# data[].attributes.body
On August 2011 Mark Duggan a 29 year old who’s taxi was intercepted by armed police in Tottenham, North London the when they got intelligence that he was carrying a pistol , Duggan was shot dead by the police officers when they thought he was pulling out a gun, there was a gun found 4.53 meters away from where Duggan was shot none of the police officers said they saw Duggan throw the gun, so this it’s self caused a backlash for the police but the death of Mark Duggan causend 5 days of violent continuous riots across the country which had some fatality’s, the officers who shot Duggan were believed to have been motivated by racism which was a big motivator for rioters.

A website recreated the video on what happend and showed how it would have been very unlikely that from getting out of the taxi that it was possible for Duggan to throw the pistol over a fence which shows the mistake the officers could have made. The website (https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/the-killing-of-mark-duggan) shows what happened that day with Duggan and that if it did happen how the officers said how hard that would have been. The public’s perception of the police after this incident decreased dramatically and there was riots to protest about police king a black male when he did not commit a crime , the public that the polices attack was not justified and they didn’t have probable cause to shoot Duggan, and riots continued in London for 3 days with a lot of violence and fires.
Mark Duggan was in one of London’s gangs and was seen to be “confrontational and violent) person the gang he was in was known for gun violence, Duggan has also been arrested (not charged) for attempted murder so the police seen Duggan as a very violent man who has been reported to have shot someone in a nightclub before so the police were not being hesitant when they thought he was pulling a pistol out.(https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25363828).
The public were at a cross roads with the Mark Duggan case because some people agree with the police but a lot believe it was unprovoked and a key witness said it was like “an execution”. The police lost all trust with members of the community and lost all respect which lead them to loose control.

# data[].attributes.body
During the middle of lockdown on the 12th of April Dominic travelled from London to Durham on long trip to visit his family in Durham. He broke the law by travelling so far during Lockdown, where you are restricted to travel a certain distance not into other counties, But he travelled through many. He met his wife who had covid-19 symptoms and they went on a 52 mile round trip to barnard castle, where he claimed he went their to get his eyes tested. The Durham police and the English government, stood by what Dominic did and let him keep his job and come back to London. This caused a massive eruption from the public because they are following the rules but a person that is meant to represent our country is breaking the rules. This destroyed the perception of the UK government and the Durham police for not giving him a punishment for breaking the law. The Durham police said this " There is currently no investigation into the force’s handling of this inquiry.”  This shows that the police are not showing respect and fairness to the general public.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/may/29/durham-police-facing-possible-inquiry-into-handling-of-cummings-case.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52784290
In the BBC article it explains more about why he left his house and more quotes on what happened and his reasoning why he left London to go and visit his wife. "I suddenly got a call from my wife who was looking after our four-year-old child. She told me she suddenly felt badly ill." He went home, but after a couple of hours his wife felt better and he returned to work. He thought to leave the house to help his wife to look after the kids, so he broke the rules, which left the whole country so confused and feel like they can break the lockdown rules. This is really bad for the perception of of the government and the Durham police for not giving him some sort of punishment. He is a role model of our country and he is breaking the law so he should serve a massive punishment, but that did not happen. In both articles it shows what the police and the government did wrong and why the public disagree with it. A massive amount of unfairness was lost in this event so the public will mostly like not listen to the police and the government for what they have done.

# data[].attributes.body
The murder of Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry - Olivia
Two officers were arrested after being found that they took selfies with the deceased, Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry, after they were discovered. They also took the photos at the crime scene without being realised.
After the allegations were confirmed that they did, the metropolitan police also found out that the two officers also sent the picture to a few members of the public.
Due to this members of the public had to be seen to, to make sure they didn’t send around the picture to any more sources.
The officers were arrested and suspended from duty, no further action was taken forward
Their grieving mother said the pictures ‘dehumanised’ her children. And:
‘ If ever we needed an example of how toxic it has become, those officers felt so safe, so untouchable, that they felt they could take photographs of dead girls and send them on....It speaks volumes of the ethos that runs through the metropolitan police’
Members of the public were extremely disturbed by the incident, to them it created an image of being unsafe and untrustworthy to be near. It creates a large negative impact on the service in those months.
Even other law enforcement believed the incident was shocking and that these situations should never happen again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-53198702
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/met-police-arrest-suspended-nicole-smallman-bibaa-henry-murder-scene-photo-a9586416.html%3famp

