# data[].attributes.body
This Video is about The Saphir-Whorf hypothesis, It is a structure of language that create perceptions and understanding of time and space and matters. How different language have different words because of culture. and this video tells us how language determines how we see the world and language determine how we think.

# data[].attributes.body
The video talks of the Saphir-Whorf hypothesis, a theory of linguistic relativity. Basically how different languages have varying words or phrases due to culture. How the same thing can be very different due to differences in culture, time or place.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, language in itself is so varied from culture to culture and the different languages that exist. Some languages hold more of a hierarchy in it's nouns, some languages speak of the world in different ways than others. All in all languages have a pivotal role in how people understand and see the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Saphir-Whorf hypothesis is a fantastic example to analyze what the connections and the relationship between language and culture is. Language differentiates greatly on how much a culture values something, for example the filipino language has 92 different words for rice simply because they value rice much more than western cultures do. Same with the arabic language with camels (amongst others) and the mandarin language having a word that means respect for elders. Language is built around culture and built around values, therefore the saphic-whorf hypothesis would be extremely helpful in trying to fully understand language and culture and it's relation.

# data[].attributes.body
The video tells us that language can change people's perception towards the world and in different cultures and languages people see the world differently from other cultures and languages, this is called the sapir whorf hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
the video is about the saphir-whorf hypotheses that states languange can affect the way we see the world.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe so, language affects the way we see the world because we each have our own different cultures and languages, our different cultures affect our languages and interpret their own meanings to the languages, for example as shown in the video the Philippines have 92 different words for rice therefore their culture values rice than the other cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
Restrictions within our thought process due to language comes as no surprise. The way we think and the way we understand things is wholly dependent on the language we know and the language we're familiar with. Even with informal languages that are made up within communities, those informalities can make ripples in our thought process and change it bit by bit. The easiest example is probably languages using future present and past tenses amongst others.

# data[].attributes.body
This video tells us about how language can change one's point of view on a certain object or culture. "Language influences the ways that members of a culture see the world." This is called the Sapir - Whorf Hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Because language affect the way we see the world, and each one of us come from different cultures which affect our languages and interpret their own meanings to the languages.

# data[].attributes.body
Not only does the video talk about what the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis means - that language is a fundamental part in how we perceive the world, but it also deconstructs the theory into two aspects of the theory that explains the relationship between language, culture, and perceptions: the linguistic determinism and relativism.

# data[].attributes.body
The hypothesis is a great tool to analyse the relationship between culture and language because as seen in the video culture affects how their language is made, the meanings and interpretations of their language is unique to different cultures as well so each culture have different values of things and it is affected by the language of the cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
Since some cultures have different languages which affects how people see the world i believe language can also restrict someone's thought process, for example some languages who don't use future tenses may not see time the way we do.

# data[].attributes.body
yes, I do believe language can influence the way a person can understand the world. Language is used the same way but people say it differently (each culture has their own) in which, with different language and cultural background, something can be described or seen as more important in a certain culture than another.

# data[].attributes.body
Definitely, I believe that the construction of language itself is based on cultural aspects of a certain community, therefore, by speaking a certain language, we are embracing how one culture perceives the world. A simple example to represent this would be to compare how the term "older sibling" is presented in the English and Indonesian language. "Older Sibling" has a diverse selection of words in the Indonesian language, which ultimately encourages the culture of respecting those older than us. But the English language does not have a specific word to be used for calling another person, thus, how they perceive sibling-relationship would be different.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the importance of something in a certain culture can be described and understood by language as it is a tool in which people can understand and value things more. I do believe that language and culture are connected in which we need both of language and culture to understand language and culture itself. the sapir-whorf hypothesis could be useful in which language does helps us understand the world which is full of various cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
sapir-whorf hypothesis is a really great way

# data[].attributes.body
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is an efficient and elaborate tool to analyse the relationship between language and culture as it clearly illustrates that they are dependent on each other (influence one another). Learning a new culture would instantly require us to understand the cultural context behind it, thus the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is an appropriate and reliable tool to understand or further analyse the relationship between language and culture.

# data[].attributes.body
The Saphir-Whorf hypothesis breaks down the impact that language has towards an individual's perception/experience in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
The sapir-whorf hypothesis is a very useful way to analyse the relationship between language and culture.

