# data[].attributes.body
by George Troumpoukis

Nowadays, people are arguing whether animal testing should be banned or not. I’m

George and I think that animals testing should not be abolished.

Imagine, someone’s life is at stake with a disease like ebola. There are no medicines so this person’s life is used to test and make the antidote. Which life is more important in this case? The human or the animal?

First and foremost, Animals testing has positive effects on both, humans and animals. It helps research and create life-saving medicines and vaccines that can be used on humans to prevent any life-threatening disease. These tests, also help animals. When you get a dog or a cat as a pet, don’t you go to the vet to do vaccines so they are more healthy? Do you think this is bad or good for an animal?

However, there are those who argue that there are more humane ways to get results than testing animals for them. To this I must answer that maybe there are better ways to test, but don’t you think it will need more time to create new antidotes for diseases ? Take for example the vaccine for Covid-19. If we hadn't used animals to create it, we may still have had a pandemic with more people in the hospitals and more deaths.

To sum up, I think animal testing should not be abolished. I know that animals have

rights as well but I am asking you again. Would you prefer a person to die to prevent diseases or an animal? Plus you don’t know maybe one of your close friends or family could be this one.

# data[].attributes.headline
Ending Cruelty: Why Animal Testing Must Stop

# data[].attributes.subject
Ending Cruelty: Why Animal Testing Must Stop

# data[].attributes.body
by Giannis Tsaousidis

Animal testing is a big problem because it causes pain and suffering to animals. Scientists use animals to test medicines, makeup, and chemicals, but it is very cruel. Many animals are hurt or killed during these tests. However, there are solutions to this problem which will reduce or even stop those actions forever!

To begin with, by using  computers and special models instead of animals we can predict how medicines will work, and fake human skin can show how products affect people. If scientists use these methods, fewer animals will suffer. This can also save money and give better results for humans.

Another point is to make stricter rules about testing. Governments can ban animal testing and only allow safe and modern methods. If there are strong laws, companies will stop hurting animals. This will protect many animals and push scientists to create better testing methods.

Furthermore, educating people about animal testing and encourage them to support cruelty-free products allow companies to make products without testing on animals, and they often label their items as “cruelty-free.” If more people choose to buy from these companies, no animal-testing methods will be popular and acceptable. This can lead to more companies stopping or get interested on using those modern methods instead!

To sum up, Animal testing is cruel and unnecessary. It causes pain to animals and does not always help humans. I believe we should stop using animals for tests and focus on better solutions. This way, we can protect animals and still keep people safe.

# data[].attributes.body
essay by Lefteris Ntitsas

Animal testing has always been a controversial practice, as ethical scientific, and practical concerns are brought up. Though animal testing has historically been used in the development of medicines and products, it is undeniable that these animals go through suffering. Many animals suffer from pain, confinement, and even death. Moral

questions regarding their treatment come to mind.

Scientifically, animal testing is often unreliable. Animals and humans are very different biologically, so the results might not predict human outcomes accurately. This inefficiency has wasted resources and delayed medical progress. Modern technology offers superior alternatives that are not only more ethical but also more precise and cost-effective.

However there are those who argue that during animal testing , animals are not being harmed. To this I must answer with an example. Imagine being in a lab and hearing shrieks of pain of the animals during a test. How would you feel? And also it might not be worth it because the results may not be the ones that scientists are looking for.

It is, therefore, time to retire animal testing for more sophisticated and humane alternatives. Moving in this direction is in line with scientific progress and moral

responsibility, securing a future of effective and compassionate research.

# data[].attributes.body
essay by George Troumpoukis

Various wildlife species are on the verge of extinction due to human activity. In order to protect them, we should do the opposite of pollution, hunting, and other harmfulpractices.

Pollution first threatens animals in a major way. Air and water pollution destroy

natural habitats, hence making animal survival difficult. Cars and factory emit toxic gases, while plastics dumped in the sea destroy marine life. Reducing

wastage, reusing and recycling, and using eco-friendly products is the way to save

wildlife.

Sterilization, poaching wildlife for their fur or tusks, or recreational hunting have

already wiped out a number of species, and thus, its end can justify a protection of

certain species like tigers and elephants. The government should be very adamant

with the anti-poaching laws, and citizens must stop buying items made from

endangered species.

Finally, we can help contribute to wildlife preservation through various other means

of conservation, tree planting, and raising awareness among people. By creating

more national parks and wildlife sanctuaries, animals will be safe.

To conclude, it is our moral responsibility to ensure the survival of any endangered

species. It is all up to us to save these creatures from pollution, poaching, and

extinction after all.

# data[].attributes.headline
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity 

# data[].attributes.subject
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity 

# data[].attributes.body
by Katerina Symeonidou

Keeping animals in captivity, for example in zoos or aquariums, has both advantages and disadvantages.

The advantages of keeping them in captivity are that captive breeding programs help preserve endangered species and prevent extinction. Also zoos and aquariums educate the public about wildlife, fostering a deeper understanding of species and their habitats. And lastly animals in captivity provide scientists with the chance to study their behavior, health, and reproduction, aiding conservation strategies.

Now many argue that keeping animals in captivity is inhumane, as it limits their natural behavior and causes stress.

Also captivity often fails to replicate the animals' natural habitats, leading to physical and psychological issues.

And last but definitely not least, animals in captivity may suffer from diseases due to close confinement and lack of genetic diversity.

To sum up, while captivity can benefit conservation, it raises significant ethical and welfare concerns.

# data[].attributes.headline
How we can protect endangered animals? essay by Giannis Tsaousidis

# data[].attributes.subject
How we can protect endangered animals? essay by Giannis Tsaousidis

# data[].attributes.body
Many animals around the world are at risk of disappearing forever. Their homes are being destroyed, the climate is changing, and some people hunt them illegally. While this is a big problem, there are still ways we can help protect them and we need to learn about the endangered animals in our area. The more we know, the more we can help. Talk to friends and family about these animals and why they are important. When more people care, more action can be taken.

We should also be careful with harmful chemicals. Pesticides, herbicides, and too much fertilizer can poison plants and animals. Choosing natural options and using fewer chemicals can help keep the environment safe. Also, stricter rules and punishments for illegal hunting can help stop poachers.

Simple daily choices can make a difference, too. Avoid buying products made from endangered animals, use less plastic to keep oceans clean, and save energy to help slow down climate change. Since global warming harms animal homes, reducing pollution is a big step in protecting them.

If we do nothing, we risk losing not just animals but also the balance of nature. Protecting wildlife means protecting our own future. By working together, we can make sure animals and people continue to share the planet for years to come.

tsaousidis giannis a4

# data[].attributes.body
Essay by Antonia Touliari

Animal testing has been a controversial issue for many years, with strong arguments on both sides. However, I firmly believe that animal testing is cruel, unnecessary, and should be banned. While some claim that it is essential for medical progress, there are now more ethical and effective alternatives that do not involve the suffering of innocent animals.

First and foremost, animal testing is inhumane. Millions of animals are subjected to painful experiments every year, often leading to severe suffering and death. These animals are kept in unnatural conditions, deprived of their freedom, and forced to endure cruel procedures. Just because they cannot speak it does not mean they do not feel pain and fear. Treating animals in this way is ethically wrong and goes against the principles of compassion and respect for all living beings.

Moreover, animal testing is often unreliable. Animals react differently to substances than humans do, which means that results from animal experiments may not be applicable to humans. Many drugs and products that pass animal testing later fail in human trials because of differences in biology. This makes animal testing not only cruel but also scientifically flawed. Instead of relying on outdated methods, we should invest in modern alternatives such as computer models, human cell cultures, and artificial organs, which provide more accurate results without harming animals.

Additionally, the world is evolving towards a more ethical and sustainable future. Many companies and researchers are already adopting cruelty-free methods, proving that innovation does not require suffering. Governments and organizations should support these efforts by banning animal testing and promoting humane research techniques.

In conclusion, animal testing is an unnecessary and inhumane practice that should no longer be allowed. With advanced technology and more ethical alternatives available, there is no justification for continuing this cruel method. It is time for society to take a stand and protect innocent animals from suffering in the name of science.

