# data[].attributes.body
should social media be banned for under 16 year olds?

should sacred cultural land be aloud to be used for economic gain?

should new zealand rethink its policies against nuclear power?

should religious organisations be used in education?

Does the normalization of alcohol in media and advertising contribute to its overconsumption?

Does freedom of speech inherently protect all forms of expression, including those that are offensive or controversial?

Do international climate agreements adequately consider the historical responsibility of developed nations in global emissions?

Can social media serve as a tool for mental health support, or does it exacerbate existing issues?

Does the design of social media platforms, with features like endless scrolling and notifications, contribute to mental health decline?

is carbon credits the best way of holding countries accountable for carbon emission outputs?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the internet good or bad? (privacy and data collection, dangers, misinformation in media, the dark side of the internet --> changing belief systems and perspectives)

Abortion laws / US and india issues affecting women / cultural and religious effects on woman rights --> young marriage, low rates of education, not aloud to drive ect

Drinking culture - does alcohol play an important role in society

immigrants of war and allowing refugees into countries (people displaced by war)

differing views & perspectives on the global warming issue (climate change deniers)

Water security/rights

raising public awareness and education about climate change / how easy is it to change our behaviour in response to climate change

compulsory army service in russia vs morals of individuals

gender rights & discrimination

carbon taxes and credits approach to global warming

industrial waste (fast fashion, perceived obsolescence ect) and effects on environment

Gender issues in high level sports

The Fight for LGBTQ+ Rights: Why Some People Still Face Discrimination

Why Freedom of Speech Matters and Where It Can Cross the Line

Why Women’s Reproductive Rights Are Still Under Threat in Modern Society

Refugee Crises: Why Millions of People Are Forced to Flee and Struggle to Find Safety

Trade Wars: How Price Hikes on Everyday Goods Start with Political Feuds --> Trumps tariffs, USA trade wars against china

Young People Are Showing Up to Vote, But Their Opinions Barely Make It into Policy Decisions --> why its important young people have a say

People Still Act Like Mental Health Struggles Are a Personal Weakness Instead of a Real Issue

The Growing Problem of Social Media Dependency and Its Impact on Mental Health --> dopamine of doom scrolling, phone addiction

The Importance of Raising Awareness for Substance Abuse Prevention -->

nuclear power

indigenous land rights --> maori, indo americain, aboriginal

cults

Assess the effectiveness of international agreements in combating climate change.

# data[].attributes.headline
should sacred cultural land be aloud to be used for economic gain? 

# data[].attributes.subject
should sacred cultural land be aloud to be used for economic gain? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Is climate change part of the blame for the disappearance of endangered cultures? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Is climate change part of the blame for the disappearance of endangered cultures? 

# data[].attributes.body
Are endangered cultures able to adapt to climate change?

# data[].attributes.headline
should land with importance to indigenous minorities be aloud to be used for the economic gain of large scale companies and government?

# data[].attributes.subject
should land with importance to indigenous minorities be aloud to be used for the economic gain of large scale companies and government?

# data[].attributes.body
perspectives

yes:

mining resources needed

helps more people then it will effect

Economic Empowerment and Community Development

no:

Spiritual and Cultural Integrity

Historical Precedents of Harm

Environmental and Biodiversity Concerns

Balancing perspectives:

The key to navigating this issue lies in meaningful consultation and collaboration with Indigenous communities. Implementing frameworks that respect cultural values, ensure environmental protection, and provide economic opportunities can lead to outcomes that honor both heritage and development. For instance, the concept of ethnodevelopment emphasizes the importance of enabling ethnic groups to revive their cultural values and strengthen their ability to resist exploitation through self-led development.

economic gains

housing --> could argue about housing crisis's

tourism

mining, deforesting

pros of this topic:

can be very local

two defined perspectives

lots of global examples

cons of this topic:

not many studies or evidence?? maybe

How to specify this question?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Gemini is your personal, proactive, and powerful AI assistant from Google. Try it for free to help with work, school, and at home for whatever inspires you.

# data[].attributes.body
Can the exploitation of indigenous land for economic gain ever be ethical?

To what extent should economic development take priority over the land rights of indigenous communities?

Does protecting indigenous land rights hinder or help national development?

