# data[].attributes.headline
Issue Question: Has Amazon been fair to its workers?

# data[].attributes.subject
Issue Question: Has Amazon been fair to its workers?

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
Step 2: Inference of Source E
Step 3: Evidence
Step 4: Explanation
Step 5: Link

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
Step 2: Inference of Source
Step 3: Evidence
Step 4: Explanation
Step 5: Link

# data[].attributes.headline
Source A: A nutrition chart of two popular drinks that people consume.

# data[].attributes.subject
Source A: A nutrition chart of two popular drinks that people consume.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
I am surprised by this source.

Step 2: Inference
Source A states that both drinks contain a high amount of sugar and are unhealthy.

Step 3: Evidence
I know this because the coke can contains 33g of sugar and the orange juice contains 34g of sugar. The source also states that the 'Vitamin C doesn't make the sugar in orange juice better'.

Step 4: Explanation
This shows that the source wants to highlight that orange juice contains almost as much sugar as coke, and is just as unhealthy as coke.

Step 5: Link
Therefore, this source is surprising to me as orange juice comes from oranges which is a fruit, and is thought to be healthier than a soft drink like coke, however, both are shown to have high sugar. Thus, as the source contradicts my contextual knowledge, it is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by Source B as it shows that the Blue whale is really heavy. Source B states that "a Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant" and it also shows the blue whale able to carry the elephant by it's tongue. This shows that the source wants to highlight that the blue whale is really heavy. Therefore this source contradicts my contextual knowledge and is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by source B. Source B shows that a blue whale weigh more than an elephant. I know this because the drawing shows that an elephant is getting lifted by a blue whale tongue and the size difference is very obvious. This shows that the source want to highlight that a blue whale weighs a lot since it can support an elephant easily. Therefore, this source is not surprising to me because i know that the blue whale is the biggest animal in the world so obviously it will weigh a ton. Thus, as the source supports my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised towards source C
source C claims that a Blue whale's tongue is equally as heavy as an elephant
I can see that from the statement "this drawing
suggests a blue whale 's tongue weighs as much as an elephant" further elaborated with the cartoon of the whale carrying an elephant with its tongue.
It is not surprising, as one would expect a Blue whale to already be heavier than an elephant, so it would not be hard to believe the whales tongue weighing close to or the same as the elephant. Thus as it supports my contextual knowledge it is not surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by this source. I can infer from Source B that since Blue Whales are the largest animals known to us, their body parts weigh a lot. Source B states how "Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an Elephant." This shows that the Source wants to highlight that Blue Whales weighs more than we think they do. Therefore, this source is not surprising as we know that Blue Whales are the largest animal known to us, having also large body parts in their body weighing a lot. Therefore, as the source does not contradict my contextual knowledge, I am not surprised by it.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by Source B. Source B states that the blue whale is very massive as compared to the elephant. I know this because the drawing suggest that "a Blue whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant." This shows that the source wants to highlight that the  blue whale's body part is heavier that the elephant. Therefore, the source is surprising because blue whale is larger than the elephant but we do not expect that the blue whale tongue is heavier than an elephant hence it contradicts my contextual knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
I am surprised by this source.

Step 2: Inference
Source B states that Blue Whale's are the biggest animal in the world.

Step 3: Evidence
I know this because, elephants are usually smaller in size compared to a blue whale. But the source states that Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant.

Step 4: Explanation
This shows that the source wants to highlight that even if the size of an elephant is smaller that a blue whale, the sizes of their tongue is still the same.

Step 5: Link
Therefore, this source is surprising to me as elephants are suppose to have smaller tongues when it is compared with a blue whale but yet they have the same size of the blue whale. Thus, as the source contradicts my contextual knowledge, it is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by source B ,  Source B states that the blue whale is very massive and heavy. I know this because "The blue whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant." This shows that the source wants to highlight that the blue whale is very huge. Therefore, this source is surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surpirsed by the source, The source states that a " blue whales tounge weighs as much as an elephant" , I know this because the source shows a picture of an elephant on a whales tounge suggesting that the tounge weighs the same as an elephant. This shows that the souce is implying that a whales tounge is very heavy and that it can be as heavy as an elephant. Therefore the source isnt surprising as a blue whale is the biggest animal and thus not surprising how its tounge can get as heavy as an elephant. Hence , the source doesnt contradict my contextual knowledge it is not surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
step 1: I am not surprised by this source.