Antonia Touliari

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.headline
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Keeping Animals in Captivity

# data[].attributes.subject
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Keeping Animals in Captivity

# data[].attributes.body
Essay by Antonia Touliari

Keeping animals in captivity, such as in zoos, circuses, and aquariums, is a widely debated topic with both advantages and disadvantages.

One advantage is that captivity can help protect endangered species. Zoos and conservation programs provide a safe environment where animals receive food, medical care, and protection from predators. Additionally, they allow scientists to study animal behavior and develop conservation strategies. Another benefit is education. Zoos and aquariums teach people about wildlife, encouraging respect for nature.

However, there are also significant disadvantages. Many animals suffer from stress, limited space, and unnatural living conditions. They may develop health problems or display abnormal behaviors due to boredom and lack of stimulation. Furthermore, circuses often exploit animals for entertainment, forcing them to perform unnatural tricks through harsh training methods.

In conclusion, while captivity can help protect animals and educate people, it often causes suffering and limits natural behaviors. Ethical alternatives, such as wildlife sanctuaries, should be encouraged.

# data[].attributes.body
Essay by Lefteris Ntitsas

Animal testing has always been a controversial practice, as ethical, scientific, and practical concerns are brought up. Though animal testing has historically been used in the development of medicines and products, it is undeniable that these animals go through suffering. Many animals suffer from pain, confinement, and even death thus moral questions regarding their treatment come to mind.

Scientifically, animal testing is often unreliable. Animals and humans are very different biologically, so the results might not predict human outcomes accurately. This inefficiency has wasted resources and delayed medical progress. Modern technology offers superior alternatives that are not only more ethical but also more precise and cost-effective.

However, there are those who argue that during animal testing, animals are not being harmed. To this I must answer with an example. Imagine being in a lab and hearing shrieks of pain of the animals during a test. How would you feel? And also, it might not be worth it because the results may not be the ones that scientists are looking for.

It is, therefore, time to retire animal testing for more sophisticated and humane alternatives. Moving in this direction is in line with scientific progress and moral responsibility, securing a future of effective and compassionate research.

Lefteris Ntitsas

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing

The use of animals in scientific experiments has been a controversial issue for many years. Some people believe that animals should be used in such experiments to test drugs and medical procedures, while others argue that it is unethical and inhumane. In my opinion, scientists should not perform experiments on animals for such purposes.

Firstly, animals have the same right to life and freedom as humans do. Therefore, it is not fair to subject them to pain and suffering for our own benefits. Animals are sentient beings capable of feeling pain, fear, and stress, and it is our moral obligation to protect them from unnecessary harm.

Secondly, there are alternative methods of testing drugs and medical procedures that do not involve animal testing. For instance, computer models and human cells can be used to simulate the effects of drugs and medical procedures without harming animals. Therefore, there is no need to subject animals to such experiments.

In conclusion, I believe that scientists should not perform experiments on animals for the purpose of testing drugs and medical procedures. It is our responsibility to protect the rights and well-being of all living beings, including animals, and to find alternative methods of testing that do not involve animal testing.

Excellent!

# data[].attributes.body
Keeping animals in captivity

Keeping animals in captivity has been a controversial issue for years, with people taking different sides on the matter. While some argue that keeping animals in captivity is essential for their protection, others contend that it is unethical and inhumane.

Advantages: Firstly, keeping animals in captivity provides them with protection from predators, diseases, and harsh weather conditions. Zoos and wildlife parks, for instance, provide a safe and controlled environment where animals can thrive and receive medical care.

Secondly, captivity allows for scientific research and conservation efforts to be conducted more easily. Studying animals in captivity enables scientists to learn more about their behavior and biology, which can aid in species conservation.

Disadvantages: On the other hand, keeping animals in captivity can have significant drawbacks. One of the main disadvantages is that captivity deprives animals of their natural habitats, instincts, and behaviors. Animals in captivity can develop behavioral and psychological problems, such as anxiety and depression, which can affect their overall well-being.

Secondly, captivity limits an animal's freedom of movement and social interactions. Animals need to roam freely and interact with their own kind to maintain a healthy and balanced lifestyle. In captivity, animals are often confined to small spaces, leading to boredom and frustration.

In conclusion, while keeping animals in captivity may have some advantages, such as protection and research opportunities, the disadvantages, such as the deprivation of their natural habitat and instincts, cannot be ignored. Therefore, it is essential to strike a balance between the two and ensure that animals in captivity are given the best possible care and environment to live in.

Excellent!

# data[].attributes.body
Protecting wildlife
ENDANGARED SPECIES

Nowadays, our planet has to deal with the problem of the extinction of wildlife species and it is something that must be solved as fast as possible, otherwise the result will be fatal.

First of all, especially in big cities the air, water and solid pollution has caused the death to thousands of animal lives every day. People are warned about this problem but they act like they do not care about their environment. However, they regret it when it is time for them to pay. For instance, when the water in the seas is polluted, the sea creatures that you consume can make you ill.

Secondly, hunters in places such as Africa are a big problem because they kill animals just to take a part of their body to sell it or to make decorations. This has led to a very small number of wild animals left in Africa.

Last but not least, technological development forces people to extend the areas which they occupy even more and to achieve that they destroy forests to create new cites, but because of this, animals do not have a place to live.

Each kind of life on Earth is connected to each other and we must understand that if a species became extinct, other ones will be extinct too and this will affect us too. So, we have to stop killing them for our good too.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Protecting wildlife

Endangered species is a serious problem that has caused a lot of concern. This is because people don’t care about the environment and as a result a lot of animals are endangered to become extinct. However, there are many ways to solve this problem.

To begin with, it is very important to try not to pollute the environment. We should reduce the use of plastic because it ends up in the seas and as a result a lot of animals die. In addition, we should try to reduce the carbon dioxide. In this way, we will not pollute the environment and the animals will not be killed.

Another solution is to stop hunting wild animals. The government should impose heavy fines on the poachers or put them in prison. As a result, the number of poachers will be reduced and wild animals will not be killed.

Another suggestion could be to try not to destroy their habitat to build houses or hotels. On the contrary, we should promote eco-tourism in order to protect the habitat of animals.

To sum up, I believe that these suggestions will help us to protect the endangered species. If we try all together, we will manage to save our planet.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for decades. As we know people's feelings about it differ. In my perspective animal testing even though it's cruel towards animals we cannot evade it.

To begin with, animal testing contributes to life-saving remedies and treatments. Without testing on animals most of the important treatments would still be in their premature forms as scientists wouldn't be able to detect potential side effects without testing on organisms similar to humans.

Furthermore, in most countries, animal research is highly regulated for anything regarding the animal being mistreated. Even if an animal has to undergo surgery the regulations obligate the scientists to treat them as a human.

Nonetheless, some people assume that animal testing is cruel and insensitive because animals have feelings too. However as mentioned before, some laws defend animals from being cruelly mistreated.

In conclusion, I vigorously believe that even though animal testing can be evil if accomplished by following the laws it can be very helpful to humanity.

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing
Nowadays, there is a widespread argument among people that believe that animal testing experiments are wrong and those who argue that they are right. In my point of view, I truly believe that animal testing experiments are totally wrong and contribute to more drawbacks than benefits.

To start with, alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Other research methods such as in vitro testing (tests done on human cells or tissue in a petri dish) offer opportunities to reduce or replace animal testing. Technological advancements in 3D printing allow the possibility for tissue bioprinting.

Moreover, animal testing is cruel and inhumane and also animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.

In a nutshell, I am against animal testing experiments and I do believe that there are many other different methods that can be used in order to find cures, which are less harmful and traumatic.

Excellent

# data[].attributes.body
Animal Rights Opinion Essay

Animal testing is a sensitive topic with contradicting sides. There are the researchers whom claim to require animals for the experiments in order to make advancements. On the other side, there are people who are against such use of animal lives and seek to “protect” them. In my opinion, animal testing is one of the necessary evils in order to make advancements in science.