# data[].attributes.body
Highlights

Industrial development threatens nearly 60% of Indigenous Peoples’ lands in 64 countries

37 countries have highly threatened lands that are vulnerable to conversion

Vulnerabilities in rights, representation, and capital increase the risk of conversion

Support of Indigenous governance and stewardship can reduce conversion risk

USE GEMINI TO SUMMARISE

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
About ScienceDirect
Shopping cart
Contact and
supportTerms and
conditionsPrivacy policy

# data[].attributes.body
The question of whether economic development should take priority over the land rights of Indigenous communities is complex and ethically charged. Here’s a breakdown of key considerations:

Why Land Rights Should Not Be Subordinated to Economic Development:

1. Human Rights and Legal Protections:

Indigenous land rights are recognized under international law (e.g., UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples).

Many countries also have constitutional or legal protections for Indigenous lands.

Ignoring these rights often leads to violations of consent, forced displacement, and cultural erasure.

2. Cultural and Spiritual Significance:

For Indigenous peoples, land is not just an economic resource—it’s tied to their identity, traditions, and way of life.

Disrupting this connection can have long-term psychological, social, and cultural consequences.

3. Sustainable Stewardship:

Indigenous communities have often been effective stewards of the environment.

Development that displaces them can lead to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation.

4. False Dichotomy:

Economic development and Indigenous rights aren’t mutually exclusive.

Inclusive development models (e.g., co-management, Indigenous-led projects) can respect land rights while fostering economic growth.

Arguments Often Made for Prioritizing Economic Development:

1. National Interest and Infrastructure Needs:

Governments may argue that certain projects (dams, roads, mining) are vital for national development or energy security.

These projects can provide jobs and revenue.

2. Poverty Alleviation:

Proponents might claim development can reduce poverty—though often the benefits bypass Indigenous communities and go to elites or corporations.

3. Legal Ambiguities:

In some countries, Indigenous land tenure isn’t clearly defined or recognized, which developers exploit.

Ethical and Practical Middle Ground:

Rather than prioritizing one over the other, many experts advocate for:

Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC): Engaging Indigenous communities meaningfully in decision-making.

Benefit-sharing agreements: Ensuring communities see tangible benefits from any development.

Alternative development paths: Supporting projects that align with Indigenous values and sustainability.

Conclusion:

No, economic development should not take priority over the land rights of Indigenous communities. Economic growth must be pursued in ways that uphold human rights, environmental stewardship, and social justice. Failing to do so not only perpetuates historical injustices but often undermines the long-term sustainability of the development itself.

Would you like a case study to illustrate this issue?

# data[].attributes.headline
CASE STUDIES, yay for chat gpt (ill go into more research later)

# data[].attributes.subject
CASE STUDIES, yay for chat gpt (ill go into more research later)

# data[].attributes.body
Certainly. Here's a case study that illustrates the complex interplay between Indigenous land rights and economic development:

Case Study: The Yurok Tribe's Land Restoration Efforts in California

Background

The Yurok Tribe, located along the Klamath River in Northern California, has a history of displacement and loss of ancestral lands. For over a century, the tribe's traditional territories were taken without consent, leading to significant cultural and environmental impacts.(apnews.com)

Recent Developments

In a landmark move, the Yurok Tribe has regained approximately 73 square miles of its ancestral homelands through a $56 million land-back deal. This acquisition more than doubles the tribe's land holdings and marks the largest conservation initiative of its kind in California's history. (apnews.com)

Economic and Environmental Restoration

The reclaimed land, previously exploited by timber companies, is now being managed by the Yurok Tribe for restoration and cultural purposes. Efforts include reintroducing traditional fire practices, restoring prairies, and rehabilitating critical salmon habitats. These initiatives aim to restore biodiversity and address environmental degradation caused by past industrial activities.(apnews.com)

The area is home to endangered species and serves as a vital cold-water sanctuary for salmon, especially important as climate change affects local ecosystems. The tribe's approach integrates traditional ecological knowledge with modern conservation practices, demonstrating a sustainable model for land management.(apnews.com)

Cultural Significance

Beyond environmental restoration, the land reclamation holds profound cultural significance for the Yurok people. It represents a reclaiming of identity, heritage, and self-determination. The tribe's leadership emphasizes the importance of cultural practices and community well-being in the land's stewardship.(apnews.com)

Conclusion

This case underscores the importance of respecting Indigenous land rights in the context of economic development. By prioritizing the Yurok Tribe's ancestral connection to the land, the restoration efforts not only address environmental concerns but also promote cultural revitalization and community empowerment.

If you're interested in exploring more about Indigenous-led conservation efforts or the broader implications of land rights on development, feel free to ask.

