# data[].attributes.body
Chief Justice
- John G. Roberts, Jr
Associate Justices
- John Paul Stevens
- Antonin Scalia
- Samuel A. Alito, Jr
- Stephen G. Breyer
- David H. Souter
- Clarence Thomas
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg

# data[].attributes.body
This was a court case the came from Joseph Frederick, he's a kid who decided to hang up a banner with the words "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" The principal of his school suspended him for 10 days. After being suspended Frederick sued claiming that his his first amendment right, freedom of speech, was violated.

# data[].attributes.body
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled the punishment unconstitutional

# data[].attributes.body
The petitioner believes that they were in the right due to the fact that the schools campus was in their jurisdiction and according to the law the can do whatever they need to keep the school in order. The respondent things that since the event that occurred had didn't need to be attended or to be done on school grounds that it shouldn't be a punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Does a school official have qualified immunity from a damages lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 when, in accordance with school policy, she disciplines a student for displaying a banner with a drug reference at a school-supervised event? Not found yet

2. Does the First Amendment allow to prohibit students from displaying messaged promoting the use of illegal drugs at school supervised events? yes

# data[].attributes.body
The ruling was made by John G. Roberts, Jr
majority of them ruled that even though the student does have certain rights within the school it is crucial that the rights of the students have to be characterized by the schools environment to make it fair. Therefore the ruling was in favor of the petitioner.

# data[].attributes.body
- Stevens explains that due to the fact that the banner had no restrictions on restricting the speech on political or social issues it simply was a explicit statement for the environment that it was currently in.

# data[].attributes.body
This case might not be seen as a serious case but it still has its significance. This has to do with the freedoms of young adults. Yes the freedoms are given to you but in some cases those freedoms should have some restrictions depending on the place/enviroment to keep order.

# data[].attributes.body
It encourages the government to intervene in any incidents like this case.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.youtube.com/watch/n_LsGoDWC0o