One side states that animal testing is necessary in order to make advancements in science. Firstly, the animals themselves benefit from such research since a medicine can prove effective for them and be used to save and improve their lives in the future, which in itself could be enough to convince people that animal testing should be done on animals.

In addition to this, there are several laws in place in most modern countries to prevent researchers from mistreating animals in their experiments. These laws make sure that animals are being treated humanely and ethically.

On the other hand, people claim testing on animals is cruel and inhumane as well as unethical. The claims have solid evidence to support them but most developed countries have placed laws in order to protect the animals from mistreatment in animal testing facilities. These laws provide humane living conditions for the animals therefore I believe that this should not be a worry.

All in all, animal testing is a controversial issue which might not of itself have a correct answer but in my opinion animal testing is necessary in order to make advancements in science.

Excellent!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Protecting Endangered Species

I am writing this essay to spread awareness of the wildlife species which are in danger of extinction and to present ways that prevent this from happening.

First of all, we should reduce pollution. Namely, we should not use plastic-it ends up in oceans, but reduce our carbon footprint. Less CO2 means less global warming. Climate change is threatening habitats, which is the exact opposite of our target which is to protect those animals’ habitats.

In addition, we must promote ecotourism. Every day we destroy nature in order to build big hotels that will give human beings themselves profit. In contrast, we can go camping or do any other alternative activity in the nature to spend our holidays and instead of damaging the habitats of animals’, we will learn more about them.

Furthermore, we can support National Wildlife Refuges. Because refuge lands and waters are expressly managed to conserve and restore fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats, they offer one of the highest levels of land protection.

To conclude, every living organism has a functional value in the ecosystem, especially in the food chain, even if it is not apparent to humans. So, we have no right to threaten them but on the other hand we have a duty to protect them.

Excellent!

# data[].attributes.body
Animal Testing

In our days we can see more and more scientists performing experiments on animals in order to test drugs or various medical procedures. I, personally, would find it acceptable if we were living in a non-evolved society but with the technology we have nowadays those type of experiments are pointless .

To begin with, animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animals suffer like humans do. Moreover, most of the times animals are being killed for no particular reason as a result of the failed tests because of all the differences humans and animals may present.

Secondly, animal experiments are expensive and time consuming. Costs and duration of toxicological studies are clearly prohibitive to satisfy societal safety needs, in large part because animals are experimented on over a long period of time during which researchers collect and analyze a lot of data to ensure that they are not missing any harmful effects.

At the same time, animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments and relatively few animals are used in research, which is a small price to pay for advancing medical progress

To sum up, animal testing might be a great benefit sometimes but in my opinion it is still one of the biggest crimes.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing experiments

It is a well known fact that animal testing experiments occur daily all around the world. Most people state that these experiments have both some disadvantages and some advantages. In my opinion, the latter outweigh the former.

To begin with, animal testing has many positive effects. One of them is its contribution to many life saving cures and treatments for people.  Without animal testing, scientists wouldn’t be completely sure if their product would work without having side effects. Furthermore, there is not an adequate alternative living organism that is so similar to humans, which can be used in these experiments. By using animals in their experiments, scientists can create huge medical inventions that will save more lives than the animal lives wasted throughout the testing.

Then, in some cases, animals may benefit from these experiments too. This is because, with the medical advancement created by using them, scientists can invent cures or treatments that can be used on both animals and humans. Last but not least, a majority of people, including many biologists and organizations, approve animal testing.

All in all, I believe that animal testing experiments should continue to exist because for wasting the lives of just a few animals many lives, both human and animal, are saved by the creation of cures and treatments from such experiments.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
WILDLIFE SPECIES IN DANGER OF EXTINCTION

Nowadays, wildlife species have been in danger of extinction for plenty of factors. Many believe that there is no going back from this situation. However, there are various steps you can take to protect endangered species and their precious habitats.

Firstly, you ought to learn about endangered species in your area. Teach your friends and family about the wonderful wildlife, birds, fish and plants that live near you. The first step to protecting endangered species is learning about how interesting and important they are.

Moreover, minimize use of herbicides and pesticides. Herbicides and pesticides are hazardous pollutants that can affect wildlife at many levels. In addition to that, reduce your use of fertilizer. Excess fertilizer will likely wash into streams and rivers and may lead to amphibian deformities and deaths. Another way to deal with this situation is, heavy fines being imposed on poachers.

Finally, what you really should do is not buy goods         made from endangered species, not use plastic as it ends up in oceans and not waste energy. That way we reduce our carbon footprint and less CO2 means less global warming. Climate change is threatening habitats so dealing with global warming in a proper way can be beneficial.

Summing up, if we ignore wild life being in danger of extinction, we are putting    in danger a whole kingdom of animals and as consequence we are putting in danger our own lives so what we should really do is team up and help our animals.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Should scientists perform experiments on animals in order to test drugs or various medical procedures?

Animal testing is a topic that has caused many disagreements between scientists and activists. Even though scientists insist that animal testing is necessary in order to find new medicines that will cure serious diseases, there are many people who disagree with this view. In my opinion, this is an action very cruel and violent for animals.

First of all, animal testing is immoral and inhumane. Animals suffer and can feel emotions like people. In addition, results of animal testing are not always reliable. Animals are different from human beings and therefore no one can reassure that these drugs are safe for people.

On the other hand, scientists say that animal testing contributes to saving many people from serious diseases. In addition, it is the safest way to reassure that these medicines are not dangerous for humans before testing on them. Last but not least, animal testing also benefits animals, because some medicines also help to cure diseases of animals.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that animal testing is unethical and causes animals a lot of pain. In addition, nowadays there are many alternative testing methods that don’t endanger the lives of animals.

Excellent!!!

Maria Ariola

# data[].attributes.body
Animal captivity is a controversial subject that has been concerning people for years. Many humans are against it, but others believe it has some benefits. So what are the benefits and drawbacks of animal captivity?

On the one hand, keeping animals in captivity can save lots of species from going extinct and also ensure their health and breeding. Moreover, they are provided with proper care which could extend their lifespan.

On the other hand, keeping animals captivated could lead them to suffer from certain mental illinesses, such as depression. Keeping animals away from their natural habitat can be very cruel and can also cause them many problems.

To sum up, animal captivity might provide certain benefits but most of the time its drawbacks are very serious and should be acknowlegded.

# data[].attributes.body
These days, there's an arguable issue that concerns many human beings approximately whether animals ought to be captivated or not. There are two different evaluations in that argument. some human beings agree with that it is wrong to preserve animals in captivity and that they ought to be left unfastened and untouchable, however, then again, there are humans that accept as true with that it is higher to have the animals captivated and have completely manipulate over them.
to start with, one of the maximum enormous drawbacks of preserving animals in captivity is as an instance, the easy truth, that animals have their personal non-public existence and they are no longer objects for human enjoyment. furthermore, animals may be greater intelligent than we think and because of that they take into account that they may be being held in a restrictive vicinity, thus they may be afflicted by despair and experience extraordinarily bored at the same time. further, in many cases animals are being educated by the use of force and many of them reply pretty badly at being held captive. last but no longer least, some animals are very sociable and prefer to live in conjunction with animals in their type in any other case they're being disadvantaged in their herbal habitats
however, we cannot refuse the reality that animal captivity also offers some advantages that help the animals and additionally people, so one can study extra approximately the lifestyles of animals ,their behaviour and lots of greater. For starters, many animals which are in jeopardy of extinction are more likely to be included with the aid of being saved in zoos. moreover, animals stay longer as they're included from predators and are supplied with fitness care and lastly, they've a secured warm region to sleep and they may be being fed day by day.
In a nutshell, i'm of the opinion that animals ought to no longer be stored in zoos but need to be left unfastened of their environment however I also consider that some exceptions need to be made while a sort of an animal is in risk of extinction.

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing has been a sensitive topic for ages, however, nowadays it has been heated even more, due to the growth of knowledge people have on it. Even though scientists reassure that it is a necessary action in order to help medicine, a lot of activists claim that it is a vile and anethical movement. Personally, I am totally against it.