# data[].attributes.body
Case Study: The Rabha People's Resistance to the Barduar Satellite Township in Assam, India

Background

In Assam, India, the proposed development of a 1,500-acre satellite township in Barduar has sparked significant opposition from the Rabha people, an Indigenous community residing in the region. The area, rich in tea gardens, paddy fields, and forests near the Meghalaya hills, is home to tribal families who fear displacement and cultural erosion due to the project.timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Key Concerns

Displacement and Cultural Erosion: The Rabha community expressed concerns that the development would lead to the displacement of approximately 2,100 families, threatening their traditional livelihoods and cultural heritage.

Historical Injustices: Opposition intensified following the review of $1 billion in urban infrastructure projects by the Chief Minister, with the Rabha organizations highlighting historical injustices, noting that land was handed to a Tea & Timber Company in 1922 without recognizing Indigenous claims.timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Demand for Autonomy: Protesters, led by the All Rabha Students' Union (Arsu) and Sangrami Krishak Sramik Sangha (SKSS), submitted a memorandum demanding land rights for Indigenous families and inclusion of Rabha-dominated areas under the Sixth Schedule for greater autonomy.timesofindia.indiatimes.com+3en.wikipedia.org+3timesofindia.indiatimes.com+3

Community Response

The Rabha community has actively resisted the development plans through demonstrations and legal actions, emphasizing the need for recognition of their land rights and cultural preservation. Their efforts underscore the importance of inclusive development that respects Indigenous sovereignty and addresses historical injustices.

This case exemplifies the challenges faced by Indigenous communities in balancing economic development with the preservation of their land rights and cultural identity. It highlights the necessity for meaningful consultation, respect for traditional governance structures, and the recognition of historical grievances in development planning.

If you're interested in exploring more about this topic or other related case studies, feel free to ask.

# data[].attributes.body
Certainly, here's another compelling case study that highlights the complex relationship between Indigenous land rights and economic development:

Case Study: The Maya Train Project in Mexico

Background

In 2018, the Mexican government announced the Maya Train Project, a large-scale infrastructure initiative aimed at constructing a 1,500-kilometer railway system connecting five states in southeastern Mexico: Chiapas, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatán, and Quintana Roo. The project was promoted as a means to boost regional economic development, enhance tourism, and improve connectivity.(djilp.org)

Indigenous Concerns and Resistance

The proposed route of the Maya Train traverses several Indigenous territories, including those of the Maya, Tzotzil, and Tzeltal peoples. Many Indigenous communities expressed concerns that the project would lead to land dispossession, environmental degradation, and cultural erosion. Critics argued that the government did not adequately consult with affected communities, violating their rights to free, prior, and informed consent as outlined in international conventions such as the International Labour Organization's Convention No. 169.

In response, various Indigenous groups and civil society organizations mobilized protests, legal challenges, and advocacy campaigns to halt the project or ensure that it proceeded with proper consultation and safeguards.

Legal and Political Developments

Despite widespread opposition, the Mexican government continued to advance the Maya Train Project, citing its potential economic benefits. In 2020, the government initiated consultations with Indigenous communities, but many activists and legal experts contended that these consultations were insufficient and did not meet international standards.(djilp.org)

In 2021, a coalition of Indigenous organizations filed a lawsuit against the government, alleging violations of their constitutional and human rights. The case was pending as of the last available reports.

Implications and Broader Context

The Maya Train Project exemplifies the tension between economic development initiatives and the rights of Indigenous communities. It underscores the importance of ensuring that development projects respect Indigenous land rights, cultural heritage, and environmental sustainability. The case also highlights the need for robust legal frameworks and genuine consultation processes to protect Indigenous peoples from exploitation and marginalization.

This case study illustrates the challenges faced by Indigenous communities in asserting their rights in the face of large-scale development projects. It serves as a reminder of the necessity for inclusive and equitable development practices that honor the rights and dignity of Indigenous peoples.

# data[].attributes.body
Certainly, here's a pertinent case study from Russia that illustrates the complex relationship between Indigenous land rights and economic development:

Case Study: The Sámi People's Struggle for Land Rights in Northwestern Russia

Background

The Sámi are an Indigenous people residing in the Arctic regions of Russia, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. In Russia, they inhabit the Kola Peninsula, an area rich in natural resources such as nickel, copper, and palladium. The Russian government has prioritized the extraction of these resources, leading to significant environmental degradation and encroachment on Sámi ancestral lands.(en.wikipedia.org)

Key Issues

Environmental Degradation: Industrial activities, including mining and infrastructure development, have led to the destruction of pasturelands, sacred sites, and traditional fishing areas. For instance, the closure of a 50-mile stretch of the Ponoi River to local fishing, granting exclusive rights to a commercial company, deprived the Sámi of their traditional food sources .(en.wikipedia.org)

