# data[].attributes.body
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:

Is adaptable in various subjects.

It uses balance by widening your technology world, but it does not take away from classroom learning.

Holistic approach: Looking at technology as a whole rather than individual parts.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons:

Complex: Hard to understand because all components need to be balanced.

It needs more practicability for teachers who struggle with technology integration.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology Integration Matrix

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:

Detailed levels of progression (Entry, Adoption, Adaptation, Infusion, transformation).

Student centered learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons:

It is just a "guide", so it will not fit into every class subject and will require more research form teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
The Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition Model

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:

Easy frame work to work off of in the classroom.

Engages a deeper level of thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons:

May prioritize the use of technology rather than actually learning about it.

Lack of depth.

# data[].attributes.body
Pros:

Student-centered learning.

Easy to understand with measurable goals

Incorporated the use of technology with technology learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Cons:

It focuses on the three ideas but misses the mark on other important goals.

There is not one set understanding of the framework; it can be interpreted differently by many educators.

# data[].attributes.body
TPACK servers as the foundation model for tech frameworks.

# data[].attributes.body
Builds off of TPACK, but with more structure to the learning process.

# data[].attributes.body
Similar to the TPACK framework, SAMR simplifies the complexity so teacher can easily integrates in the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
Uses ideas from TPACK and SAMR to create a more functional leaning and engagement.