To begin with, animals, just like the human beings can feel physical and psychic pain. During the testing, scientists tend to hurt them unnecessarily a lot and as a result, those poor creatures are being left with open, and infected wounds. Furthermore, the living conditions in the labs are completely unacceptable and animals are being held there without any food and water sources. Moreover, these creatures are literally, born to die. Their lives are being wasted on a daily basis and most people are being ignorant about it.

On the other hand, some people claim that animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways. Consequently, by testing drugs on animals instead of humans is a safe way to reassure their safety without putting human beings in danger. Also, animals themselves may benefit from the results of animal testing, as some cures are useful for animal species, too

To sum up, I strongly believe that animal testing is a cruel action whose drawbacks outweigh its benefits. Scientists need to reduce those tests, if not ban them completely, so that animals will no longer die unreasonably.

# data[].attributes.body
Animals in captivity
Animal captivity has been a topic that has concerned society for ages. A lot of people believe that it is completely unacceptable. However, some argue that it can be beneficial to keep animals in captivity.

On one hand, animal captivity can be favorable. Firstly, keeping animals in captivity such as in zoos and aquariums can prevent endangered animals from being extinct. Moreover, animals that are kept in captivity are provided with better healthcare and have longer life expectancies than those in the wild, because they are provided with a vet they can always access.

On the other hand, animal captivity has some throwbacks. As we all know animals are built to live in their natural habitat, even the best replica of their living environment can’t replace mother nature. Furthermore, captivity can alter the behavior of animals and create complacency, aggression, or unpredictable outcomes.

In summary, animal captivity, as considered from one perspective can be unethical. However, for the right purposes it could even be beneficial to even animals themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
The advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity

Should we keep animals in captivity; This is a matter that has caused much controversy. Some people say that animals should live in their natural world, but others claim that sometimes it is essential to keep them in captivity.

On the one hand, there are many advantages of keeping animals in captivity. First of all, a lot of animals are endangered species and therefore it is essential to keep them in zoos in order to protect them from extinction. In addition, animals that live in the zoos, live longer than the others because there they are protected from predators.

On the other hand, keeping animals in zoos also has many drawbacks. Firstly, animals shouldn’t be restricted but they should live free in their natural environment. Furthermore, some animals are very sensitive and the don’t like being captive. So, they may suffer from depression. Last but not least, animals living in zoos are often treated with cruelty. Therefore, their rights are violated.

To sum up, keeping animals in captivity has many advantages, but it also has a lot of drawbacks that people shouldn’t forget.

Excellent!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Keeping Animals in Captivity

Many animals nowadays are kept in captivity in almost every country in the world. This action may be considered cruel or inhuman to some people but I have a balanced view on the matter

To begin with, keeping animals in captivity has some advantages. one important advantage is keeping some animal breeds safe thus preventing their extinction. For instance, many zoos and Chinese facilities have kept giant pandas in captivity in order to be treated better than the in the wild and reproduce. Furthermore, zoos are quite popular so they can provide entertainment for many people during their trips in addition to being affordable.

On the other hand, many people believe that keeping animals in captivity is wrong. One disadvantage of keeping animals in captivity is the well-being of the animal. This is because animals in zoos are trapped in unnatural environments with poor conditions while not even having enough space for themselves. Last but not least, many zoos only exist in order to enlarge their profits without bothering about the animals. Such zoos may hire cheaper staff with insufficient knowledge that care about human amazement solely.

All in all, keeping animals in captivity has both some advantages and some disadvantages though the advantages seem to be more positive in general.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
ANIMAL TESTING

Animal testing has been an important debate for ages.It is undoubtable  that currently this debate has become really heated as many  organisations stand for animals’ rights.The real question is what are the  factors that determine if animal testing is wrong or not ?

On the one hand, people who support these experiments say that we must  do tests on animals. For example, many famous drugs were invented  this way, and animal experiments may help us to find more cures in the  future like a cure for cancer or AIDS. Furthermore, the animals which  are used are not usually wild but are bred especially for experiments  meaning that in most cases accidents  will not occur and the  animal won’t be hurt.

On the other hand,animal experiments are not morally right and cause  animals a lot of pain. In addition, many people feel that many tests are useless,  and in fact animals are not only used to test new drug but also new  cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead. Moreover,  sometimes an experiment on animals gives us the wrong result because  animals’ bodies are not exactly the same as our own. As a consequence,  this testing may not be providing safety.

In conclusion, I think that the benefits do not outweigh the  disadvantages, and testing on animals should only continue in special  cases. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that  animals should suffer for unreasonable testing.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity
There has been much debate on whether it is good for animals to be kept in captivity or not and the reasons why. I, personally, believe that there are both advantages and drawbacks.

To begin with, the main downside is that they are deprived from their own right of freedom which is as significant as it is for humans. In fact, they do not have enough space to move around freely, the way they had, back at their natural habitat. Consequently, they are often unhappy, something that is awful.(unacceptable)

Furthermore, unfortunately, torture is commonplace with animals that are kept in captivity. They are often trained to perform unique skills and while doing so, they get hurt by these people called “professionals», which is definitely outrageous! (immoral)

However, some animals may have to be kept in zoos for multiple reasons. One of them is extinction. In reality, it is better for species who face extinction to live in a small protected area, where they are provided with the essentials. Some organisations also give these animals so much love that they would not have epxerienced otherwise.

Moreover, in cases of disaster, a fire for instance, the best thing is for animals to be taken and be kept safe until things are back to normal again.

Taking everything into consideration, I personally believe that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits. Nevertheless, the best thing to do is to raise awareness and inform people about animal rights and what should be done in order for animals to live a blissful life!

Excellent!

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity
Nowadays, there is a controversial issue that concerns many people about whether animals should be captivated or not. In that argument there are two different opinions. Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in captivity and that they should be left free and untouchable, but, on the other hand, there are people that believe that it is better to have the animals captivated and have fully control over them.

To begin with, one of the most significant drawbacks of keeping animals in captivity is for example, the simple fact, that animals have their own personal life and they are not objects for human entertainment. Moreover, animals may be more intelligent than we think and because of that they understand that they are being held in a restrictive area, thus they may suffer from depression and feel extremely bored at the same time. In addition, in many cases animals are being trained by the use of force and many of them respond pretty badly at being held captive. Last but not least, some animals are very sociable and prefer to stay along with animals of their kind or else they are being deprived of their natural habitats

However, we cannot refuse the fact that animal captivity also offers some advantages that help the animals and also humans, in order to learn more about the life of animals ,their  behaviour and many more. For starters, many animals that are in jeopardy of extinction are more likely to be protected by being kept in zoos. Furthermore, animals live longer as they are protected from predators and are provided with health care and lastly, they have a secured warm place to sleep and they are being fed daily.

In a nutshell, I am of the opinion that animals should not be kept in zoos but should be left free in their environment but I also believe that a few exceptions must be made when a kind of an animal is in danger of extinction.

Excellent!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity
Wild animals are kept for a variety of reasons and in a range of environments. You can find wild animals in zoos, circuses, aquariums, while some people even have wild animals as exotic pets. There are many people and a lot of animal activists who protest against the captivity of animals. On the other hand, there are some people who claim that by having animals in captivity we can protect them.

To begin with the first argument, we cannot doubt about animals’ rights. Their habitats are in nature and they deserve to have a free life there. Furthermore, the animals in captivity suffer especially when they are being taken from their wild environment to a place in captivity and in many cases they die earlier.

However, people who find advantages in animals’ captivity. They argue that keeping animals in captivity can prevent their extinction, to a large extent when we have endangered species. Animals that are orphaned or wounded may not have the capability of fending for themselves. Moreover, those people feel that animal companionship makes them less anxious and happier.

To sum up, I think that animals should live in their natural habitats and only if there are cases of injured, orphaned animals we should keep them in protected environments for a while, in order to take care of them and then we should bring them back to their home.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity

Nowadays, an extremely popular form of entertainment is zoos. People have different opinions about this topic and it both has serious advantages and disadvantages, but still zoos legally work. So, should animals be kept in zoos or not?