# data[].attributes.headline
Finley Broad- police chief sacked over child sexual abuse video

# data[].attributes.subject
Finley Broad- police chief sacked over child sexual abuse video

# data[].attributes.body
Metropolitan police officer Robyn Williams was convicted of possessing a video of child sexual abuse. She was sacked due to gross misconduct after the incident. The public will have lost trust in the police force after this because it shows that there is no discipline towards officers. Assistant commissioner Helen Ball said “it is entirely unacceptable for police officers responsible for enforcing the law to break it themselves”, after suggesting Williams should be dismissed without notice.
(amp.theguardian.c

# data[].attributes.headline
Jade Brough (panorama-war crimes scandal exposed)

# data[].attributes.subject
Jade Brough (panorama-war crimes scandal exposed)

# data[].attributes.body
In 2003, the British Army were travelling around Iraq killing men and young boys who they suspected to be apart of a Taliban. Although instead of questioning them they would violently abuse them to death or kill them in cold blood without warning, I lull using people who were innocent.
Many homes were invaded and families torn apart,  never seeing each other again. Families were witnessing their loved ones being dragged away or killed in front of them. The army were trying to cover up their tracks by saying it was a natural causes like a heart attack, this was to stop the unexplained deaths from being investigated further.
These actions changed the public’s perception of the army from being trustworthy to murderers. This incident had so many people scared of the army and what they were capable of. Others would have been disgusted that the army could kill so many innocent people and get away with it and not feeling ashamed at themselves for their actions.

# data[].attributes.headline
Bradlee Peart ("Get off my neck" London police officer suspended after arrest incident).

# data[].attributes.subject
Bradlee Peart ("Get off my neck" London police officer suspended after arrest incident).

# data[].attributes.body
A metropolitan police officer was suspended after there was a video circulating social media showing him applying pressure on a suspects neck.

"Officers are not supposed to apply pressure to the neck are unless under exceptional circumstances" said the Independent office for police conduct (IOPC).The incident happened at 6:30 pm on Isledon Road in North London.

There was several other people at the scene of the arrest many were recording and some even remonstrating with the officers.

I believe the the public  perception of the police after this incident would have most likely hit rock bottom , most people see this as a racially  motivated attack even though the man did have a knife on him the way the treat the man and handled the situation was absolutely appalling. I think the police officer being suspended wasn't really enough because he knelt on his neck the situation could have ended up a lot worse than it did and i think that has an impact the publics opinion on how the police arrest and treat suspects.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/17/get-off-my-neck-london-police-officer-suspended-after-arrest-incident#
(2020).

