# data[].attributes.headline
Trump Administration Officials Urged Furious Tillerson Not to Quit

# data[].attributes.subject
Trump Administration Officials Urged Furious Tillerson Not to Quit

# data[].attributes.body
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/353779-report-trump-administration-officials-urged-furious-tillerson-not-to

# data[].attributes.headline
University giving black students free tuition as apology for slavery

# data[].attributes.subject
University giving black students free tuition as apology for slavery

# data[].attributes.body
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:taxTA_757aIJ:www.therightwingportal.com/black-students-free-tuition/&num=1&hl=en&gl=us&strip=0&vwsrc=0

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
These estimates are calculated with data collected from employers in all industry sectors in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in every state and the District of Columbia.

Additional information, including the hourly and annual 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentile wages, is available in the downloadable XLS file.

Major Occupational Groups ( Note--clicking a link will scroll the page to the occupational group):

00-0000 All Occupations

11-0000 Management Occupations

13-0000 Business and Financial Operations Occupations

15-0000 Computer and Mathematical Occupations

17-0000 Architecture and Engineering Occupations

19-0000 Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

21-0000 Community and Social Service Occupations

23-0000 Legal Occupations

25-0000 Educational Instruction and Library Occupations

27-0000 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media Occupations

29-0000 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical Occupations

31-0000 Healthcare Support Occupations

33-0000 Protective Service Occupations

35-0000 Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations

37-0000 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance Occupations

39-0000 Personal Care and Service Occupations

41-0000 Sales and Related Occupations

43-0000 Office and Administrative Support Occupations

45-0000 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Occupations

47-0000 Construction and Extraction Occupations

49-0000 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair Occupations

51-0000 Production Occupations

53-0000 Transportation and Material Moving Occupations

To sort this table by a different column, click on the column header
About May 2022 National, State, Metropolitan, and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
(1) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.

(2) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a "year-round, full-time" hours figure of 2,080 hours; for those occupations where there is not an hourly wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.

(3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.

(4) Wages for some occupations that do not generally work year-round, full time, are reported either as hourly wages or annual salaries depending on how they are typically paid.

(5) This wage is equal to or greater than $115.00 per hour or $239,200 per year.
May 2022 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates May 2022 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates May 2022 Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates May 2022 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates May 2022 Occupation Profiles Technical notes

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
May 2022 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
These estimates are calculated with data collected from employers in all industry sectors in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in every state and the District of Columbia. Additional information, including the hourly and annual 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentile wages, is available in the downloadable XLS file.

# data[].attributes.body
http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/vaccines-caused-sons-autism/

# data[].attributes.body
www.havidol.com

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.cato.org/blog/federal-government-monopoly-worst-experiences

# data[].attributes.body
The Conversation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
BuzzFeed News; Getty Images

When eight people were shot at Burnett Chapel Church in Burnett, Tennessee, last week, an Idaho man posted a link to a news story on the shooting. "My church is a 'Guns Welcome' church," he wrote. "I pity the fool who would try something like this there." This man, a Facebook friend whom I won't name here, is a proud gun owner; in fact, he moved to Idaho in part because it's easier to own and carry guns there.

This friend articulated one of the main reasons why the gun control debate remains at an impasse even in the aftermath of dozens of mass shootings, including an attack on Sunday night at a country music festival in Las Vegas that killed more than 50 people and injured hundreds. Specifically: the deeply held belief, among many people in this country, that evil men with guns should be countered with righteous men with guns - or that evil is uncontrollable. It's the same idea that guides the training of teachers to wield rifles in a rural Idaho town and that allows the concealed carry of firearms on Idaho college campuses. At a public meeting held last week in Idaho, I saw the telling bulge of at least three concealed weapons.

This philosophy is not limited to Idaho: All 50 states permit concealed carry; 23 states allow individual institutions to decide gun laws on their campus; 10 additional states mandate that concealed carry must be allowed (with specific provisions). Most of the laws that permit guns on campus - or reverse bans on concealed carry - were introduced and passed in the aftermath of the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007. It's the pro-gun version of gun control: Protect Americans from bad people with guns by allowing more guns to circulate.