First of all, zoos help animals survive from extinction. Endangered species have a high risk of completely disappearing, zoos assist them to live and reproduce. We can all agree that conditions in zoos are safer and animals have more chances living longer and having descendants. So, keeping animals in captivity has an important advantage that cannot be overlooked because the numbers of endangered species are increasing.

Another advantage is the educational purposes. Not only do zoos entertain people but they also inform them about a lot of animal characteristics. Zoos teach them why animals are important for our planet and make them respect them more. Moreover, it is an extraordinary experience seeing big or wild animals up close. Learning about animals can broaden their horizons

On the other hand, animals are supposed to live in their natural habitat, something that zoos cannot provide. Many big animals do not have the space they need and this can lead to violent behavior. Zoos try to imitate appropriate environment but of course this is impossible to be done perfectly. Animals are deprived of their real home and grow up under condition that sometimes are unsuitable for them.

Furthermore, another significant disadvantage is that when animals grow up in a zoo and not in their natural habitat, they lose their natural instincts. This happens because they no longer have to protect themselves and do not have to search for food. Animals are not putting effort to survive and this is against their nature. So, slowly animals lose their identity.

In conclusion, keeping animals in captivity has drawbacks and advantages too. In my opinion, animals should be free and live in the wild. Animals biologically belong there and not in cages. If people have the desire to see them, they can go on a safari. Society must be more concerned about animal’s rights and respect them.

# data[].attributes.body
Advantages and disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity
The purpose of this essay is to shed light on some of the most important pros and cons of keeping animals in captivity at zoos.

To begin with, a great advantage for the animals is that they are probably getting a better health treatment in general from qualified vets and doctors. Namely, they are provided with the appropriate alimentation and drugs, which would have been impossible to do if they were not kept in zoos. Moreover, zoos and aquariums protect endangered species in order for them not to become extinct, which can cause terrible damage to our environment and indirectly later to us.

On the other hand, there are numerous disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity. First of all, animals in captivity suffer from stress and boredom. It is a well-known fact that animals that live in zoos have much shorter lives. The confinement in small enclosures leads to poor mental and physical health in zoo animals. Moreover, they can no longer hunt for their food or follow their migration instincts. Some species may be kept separated so their breeding behaviors are kept under control.

In conclusion, I would totally say that I am against animal captivity when animals are not treated carefully and appropriately, because this leads to animals developing complacency, aggression, or to unpredictable results.

# data[].attributes.body
Wildlife species in danger of extinction

Today endangered species of all kinds, which play a major role to the balance of our ecosystem, are unfortunately increasing due to human interference. Thankfully, there are many ways in which people can prevent more damage from happening and save the wildlife.

First of all, we must reduce pollution. We have to start recycling and reusing in order to avoid using chemicals and plastic.

Secondly, fines must be imposed on poachers, especially when they do not follow the hunting laws, and we must stop buying goods made from endangered species.

Lastly, I think that all humans, and mostly the youth, should be educated and must take part in special activities such as the cleaning of beaches and oceans.

I strongly believe that with the care of governments and everyone’s contribution, all the endangered species can actually be saved and this will lead to the best survival of our planet!

Excellent!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Pros and cons of animal captivity

Zoos are found in almost every country and are an attraction for thousands of people who want to learn more and admire wildlife without endangering themselves and without having to travel to different parts of the world. At the same time, there are many voices opposing the existence and operation of zoos under the pretext of exploiting and depriving animals of their freedom. What are the pros and cons of zoos?
As is well known, wildlife is threatened daily by poachers, who hunt animals for  their fur, ivory and, in more extreme cases, their meat. From this point of view, the advantage of having a wildlife shelter in the form of a zoo is easily understood. In addition, modern zoos have special adaptations to the living spaces of animals to represent the natural habitat of each animal, thus increasing the feeling of calm and  security of the animals. Undoubtedly, zoos play an important role in education as they are sources of information both on the biology of each animal and on the natural environment in which each species comes from. Also, special reference is made to endangered and critically endangered species, thus raising public interest.
However, zoos are captives of wildlife and this violates the right of animals to freedom while imposing on them a way of life that changes the habits of animals in the natural environment such as the phenomenon of migration and movement of populations. At the same time, many times and due to lack of a legal framework, many zoos do not meet the appropriate conditions for the installation and living of animals resulting in many animals being mistreated and dying of physical deprivation or the negative psychological effects of captivity

# data[].attributes.body
Animal captivity, pros and cons.

# data[].attributes.body
Animal testing

Animal testing is being performed regularly all over the world to find out whether or not drugs or medical procedures are safe to be used by humans.

Sometimes scientists are over ambitious and in order to bring out high results, they take advantage of animal testing. This results in the use of extremely large numbers of animals, usually mice, and leads to pointless deaths.

In addition, animals suffer just like humans do and their emotions are not taken into consideration. They feel pain and that something strange is happening to them.

On the other hand, animal testing has contributed to many life-saving treatments and cures. Thus, people are given the required medicine that will help them straight away, since it has been tested before on animals.

In my opinion, animal testing should be done only when it is necessary and it is for the best of humanity!

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
The advantages and disadvantages of animal captivity.

Nowadays hundreds of animals are in captivity all around the world. These animals are usually kept in zoos, research laboratories, breeding centers and in other places for entertainment, such as circuses. There are many arguments for both sides considering this issue.

A very good reason to keep an animal captivated is when it is wounded or in danger. For instance, sometimes animals that have been hurt by accident by humans (e.g. hit by a car) have the opportunity to be taken care of and left to their natural environment when fully healed. In addition, when they belong to endangered species, they will be protected in order to avoid their extinction.

On the other hand, when animals are held captive for entertainment reasons, as is usually the case, for example, in circuses or zoos, it is not ethical. Most of the times animals are being treated in a bad way or live in inappropriate conditions. Lastly, animals do have feelings and deserve to live free.

To sum up, I strongly believe that the right environment for all animals is their natural environment accordingly, except when human help and interference is needed for their survival.

Excellent!!

# data[].attributes.body
by Nikos Moschovas

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
MOSCHOVAS What can we do to protect endangered species

# data[].attributes.body
by Eleftheria Ntampou

We live in a society with lots of chemicals and pollution problems so we have to protect animals especially the endangered species.

First of all, we could recycle and avoid using chemicals or plastic products because they harm the environment. We could also stop water pollution so that the animals in sea can be safe. Another option is to protect their habitat. And in the end, we have to stop building hotels and resorts everywhere so we could protect their habitats.

If every single person at least recycled, we could create a whole new world with cleaner atmosphere, a safer place for all of us to live in and a safe place for all the animals too.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitris Rallis

# data[].attributes.body
by Valantis Christoforidis

# data[].attributes.body
by Nikos Christoforidis

# data[].attributes.body
by Marianthi Papadopoulou

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
ΜΑΡΙΑΝΘΗ έκθεση αγγλικών προστασία των ζώων

# data[].attributes.body
by Christos Papadopoulos

Nowadays there is an increasing number of endangered species all over the world. This is because humans are so irresponsible about animals' natural habitats. However, there are some solutions to this problem.

Firstly, humans should stop hunting animals illegally. Illegal hunting is one of the main reasons why animals become extinct. Stopping illegal hunting would result in a normal life for animals.

In addition to that another solution is to mitigate pollution. By limiting pollution we would decrease the CO2 levels in the atmosphere and as a result we can reduce the global warming. Animals living in the north pole would not go extinct because of the global warming mitigation.

Moreover, we could stop the destruction of animals' natural habitats. A lot of animals go extinct because of overexploitation of resources such as trees. By destroying animals' natural habitats animals face a lot of difficulties and finally go extinct.

To sum up, I believe we humans can take many actions and slowly decrease the number of animals that go extinct. I think that we are the cause of animals' extinction and we should take action and save the animals.

# data[].attributes.body
by Ilias Papanikoloaou

# data[].attributes.body
by Marianna Simina

In recent years many wildlife species have become extinct, while others are in danger of extinction. This is because the human race is too careless or lazy to handle this issue responsibly. However there are several solutions to the problem.

Firstly, we should try to pollute our planet less, by diminishing our energy waste and our use of single-use plastic. In this way, both land and seas would be much cleaner, giving animals a healthier environment to live.