# data[].attributes.body
I think language does both expand our perception of the world and at the same time, limit our thought process because our way of thinking is shaped by the cultures that we are accustomed with. To embrace a new information, it's likely that there will initial resistance before we become familiar with it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think language can help us to build a better and wider perspective of the world and understand more about other cultures and also in order to understand our culture more.

# data[].attributes.body
This video talks about the phenomenon that language determines the way a native speaker perceives a thing or experience. This is known as the Sapir-whorf hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
The Saphir-Whorf hypothesis is about how language can impact people’s perception on how we see the world

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, language can either slightly or majorly influence the way different native speakers understands and perceives the world. Since language is the tool that allows communication and cooperation in the world the lack or addition of some words can make certain languages unable to fully connect or relate with one another. This means that some cultures won't comprehend words that are inexistent in their language since it isn't something that is considered relevant or important.

# data[].attributes.body
Tannen explores how language or communication is viewed differently by males and females. To females, communication is done for interaction (thus the general conception that females are talkative). The foundation of female friendships are built by sharing each other how we feel because the habit we are used to experiencing as a young age is to express our thoughts and emotions. This is contradicting to males who communicate to exchange information and raised with the habit to keep their private thoughts and feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
The video mainly talks about how the structure of language influences the interpretation and perception of a native speaker.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, I think language can influence the way a person understand the world. Living things use language to communicate with others. People around the world use language, but not all people use the same language. So, since language are diverse base on their cultures, language can be differently interpreted by different cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
The sapir-whorf hypothesis is a great way of looking at and analysing the relationship between culture and language. Since the hypothesis believes that language impacts and influences the way people perceive the world, it must also mean that different cultures see things differently not only in terms of tradition, arts and beliefs but also regarding language. For example cultures that view music as of great importance would likely have some distinct words that form around music.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is true that in some cases language can definitely restrict our thought process. Not having a conceptual understanding of a certain topic due to a lack of words around it would disregard it completely. To put it simply we wouldn't think about things that we don't understand.

# data[].attributes.body
The argument states that female and males have different ways in which expressing feelings and thoughts. Women are proven to be more talkative and use language in order to interact with people, while men uses language for information rather than interaction. These different approach towards language somehow affects relationships either romantically or not. The evidence in my own environment could be seen on how me and my friends interact, especially the girls, in how our conversation goes on and how we deliver our thoughts and feelings, rather than it is with boys.

# data[].attributes.body
By the way that Tannen state how women and men both have different ways in approaching language, seems to have the same concept as the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, in which language determined how us, humans view the world. As women sees language as could be a form of interaction, while men uses language as a form of information makes it different in the way they deliver their thoughts and feelings and how they use language in different purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like both cultures and language influence each other. Both influence each other to in which cultures involve with language as part of it and how language in terms of slang or many more new terms in language is highly impacted due to the constant evolving of culture. Social Interaction somehow is a big part of this constant evolving of both cultures and language.

# data[].attributes.body
As it is a hypothesis that the structure of a language determines a native speaker's perception and categorization of experience, it really discusses linguistic relativity and how that affects various speakers' world view or cognition, and thus makes people's perceptions are relative to their spoken language.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, since their study claims that speakers of different languages see the world differently because of that. Though, there is also culture that is involved and factored into this. One’s culture, traditions, lifestyle, and habits that are picked up from the people they interact with simply shapes the way they think and talk. Approximately 7000 different languages are spoken around the globe today. What is especially interesting is that each of them possess certain unique qualities which appear to be reflected in the way its speakers lead their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Our language influences and shapes our cultural reality by limiting our thought processes. The term culture refers to the beliefs, norms, and values exhibited by a society and that can be thought of as a lens through which we experience the world and develop shared meaning. It follows that the language that we use is created in response to cultural needs. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis states that how we look at the world is largely determined by our thought processes. It follows that our language shapes our reality. Since it theorizes that our language use shapes our perspective of the world, it follows that people who speak different languages have different world views.

# data[].attributes.body
Whether all human beings think in a similar way, regardless of the language they use to convey their thoughts, or the language we speak affects the way we think, there will always be people who have strong opinions about it. Me, personally, can agree to this statement because prior to learning Indonesian back in my formative years, I used to have a lot of trouble even just understanding what my family was saying around me. Eventually, I started speaking it through various forms of media and familiarized myself with my own country’s culture and society, ultimately opening up my mind to Indonesian and Muslim views, which I have implemented in the years to come and have been very helpful to me since.