Step 2 : Source B shows that Blue whale's is big and heavy

Step 3 : I know this because research shows that an adult blue whales size is equal to about 40 elephants combined

Step 4 : This shows that whales are much larger than elephants and possibly larger then most sea and land creatures

Step4: Therefore this source isnt surprising as Blue whales are enormous animals

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by Source B. Source B states that a Blue Whale's tongue is just as heavy as an elephant. I know this because the source shows a drawing of a blue whale with an elephant on its tongue. This shows that a blue whale is just as strong as an elephant with just its tongue. Therefore, this source is not surprising as the blue whale is twice the size of an elephant and are one of the stronger animals in water. Thus, as the source supports my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am not suprise by source B.Souce B states that a whale is heavier compared to an elephant.I konw this because the souce shows and picture of a whale which is 10 times larger than an elephant holding the elepant with its tougue.This shows that the souce wants to highlight that the blue whale size makes their body more heavier and stonger which also makes their tougue as heavy.Therefore,the source is not surprising because looing at ther blue whale I can see that it is ten times more larger than a elephant which we can tell that it is sure to be heavier than an elephant due to their massive body size.Therefore, as the source does not contradict my contextrusal knowledge,it is not surprising

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
I am not surprised by this source

Step 2: Inference
Source B shows that the blue whale is a very big animal.

Step 3: Evidence
I know this because the source shows an elephant on a blue whales tongue and states that "Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant."

Step 4: Explanation
This shows that the source the whale is a huge and heavy sea creature and its tongue alone already weighs a lot.

Step 5: Link
Therefore this source is not surprising because it does not contradicts my contextual knowledge that blue whale is the largest mammal on earth which mean that we expect that it would weigh a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by source B. Source B is trying to say that the blue whale is very heavy and big .I know this because the source states that "Blue whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant".This shows that the source wants to highlight that the blue whale is very big and heavy. Therefore the source is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by source B. Source B shows the Blue whale the largest animal known in the planet and their body parts are expected to be heavy so they must be strong to support all that weight. Source B states that a "blue whales tongue weighs as much as an elephant". This shows that the source wants to highlight that Blue Whales are very strong. Therefore this source is not surprising as i already expected the Blue Whale is very strong. Therefore, as the source supports my contextual knowledge, i am not surprised.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by this source. Source B is trying show that the blue whale is big. I know this because the source states that, "a Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant". This shows that the source wants to highlight that the blue whale is extremely heavy. Therefore, the source is not surprising since, i already know based my contextual knowledge that blue whale is heavy and big.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by source B. Source B states that an elephant weighs as much as the Blue Whale's tongue. I know this because the image shows a elephant standing on the Blue Whale's tongue which suggest that the tongue is just as heavy as the tongue of the Blue Whale. This shows that the source is trying to highlight that the elephant is just as heavy as the tongue of the Blue Whale. Therefore, this source is surprising because the elephant weighs as much as the tongue only as I thought that elephants was heavy but not similar to the only the Blue Whale's tongue. Therefore, as the source contradicts my contextual knowledge , it is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
step 1: atq
i am surprised by this source.

step 2: inference
source b states that a blue whale's tongue weighs as much as a elephant.

step 3: evidence
i know this because the whale is holding up the elephant

step 4: explanation
this shows that the source wants to highlight that the whale is big

step 5: link
therefore, this source is surprising to me as a whale's tongue is bigger than an elephant

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not surprised by Source B, which states about how massive is the blue whale.
As seen from source B, it is said about how "a Blue Whale's tongue weighs as much as an elephant."
This shows about how the source wants to highlight the fact that the tongue of a blue whale is that heavy.
Therefore, the source does not surprise me as I already know the fact that the blue whale is huge and massive, making it obvious that it is going to be heavy too, even the tongue too. Thus, the source does not contradict my contextual knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by Source B. Source B states that both Blue Whale's tongue and Elephant weighs the same. I know this because the Source illustrated the Blue Whale's tongue to be balance with the elephant. This shows that the Source wants to highlight that the Blue Whale's tongue to have the same weight as the Elephant. Therefore, this source is surprising because Blue Whale itself is heavier than the Elephant and that we did not expected the tongue of the Blue Whale to be this heavier as the source contradicts my contextual knowledge, it is surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1:
I am surprised by this source

Step 2:
Source E shows that a very successful business who could afford to expand their business to different countries but can't provide the basic privilege's and necessities to its employees.

Step 3:
I know this because source E states that "Amazon" has "failed to provide adequate safety measures against Covid-19 and has refused paid sick leave." They also pay their workers the minimum wage of "$15 an hour" which  "is not enough still" and employees has to "work even longer overnight." If they refuse, they will be "replace".

Step 4:
This means that this company does not care about their employees and due to its big expansion across the globe, employees are easy to replace. They do not seek to have a employee and employers bond, instead they prioritize the business income over human beings which serves them.