One side believes in the responsibility of the group to put controls in place that protect its individual members. The other believes, above all else, in the rights of the individual.

Whether or not you believe that philosophy, you can see how fundamentally discordant it is with the liberal belief that restrictions on access to guns - whether banning certain types of guns, mandating waiting periods, preventing certain individuals from obtaining guns, or eliminating public ownership of guns altogether - will decrease mass shootings, accidental shootings, homicides, and even suicides. Data, and comparisons to countries with tighter and/or complete gun control, supports these claims. Thus the declarations that percolate across social media after every mass shooting: "Why does anyone need a gun like this?" "Why do we keep letting this happen, when there's an obvious solution?"

With each mass shooting - and there have been 273 in 2017 alone - these oppositional philosophies harden. The same conversations, statistics, accusations, videos, memes, and, as Jamilah Lemieux put it on Twitter, "vague chatter about the mentally ill that doesn't lead to any action other than further stigmatizing the mentally ill," cycle through the media, then go dormant until the next mass shooting reactivates them.

The impasse remains, at least in part, because these discussions of gun control don't really address the deeper, seemingly intractable difference between the two sides - one that has everything to do with the way that each conceives of individual agency. Simply put, one side believes in the responsibility of the group to put controls in place that protect its individual members. The other believes, above all else, in the rights of the individual. What we're not talking about when we talk about gun control is just how difficult it is to for these viewpoints to meet in conversation.

For those opposed to government-mandated gun control, no limit will actually inhibit an individual who is set on committing violence. To impose any of those strictures, even on people with mental illnesses, would limit the inalienable rights of all citizens - making many answer for the actions of the few. That's why many gun advocates prefer to be called advocates for or "protectors" of the Second Amendment: Their answer to tragedy isn't more regulation, but more freedom. (Those in favor of gun control would counter that the first inalienable right outlined by the Declaration of Independence is the right to life, which is impinged upon by those who abuse their access to guns.)

These attitudes align fairly precisely with the two sides of the political spectrum. Liberal ideology supports governmental regulation in the name of the greater good, for higher taxes that pay for social safety nets, for universal health care. Each of those ideas is rooted in the belief that what happens to one of us happens to all of us, and measures should be put in place to ensure the greater good.

On the other side of the ideological spectrum, the conservative stance is rooted in the individual's ability and right to make decisions for themselves and their families, to decide how to spend the money they earn, to do the right thing, to use guns safely and correctly. One person shouldn't have to have to pay for others' mistakes, nor should their liberty be compromised because of the tresspasses of another. These ideas fuel the canny and successful messaging of the NRA, which calls itself "freedom's safest place" and incites membership by warning that "our rights are under attack like never before."

One position leans toward socialism, the other toward libertarianism, and our country has been built through compromises on both sides. The agreement that we'll pay taxes that fund schools even if we don't have children in them and the reliance on programs like Medicare and Social Security are all undergirded by a persistent belief in the American dream, which suggests that any person, of any race or religion or class or upbringing, can become a thriving member of society if they work hard enough.

The American democratic project survives through détente between left and right.

The American democratic project survives through détente between left and right, through the election of moderates who seem to reconcile both sides and extremists who balance each other out. It is often troubled, and never without conflict. But it endures, an assurance to voters that their philosophy of the country and their place in it remains intact.

But certain issues - Obamacare and gun control foremost among them - are increasingly treated by many conservatives as warning shots, threats to the integrity of the entire enterprise. Within this logic, a move to curtail gun ownership is a move to curtail liberty, full stop. That's why so many politicians currently making inroads from the the far right label themselves "liberty-minded": They have pledged to prevent the first rock from sliding down the slippery slope toward government control. They do more than pledge it - they make it a centerpiece of their campaigns. This then forces their opponents in both primary and general elections to pick a side, which often means reassuring people that they aren't out to take away anyone's all-American rights.

