# data[].attributes.body
1. good: related to audience
bad: too short
2. good: thanks faculty/ makes audience laugh
bad: was short
3.  good: very enthusiastic
bad: a little too enthusiastic

# data[].attributes.body
1. (mcraven) Good: Related to audience
Bad: Short and a tad disjointed
2. (Damon) Good: Humbles himself, says who he is, Bad: didn't speak much of his achievements
3.(oprah) good: uses comedy, Bad: Pauses are distracting.

# data[].attributes.body
1)  mcraven
good: uses humor and engages with audience
bad: it wasn't too long / short
2)  damon
good: humor / cracked a joke
bad: kinda lost me at the end
3) oprah
good: very enthusiastic & high energy
bad:  could've had better formatting

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Good: (Mcraven) Thanks facility and jokes about his graduation.

2. Bad:(Damon) Starts with a confusing improvised intro talking about the class of 1966

3. Good: (Oprah) Yelling ropes you in especially when it's oprah winfrey

# data[].attributes.body
- He tries to relate to his audience by using the party reference. (McRavon)
- Matt Damon uses humor in terms of talking about his role of being a horse
- Oprah had a lot of energy and enthusiasm which made people smile like the guy in the back.
- Matt Damon seemed to be very nervous and seemed a little serious.

# data[].attributes.body
They all gave thanks to the people who introduced them
He gave the audience something to clap for. Mcraven, made jokes.
Damon didn't make sense.
They tried to make a connection to the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Matt Daemon: Talks about his graduation day to relate with the audience
Craven: Uses humor and a casual tone to engage the audience
Opera: Talks about how hard it is to get in the school to connect with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Matt Damon good icebreaker/joke about cartoon horse. But reference to class of 1966 was unclear/weird

# data[].attributes.body
1. (mcraven) They made a good connection with the audience right away
2. (Damon) good: they made the audience laugh which made them engage.bad: it was short
3. (oprah) Good: She used humor
bad: she was a little loud

# data[].attributes.body
#1 Good: Good Connection with the audience. They could of made it a little longer
#2 Bad: was kind of confusing in where he was coming from
#3 Good: Had a nice enthusiastic voice. Didn't have a nice intro.

# data[].attributes.body
1. (McRaven)Good jokes to connect with the audience
2. (Matt Damon)Makes jokes, but discredits himself
3. (Orpah) She was very excited to be there, but not many jokes

# data[].attributes.body
1.  William mcraven thanks facility jokes about how the speech he was given at his graduation.

2. Matt Damen, confused why he talked about the class of 1966 and then goes to he playing as a cartoon horse.

3. Oprah, A lot of excitement that came from her

# data[].attributes.body
Matt Damon uses a a good joke/ icebreaker to start the speach, audience was engaged and laughed.

Mcraven's tone is extremely rigid and felt too serious compared to his story.

# data[].attributes.body
1) he related to his audience and makes a few jokes
2) Matt Damon makes jokes about how other commencement speeches have better speakers.
3)Oprah Winfrey was excited but I was a little lost because she didn't really connect with the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Macraven- Good: Made some good jokes/ icebreaking comments
Bad:  A little short
2. Matt Damon- Good: Again some really good jokes
Bad: The way he was talk was "choppy" meaning he was constantly stopping
3. Ophera- Good: Was ver enthusiastic
Bad: No real icebreaker

# data[].attributes.body
#1 made jokes and was very talkative with audience(Mccraven)
#2 Made it very easy to engage with their intro but didn’t make much sence.(Damon)
#3 a lot of enthusiasm with tone of voice.(Oprah)

# data[].attributes.body
What I liked about Mcraven was how he added a relating humor about partying the night before. It created a connection with the graduates.
I liked how Matt Damon used a self deprecating joke that was tasteful. He used irony in talking about him doing a voice over when he has done better work.
I liked how Oprah thanked everyone very thoughtfully, but I wished she had added a better, more engaging hook.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Very well connection, humor -Mcraven
2. Very well he was humble  had good emotions making the audience laugh- Matt Damon
3. Sounded a bit nervous was engaged but not the best hook was excited with her voice -Ophera

# data[].attributes.body
William McRaven: relating to the graduating class
Matt Damon:  explained who he is. That people could have grown up watching him.
Oprah Winfrey . loud introduction

# data[].attributes.body
McRaven, connected with the audience with his experience

Matt, a bad thing is he didn't really seem to prepared, and his voice sounded like he didn't really want to be there.

# data[].attributes.body
William Mcraven.  Connects with the audience through humor, short
Matt Damon. Funny but relies to much on jokes
Oprah. Very enthusiastic, funny, serious, kind of throw you into the speech abruptly.

# data[].attributes.body
Matt Damon: something that worked was having jokes which made the audience laugh and stay engaged

William McRaven: something that could be worked on is his tone of voice to keep the crowd up and alive.