a costly rescue. The article conveys frustration as the boys are being portrayed as immature and irresponsible.

# data[].attributes.body
The article focuses on men learning to drive a helicopter, highlighting their training and the emotional responses of their families, who felt nervous and worried. The writer aims to try and create empathy and tension, reflecting British values like courage, perseverance, and responsibility, as these men take on a challenging role with significant impact on their loved ones and society.

# data[].attributes.body
the writer’s purpose would be to evoke a sense of frustration or anger from the reader. By focusing on the fact that taxpayers money was used for the rescue, the writer aimed to create an outrage on whether such operations are justifiable especially in this case as the crash is seen as something that could have been avoidable. This kind of tone tends to criticize the allocation of public funds, and the reader might feel a mix of disbelief, and questioning whether the rescue was truly worth the cost.

# data[].attributes.body
In summary, the essay describes how men chose to ride a helicopter and ended up getting crashed.She was able to phone someone to send assistance after the man called his wife.They dispatched the British Coast Guards, the Royal Navy, and the RAF.These soldiers were trained to fly a helipcopter, according to the report.The men's family members were feeling anxious.

# data[].attributes.body
The article tells the story of two British explorers, Steve Brooks and Quentin Smith, whose risky Antarctic expedition ended in a helicopter crash. Their rescue by British and Chilean authorities cost taxpayers a significant amount, leading to criticism of their poor planning and lack of responsibility. The writer’s purpose is to make readers question the explorers’ accountability and whether their actions were justified. This connects to British Values like responsibility, respect and the rule of law, as it highlights the need to act carefully and consider how decisions impact others.

# data[].attributes.body
To is about 2 men who go exploring on top of the antarctic ocean which turns into disaster when the small helicopter they took can't withstand the antarctic environment and crashes which causes authorities to rescue them which causes hundreds of thousands of pounds. This enrages the writer and he writes about how it is not right to do this and was the rescue truly worth the cost.