In the dozens of states that aren't solidly blue, to come out for even limited gun control dooms you as a conservative candidate, and severely hobbles a moderate hoping for independent voters. When Montana Democrat Rob Quist ran to replace Ryan Zinke, the newly appointed secretary of the interior, in the House, on a platform that included the registration of assault rifles, he was painted as a gun control fanatic. Montana Sen. Jon Tester, a Democrat in a state that voted overwhelmingly for Trump, has repeatedly pledged to "stand up to anyone - Republican or Democrat - who wants to take away Montanans' gun rights."

These examples are deeply Montanan, and Montana, like so much of the Mountain West, is a state where guns do have a utilitarian role. But for hundreds of federal, state, and local legislators outside of liberal enclaves, to sign on to gun control - even in the wake of a tragedy as massive as the one in Las Vegas - would translate, come election time, as an effort not to protect the lives of others, but to curtail the freedom of all. The NRA, which contributed to the campaigns of 293 sitting US legislators and issues a "grade" to each candidate - works tirelessly to ensure as much.

On Monday morning, Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat and leading voice in the gun control movement, tweeted the following: "To my colleagues: your cowardice to act cannot be whitewashed by thoughts and prayers. None of this ends unless we do something to stop it." But there's a reason that some are already floating the idea of Tester - a working farmer and "gravel road" Democrat who appeals to moderates on both sides - as the future of the Democratic Party.

Of course, some politicians could swallow their future personal defeat in the name of a greater law - that's what dozens of Democrats did in order to get Obamacare through the House, knowing full well how their vote would be framed when they faced reelection. But that supposition returns us to the fundamental difference at the heart of the two positions and, by extension, two Americas: One believes in the ability of the government to create safety, even if it entails sacrifices, small and large, on the part of the individual. The other believes those sacrifices, and the incremental increases in safety they cannot even guarantee to provide, are simply not worth the compromise of their liberty.

We return to this bitter, circular debate because it's not, at heart, about guns.

When Stephen Paddock opened fire in Las Vegas, Jason Aldean, one of the biggest acts in country music, was onstage. His current hit, "They Don't Know," is about the judgment people from cities pass on small towns: "They think it's a middle of nowhere place where we take it slow," he sings, "but they don't know." Country music is rooted in the virtues of ruralness, and plenty of artists have made brash hits out of small-town pride. But Aldean's song is a somber, almost mournful one: "They don't know a thing / About what it takes / Livin' this way," the chorus repeats.

There's anger when people don't understand your way of life - for instance, when then-presidential candidate Barack Obama declared that small-town resentment and economic anxiety had led citizens to "cling to guns or religion." But there's also an abiding sadness. The day after Aldean fled the stage, we return to this bitter, circular debate because it's not, at heart, about guns. Through decades of Westerns, through the fetishization of the Constitution, through ideological maneuvering on the part of the NRA, guns have become signifiers - deadly ones, but signifiers nonetheless - of the American ideal of personal freedom. A gun rights advocate might not put it that way, but they would likely tell you, when you argue that no one "needs" a gun, or that gun control measures won't impede upon the larger right to bear arms, that you just don't get it.

This weekend's shooting in Las Vegas, like the dozens of others over the past year, and the hundreds more over the last two decades, is a tragedy. On that, both sides agree. But people will continue to die until the two sides of the issue can actually have a conversation with each other. Like so many issues in American politics, this debate is ultimately driven by fear - of losing life, or losing a way of life. And until those on each side can honestly face what they're afraid of, neither will feel safe. ●

Anne Helen Petersen is a senior culture writer for BuzzFeed News. Petersen has a Ph.D. from the University Of Texas and wrote her dissertation on the gossip industry.

Contact Anne Helen Petersen at anne.helen.petersen@buzzfeed.com.

Got a confidential tip? Submit it here.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Do We Keep Having The Same Argument About Guns?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When eight people were shot at Burnett Chapel Church in Burnett, Tennessee, last week, an Idaho man posted a link to a news story on the shooting. "My church is a 'Guns Welcome' church," he wrote. "I pity the fool who would try something like this there."