# data[].attributes.body
Stephen Lawrence was a black teenager from the borough of Eltham and was waiting for the bus with his friend Duwayne on the 22nd of April 1993, when he was the victim of an unprovoked, racially fuelled attack by 6 white men. Stephen did not die straight away, so Duwayne called an ambulance. However, Duwayne was shocked to see one police car and nothing else show at the scene. This was simply because Duwayne was black, and the police continued to question Duwayne while Stephen bled out on the floor and his attackers got further and further away. Because of his skin, Duwayne was initially the main suspect, despite him telling the officers that the attackers went the other direction and the police refused to pursue. Despite the public's knowledge of the Acourt brothers (AKA the Eltham Krays) and their gang, the police claimed to know nothing about them and it took months for them to be charged with murder. The police also obtained evidence through a hidden camera, the gang using hundreds of racial slurs and practicing stabbing people. However, again due to police incompetence and systemic racism a lack of evidence meant the suspects were found not guilty. Due to the "double jeopardy" rule they couldn't be tried for it again. The Macpherson report in 1999 found that the police were guilty of blatant mistakes and "institutional racism" and the government allowed another trial to commence once sufficient evidence was found. This also lead to the scrapping of the double jeopardy rule in 2005. Eventually, in 2011 the second trial begins and in January of 2012, Dobson and Norris are found guilty of murder and are sentenced to life imprisonment. There was public outcry over the whole case and gave the Met Police a negative reputation nationwide.
(www.theguardian.com)
The systemic racism and total incompetence from the police led to widescale changes of the law and recruitment process in the police.
The investigation has now moved into the "inactive" phase, years after the two convictions of Gary Dobson and David Norris, as the head of the metropolitan police has announced. "The investigation into Stephen's murder will also be periodically reviewed for any further investigative opportunities which may arise due to advancements in technology, Mr Brooks who was with Stephen the night that he died, has also been advised upon the decision" Despite tip-offs from the community in Eltham including phone calls and notes left on police cars, the suspects remained free for 19 years. The Lawrence family's struggle for justice has exposed institutional racism and corruption within the Metropolitan Police.
(www.mirror.co.uk /2020)
Both of these articles show the horrific racism and incompetence in the police, this will have lead to a total lack of trust in the Police and will have critically damaged the reputation of the Police in general. The police's values and standards were totally ignored by every officer involved in the initial investigation. For example, Respect for others and integrity both out of the window from the officers first on the scene also.

# data[].attributes.headline
James Hannon-  Police blow up 'suspicious' car parked by fellow officers

# data[].attributes.subject
James Hannon-  Police blow up 'suspicious' car parked by fellow officers

# data[].attributes.body
A kind hearted police officer helped a man who had fallen ill and took him to hospital in Cumbria. The man who had fallen ill, parked his call outside of of Workington police station for safe keeping. They failed to communicate well and the colleagues saw it as a bomb threat. They made a 100m cordon and they evacuated the building to make sure when they blew it up, they were safe. And then they called the bomb squad and they came and blew it up. They later apologized to the man and said this, " The officers who dealt with this mornings incident did so with public safety in mind and followed the appropriate procedures in respect to an unoccupied suspicious vehicle"

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38861475
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/819719/police-blew-up-suspicious-car-owned-by-officer

These two different articles show that the express one explains more about the positives after and what they did to the man so he could get his car back which they paid £2000 to get the car back because it was their own fault for blowing it up. However the BBC one explains more about what they did wrong and not what they did after it. This shows a lack of trust and communication as well as their own decisions on what to do with the car. The communication error will effect the perception of the Police force for making this mistake that could have been fixed with a bit of communication. The public might not rely on them to do a dangerous job because of the communication needed that they lacked in, in this event.

# data[].attributes.headline
Luke Teeder (Durham police probed over deer 'crowbar death')

# data[].attributes.subject
Luke Teeder (Durham police probed over deer 'crowbar death')

# data[].attributes.body
On 11 June, two Durham police officers were dispatched to "destroy" a deer that had been hit by a car and was in pain. The police officers, instead of using a firearm to put the deer down used a crowbar and it took the two of them to eventually kill the deer. The public believed that the deer should've been put down quickly the prevent the deer to be in more pain but instead used a crowbar from the back of a police car which would've been one of the most painful ways to deal with the situation. The incident was reported to other staff two weeks after but their names and ranks were not revealed. Mr Banks stated "Two officers with the right skills and relevant equipment were dispatched to deal with it." They were moved down to other duties from firearms. The public's perceptions would be negative because the officers had the right skills and equipment to put the deer down quickly without pain but chose a painful way to deal with the situation. The fact both of the officers came up with idea straight away also gives the public the idea that this wasn't the first time the police have done this and they cant even follow their own orders.

