# data[].attributes.body
I always refer to Purdue's OWL: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

# data[].attributes.body
I do have to say that 800 words is very short to combine all the different concepts and definitions. However, this forces be to be succinct. Should I be presenting this paper as a presentation, I could then further explain. But I think that even a newbie would be able to 'get' the main definitions via my simpler, shorter definitions of them.

# data[].attributes.body
While my opening sounded like I was in disbelief about spaces built around radical hospitality, my paper goes on to agree that places are built on this. While paragraph one is my argument and hook and paragraph two key definitions and how I see them interconnected, paragraph three introduces and explains GIC. Paragraph four then drives home the point of multiliteracies with more references, which is the nexus of community building and sharing at GIC. My closing paragraph gravitates back to Campano and my favorite, most moving quotes. I then weave in Sepulveda to help connect explicitly to empathetic fusion.

# data[].attributes.body
From class forums I had been writing a lot and the definitions were unfolding. This paper required me to succinctly define terms: radical hospitality; proper distance; cosmopolitan literacies; multiliteracies; ontology of place. The only concept not defined is precarity in this effort.

# data[].attributes.body
Using texts, quotes and paraphrasing, I then shared what seems like experience with GIC. However, everything mentioned about the details of what is being done at GIC can be found online or in publication. However, my unpacking of GIC's work utilized LCLE discourse from these texts.

# data[].attributes.body
While I brought in five references, I connect Campano to Hawkins through stance: interdependence and ontology of place. As this is the key to sharing how GIC is also a place of interdependence, I then go on to talk about some key muliliteracies that help community members develop proper distance techniques through fusing empatheticaly with each other.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. My paper challenges (yet supports) Campano's book

# data[].attributes.subject
2. My paper challenges (yet supports) Campano's book

# data[].attributes.body
"In Partnering with Immigrant Communities, Campano et al. share about designing a space of radical hospitality. But is it really possible to design a place of hospitality in a space of precarity? How do strangers from multiple cultures, different generations and with different languages and literacies negotiate proper distance to create community?"

I go on to argue that GIC is such a space using Campano and four other references. In my Rubric Feedback, I shared: "I really wanted to extend this topic with more support on agency, postcolonial agency and subaltern spaces but felt I had already covered too much in 800 words. So I chose to make an editing decision on this to leave them out."

Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Welch, B. J. (2016). Partnering with immigrant communities: Literacy through action.

Hawkins, M. R. (2014). Ontologies of place, creative meaning making and critical cosmopolitan education. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 90-112.

Hull, G. A., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2014). Cosmopolitan literacies, social networks, and “proper distance”: Striving to understand in a global world.Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 15-44.

Sepúlveda III, E. (2011). Toward a pedagogy of Acompañamiento: Mexican migrant youth writing from the underside of modernity. Harvard Educational Review, 81(3), 550-573.

Vasudevan, L. M. (2014). Multimodal cosmopolitanism: Cultivating belonging in everyday moments with youth. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 45-67.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 700-800 words, typed, double-spaced
2. paper should take the form of an argument supported by evidence from academic texts used in this class.
3. reflecting on the thematic readings,

and how they might relate to one another,

what significance they have for me
4. It is an argument that you create and defend with supporting evidence from class texts, in your own voice, and with your own experience used sparingly.
5. Explain briefly how the authors develop their perspectives on the topic or issue you have identified, and offer your own analysis of the author’s ideas.
6. Explain why the points you mentioned are important, or why you agree or disagree with the authors.
7. In academic genres, the expectation is that the reader is unfamiliar with the issue involved and that support comes in the form of evidence from academic texts.
8. Use referencing and citation conventions correctly and consistently.  For more information on this, refer to the American Psychological Association (APA) Style Manual.

# data[].attributes.body
In our Discussion Thread we were challenged to write about our Reaction Paper topic in 15 minutes or less. This is my writing:

I think I am going to write about Gwangju International Center using Campano. et al, specifically chapters 2 (Aquinas Center: Designing a Space of Radical Hospitality) and 7 (Multiliteracies, the Arts and Postcolonial Agency). I would like to show how GIC is a space of radical hospitality both for expats and locals Koreans. I will also bring in some of Hull about hospitality and proper distance. Additionally, I will outline GIC's all volunteer-run monthly magazine of Gwangju News to show the multiliteracies of the multicultural volunteer team and how Gwangju's unique position in Korean history and democracy is the foundation for a project such as GN that documents the revitalization of Gwangju from the political oppression of the 1980s democratization movement.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the pic to make it bigger.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the paper below to read.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Submitted Reaction Paper on Readings Lisak