Moreover, we should stop hunting wild animals and also impose heavy fines on poachers. By doing so, we set a good example for others and they will hopefully learn to do the same.

Another solution would be to take personal action. There is a large number of organizations that actively help endangered animals. We could either volunteer offering our help or donate money if we cannot do so.

To conclude, it is true that the extinction of any wildlife species is a serious problem for our planet. Nevertheless, I believe that if we all work together responsibly, we can ensure their safety.

# data[].attributes.body
by Elisavet Papadopoulou

# data[].attributes.body
by Strergiani Mpampi

Nowadays, there are many wildlife species in danger of extinction. This is because there are many people who hunt even though it is forbidden. However, there are several solutions to the problem.

First of all, reduce, reuse and recycle. Avoid using chemicals or plastic products that harm the environment. In addition, inform others to stop water pollution. Water pollution is killing animals in seas, lakes and rivers. In this way, we protect their habitats.

Another solution would be to reduce your carbon footprint. Less CO2 means less global warming. Climate change is threatening wildlife habitats. Moreover, never purchase products made from threatened species and of course do not destroy habitats to build holiday resorts and hotels. Promote ecotourism.

All things considered, it is true that many species are in danger. I believe that if we all work together responsibly, we can protect these species and make our planet a better place for us and animals.

# data[].attributes.body
by Konstantinos Mpampis

Nowadays, more and more endangered animals are becoming extinct because they get killed by their predators or humans. Many people believe that this is not their problem to solve but letting animals go extinct has consequences. So, it is considered appropriate to mention ways to protect endangered animals.

First of all, one way to stop the extinction of threatened species is the following. We should stop polluting the water. Many animals around the world are dying from the water they drink for it is polluted. In this way, animals will not get killed by it and will drink fresh water.

Moreover, we can restrict ourselves and stop purchasing products made from threatened species. If we stop buying those products, animals will stop being killed for the things they have (fur, ivory).

Another solution would be to stop destroying animal habitats to build hotels. Instead, we should promote ecotourism and persuade people to come to our country to enjoy its natural beauty and the sights.  As a result, animals won’t have to move around searching for a new home or getting killed when their homes are being destroyed.

To sum up, it is known that many species in our days are being threatened and regardless of whether it is caused by us or not, it is our responsibility to keep those animals safe.

# data[].attributes.body
by Eirini Symeonidou

# data[].attributes.body
by Dionysis Saltapidas

# data[].attributes.body
by Kostas Smilidis

The extinction of different animal species is at its all time high. This is why we should all do our best to protect endangered animals which are very close to extinction.

Starting off, one of the main reasons for animal extinction is the polluted environment we have created, which they cannot live in. But why is pollution so harmful to animals? The polluted world in which we live in negatively affects the natural habitats of several wild animals that are being stripped of their homes.

In addition to the polluted environment we have forced animals to live in, there are lots of people which still hunt animals. Hunting wild animals for profit, is slowly making them disappear and thus leading to the extinction of animal species along with their habitats. This is why, we should try stopping hunters from taking the lives of wild animals by not buying products made from animals. Furthermore, the government can   fine people who illegally hunt wild animals.

To sum up, if we take action against the pollution and hunt of endangered animals there is still hope for animals to live good lives again.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitris Stathakopoulos

# data[].attributes.body
by Kira Ntaouka

# data[].attributes.body
by Tasos Tzegkas

# data[].attributes.body
by Tasos Tzegkas

# data[].attributes.body
by Athanasia Rousta

# data[].attributes.body
by Anastasia Tsakiridou

Wild Animals are one of the most important elements in preserving a nation’s natural environment and ecosystem. Nowadays, mankind has been confronted with one of the most serious issues of modern life -the endangerment of animals. Without them, the cycle of life would disrupt and could result in life-threatening situations for all. Therefore, we need to find solutions to our problem and help endangered species make gain more numbers.

To begin with, it is common sense that pollution is one of the two main factors that does great harm to wild creatures. For instance, water pollution from sewage, chemical waste or leaked oil causes the death of countless aquatic animals and plants. Also, as soil pollution is concerned, the increase in urbanization has consequently increased the demands of the population and it is becoming necessary to “clear off” new lands in order to build new houses, metros, shopping centers, schools, and hospitals. When forests are “cleared off”, animals lose their habitat which in turn threatens their survival. As a result, we should protect the environment by reducing the construction of unnecessary premises. A good idea would also be to organize long walks along the beach while collecting litter.

Another major factor that leads to the extinction of the wildlife kingdom is hunting and poaching. Animal poaching is the act of illegally killing animals for the use of clothes, wool, cosmetics, ornaments or even decorations. It affects many species of animals to the point of their extinction. Moreover, it can be considered as crime and in my opinion, it should be banned. In addition, a helpful solution to this problem is to impose heavy fines on people who hunt in order to stop them.

Furthermore, it is quite important to mention some other alternative ways, in which we can help alleviate this problem. One of them is to inform people by raising awareness through adds or even students at schools while making presentations and discussions about the topic. Finally, it would be thoughtful and considerate to try and cut down on purchasing products made from threatened species.

To summarize, I think that people should remember that the main part of life is nature and not its master. Protecting endangered animals from the edge of extinction is absolutely essential for every individual because it is primarily the result of human awareness. From my point of view, people should be more aware of the effects on the destruction of wild animals' lives.

# data[].attributes.body
by Konstantina Chatzinikolaou

Humans have been polluting the planet, many of the homes of wildlife have been destroyed, or poisoned. Many hunters hunt wildlife for food, for leather and for fun. These are some of the reasons why some of the wildlife species are in danger of extinction.

The hunting of wildlife is a cruel thing that must stop. It has been illegal for some time now but there are people who still do it, something that is absolutely wrong and terrible. Don’t ever purchase products made from threatened or endangered species, clothes or accessories made from their leather. There’s no reason to hurt animals to have fashionable look. Recycle and buy sustainable products. That way you help for the safety of wildlife’s homes.

We all have to help for wildlife’s existence. We have to understand and take this dangerous problem seriously.

# data[].attributes.body
by Andreas Santou

Animal extinction is something that happens because humans can't or won't protect the  wildlife. Some of the solutions for this problem are quite simple to accomplish.

One of the reasons behind the animal eradication is pollution, something that occurs because humans are irresponsible for their acts. Namely, humans throw plastic and other junk in the ocean with the result being alot of sea-turtles eating them believing that they are jellyfish. We can stop this by educating people to throw their rubbish and plastic in specially made locations for recycling.

Another reason is the illegal hunting of animals by poachers and the selling of their goods on the Black Market. This brings up the solution of imposing high financial penalties to the poachers and the buyers.

Lastly, a problem that appeared in the last decade is the destruction of animal habitats and the construction of tourist points of interest instead. Promoting ecotourism could fix that problem, making people more interested in helping the conservation of the natural ecosystem and making the lifespan of an animal longer and easier.

In conclusion, we must be more careful with the natural environment because if the earth is clean, our life will be easier and more pleasant.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitra Rousta

# data[].attributes.body
by George Chamouris

# data[].attributes.body
by Athanasia Rousta

# data[].attributes.body
by Michalis Tsikouras

Nowadays, more and more animals are in danger of extinction. That is because many people hunt such animals without stopping. However, that doesn’t mean that there are not any ways to solve the problem.

There are many solutions to the problem. Firstly, new laws can be made which prohibit hunting endangered species. Therefore, these species will live without worrying about devious hunters. Also, heavy fines or even imprisonment will be applied to those that don’t comply with these new laws.

Furthermore, we can protect their habitat. That means that the places where they live shouldn’t be destroyed and hotels and resorts shouldn’t be replacing these habitats. Last but not least, we must recycle, reduce, reuse and in general we must avoid using chemicals that are harmful for the environment.

All in all, it is true that many animals are in danger of extinction. Nevertheless, I believe that if we educate ourselves, inform others and spread the message that we must protect endangered animals, more people will care about these animals and thus more animals will be alive.