In the ChronicleLive they stated that the police officers "battered a badly injured deer with a crowbar" however they dont exactly know how they used the crowbar to kill it as it wasnt stated by the police.
(https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/police-who-battered-severely-injured-8500500)

In the BBC news article it doesnt mention about the deer being "battered" but instead just said "the officers used a crowbar to kill the animal."
(https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-28558929)

# data[].attributes.body
Mark Duggan was shot and killed by armed police in august of 2011 while fleeing the taxi he had been stopped in. The investigation claimed that Duggan was holding a gun and threw it as he was shot. This however was most likely not he case as found by Forensic Architecture who investigated it themselves. At the time there was dispute of this fact and whether or not it was racially motivated, and whether the officer would have fired had it been a white suspect. As a result of this, public perception significantly worsened leading to some of the worst riots and attacks on police in recent History across the country for several days. To this day there is still debate about the legality of the shooting, and whether officers rightfully believed he had a firearm when they shot him, with recent BLM protests in Tottenham thinking back on the issue and the police, demonstrating that even now the reputation of the Met Police still hasn't fully recovered.
The guardian, reports and supports the idea of its unlawfulness and maintains the officers are in the wrong, calling in to question several issues such as why the Met settled for an undisclosed sum for a killing they ruled as lawful. (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/dec/05/mark-duggan-shooting-report-challenged-by-human-rights-groups)
The BBC reports that a civilian witness viewed the whole interaction and saw it as "an execution" with officers shooting him with his arms up and within 5 to 7 steps. They also however highlight the possibility that officers did believe he was reaching for a gun or even reached for one and threw it as he was shot, as well as the fact that officers could reasonably believe there was a credible threat as he was a known gang member, suspected of having a firearm and had previously been arrested for attempted murder and possession of guns.
(https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25321711)

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/17/get-off-my-neck-london-police-officer-suspended-after-arrest-incident 2020
A metropolitan police officer rests his knee on the suspects neck. On Thursday at 6:30pm a suspect in a green tee shirt handcuffed and on  the ground with 2 police officers trying to gain further control of him. The officer places his hand on the suspects head to keep it down as the crowd gathers and pulls out phones to record. One officer hold the handcuffs around the suspects wrists, while the other that "did" have is knee on the suspects neck was telling he crowd to get back. After around 90 seconds the man is seen sitting up. The man that was arrested has been taken to the police station and seen by a police doctor. The officer that had his knee on the suspects neck has been suspended and the other has been removed form his operational duty.  This impacts the public perception because the public will change there outlook of the police into bad people which they are not apart from some. The public will lose trust, support ,many things because of incidents like this. its shines a bad light on the police and therefor people lose confidence in them doing there job.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/marcus-coutain-video-kneel-neck-police-arrest-london-a9663991.html 2020
Both these articles show the police officer with his knee on the suspects neck. This is the same article but on a different new page. Therefor they will state most of the story but when your read thing on many different websites they twist and change words to make the story sound worse than it is.

# data[].attributes.headline
Durham police kill a deer (Callum Clark)

# data[].attributes.subject
Durham police kill a deer (Callum Clark)

# data[].attributes.body
Two Durham police officers were told to kill a deer that had been injured in an incident before they arrived, usually they would shoot the deer so it would die in no pain but these officers had another idea. They both decided to smash away at it with 2 crowbars until it was fully dead. This shows a lack of discipline from the two officers. The public believe that the deer should have been ‘destroyed’ properly by using a gun. It was reported to other officers 2 weeks after the incident happened. It was believed that the animal had been hit by a vehicle. Both officers should face disciplinary action for gross misconduct.

Mr Banks said “There is currently an investigation under way because we do not believe the deer was killed in the humane way that it should have been.” He also said  "Two other officers with the skills and relevant equipment were despatched to deal with it.”

