# data[].attributes.body
The type fo rhetoric that the author used in 'Animals in Translation" was logos. I know this since their factual evidence they used connected to the way real life things run and included things like data and results from expiriements they did with janes' cat which supports logistic thinking which is why i would say that he used logos.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of logos the authors used is logos because they don't really use any type of emotions or any type of morals.

# data[].attributes.body
They used Logos
I know this because he repeatedly used evidence to back up his claim of the cat not having esp and supported it with reasoning like the cat hears Jane because she always talks to a doorman. the evidence would be that he asked her about the doorman and when she said she had on it made the evidence a for sure fact.

# data[].attributes.body
The Author in "Animals in Translation" uses Logos. I know this because an experiment was explained, Jane's cat was an example as well as the dog and how its movements showed that it wasn't ESP. The authors evidence was effective because it helped me understand how most people like scientist would believe that animals have ESP.

# data[].attributes.body
The rhetoric the author used was logos because they had a experiment on Jane's cat on whether the cat has ESP since the cat is always going to the door and waiting for Jane

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author in "Animals in Translation" was logos because he included factual evidence like data gathered during experiments. He also used ethos because he used the beliefs of the public since some people thought that cats had ESP. Their evidence was effective because it help back their claim that they didn't have ESP.

# data[].attributes.body
The author used logos. I know this because their was factual evidence that related to the topics in Animals in Translation. Also ethos was used because the story includes two sides of the argument, some thought the animals had ESP while the author didn't. Their evidence was effective because it appealed to the audience.

# data[].attributes.body
the type of rhetoric the author used in the article " Animals in Translation" was logos because there was many factual evidence that was related to the experiments made for the animals and didn't really have emotions shown. I know this because the experiment about Jane's cat hearing her talk to the doorman alerted the cat that shes was there in the building already.

# data[].attributes.body
they type of evidence that the author used was ethos and logos. Then author provided factual evidence from other sources and ethos by appealing to the morals of the audience. They appeal to the ethics of the audience by showing how cats don't have esp but just very heightened senses which was the authors belief. The effects of the pathos and ethos made a very persuasive argument for the point of view of the author allowing the readers to see that cats son't have special ESP powers.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric the author uses in "Animals in Translation" is logos. They use factual evidence to support their claim. Their way was effective because it is the strongest rhetoric to use when proving someone wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric the author used was logos because they provided, facts to support their claim and some examples in the real life world about how animals having a sensitive sensory apparatus. Their evidence was effective because facts usually appear to one's logic.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric the author in, "Animal in Translation", used was logos because they gathered information and facts from experiments to prove their claim, They also used ethos because they included beliefs of others that thought animals have ESP but was able to include information to support that they did not. Their evidence was effective because it
made the authors point more reasonable and helped support them.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author used in Animals in Translation was was logos because the author talked about a experiment that they did . The experiment was made up of information that they used

# data[].attributes.body
The rhetoric the author used was ethos because the author brought up personal experiences like the cat being able to tell time and comprehend a schedule.

The author's use of this evidence wasn't too effective. While it did state a real experience there are far too many variables to consider this as a reliable piece of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author used was logos. I know this because their logic was included and also means to convince the audience to their reasoning. With an experiment, he disagrees with animals having ESP. The author

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric the author used was Ethos because he entire article and theory about sensory apparatous is appealing to morals and what the owner of the cat does everyday, the owner always talks to the doorman as well as take the elevator. The Authors use of evidence was alright at best. This is because the author used morals to explain evidence, BUT, there is always a chance those morals change and or not happen for a little while.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author used in the article "Animals in Translation" was logos because they used multiple pieces of evidence to support their claims as well as evaluated animals and their movements. Their evidence was effective because it appealed to my logic and used facts to support their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the authors used was logos. This is because the authors used evidence from real world. They used the dog who always knew when the session with the client was over. Their evidence was effective because it was factual and it helped support/strengthen their claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors' form of rhetoric used in "Animals in Translation" is ethos, because the authors appear to the morals that you believe that animals have ESP but instead using evidence to explain that animals have extreme perception as they are able to know when an owner is coming and whether is it is them or not. By using Jane's cat as an example.

# data[].attributes.body
the type of rhetoric the author used was pathos.

# data[].attributes.body
Types of rhetoric that the author in the article "Animals in Translation" are a combination of logos and ethos, because the author adds scientific evidence of what might solve the mystery of Jane's Cat, but at the end the author also leaves it up to us to assume based on our morals like what we believe in.

# data[].attributes.body
The rhetoric that was used in "Animals in Translation" is a combination of logos and ethos because it's appealing to morals and stating facts. I know this because the story and theory about ESP appeals to morals while giving facts about why animals don't have ESP. They had plenty of evidence but it wasn't so credible because it didn't come from a credible source.

# data[].attributes.body
What is the meaning of life?
42

# data[].attributes.body
The author in 'Animals in Translation' uses Logos. I know this because an experiment explained, Jane's cat was an example and as well as the dog. The dog is an example because its movements showed that it wasn't ESP. The author as well used Ethos because it appealed to the morals

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the authors used in Animals in Translation was logos because the authors used a little bit of scientific evidence to prove that animals have animals have supersensitive sensory apparatus instead of ESP. They also used ethos by including a story about an owner and a cat, who can tell when their owner is coming home. Both of these pieces of evidence were effective because

# data[].attributes.body
The type of rhetoric that the author used was logos and ethos because he used his morals about animals and how they thought that they had ESP. The author also used logos because he used different sources to support their claim and also to evaluate. This is was effective because it made a persuasive argument in which he used multiple sources of evidence to prove this.

# data[].attributes.body
In "Animals in Translation" the authors had used was logos. This is because the authors had provided multiple pieces of evidence proving animals have a different way of percieiving the world. They had stated situations in which animals were able to tell time without looking at a clock and a situation in which talked about how a cat was able to predict when her owner was coming home. It, however, was not as effective as it could've been because many things were able to be said arguing against their claim.