# data[].attributes.headline
Administration Officials Urge Tillerson- Angel V

# data[].attributes.subject
Administration Officials Urge Tillerson- Angel V

# data[].attributes.body
Accuracy: The information provided can be found elsewhere off of nbc news which is a well respected news source with a long history of reliable news. NBC verified the information and makes the article's information reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
cato.com
3
purpose- to give an emotional appeal about the vaccines given to her son. to warn people about the dangers of them
credibility- not much. she doesn't know the science behind the vaccines or if her son would've had autism either way.

# data[].attributes.headline
Trump Administration Urged Furious Tillerson Not to Quit 

# data[].attributes.subject
Trump Administration Urged Furious Tillerson Not to Quit 

# data[].attributes.body
Dylan Sachs
7/10
Poor website design, with a lot of ads and links to other articles surrounding the article.

# data[].attributes.body
6/10
Accuracy/Credibility: This source contains a considerable amount of bias. The author is a economist and is a very credible man, but the stance that you take will always leak into your writing. This text was written to inform people and be a database for how the government is getting too powerful. The info comes from NextGov, which is a questionable source.

# data[].attributes.body
Ali
0

Accuracy: it gives no specific facts and it only talks about the debt owed to black people without giving any specific statistics.

# data[].attributes.body
0/10
RyanAveryAngel
The website has the phrase "right-wing" in it. It uses personal opinions, has absolutely no facts, statistics, or evidence, and shows so much ignorance in every possible statement without showing anything but contempt for logic and reason. Poor website design doesn't help, poor writing skills detract, generally a poor article (that also contains some fairly illegitimate opinions). It is a white man saying that black people do not face any inequality at all, and even before this becomes an abhorrent moral argument and a horrible ethical debate, it has no credibility to begin with.

# data[].attributes.body
By Meg
0/10
Purpose:
to prove the army's football team is  kneeling during the national anthem
Accuracy:
When the national anthem starts at the beginning of the game the football team can't go all the way to the touchdown zone, so in turn they weren't kneeling during the national anthem, even if they were kneeling

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan/Avery/Angel
0/10

If you google it the first result says how it's a popular internet scam and a play on the word "have it all" to treat a fake personality disorder. Also, their website advertises buying it as a gift. Pretty poor

# data[].attributes.body
3/10
The purpose was to ridicule a side of the debate in order to make a point. Because the person is anonymous they have practically no authority. Finally the context for this picture is not given- the team may or may not be kneeling for the anthem, or a multitude of other relevant details that effect her implied meaning,

# data[].attributes.body
2
purpose- to advertise a drug for dsacdad
accuracy- not much, it isn't a credible sight and it isn't a prescription drug
authority-none
credibility- none
design- this site is designed to advertise a product not really giving credible information on it

# data[].attributes.body
Information is self reciprocating, meaning it is its only source of credibility. other doctors forums have debunked this drug also.

# data[].attributes.body
3/10

Accuracy- It is just a picture, their is no evidence saying that these teams are kneeling during the pledge, so the conclusion that was made is in accurate

# data[].attributes.body
Accuracy: The source implies that the Army football team took knees during the national anthem because they used a current debate question in their post. The picture was misused as they were praying before one of their games with no relationship to the national anthem. According to Snopes.com they were praying in the picture.

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
Purpose- To promote limited government which highlights their political bias.
Authority- This limited government think tank has been around since 1977 which suggests that they have experience and/or are knowledgeable about the policies they promote.

# data[].attributes.headline
Vaccine's Caused my Son's Autism- Mason Herbet

# data[].attributes.subject
Vaccine's Caused my Son's Autism- Mason Herbet

# data[].attributes.body
2/10
Accuracy/Credibility: This web-article was created by a bunch of parents who wanted to raise awareness about vaccines and autism. Most evidence comes from personal experiences which hold bias and only a small amount of credibility, and it seems like the parents are trying to blame a well-qualified procedure with false evidence. Adding to the non-credibility, the website is poorly made and shows how much effort is put into the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
1/10
Information about this medicine can only be found on the HAVIDOL website. The only other information about it is that it is a fake drug and is used to treat a fake illness, (Reuters). The purpose of this source is to sell people with DSACDAD the drug HAVIDOL. This is a fake sight with no credibility.