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-28558929

# data[].attributes.body
On The 14th of June, 2017 a fatal tragedy happened where Grenfell Tower caught on fire due to unforseen curcumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
On April 15th 1989 there was a fatal human "crush" after police officers failed to manage the intake of football fans that entered the stadium.This ended up leaving 766 people injured and 96 people dead.At 14.45 CCTV footage showed there was thousands of people pressing into the turnstiles and alongside a large exit gate called Gate C.Supt Roger Marshall ,the police officer in charge of the area, told the inquests he thought somebody "was going to get killed here" unless the exit gates were opened to alleviate pressure.At 14.52 Mr Duckingfield gave the order and opened the gates only that allowed around 2,000 more fans to enter through that  gate into the turnstile.The game had started at 14.59 and by that time people were pressed up against the barrier and began to fall unconscious.One barrier in pen 3 gave way.But it wasn't until 15.06 Supt Roger Greenwood ran on to the pitch and told the referee to stop the game.

The authorities reaction to the disaster was was and badly co-ordinated. The police delayed declaring a major incident and staff from South Yorkshire Met Ambulance Service at the ground also failed to call a major incident.Firefighters with cutting gear had difficulty getting into the ground,and although dozens of ambulances were dispatched,access to the pitch was delayed because police were reporting "crowd trouble" and not the actual incident what was happening.Only 2 ambulances ever reached the end of the pitch so out of the 96 that died only 14 were admitted to hospital.A jury decided that Ch Supt David Duckenfeild had a duty of care to the fan. "They found he was in breach of that duty of care,that this amount of gross negligence and that the 96 victims were unlawfully killed."
"The jury also concluded;
Police errors caused a dangerous situation at the turnstiles.
Failures by commanding officers caused a crush on the terraces.
There were mistakes in the police control box over the order to open Leppings Lane end exit gates.
Defects at the stadium contributed to the disaster.
There was an error in safety certification of the Hillsborough stadium.
Police delayed declaring a major incident.
The emergency response including the ambulance service was also delayed."

The public would have perceived this in a very negative fashion as the public services negligence caused horrific injury and death.This shows that the officers on duty at that scene had very poor decision making and that will have left the public to not trust polices judgement as much as they did before.

The news article made by the BBC is very factual and informs you on how the disaster took place step by step and shows the end result and what happened to Duckenfeild.- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19545126
However an article made by this is Anfield focused more of the article on emotions of the day/people-https://www.thisisanfield.com/clubinfo/hillsborough/about/

# data[].attributes.headline
Natasha Slade (Greater Manchester police officer sacked for hitting man on the head with a baton)

# data[].attributes.subject
Natasha Slade (Greater Manchester police officer sacked for hitting man on the head with a baton)

# data[].attributes.body
Greater Manchester Police officer Philip Ellis has been dismissed after a misconduct hearing found he used excessive force. A 23 year old man needed hospital treatment after the incident outside a pub in Manchester in October 2016. The independent Officer for Police Conduct said Mr Ellis "behaved recklessly". A misconduct hearing found that the officer had breached standards of professional behaviour relating to the use of force after a disturbance at Deansgate Locks and that gross misconduct was proven. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-54016347#:~:text=A%20police%20officer%20has%20been,found%20he%20used%20excessive%20force.

IOPC (independent officer for Police Conduct)
A Greater Manchester Police (GMP) officer has been dismissed without notice after a police disciplinary panel concluded he used excessive force on a man in Manchester city centre. A misconduct hearing was held on the 2nd September 2020. The IOPC stated "our investigation took five months and concluded in March 2017 when our findings and evidence were provided". In February 2018 the force agreed that the officer had a case to answer for gross misconduct. IOPC Regional Director Amanda Rowe said: “Police officers are trained to deal with challenging situations and should only use force when it is necessary, proportionate and reasonable. We found a case to answer that PC Ellis used an excessive amount of force when dealing with the disturbance. Having considered all of the evidence we gathered during our investigation, the panel decided PC Ellis had behaved recklessly and his actions put people at risk." PC Ellis will now be placed on the police barred list.
https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/news/greater-manchester-police-officer-dismissed-after-using-excessive-force-man