Legal and Political Challenges: Despite constitutional guarantees of Indigenous rights, the Sámi face legal and political obstacles in asserting their land rights. The Russian legal system often fails to protect these rights, and Indigenous leaders have reported harassment and intimidation by authorities .(en.wikipedia.org)

Cultural Erosion: The encroachment on traditional lands and the suppression of Sámi identity have led to cultural erosion. Many Sámi are forced to hide their identity or seek asylum abroad to avoid persecution .(theguardian.com)

Community Response

In response to these challenges, Sámi activists have organized protests and legal actions to defend their land rights. For example, Andrei Danilov, a Sámi community leader, led a campaign against mining on Sámi lands and successfully challenged restrictive hunting laws in the Constitutional Court . However, such activism often leads to retaliation, including detention and exile.(aljazeera.com)

Implications

This case underscores the tension between economic development and the preservation of Indigenous land rights. While resource extraction contributes to national economic growth, it often comes at the expense of Indigenous communities' livelihoods and cultural heritage. The situation highlights the need for stronger legal protections for Indigenous rights and meaningful consultation processes in development projects.

If you're interested in exploring more about this topic or other related case studies, feel free to ask.

# data[].attributes.headline
LOCAL case study - Onoke pā - Kamo - New zealand 

# data[].attributes.subject
LOCAL case study - Onoke pā - Kamo - New zealand 

# data[].attributes.body
Conversion risk -

ecological integrity -

# data[].attributes.headline
arguments anti, should economic development take priority over the land rights of indigenous communities? 

# data[].attributes.subject
arguments anti, should economic development take priority over the land rights of indigenous communities? 

# data[].attributes.body
indigenous rights --> human rights

community displacement --> loss of practices --> loss of unity & culture

# data[].attributes.body
Reputation

Ability to Observe

Vested Interest

Expertise

Neutrality

# data[].attributes.body
cultural erosion

https://hindupost.in/society-culture/cultural-erosion-in-the-face-of-development/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Is development always for the better?

Unfortunately, that is not the case. Development, whether infrastructural, economic, or social, can be a powerful tool for progress. But it is important to acknowledge its potential downsides and unintended consequences.

Cultures are defined as distinct meaning and practice systems that are shared by a community. They create, function in, and emerge from environmental conditions. Humans have developed distinct livelihoods and corresponding patterns of thought, language, expression, dress, worship, manners, and cosmos, shaped and reshaped by their surroundings[1].

Cultural erosion in the face of development is a complex and multifaceted issue that has captured the attention of scholars, policymakers, and communities worldwide. It presents a critical question: how can we achieve progress and prosperity without sacrificing the unique threads that weave together the tapestry of our identities and traditions?

Large-scale projects, often driven by globalized models, can lead to a homogenization of landscapes, architectures, and even social structures. Local practices and customs can be overshadowed by standardized approaches, eroding the distinctiveness of cultural identities[2]. Development projects can displace communities from their ancestral lands or disrupt their traditional ways of life. This is certainly not to say that development is directly proportional to cultural erosion, but some large projects although done for the betterment of society, do not consider how big of a damage can be caused if not implemented carefully.

The Sardar Sarovar Dam Project on the Narmada River in Gujarat was envisioned to provide irrigation, drinking water, and hydroelectricity. However, its construction displaced thousands of tribal and marginalized communities from their ancestral lands, disrupting their traditional livelihoods and cultural practices[3]. The project submerged sacred sites and ancestral burial grounds, leading to a sense of cultural loss and identity displacement for the affected communities.

Resettlement programs faced challenges, often failing to adequately compensate or provide culturally appropriate living conditions. There are more examples close to home. Rapid urbanization in cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Bengaluru has resulted in the displacement of low-income communities and the destruction of traditional neighbourhoods to make way for new developments[4].

Bengaluru especially has taken the heat. Overpopulation and overdevelopment have overshadowed its culture and is becoming more and more westernised as the years progress. Brigade road, which was once a business destination, has become the party destination[5]. The youth in urban areas is more influenced by global trends and Western cultural elements, impacting their preferences in music, fashion, and lifestyle choices.

Environmental shifts have an impact on the diversity of human experience. Although it is difficult to measure cultural decline rigorously, the global decline in languages serves as a decent indicator. Every language has a distinct vocabulary with its own ontology, and every grammar form has a model of causes and effects. These languages offer us a unique means of understanding the world. Lost languages are lost cultures even if the vice versa of it remains untrue. Furthermore, the numbers do not look good:

It is estimated that between 50 and 90 percent of the languages spoken today will be extinct by the year 2,100. It disappears every two weeks or so[6]. For example, the decline of Irish is often attributed to various historical factors, including British colonial policies. However, urbanization, particularly in Dublin and other major cities, has accelerated the decline of Irish as English became the dominant language in urban centres. This is true even for Indian languages such as Odia, as Hindi became a dominant language[7].