# data[].attributes.headline
Instagram picture-raechle stronko, sika, and sophia

# data[].attributes.subject
Instagram picture-raechle stronko, sika, and sophia

# data[].attributes.body
1
purpose- to post fake news, possibly make a team look bad?
authority-none
accuracy-none they are kneeling to pray before their game
credibility-none
design-the site is designed to let anyone post pictures with any captions

# data[].attributes.body
Dylan Sachs
2/10
Authority- The person who wrote this article made it to persuade people that vaccines cause autism. Her stance was based purely on her own experience and the experience of people she knows.

# data[].attributes.body
Ryan/Avery/Angel
Purpose: To describe results of a survey in which the government was viewed as being too large in size
Accuracy: Unprovable. The paper it is based off of is a policy analysis and an opinion poll with few details.
Authority: Questionable. Cato Institute is a Libertarian think tank, and while it is generally regarded as a good think tank, it is Libertarian, who supports small government to a drastic extent. Thus, having a study saying it's too large seems sketchy.
Currency: July 25, 2015. Somewhat old, especially because opinion polls can heavily change over time
Design: elegant and elaborate; does not deface the overall credibility

# data[].attributes.headline
Vaccines Caused My Son's Autism- 2/10 Sophia, Sika, Raechle

# data[].attributes.subject
Vaccines Caused My Son's Autism- 2/10 Sophia, Sika, Raechle

# data[].attributes.body
Accuracy- The claim that vaccines cause autism has been debunked several times before by credible research
Authority- The people of the site are a small group of parents that seem to be presenting Autism as a curse of sorts and supporting it with faulty science

# data[].attributes.body
1/10
Hannah
Purpose: This website was made to sell people Havidol for  DSACDAD.
Accuracy:  DSACDAD is actually not a real mental illness. When one looks for it online it's just said to be a  " parody campaign for a fictional medication to treat a fake psychological disorder called Dysphoric Social Attention Consumption Deficit Anxiety Disorder. "

# data[].attributes.body
4/10
Avery Millard

Purpose: Vaccines cause autism because her children got autism after getting vaccinated.

Accuracy:  Snopes.com declared the article stating vaccines raising autism levels by 340% false.

Authority:  it was made by a mother on a free lance blog post

Currency: Made in 2014, so facts could have changed.

Design: The website has lots of propaganda talking about refusing vaccinations for autism.

# data[].attributes.headline
Wages by Occupation and Gender 10 Sophia

# data[].attributes.subject
Wages by Occupation and Gender 10 Sophia

# data[].attributes.body
Authority- Verified government website with trustworthy statistics.
Currency- Information is updated accordingly to maintain accuracy

# data[].attributes.body
By Meg
10/10
Purpose: to show the wages between the sexes in most of the well known occupation in america
Authority: it is by the government and only consists of statistics and numbers based on the data provided, they gain nothing from being wrong so taking their word isn't a bad idea.

# data[].attributes.headline
Wages by Occupation and Gender 10/10 Connor & Liam

# data[].attributes.subject
Wages by Occupation and Gender 10/10 Connor & Liam

# data[].attributes.body
Purpose: Analysis of labor statistics in the US.
Accuracy: Highly credible due to the fact that it is a government sponsored source.
Authority: It is quite literally information gathered by the government.
Currency: As of May 2016, the government gathered this data from the once every four years census.
Design: This website is function over aesthetics and definitely gets the information across.

# data[].attributes.body
10/10

Purpose: As a public record of employment and wages in the United States
Accuracy: Any sources that provide information relating to this relies on the BLS as their primary source of information.
Authority: It is by the government and consists of entirely public records. Government records are legally required to be accurate. In addition, they gain nothing from inaccuracy except for a loss of trust.
Currency: May of 2016 - certainly current for financial details as these normally take time to process
Design: Designed well, very simply yet clean. Government run, so government organized: no frills, no ads, but professionally done

# data[].attributes.body
9/10

Purpose: To give the public access to analysis of statistics about wages and jobs

Accuracy: All of the other sources that provide information on this topic use the Bureau of Labor Statistics' information.