Both of these articles shows how PC Ellis excessive amount of force on a 23 year old man outside a pub in October of 2016. In the BBC News article it doesn't go into much detail as of how long the investigation took as it did in the IOCP. In the IOCP it states that the investigation took five months and was concluded in March 2017 when they had enough evidence against PC Ellis. The BBC News article only gives one statement from one officer  who stated the PC Ellis "behaved recklessly" as in the IOCP Regional Director Amanda Rowe said: “Police officers are trained to deal with challenging situations and should only use force when it is necessary, proportionate and reasonable. This shows that she knew what PC Ellis had done was against the code of conduct and the PACE Act of 1984. Not much was really done about what PC Ellis had done he was dismissed without notice and was placed on the police barred list. This would have caused a lot of disputes between the public as they may think more should have been done. If a member of the public has assaulted that 23 year old man like PC Ellis would of done then they would have been arrested on  suspicion of assault and would have been charged with ABH or GBH but PC Ellis was not charged with any of these however he lost his rights to a pension.
Due to this incident the public perception on the police will have changed drastically  with the public loosing all their faith and trust within the police. There would have been a lot of hate and disliking to PC Ellis as he went against all of his Values and Standards however both of the articles don't specifically state why PC Ellis was forced to withdraw his baton on the man or what the man was behaving like. The media portrayed the police officer and didn't look at both sides of the story all they will have seen is " police officer hits man over the head with a baton". Due to this Pc Ellis probably got targeted by the public with him and eye witnesses only knowing the true story. I don't condole with what PC Ellis did and I think that he misused his power as a police officers and didn't have good self - discipline at all. He should of been treated with the exact same charges as a member of the public would have been given and that is why a lot of confidence was probably lost in the police and people probably stopped looking in relying on them for support and help. I believe that due to incidents like this and police officers misusing their police powers that that's the reason why there is so much hate against police officers today due to the lack of discipline they have for them selves and respect for others however, not all police officers are the same and have the same traits there is good and bad people in every job.

# data[].attributes.body
On the 22nd of April 1993, Stephen Lawrence was assaulted and killed by a group of white young adults. He was stabbed with a 5 inch blade in his left shoulder and right collarbone. The attack was sincerely due to the colour of his skin, it was a racial attack.

Stephen and his best friend Duwayne were walking home at around half 10 at night, as Stephen missed his curfew by mere minutes. The boys thought getting the bus would be the quickest way to get home so they waited for the bus. Duwayne asked Stephen to see where the bus was and if he could look out for it so he turned around the corner, but little did he know on that corner would he be pushed down and stabbed. Stephen, still in shock stood up after the attackers ran off and was limping, Duwayne, in complete shock, ordered Stephen to run to get help, but Stephen fell, bleeding out.

Shortly after, their first encounter with the police ensued, a patrol car pulled up when Duwayne was pleading for them to stop. They got out of the car, and instead of trying to help Stephen, they questioned Duwayne, asking if him or Stephen had been carrying any weapons, and trying to withhold from actually aiding Stephen as his life is currently leaving his body, luckily for the boys, a couple were at aid, trying to contain the mass amounts of blood.

9 minutes later the Ambulance crew arrives and places Stephen on a trolley, by that time, he is already lifeless.

Meanwhile, the bus passed the scene, and on the bus was a family friend, who with haste, notified Stephens Family at which raced to the Hospital, at that time, Stephen was already dead.

Meanwhile, Duwayne tried to inform the police about the attackers, as to which direction they went. As dire and oblivious the police were, they went in the completely opposite way. They were incompetent, all because of the boys skin colour.

The Police informed the family that they could not find the attackers, to no surprise, they are furious.

Weeks after the murder, the MET were still doing nothing, meanwhile, the Lawrence family met Nelson Mandela, this caused the case to go global and the MET were on it straight away.