Another important aspect of culture is food. Urbanization and development bring with it a shift in the quality and types of food consumed. With more and more cultivation lands becoming unusable because of land and water pollution which are a product of development projects, and while pesticides and modern farming equipment have been considered products of development, they are the real cause of declining food quality. Asian diets are drastically changing away from staple foods and toward more livestock and dairy products, fats and oils. These patterns are being strengthened by the quick expansion of international grocery stores and fast-food joints[8]. The dietary preferences of people, especially the younger generation, is towards western foods. Thus, traditional foods are being cooked and consumed lesser and lesser. This is how cultural foods are being replaced as a result of development.

To deny the impact of cultural erosion is to turn a blind eye to the vanishing languages, displaced communities, and fading traditions. We must acknowledge the irreplaceable value of these intangible treasures, recognizing their role in shaping our values, fostering a sense of belonging, and connecting us to our ancestors.

The path forward lies not in halting development or romanticizing the past, but in charting a course that fosters a symbiotic relationship between progress and preservation. The Government and the Corporates must do their part in promoting cultural awareness through education, media, and community engagement. This can shape a presentational attitude that values and preserves cultural practices.

Encouraging open dialogue, celebrating diversity, and fostering a sense of pride in heritage can contribute to a positive shift in societal attitudes toward cultural preservation. The first step towards that change is acknowledging the losses, embracing adaptive strategies, empowering communities, to ensure the continuity of the vibrant tapestry of human cultures.

[1] Paul Robbins, Eroding Cultures and Environments: What a Rapidly Changing Earth Means for the Richness of Human Experience, 16 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 132, XXXX (2015).

[6] Nicholas Evans, Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us XXXX (Wiley & Sons, Limited, John 2009).
-By Yuktha Suresh

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cultural erosion in the face of development

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Is development always for the better? Unfortunately, that is not the case. Development, whether infrastructural, economic, or social, can be a powerful tool for progress. But it is important to acknowledge its potential downsides and unintended consequences. Cultures are defined as distinct meaning and practice systems that are shared by a community.

# data[].attributes.headline
example of cultral erosion from economic development 

# data[].attributes.subject
example of cultral erosion from economic development 

# data[].attributes.body
The Sardar Sarovar Dam Project on the Narmada River in Gujarat was envisioned to provide irrigation, drinking water, and hydroelectricity. However, its construction displaced thousands of tribal and marginalized communities from their ancestral lands, disrupting their traditional livelihoods and cultural practices[3]. The project submerged sacred sites and ancestral burial grounds, leading to a sense of cultural loss and identity displacement for the affected communities.

https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/displacement-and-development-construction-sardar-dam#:~:text=The%20dam%20alone%20displaces%20more,%2C%20Maharashtra%2C%20and%20Madhya%20Pradesh.

more info

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Is development always for the better?

Unfortunately, that is not the case. Development, whether infrastructural, economic, or social, can be a powerful tool for progress. But it is important to acknowledge its potential downsides and unintended consequences.

Cultures are defined as distinct meaning and practice systems that are shared by a community. They create, function in, and emerge from environmental conditions. Humans have developed distinct livelihoods and corresponding patterns of thought, language, expression, dress, worship, manners, and cosmos, shaped and reshaped by their surroundings[1].

Cultural erosion in the face of development is a complex and multifaceted issue that has captured the attention of scholars, policymakers, and communities worldwide. It presents a critical question: how can we achieve progress and prosperity without sacrificing the unique threads that weave together the tapestry of our identities and traditions?

Large-scale projects, often driven by globalized models, can lead to a homogenization of landscapes, architectures, and even social structures. Local practices and customs can be overshadowed by standardized approaches, eroding the distinctiveness of cultural identities[2]. Development projects can displace communities from their ancestral lands or disrupt their traditional ways of life. This is certainly not to say that development is directly proportional to cultural erosion, but some large projects although done for the betterment of society, do not consider how big of a damage can be caused if not implemented carefully.

The Sardar Sarovar Dam Project on the Narmada River in Gujarat was envisioned to provide irrigation, drinking water, and hydroelectricity. However, its construction displaced thousands of tribal and marginalized communities from their ancestral lands, disrupting their traditional livelihoods and cultural practices[3]. The project submerged sacred sites and ancestral burial grounds, leading to a sense of cultural loss and identity displacement for the affected communities.