Authority - The agency is part of the government and is legally required to be accurate. There is no bias so they don't gain anything by being inaccurate.

Currency - The article is very current.

Design - The design is pretty good. It is a boring site but it is run by the government so it is simple and straight to the point.

# data[].attributes.body
Score the source on a scale from 1-10. 10=Extremely credible/believable.  1=All lies!

Provide an explanation for your score using one of the elements of PAACD. Every group should evaluate every source once. Try to attach your evaluation to the source's box thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Purpose - What was the site created for? Why does it exist? Try the "About us" page if there is one.

Accuracy - Can the information be verified anywhere else? Is it accurate? Can you find other sites with the same info?

Authority - Why should the creators of the site be believed? Who are they? Do they have a reputation? Is it good? Do they have a history?

Currency - When was it made? Is there more current information? Has it been debunked?

Design - What's the design of the website? Does the design speak to the website's credibility? How is it organized?

# data[].attributes.headline
BLS May 2015 National Occupation Employment (Sika, Sophia, Raechle)

# data[].attributes.subject
BLS May 2015 National Occupation Employment (Sika, Sophia, Raechle)

# data[].attributes.body
9/10 Government website to educate & record employment data. However, these statistics are from 2015 so they are only relatively current with today's job market.

# data[].attributes.body
5
Purpose- This is trying to inform you that they government is not doing a god job.
Accuracy-  It's very biased towards the point of view of bad government. However it does give an accurate survey with a decent sample size.
Authority: the author give no credentials.
Currency: It is current since it was published September 6, 206
Design: Poorly designed since it only gives one point of view

# data[].attributes.headline
Report: Trump administration officials urged furious Tillerson not to quit- Ben Bosley

# data[].attributes.subject
Report: Trump administration officials urged furious Tillerson not to quit- Ben Bosley

# data[].attributes.body
8/10
This source gives accurate information that can be found on other news sites such as NBC.com, which is a reputable news source. This article was posted very recently, it was posted yesterday. This shows that the information in the article is not outdated and it is current information. This source has some bias which is why i gave it a 8. It has some left wing bias.

# data[].attributes.body
5/10

Salon gave a ton of facts but there was pretty clearly a bias leaning towards the left. There was little credibility and no citations for their evidence. The article is extremely recent though so the currency of it is good. The website is professional and well laid out.

# data[].attributes.body
5/10
The purpose of The Right Wing Portal is to report news from a conservative perspective. In addition, the quotes they use line up with past statements the subject has said. This being said they lose credibility because of their design, and heavy bias.

# data[].attributes.headline
Free Tuition To Black Students - Jammie Scott

# data[].attributes.subject
Free Tuition To Black Students - Jammie Scott

# data[].attributes.body
0/10

The article has no evidence or facts. Its based off of personal opinions and feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
7/10
Hannah
Accuracy- Salon gave mostly facts on this issue, but there were some opinions embedded in. When the company was researched it is claimed to have a slightly left perspective.

# data[].attributes.headline
Gun Control Will not Stop Mass Shootings

# data[].attributes.subject
Gun Control Will not Stop Mass Shootings

# data[].attributes.body
Angel V
Authority: The author of the source is a West Point graduate and has a 50 year career in journalism. Salon is a program that has been standing since 1995 and is even a public company. The source is somewhat credible because of its credentials but is not popular and has a political bias

# data[].attributes.body
4
credibility- not much,  their evidence isn't cited so its not for sure where they got it from
however it is very recent so that contributes to the accuracy of the article

# data[].attributes.headline
Tillerson Article- Sophia, Sika Raechle 7/10

# data[].attributes.subject
Tillerson Article- Sophia, Sika Raechle 7/10

# data[].attributes.body
Currency-  Information is recent and is not outdated, could be supported or debunked easily
Accuracy- Can be confirmed from other sources and is considered accurate even from information from before the event

# data[].attributes.body
This source is is credible on the grounds that it is organized, it was posted on September 6th, and its source is a government website.