After the initial investigation, five suspects were arrested but not charged. It was suggested during the investigation that Lawrence was killed because he was black, and that the handling of the case by the police and CPS was affected by issues of race. A 1998 public inquiry headed by William Macpherson, examined the original Metropolitan Police investigation and concluded that the force was institutionally racist.

The case did not go anywhere, the suspects were released and the case was closed.

The family was so distraught, they could not cope with how the police were handling things, they were institutionally racist, they did seamlessly nothing.
Labour was appointed into Parliament and they instantly changed the law at which people can only be tried twice. Straight after, the case was reopened.

Due to the evolution in forensic technology,  Stephens DNA was found on one of the suspects clothing items. The two people who had Stephens DNA on their clothes were trialled.
They were later found guilty of the Cold-Blooded murder of Stephen Lawrence.

The MET were appauling and they were lacking and pretty much let the attackers roam the streets for 18 years.
Most of the officers on the case, who were white older men, seemed to be quite ignorant towards the case and the victims, based on their skin colour. They didn't put in much effort to even attempt to piece together the situation.
Throughout the duration of the case the public were furious with the MET, their reputation spiralled and they were untrusted throughout London and its boroughs. Not many people backed up the MET and no one wanted to go to them when they needed help.

# data[].attributes.body
(25th June 2020)
Two Met police arrested over photo of murdered sisters.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/25/two-met-police-officers-arrested-over-photo-of-murdered-sisters
Two Metropolitan police officers where arrested after a inappropriate photograph of a murder scene was taken.

Two sister, Nichole Smallman, 27, and Bibaa Henry, 46, were found dead. It was discovered that the two sisters were found stabbed to death, with deep fatal stab wounds, in a country park in north-west London. The bodies were found shortly after they were reported missing. Following the discovery of the bodies, an investigation was held about an inappropriate photo taken by two Met police officers that occurred at the crime scene... Allegations were reported to 'Independent Office for Police Conduct'.
" The investigation elates to allegations that inappropriate photographs were taken at a homicide crime scene and subsequently shared with a small number of others. The Metropolitan police service is handling matters involving those members of the public who may have received those images."
On the 22nd June, the two Metropolitan police constables were found guilty and were arrested. Although they were bailed out shortly afterwards, they were dismissed/fired from their job.
This will have effective them greatly as they will now have a criminal record and will struggle to find further employment.

This will show the public that the police do not always act in the correct, sensible manner that they are required to present. This is also a good example of the lack of confidentiality, which police officers are expected to follow. This can show the public that the police can not be honesty and trustworthy.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/metropolitan-police-officers-arrested-photos-taken-of-sisters-murdered-bibaa-henry-nicole-smallwood-a4480471.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/wembley-murder-sisters-police-arrested-photos_uk_5ef4dc17c5b643f5b230eb78?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABaK30zFDSklRPQfDZao1Mg82UNuGMDpoLJ3zVtK6xXb31JtFLJWUIDUJ88v1_yvscJqEFlKAOyEy3rMiihyU18LROlZ9Fm8IZAwSUkIMROscukDNl5IWUT1tDB83VycvbNEGs5Dbe3upLMgBIWo8VpEs-7W70UQ0i1AyTD_QKXc

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11955369/two-cops-arrested-picture-bodies-murdered-sisters-london-park/

These are different versions of the case study from a number of different new agencies. Most of these mainly consist of fact after fact. With very few images. This can be seen as good as it will allow the public to read all the information about the situation. However, as some of these articles are found in tabloids, it means some of the information can be slightly twisted.

# data[].attributes.body
Don't forget to put our name in your post.
You the learner must research a historical, nationally reported incident of their choice involving the uniformed service chosen in learning outcome 1.
You will also clearly outline the details of the incident and actions taken by the uniformed service and the outcome.
. Public perception could be seen in terms of: trust/value/support/confidence/ethics/code of conduct/personal decision making
Find two different new articles what report on the same incident. and explain the possible difference in reporting??