Resettlement programs faced challenges, often failing to adequately compensate or provide culturally appropriate living conditions. There are more examples close to home. Rapid urbanization in cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Bengaluru has resulted in the displacement of low-income communities and the destruction of traditional neighbourhoods to make way for new developments[4].

Bengaluru especially has taken the heat. Overpopulation and overdevelopment have overshadowed its culture and is becoming more and more westernised as the years progress. Brigade road, which was once a business destination, has become the party destination[5]. The youth in urban areas is more influenced by global trends and Western cultural elements, impacting their preferences in music, fashion, and lifestyle choices.

Environmental shifts have an impact on the diversity of human experience. Although it is difficult to measure cultural decline rigorously, the global decline in languages serves as a decent indicator. Every language has a distinct vocabulary with its own ontology, and every grammar form has a model of causes and effects. These languages offer us a unique means of understanding the world. Lost languages are lost cultures even if the vice versa of it remains untrue. Furthermore, the numbers do not look good:

It is estimated that between 50 and 90 percent of the languages spoken today will be extinct by the year 2,100. It disappears every two weeks or so[6]. For example, the decline of Irish is often attributed to various historical factors, including British colonial policies. However, urbanization, particularly in Dublin and other major cities, has accelerated the decline of Irish as English became the dominant language in urban centres. This is true even for Indian languages such as Odia, as Hindi became a dominant language[7].

Another important aspect of culture is food. Urbanization and development bring with it a shift in the quality and types of food consumed. With more and more cultivation lands becoming unusable because of land and water pollution which are a product of development projects, and while pesticides and modern farming equipment have been considered products of development, they are the real cause of declining food quality. Asian diets are drastically changing away from staple foods and toward more livestock and dairy products, fats and oils. These patterns are being strengthened by the quick expansion of international grocery stores and fast-food joints[8]. The dietary preferences of people, especially the younger generation, is towards western foods. Thus, traditional foods are being cooked and consumed lesser and lesser. This is how cultural foods are being replaced as a result of development.

To deny the impact of cultural erosion is to turn a blind eye to the vanishing languages, displaced communities, and fading traditions. We must acknowledge the irreplaceable value of these intangible treasures, recognizing their role in shaping our values, fostering a sense of belonging, and connecting us to our ancestors.

The path forward lies not in halting development or romanticizing the past, but in charting a course that fosters a symbiotic relationship between progress and preservation. The Government and the Corporates must do their part in promoting cultural awareness through education, media, and community engagement. This can shape a presentational attitude that values and preserves cultural practices.

Encouraging open dialogue, celebrating diversity, and fostering a sense of pride in heritage can contribute to a positive shift in societal attitudes toward cultural preservation. The first step towards that change is acknowledging the losses, embracing adaptive strategies, empowering communities, to ensure the continuity of the vibrant tapestry of human cultures.

[1] Paul Robbins, Eroding Cultures and Environments: What a Rapidly Changing Earth Means for the Richness of Human Experience, 16 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 132, XXXX (2015).

[6] Nicholas Evans, Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us XXXX (Wiley & Sons, Limited, John 2009).
-By Yuktha Suresh

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Cultural erosion in the face of development

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Is development always for the better? Unfortunately, that is not the case. Development, whether infrastructural, economic, or social, can be a powerful tool for progress. But it is important to acknowledge its potential downsides and unintended consequences. Cultures are defined as distinct meaning and practice systems that are shared by a community.

# data[].attributes.body
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/media/video/reclaiming-bastion-point-roadside-stories

https://e-tangata.co.nz/history/bastion-point-a-desperate-struggle-and-a-dream-fulfilled/

https://thespinoff.co.nz/books/24-05-2023/takaparawhau-the-peoples-story-of-bastion-point

The Bastion Point protests in 1977-78 were a result of a government plan to develop expensive housing on the land, which was ancestral land of Ngāti Whātua. The tribe, along with supporters, occupied Bastion Point for 506 days to protest the government's plan.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Bastion Point | NZHistory, New Zealand history online

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This promontory above Tāmaki Drive has come to symbolise Māori land issues. It was given to the Crown by Ngāti Whātua as a defence site during the Russian scare of 1885. In 1977-78 a 506-day protest against a proposed Crown sale was held there.

# data[].attributes.body
"Along with the injustices suffered by the Ngāti Whātua and the belief that this land claim was rightful"

"I like to think that the increased awareness of land injustices and government recognition of these issues were highlighted with Bastion Point. Looking back I see that it was a pivotal point in my desire for justice for the Ngāti Whātua. Bastion Point was another marker in the history of Māori self-determination.

