# data[].attributes.body
Analyze the causes and consequences of the pro=slavery and abolitionist groups' respective beliefs in their own superior moral identity

# data[].attributes.body
Explain how both the North and the South left threatened by the other side's ability to control the federal government and legislate against the interests of their regions

# data[].attributes.body
Analyze the degree to which and the ways in which the shift of the pro slavery and anti- slavery forces to more extreme positions worsened the sections crisis

# data[].attributes.body
Explain the impact of territorial acquisition in intensifying sectional conflict

# data[].attributes.body
The diagram

# data[].attributes.body
Taney's Sweeping opinion subheading to end

# data[].attributes.headline
Pg. 351-Competing plans- Right page, left side, Middle

# data[].attributes.subject
Pg. 351-Competing plans- Right page, left side, Middle

# data[].attributes.headline
342 - "Tensions between the US and Mexico"

# data[].attributes.subject
342 - "Tensions between the US and Mexico"

# data[].attributes.body
Bottom on the right and then top on the left side, all on page 342

# data[].attributes.body
This theme is stating to explain the impacts of gaining a territory/ land.

# data[].attributes.body
Describe how the opinions and views of the 2 groups affected/ worsened the sectional crisis throughout the regions.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyze the causes and effects of the pro slavery and abolitionist group perspectives on their own moral identities.

# data[].attributes.body
The causes and effects of the groups' perspectives resulted in arguments and caused differences. The southern states (pro- slavery group) sided with the vision to expand slavery in to other states while the abolitionists wanted slavery to end. They both new they needed to get other upcoming states on their standpoints. One example would be Kansas in which 5 pro-slavery people were murdered by an abolitionist group led by John brown.

# data[].attributes.body
356-361

# data[].attributes.body
Explain the reasons why the north and south felt threatened by the oppositions`````````````````````````````````````` power to gain control of the federal government on their veiws.

# data[].attributes.body
Both the north and south were threatened by the other sides ability to gain control of the government. Both sides sought to attract more interest to their groups and one great example of the competition to gain control over the government was the election of Lincoln, in the picture above we can see that the race was a competitive one and the north was eventually able to gain control over the government.

# data[].attributes.body
351-354/355 and End of 359- map/little context of 361

# data[].attributes.body
#1

# data[].attributes.body
The acquisition of lands became a problem and led to many conflicts between the groups. According to Zachary Taylor, leaving the lands as territories would leave dilemma out of sight. This theme's main point is portrayed through the example of the tensions between Mexico and the United States. Which focuses on Texas. The attempt to acquire Texas from the United states lead to a war between the 2 countries.

# data[].attributes.body
340-354

# data[].attributes.body
The different interests in economy and territories worsened the situation throughout the sections/regions. The North was anti-slavery and the south was pro-slavery. The example i have chosen from the book is called "competing plans". This section talks about the 2 different ideas of how sections should be run.

# data[].attributes.body
351-359