Step 5:
Therefore, this source is surprising to me as we expect the bigger company to share its income and use it well especially to those who help the company expand and grow especially during the time of a global crisis.  Thus it contradicts my contextual knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by this source. I can infer from Source E that Amazon workers are not being treated fairly. Source E states about how "Amazon is putting its profits above the workers safety" and how "they just think of them as numbers and quotas." This shows that the Amazon companies are only thinking about the money instead of their workers and their safety working in the warehouses. Therefore, this source is not surprising as many people would only think about being rich and having money without having to spend a lot on those who are helping them out, making that money. As the source does not contradict my contextual knowledge, I am not surprised by it.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by this source. Source E states that the Amazon workers are being treated unfairly. I know this because Amazon are "not protecting the worker's health". The source also states that Amazon is "threatening the workers" when they complain Amazon will replace them with new staffs. This shows that the source wants to highlight that Amazon do not care about their workers but instead of the money they earn. Therefore, this source is not surprising to me because Amazon is a big company, usually companies like this would choose to focus on earning money over their worker's health. Thus, as the source does not contradict my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by source E as it shows that the amazon workers are not treated fairly. I know this because "Hundreds of Amazon workers protested in the largest US protest outside its warehouses that their "

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by the source. Source E states that Amazon is not treating their workers well. I know this because source E says "Amazon is putting its profit above our safety" . This show that Amazon does not care about their worker's well-being and instead wanting to make more revenue. Therefore, this source is not surprising to me as businesses are most likely to only care about the revenue earned then the well-being of the workers. Thus, as the source supports my contextual knowledge, I am not surprised.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by Source E. I can infer from source E that Amazon workers have been treated poorly. Source E states that , " company has failed to provide adequate safety measures against Covid 19 and has refused paid sick leave." They also said that " $15 an hour is not enough." This shows that the source wants to highlight how poorly the workers has been treated by Amazon. Therefore , this source is not surprising to me as it supports my contextual knowledge . Thus, as the the source states the similar information of background information , it is not surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by the source. Source E states that the workers were not treated well in the company. I know this because the source states that "failed to provide adequate safety measures against Covid 19 and has refused paid sick leave". This shows that the source wants to highlight that the company does not care about its workers. Therefore, this source is not surprising to me as bigger companies would care more about the income they earn more than their employees. Thus, as this source does not contradict my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by source E. Source E states that Amazon is mistreating their employees badly and i know this because the source says that "Amazon is putting its profits above our safety" and "they just thinks of us as numbers and quotas".
This means that Amazon only cares for the profits that the employees make instead of the well beings of their employees.
Therefore, the source is not surprising as these companies like amazon has a reputation of ignoring their staffs health and well being just so they can make the most amount of profits. So since the source doesn't contradict my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by source E. Source E states that Amazon workers are unhappy with Amazon . I know this because "hundreds of Amazon workers protested in the largest US protest outside its warehouses" and "has failed to provide adequate safety measures against Covid-19". This shows that the source wants to highlight that Amazon is not doing their part to ensure the safety of their workers. Therefore, this source is surprising because as Amazon is a MNC company, they should have the funds to support their workers and should no problem doing so.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by source E. Source E states that Amazon did treat their worker fairly . I know this because " their company has fail to provide adequate safety measures against Covid 19 and has refused paid sick leave. This mean that Amazon did not care about their worker lives. Therefore, this source is not surprising because

# data[].attributes.body
Step 1: ATQ
I am not surprised by this source.

Step 2: Inference
Source E states that the Amazon workers had to protest since they were treated unfairly.

Step 3: Evidence
As can be seen from the source, "Amazon is putting its profits above our safety. We are not essential to them, they just think of us as numbers and quotas."

Step 4: Explanation
This shows that the company didn't care about their workers and they only saw the profits more important.

Step 5: Link
Therefore, this source is not surprising to me as the workers were protesting for their rights and they can't work when they are being treated unfairly. Thus as the source supports my contextual knowledge, it is not surprising.

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by Source E. Source E states that he Amazon workers wanted to protested against Amazon. I know this because " $15 an hour is not enough still' and "to work even longer overnight'. This means that Amazon has been underpaying their staff and they have to work extra hours as well. Therefore, this source is not surprising because

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by Source E. Source E shows about the unjust treatment that Amazon provide to their employees. Source E states, "their company has failed to provide adequate safety measures against Covid-19 and has refused paid sick leave". This shows that Amazon is not providing to their employees in terms of safety. This source is not surprising as I see Amazon as a company that does not provide to their employees by looking at the complains and criticism for poor work conditions, long working hours and a lack of healthcare benefits. The source fits my contextual knowledge of Amazon, therefore the source is not surprising,

# data[].attributes.body
I am surprised by the source as it shows that Amazon workers have been treated poorly. I know this because the source says "Hundereds of Amazon workers prostested in the Largest US protest outside its warehouses that their company has failed to provide adequate safety measures." This shows that the source wants to highlight the fact that The workers were being treated poorly to the point they had to protest in order to get better working conditions. Therefore, the source is surprising to me as Amazon is one of the largest companies and is very popular yet they treat their workers horribly. Thus, as the source contradicts my contextual knowledge, it is surprising

# data[].attributes.body
I am not surprised by Source E as it is inferred that Amazon is exploitive to it's employees, and really greedy. Source E states that "Amazon is putting its profits above our safety" and also "think of us as numbers and quotas". This shows that Amazon prefer slavery rather than a conducive workforce, especially when "$15 an hour is not enough still". Therefore, as this source does not contradicts with my contextual knowledge, where MMCs will always exploit and cut corners for profits, I am therefore not surprised at all.