I do question the monetary exchange for the current land grievances. Haven’t we learnt our lesson that money can’t replace land? Land has no cash value to the Māori! It is sacred — our taonga! We are just the guardians."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Takaparawhau: The people’s story of the Bastion Point occupation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
‘We lived in the moment’ – memories from living at Takaparawhau, Bastion Point during the land rights protest 45 years ago.

# data[].attributes.body
The land at Bastion Point originally belonged to the Ngāti Whātua iwi, or tribe. In 1840, its chief, Te Kawau, invited Governor Hobson to establish the new capital city of Auckland on 3000 acres of the tribe’s area. Te Kawau hoped this generous gesture would safeguard the rest of his iwi’s land. However, by the 1850s, most of Ngāti Whātua’s land in Auckland had gone. The tribe survived on its small remaining base at Ōkahu Bay.

In the late 1850s, land at Bastion Point was taken by the Crown for defence purposes. During the ‘Russian Scare’ of 1885, when New Zealand feared a sea invasion from Russia, military fortifications were built. During World War Two, more land was requisitioned.

By the end of the war, Ngāti Whātua was hemmed into a tiny section of land. But even this land, close to the city and with great views, was coveted by the local council.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
After European settlement of Auckland, the lands of the Ngāti Whātua tribe were gradually whittled away, and the harbourside area of Bastion Point was taken by the Crown for defence purposes. A 1977 government plan to develop expensive housing on Bastion Point prompted a 506-day occupation by the tribe and supporters.

Transcript

Archival audio: Joe Hawke, who led the occupation of Bastion Point, explains why the issue was so important to Ngāti Whātua.

Narrator: Takaparawhā, or Bastion Point, at Ōkahu Bay in Auckland's Waitematā Harbour, was the site of an occupation in the late 1970s that became one of New Zealand's most famous protest actions.

The land at Bastion Point originally belonged to the Ngāti Whātua iwi, or tribe. In 1840, its chief, Te Kawau, invited Governor Hobson to establish the new capital city of Auckland on 3000 acres of the tribe's area. Te Kawau hoped this generous gesture would safeguard the rest of his iwi's land. However, by the 1850s, most of Ngāti Whātua's land in Auckland had gone. The tribe survived on its small remaining base at Ōkahu Bay.

In the late 1850s, land at Bastion Point was taken by the Crown for defence purposes. During the 'Russian Scare' of 1885, when New Zealand feared a sea invasion from Russia, military fortifications were built. During World War Two, more land was requisitioned.

By the end of the war, Ngāti Whātua was hemmed into a tiny section of land. But even this land, close to the city and with great views, was coveted by the local council.

Various measures, some of them underhand, were used to try and force Ngāti Whātua off their land, but they were not completely successful. So, in 1951, Māori families still living at Ōkahu Bay were evicted and relocated, and their dwellings burned.

By 1977, the government no longer needed the Bastion Point land that they had taken for military use. Ngāti Whātua had expected that this land would be returned to them when it was no longer needed. But this was not the case. The government announced plans to develop Bastion Point into a high-income housing area.

Two day before construction work was to start Ngāti Whātua occupied the land in a protest action which lasted 506 days. The constant media coverage raised awareness of Māori grievances throughout the country. Visitors from New Zealand and overseas occupied the site to show their support, including the country singer John Denver.

In February 1978 some land was offered back to Ngāti Whātua, but at a price, and the protesters rejected the offer. By late May the government's patience was at an end and police forcibly removed over 200 protesters occupying the site.

However, nearly 10 years later, the Waitangi Tribunal, in the first historical claim it heard, found that Ngāti Whātua's grievances were valid and most of Takaparawhā was returned to them, along with other lands and compensation.

The exception was the memorial to former prime minister Michael Joseph Savage, which remains at Bastion Point. Savage was New Zealand's first Labour prime minister and one of its most beloved. When Savage died in 1940, an estimated 200,000 New Zealanders, Māori and Pākehā, watched his coffin travel from central Auckland to Bastion Point.

Though he was buried on Māori land acquired by the Crown in 1941, five years earlier Savage had been instrumental in keeping some Bastion Point land in Ngāti Whātua hands, when he overruled a proposed government housing scheme on the site.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Reclaiming Bastion Point - roadside stories

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Video about Ngāti Whātua's occupation of Bastion Point in Auckland during the late 1970s.

# data[].attributes.body
Article 10 Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned and after agreement on just and fair compensation and, where possible, with the option of return.

Article 26

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.

2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired. 3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.