# data[].attributes.body
From the story, I can see what it is trying to say. Both men and women have traits that can lead each other to gain and have very different views of a particular situation. The problem can be stemmed from contrasting approaches. Like, too many men will complain while women often look for emotional support. But to avoid this kind of misunderstanding, they should make adjustments. A woman may observe what a man desires without seeing it as rejection and a man can understand what a woman desires without feeling like it’s manipulative intrusion. If they perceive someone is trying to cause them to indirectly do something, they feel manipulated and will respond more resentfully than they would to a straightforward request. In trying to prevent fights, some women refuse to oppose the will of others in an open environment, whether it be a loved one or not. But sometimes it’s far more effective to assert themselves, even at the risk of being dragged into conflict. However, learning others’ ways of talking is a leap across the communication gap between both men and women, and a giant step towards a more genuine understanding. But in my perspective, I have come across this before many times, mostly in my family, when we’re talking to each other. Though, it’s almost never anything serious, just minor annoyances and such.

# data[].attributes.body
Language plays a big role in our lives, so with the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis arguing that the language we speak determines how we see the world and either restricts or bolsters our ability to understand it, it can seemingly ignite both arguments and interest among other prominent linguists. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that language either determines or influences one’s thoughts. Today, it’s believed by many that there may be some aspects of perception affected by language, but the idea that a mother tongue can restrict understanding has largely been disagreed with. But on the other hand, there’s also evidence that the language-associated habits we acquire do play a role in how we view the world, which is especially true for languages that attach genders to inanimate objects. Despite its age, though, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis has continued to nudge itself into linguistic conversations, and even pop culture. The Ideas, theories and intellectual musings spawned and generated from it don’t need to be entirely true to remain in the public eye, but can still make us think about any of that. There are generalities that we can expect everyone to encounter in their day-to-day life, but thinking about more granular disparities experienced by those in different circumstances helps us to realize that there’s more to the story than ours. And at the same time, Sapir-Whorf reiterates the fact that we’re more alike than we are different, no matter what language we speak.

# data[].attributes.body
It is recognized that language plays a key role in human culture, but relatively little is known about the mechanisms by which language encourages both cultural stability and innovation. In this way, human language can be seen as technology that enhances and expands the categorization capacities that we share with other animals. It is broadly agreed that language is a distinctive human capacity and a powerful engine of cultural transmission. Words are conventional and prescriptive, and provide a stable representation that is easily shared with great fidelity, but also have an open-ended structure that invites innovation. The evolution of culture involves not only behavioral practices and material artifacts, but also the representation of these in the human mind. Cultural evolution entails an increase in diversity and complexity; it cannot just be the recycling of behaviors. Cumulative cultural change can be a good thing: tools are more sophisticated, social organizations are more complex, means of food production are more varied. But there is negative ratcheting as well, in the form of bigotry, polarization, and the perpetuation of social hierarchies. In the case of learning, cumulative cultural evolution is enhanced by labels and generics, which provide a simple yet powerful means of passing along the wisdom of prior generations. So, basically, language enhances and expands capacities that we share with others.

# data[].attributes.body
The video talks about the sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. How language structure affect an individual's perception and understanding towards the world and different meanings. Different culture has different language structures which affect how each culture have different personalities, how we perceive things, what we value, and beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
yes it does. Every culture has it's own language to communicate with each other. And every language has different structure and different things that they value, which means it will shape and affect how we see and understand the world.

# data[].attributes.body
The sapir-Whorf Hypothesis itself revolves around the idea that language has control on how you see the world. Now every culture has different beliefs and values, which means it is reasonable why people use different language in different countries

# data[].attributes.body
Language either can restrict our thought process or expand it. For example in some languages we used future present and past tenses, however there always will be other languages that does not use the same kind of structure. Same goes to us there probably other languages that has more structures that ours

# data[].attributes.body
Tannen found that men and women is perceived differently. Men tend to be more logicl and informative, meanwhile females are more likely judged to be emotional, craving for interactions, and so on. These are habits that they have since their childhood, which is being treated and taught in a different way by their parents. It is stated how men and women have a different way in approaching language.