# data[].attributes.body
by George Tziampazis

# data[].attributes.body
by Anna Maria Tsakiridou

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
endangered species Αννα Μαρια Τσακιριδου Α5

# data[].attributes.body
by Maria Tona

Nowadays animal extinction it is a common phenomenon that has causeda lot of problems worldwide and scientists are concerned about endangered animals . This is how the question ‘’ What is the point in saving endangered species? ‘’ arises. So here are some reasons why it is so important to protect these species and what can we do to safeguard them.

Firstly, every living organism has a functional value in the ecosystem (especially in the food chain) even if it is not apparent to humans. For example, if mouses become extinct then the most reptiles would become extinct and that is something that would have a big impact on medicine because as we all know many of the drugs that we use and are especially important come from snakes, so they have a big medical value. Secondly, the moral obligation to preserve the natural world for future generations is really crucial for the reason that the next generation will not be able to survive without nature since we humans are also a part of it and we actually need it not only for physical survival but for our mental health, too. Lastly and extremely important is biodiversity because it provides functioning ecosystems that supply oxygen, clean air and water, pollination of plants, pest control, wastewater treatment and many ecosystem services.

Now some ways that we can protect the endangered species are primarily to reduce our carbon footprint. Less CO2 means less global warming and climate change is threatening wildlife habitats which is something that we need to take  into consideration. Also, we should not destroy habitats to build holiday resorts and hotels, instead we should promote ecotourism. Moreover, we should start educating ourselves and inform others about this issue. Last but not least, we have to impose heavy fines or imprisonment on poachers and most importantly we need to protect the natural habitat of animals at all costs.

To sum up, I strongly believe that endangered species are really important on this planet and we need to take action to protect them and save them so they won’t be endangered anymore.

# data[].attributes.body
by Natalia Tortopidou

# data[].attributes.body
by Apostolos Tokas

# data[].attributes.body
by Elena Tsironi

# data[].attributes.body
by Konstantina Chatzinikolaou

Animal testing is a long-standing problem, which bothers people all around the world.  it’s the use of animals in experiments to explore the reactions of their bodies for biological matters and to test hygiene products, food and cosmetics to be sure if they are safe or not for selling.

In my opinion animal experiments are inhumane and they cause pain and suffering for them. Plus, some products that have passed animal testing were dangerous for humans but not for the animals. The existence of different alternatives that can replace animals is another reason I am against animal testing experiments. Moreover, some of the experiments are useless and are done only for economic advantage.

But that doesn’t mean I can’t understand the opposite opinion. Several treatments have been produced because of animal testing. Animal testing helps to prove the safety of some products to be used by humans. It prevents the cause of painful, harmful and terrible experiments on humans. Also, some animals have similar organism as humans and therefore make perfect experiment subjects.

# data[].attributes.body
by John Tzanasi

All animals are necessary for the preservation of even man in life, this means that we must do everything we can to save them from extinction. The extinction of an animal can be very harmful, it can upset the ecosystem and this is a very big problem. One thing we can do to save endangered animals is to reduce the use of plastic. Every year many billions of tons of plastic end up in the seas threatening the lives of turtles, dolphins, etc. All people must be informed and in order for everyone to be able to help we must first start from our family by informing them.

# data[].attributes.body
by Vasileia Rogka

Nowadays, we learn that more and more animals are becoming endangered or extinct and that we should take actions to protect them as well as we can. However, poachers and industry owners seem to care more about their profit instead of nature. The government does not do much to stop their actions as well as. It also does not inform people on the issue. So, a question appears: what can we do to save the endangered species? Even though the situation is very difficult solutions do exist and we can all help as well.

To begin with, we have to protect their habitats. How do we do that? Well firstly we have to reduce our daily use of plastic products and chemicals and instead try to reuse and recycle as much as we can. Plastic and glass if they are not recycled can harm seriously the environment. In addition, we have to reduce our CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions as it is one of the main factors that contribute to the increase of the planets’ temperature and so become a threat towards the wildlife habitats. Also, we should stop polluting the water as well. The animals that live in the seas, rivers and lakes are also suffering from global warming and losing their homes. Ecotourism can be promoted as a more environmentally friendly way to travel without hurting the natural ecosystems.

To continue, the government should be more alarmed of the issue. Imposing heavy fines or imprisoning poachers can actually help cut down the number of animals that are killed every day. Furthermore, people must not destroy habitats in order to build huge factories, hotels and resorts. As for us, we can all stop purchasing products that are made from endangered species and also try to educate ourselves and learn more on the issue. Finally, it is our duty to inform others and all together try to put an end to this.

In conclusion, I personally believe that if we all put some effort, we can change the situation. It is time we all understand how serious this problem is and that it will not be too late until it affects us as well. Isn’t it shocking that almost three rhinos are killed every day?  Let’s all imagine our lives if only a few animals were left in the wild. Would we then be able to survive without them?

# data[].attributes.body
by Marianna Simina

Lately there has been much debate about whether or not scientists should perform experiments on animals in order to test drugs or various medical procedures. Even though there is no simple explanation in such issues, I am personally in favor of animal testing experiments.

An important benefit of animal testing is that it has contributed in many life-saving cures and treatments. As animals are appropriate research subjects because of their similarity to human beings, those treatments would not be available otherwise. Moreover animals themselves benefit from the results, since in some cases cures are useful for animal species, too.

Another argument in favor of animal testing is that animal research is highly regulated in most countries. The law protects animals from mistreatment and ensures all the benefits from animal research at the lowest costs for animals.

On the other hand, some people argue that animal testing is cruel and inhuman. Even though, in certain cases there has been cruelty, I believe that nowadays the law has changed this situation radically.

To conclude with I strongly believe that animal testing is a necessary method for the scientific progress, in order to safeguard the human life.

# data[].attributes.body
by George Tsetsilas

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia.

It known that 90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests whether on safety grounds or because they do not work. For example, using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides little statistically useful insight, a recent analysis found. The study also revealed that drug tests on monkeys are just as poor as those using any other species in predicting the effects on humans. Also, cancer drugs have the lowest success rate (only 5% are approved after entering clinical trials) followed by psychiatry drugs (6% success rate), heart drugs (7% success rate) and neurology drugs (8% success rate).

On the other hand, removing animals completely from the lab would impede our understanding of health and disease, and consequently affect the development of new and vital treatments. Although sometimes these studies do reduce the quality of life of these animals, thorough regulations are in place to ensure that they are carried out in a humane way. One argument in favour of animal testing is that scientists have been able to advance their knowledge of human and animal health and disease dramatically by studying organisms. Moreover, antibiotics, insulin, vaccines, organ transplantation and HIV treatment have all been developed with the help of experiments involving animals. Animals, also, play a small but vital role in medical research that brings hope to many people with conditions such as cancer, heart failure and Alzheimer’s disease.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitris Rallis

A lot of scientists perform experiments on animals in order to test drugs or various medical procedures. In my opinion, this situation is a necessary evil.
Firstly, it’s evident that animal testing is essential for modern medicine and biology, because it secures the safety of drugs and chemicals. In this way, it contributes in many cures and treatments, which can save human lives.
Moreover, I believe that humans are more valuable than animals and it isn’t always morally wrong to kill an animal in order to save a human. Also animal research is highly regulated in most countries, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment.
But on the other hand, animal testing can become inhumane and atrocious, if scientists don’t care about animals at all. In addition, massive use of animals in experiments can bring about inverse consequences for humanity, because it will disrupt the food chain. However, I believe that under close scrutiny, these problems can be defeated.
To sum up, in my opinion animal testing has both advantages and disadvantages, but it’s an essential procedure.

# data[].attributes.body
by Athanasia Rousta

# data[].attributes.body
by Nikos Moschovas

# data[].attributes.body
by Nikos Moschovas

# data[].attributes.body
by George Tsetsilas

There are arguments that are in favor of animal captivity but also arguments that are against animal captivity. Let ‘s listen to both sides.

While zoo advocates and conservationists argue that zoos save endangered species and educate the public.