Article 29

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the conservation and protection of the environment and the productive capacity of their lands or territories and resources. States shall establish and implement assistance programmes for indigenous peoples for such conservation and protection, without discrimination.

2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that no storage or disposal of hazardous materials shall take place in the lands or territories of indigenous peoples without their free, prior and informed consent.

3. States shall also take effective measures to ensure, as needed, that programmes for monitoring, maintaining and restoring the health of indigenous peoples, as developed and implemented by the peoples affected by such materials, are duly implemented.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation CEO Michael Woodley addresses the media at the group's cultural centre, near Karratha in the Pilbara region, Western Australia, on October 20, 2023 [Melanie Burton/Reuters]

An Aboriginal group is seeking 1.8 billion Australian dollars ($1.15bn) in damages from Western Australia's state government after it allowed a mining firm to establish an iron ore project on its ancestral land without a land use deal, according to court filings.

The Federal Court of Australia filings, revealed on Wednesday, showed that the Yindjibarndi Ngurra Aboriginal Corporation (YNAC) claimed that activity at the Solomon hub, run by global mining firm Fortescue, has severely damaged its land and people.

Recommended Stories

The case could prove a landmark one in Australia due to the amount of compensation being sought by the Aboriginal group, as well as potentially opening the door to other claims from Indigenous organisations for past damage to their land.

The filings include claims against the state government for 1 billion Australian dollars (almost $637m) to compensate for cultural damage caused as a result of the mining project that it authorised, as well as 678 million Australian dollars (more than $431m) for economic losses.

The Federal Court of Australia is hearing arguments this week, but a ruling is not expected until late this year.

Should it lose the case, the state government is expected to try and recoup losses by suing Fortescue, the world's fourth-largest miner of iron ore.

Fortescue said in a statement to the Reuters news agency that it "accepts that the Yindjibarndi People are entitled to compensation" due to the project, but it disagrees with the group "on the amount of that compensation".

The firm's founder, Andrew Forrest, is one of Australia's wealthiest people and his firm recorded a net profit of $5.7bn last financial year, after tax.

In 2017, the Yindjibarndi People won exclusive native title rights for land covering the Solomon mining hub, about 60km (37 miles) north of the town of Tom Price in remote Western Australia.

Native title is a legal doctrine in Australia recognising land rights for Aboriginal groups.

Fortescue's vast mineral-rich project, which is capable of yielding up to 80 million tonnes of iron ore a year, started in the area in 2012.

According to experts quoted by the Yindjibarndi People in its court filings, the Solomon mine has caused existential damage to the Aboriginal people through destroying aspects of their land and culture.

The Fortescue project has damaged more than 285 significant archaeological sites, as well as six Dreaming or creation story tracks, the report said.

In Aboriginal culture, story tracks serve as a map of sacred sites, carrying important cultural knowledge passed down through generations over millennia, and which form part of Australia's understanding of human settlements dating back about 40,000-45,000 years.

"The significant harm to country, people and Dreamings remains ongoing," the report said.

Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Aboriginal group seeks $1.1bn in damages over iron ore mining project

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Yindjibarndi Ngurra Aboriginal Corporation filed the landmark case against Western Australia's state government.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
California is to examine its Amazon oil ties following pleas from Indigenous leaders from Ecuador

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The California Senate has introduced a landmark resolution to have the state examine its crude imports from the Amazon, following a visit this week by Indigenous leaders from Ecuador who urged lawmakers to help stop oil expansion in their territories.

# data[].attributes.body
"In an era of rapid globalization and industrialization, the tension between the rights of Indigenous communities and economic development has become an increasingly pressing issue. Indigenous territories and ancestral lands—rich in cultural heritage and environmental value, including vital natural resources—are often at risk of degradation due to development initiatives. Yet, in a time when housing, tourism, and the exploitation of natural resources represent significant economic opportunities for governments and large-scale businesses, it raises a critical question: How socially, environmentally, and politically ethical is it to prioritize economic growth over the protection of culturally significant lands belonging to Indigenous minorities?"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
History: Colonisation : Working with Indigenous Australians

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Working with Indigenous Australians Website

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
Australian Institute of International Affairs

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
UNDRIP at 10: Are We Making Progress in the Global Fight for Indigenous Rights? - AIIA

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Progress has been slow but steady in the fight for indigenous rights around the world, but the remaining barriers to equality may be the hardest to break.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Western Australia to scrap new law protecting Aboriginal heritage sites | Indigenous Rights News | Al Jazeera

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We and our 923 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Allow all enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. Selecting Reject all or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Manage preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.To learn more, please view our Cookie Policy.