# data[].attributes.body
The Sapir-Worf hypothesis itself is how language and different ways of communication affect an individual's perception and understanding towards the world. This can relate to Tannen's observation since it is stated how men and women have different ways in approaching language. Such as women tend to seek interactions more instead of information, this shows that they are emotional, soft, and seeking for connections. Meanwhile for men they do well in public speaking, this showed how informative and straightforward they are, which their parents taught them to be strong, and hide their feelings away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that both language and culture affects each other. Language is a communication style  that is used to interact with other people that defines and supports our values and beliefs, this is who we are and our identity. And our identity defines the culture that we live in. Meanwhile a culture has its own norms, values and beliefs as well. In order to adapt and become who we are in an area that we choose to live in we must adapt to their communication style because it identifies who we are

# data[].attributes.body
Tannen's observation concludes that for the most part men and women talk differently and for different reasons. Men usually talk for the sole purpose of exchanging information while women talk to share and interact with one another. Thus women are found to be more talkative about their experiences and their feelings towards those experiences. Men on the other hand keep more privately and only talk if there is a reason to. From my experience although it is generally true that women are more open and men are more private, there are plenty of men that are sensitive and like to share and be open about there feelings. I think that this is also a product of the world shifting towards a culture that dosen't associate masculinity with privateness.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Tannen's argument works together with the sapir-whorf hypothesis. When looking at the sapir-whorf hypothesis through tannen's argument it would mean that males and females in general have a different perspectives on daily life experiences. I think that this, for the most part, is true.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that nurture is the reason for the phenomenon that Tannen describes. Men and women talk differently and for different reasons since we were brought up to do so. For example males are told to be masculine, to not cry, not be sensitive and be private.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Tanen's Rapport vs Repor Talk compliment each other well. Both ideas discuss how language and communication may be different for everyone, depending on certain characteristics; gender for Tanen's theory and culture for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
While I do believe that language and culture have a co-dependent relationship, I feel that culture plays a larger role in how we perceive and use language (not limited to verbal communication). Humans are naturally drawn to interact with one another as we are known to be social beings. What separates individuals from one another is the extent of influence a certain culture has on how he/she communicates. We can argue that through different upbringing experiences, the way we perceive the world and utilize words to communicate will reflect on our core values.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. Language can influence the way a speaker understands the world. This is because different languages places emphasis and attention on different things in the world, which would ultimately change our perception. This usually depends on what the language's cultures' values. For example, cultures with a high dependency on different varieties for fish will most likely have multiple words for different types of fish, whereas countries unfamiliar with fish will have less words to describe fish.

# data[].attributes.body
The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is an efficient way to analyze how one views the world based on linguistic factors as it takes account of the different aspects that shape our cultural reality. It encourages people to be open-minded and serves as an argument that explains why some people aren't able to see things exactly the same way. However, this hypothesis should only be used to an extent and is still highly debatable. An example of an event that defies the hypothesis is modern globalisation—similar perspectives can still be shared by people of different cultures, despite differences in language.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that language restricts one's thought process whenever it doesn't have a word to describe particular things. However, this modern era comes with the ability to translate and adapt different languages to be more approachable for foreign people (e.g. K Drama, Anime) which actually makes it easier for other people to place themselves in a culture and language other than their own, therefore expanding the way they see the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Tannen's observation follows up the notion that men and women use languages and discussion for two entirely different reasons. On one hand, women is seen to be the "talkative" gender. This means that language and discussion is used as a way to fulfill their need of interaction, to share and to connect with other people. In the opposite hand, men are seen to use language as a means to share "information", and to keep their feelings private. An example of this is the wide array of men "public speakers". This is contradictory and stereotypical as it sets an unrealistic expectation on how certain genders are perceived. I also find that it contradicts what happens in my circle, as most men in my life are more rooted in interaction, whilst the women are the ones seen to be most active in raising awareness for different informations.

# data[].attributes.body
A clear correlation is seen between Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Tannen's observation. This is because both texts discuss how language is seen to change one's perception of the world and how language is used differently by different people.

# data[].attributes.body
Although I believe that culture and language are co-dependent and gradually adapt to one another, I think that culture and one's upbringing (nurture) is the stronger driving factor in how one ends up perceiving the world, even if it is through their language. When an individual is born into the world, they have no sense of identity. This means that as they grow up, their sense of the world will be molded based on what they experience everyday. That said, certain values that are taught to them will have a great effect on how they'll end up seeing the world, showing that a collective culture is what ultimately shapes a language.