Critics of zoos would argue that animals often suffer physically and mentally by being enclosed. Even the best artificial environments can't come close to matching the space, diversity, and freedom that animals have in their natural habitats. This deprivation causes many zoo animals to become stressed or mentally ill. Capturing animals in the wild also causes much suffering by splitting up families. Some zoos make animals behave unnaturally: for example, marine parks often force dolphins and whales to perform tricks. These mammals may die decades earlier than their wild relatives, and some even try to commit suicide.

I think it depends on the circumstances in which it is used. If it´s used for entertainment and pleasure, it’s a very cruel thing. But On the other hand , if it helps to preserve the species and take care of them in case they are endangered, I think it’s a good thing.

# data[].attributes.body
by Theodore Papakostas

# data[].attributes.body
by Theodore Papakostas

# data[].attributes.body
by George Poulios

# data[].attributes.body
by George Poulios

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitris Mpousiou

# data[].attributes.body
by Konstantinos Smilidis
Animal testing is a topic that has been rising in popularity recently with scientists saying that testing medicine on animals has saved lots of lives and that it is beneficial to the medical industry as a whole, while others believe that animal testing in too cruel and that the experiments done on animals can be flawed. In my opinion animal testing should continue being a part of medical research.

Starting off, experiments on animals have always been used to find cures for different diseases, with the vast majority of biologists and health organizations supporting it. As a result of that, many lives have been saved by animal testing. As far as I am concerned, animal testing is an effective way of gaining insight and finding cures for a plethora of diseases while also not sacrificing any human lives in the process.

On the flip side, a lot of people believe that animal testing should be banned because they claim that it is inhumane and cruel for no particular reason as they believe that most experiments on animals are not successful.

Summing up, I believe that animal testing is an effective way of curing diseases while not sacrificing human lives. This is why I believe that stopping experiments on animals would harm humans who suffer from different serious conditions that cannot be cured yet.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dionysis Saltapidas

# data[].attributes.body
by Kostas Smilidis

Animal welfare is a very controversial issue concerning modern day communities. There have been lots of debates revolving around the different conditions animals should live in. This is because the majority of the population are split between the two choices. So, should animals live free or imprisoned in zoos? There are advantages and disadvantages to both options.

On the one hand, if we let animals live free, they would be able to be in their natural habitat. This way, humans will not be interrupting the food chain, while also allowing animals to be able to keep their natural habits. Although letting animals live free has a ton of benefits it also has some drawbacks. For instance, by living free, animals are prone to the dangers of the wildlife. This could lead various species to go extinct.

On the other hand, by forcing animals to live in zoos we are actively protecting them from the dangers they would face if they were in their natural habitat. By doing this, we can prevent the extinction of different wild animals which would go extinct if we weren’t there to protect them. Even though, we are protecting the animals by building zoos for them we are also taking them away from their homes, thus forcing them to live in an artificial and event stressful environment.

Taking all of the above into consideration, we can come to the conclusion that there are pros and cons to both of the arguments made.

# data[].attributes.body
by Ilias Papanikolaou

# data[].attributes.body
by Ilias Papanikolaou

# data[].attributes.body
by Chris Papadopoulos

Every drug or medical procedure, before going public, should always be tested. Scientists however are using animals for such experiments because the don’t want to make people suffer. Although animals are living beings too and they suffer too. However, I personally believe that it is safer to use animals for experiments and studies like this. Nonetheless they should be well organised and considered in order that we do not waste animals' lives.

First of all, I think that animals should be used in cases when ethical considerations prevent the use of human subjects. Some experiments nowadays are really dangerous so wasting a life is kind of inevitable. That’s why scientists prefer to use animals and not humans. It’s more ethical in such cases to use animals and not risk some human's life.

Secondly, most countries are trying to regulate such animal experiments and the animals are protected from mistreatment. There is an increasing number of laws that been made to protect animals from abuse and cruelty.

However, animals can suffer like humans. Animals undergo much pain and suffering. The fact that animals can't express their pain doesn’t mean that they are not feeling any pain. Animals are living beings and they suffer as much as humans would if they were in their place.

To sum up, I am vacillating about this matter but I think that it is better to use animals but in a moderate level. Also, I believe that scientists should make such experiments less cruel.

However is used at the beginning of a paragraph whose content is in contrast to the content of the previous paragraph.

# data[].attributes.body
by Vasileia Rogka

Nowadays, we live in a world where medicine and technology have improved dramatically. The medicine a doctor prescribed to someone, every day products like face and hair creams are only a few examples of the importance of this progress to our lives. Some people cannot even live without their skincare products. But how do we know that what we use on a daily basis is safe? Scientists have found a rather old-fashioned way to test drugs, creams or run other experiments in order to certify that it cannot cause any harm to the human organism. Their solution is animal testing. They test what they want on animals and according to the way they act they decide whether or not they should continue with their experiment. Some people believe that animal testing is the only way to be sure whereas others are strongly against it. In my opinion, animal testing is nothing more than an additional way to torture the animals.

To begin with, animal testing is totally cruel and inhumane as scientists treat the animals in the worst way. Animals are not different from human when it comes to feelings. They are getting hurt as well but unfortunately, they cannot speak to tell how they feel. Let’s not forget that animals are already suffering enough from the damage humans brought to this planet. We hear about species of animals going extinct, or that a new species lost its home due to climate hazards and ecosystem destruction. We seem not to care about the situation at all. Why do we have to torture them even more?

Additionally, most of the experiments done on animals can be flawed. For example, the results of these tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. The drug that is tested is not necessarily safe just because it passed the animal testing. It can be found harmful for a group of people. So many people’s belief that animals are a very close representation of the human organism can be proven wrong. In fact, animals are a lot more different than us, which is why they are unreliable and poor test subjects. It is a shame to put them through a process that can bring up many flaws in the end.

However, we all have to agree that some of the experiments done on animals have contributed to saving many lives and even the animals could benefit from the cures that scientists test. But the testing methods that now exist show that animal testing is replaceable so there is no reason to continue our actions at this rate.

In retrospect, I personally believe that animal testing is wrong. The animals are going through cruel conditions just for our own safety. Since other methods that are more reliable have come to light, scientists should try to follow them instead of using animals. Imagine a world where the animals would not be free in the wild but instead, they would be laboratory subjects. Would we enjoy living in that world? And most importantly what price would we have to pay for our actions?

# data[].attributes.body
by Kira Ntaouka

# data[].attributes.body
by Eleftheria Ntampou

# data[].attributes.body
by Marianthi Papadopoulou

# data[].attributes.body
by Konstantinos Mpampis

Nowadays, it has been noticed that more and more people are against animal testing experiments. They believe that animals should be free and not used for testing drugs and medicines even though scientists say that those experiments are necessary for gathering information that would benefit us. In my opinion, scientists should use animals for testing products.

On the one hand, even though it is not right to use animals for experiments, with the experiments that already happened, useful information was gained that helped in the production of cures for diseases. With those experiments, many people lives were saved and in small conditions those cures can be used to save animals too.

Moreover, animals are being used for experiments because their bodies are very similar to the human body in many cases so the results that are being collected have many chances to help people.

On the other hand, animal testing experiments is not right because animals  have feelings too and they can suffer from the experiments. In addition, experimenting on animals and making them suffer is cruel and inhumane even if it is for a good cause.

To conclude, I strongly believe that even though animal testing experiments is not right for the animals, the things we can learn from those experiments can save many lives now and in futures cases.

# data[].attributes.body
by Dimitris Tosounidis

Animal captivity is a highly discussed topic by people. But the question is where do animals actually belong? In the zoo or in the wild, lets find out!

In my opinion all animals should be in the wild, every single animal belongs in an ecology chain, if we take one animal from the chains and put it in the zoo we basically destroy the chains and the results might be irrecoverable to the ecology.

But there is one exception. Sometimes animals should be in captivity. One example is endangered species, which should be in captivity because if those animal disappear then again the ecology chain will break. So some zoos make favor to[ΣΤ1]  the ecology by saving endangered animals and breeding them.

In conclusion as a quote says To every disadvantage there is a corresponding advantage. There are a lot of disadvantages of animal captivity but also a lot of advantages.

# data[].attributes.body
by George Tzampazis