# data[].attributes.body
Would also have liked for the cohort to provide feedback in person as well, it creates a more interactive environment instead of having people provide feedback on their phones, missing out on the lecturer's feedback, or not listening to the next person's presentations if that makes sense.

The padlet feedback is great to reflect back on, still would've been nice to hear from my peers as well

# data[].attributes.body
The timing of this presentation could have been designed better. Some of the feedback we received was like "fix this for the final version", but with what time? The portfolio is due in a week, shouldn't that be our focus instead of tweaking outcomes? We could just critique the weaknesses of the outcome in the portfolio.

# data[].attributes.body
A balance between visuals and text is important in these short presentations. A lot of people have a difficult time maintaining that balance which is understandable considering the amount of work they have produced. A little effort and structuring is necessary to bring in that balance and to make the presentation effective and memorable.

# data[].attributes.body
It was difficult to explain the full scope of my project in such a short amount of time, however I think I was able to touch on the main points within the 4-minute time frame. It was helpful to see how other classmates and students had arranged their final presentations. While I am scheduled to print my final outcome (a book) this coming Monday, it would have been nice to have that output with me during these presentations.

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder what would happen if we got the chance to see our peers' work. It feels like we're missing out on a lot of our co-hort's work with the way that classes are divided and presentations are in separate groups.

The feedback in general was really great and helpful, however there was no allotted time for feedback and so it was difficult to stick to schedule.

There were some technical issues that delayed the presentations by at least 30 minutes.

# data[].attributes.body
4minutes was quite shorter than expected. It was impossible to show all the research or process I did, so I will minimise it to be clear and simple as possible.
It was great to see various presentation design that fit the concept of their projects. I can learn from others a lot.
Giving a presentation in the middle of a project has been very helpful in decisively reducing unnecessary research and clarifying my ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
Timing, practicing the presentation for 4 minutes. Also transitioning to presenting the idea in a more polished way. Having been in the iteration research/process, expanding upon that and creating more solid outcomes now, it would have been good to step back, detaching myself from it and refining the narrative and style of the presentation. I think my presentation was beginning to do that but because of time I wasn't able to show the fully edited idea. In a WIP presentation, we were encouraged to bring our experiments but I felt it was confusing as also in this time to deliver a punchy fully worked out presentation was hard. Feedback was great - I felt in the group I was in we were all contributing which was great.

# data[].attributes.body
My final outcome wasn't 100% complete and I received so really great feedback from my peers which was really helpful about different directions the project could go in. I'm now just going through the feedback and reevaluating what I should do for the showcase. There are lots of great ideas but it's now a bit overwhelming

# data[].attributes.headline
The essence of the project is lost when its rushed through during the presentation.

# data[].attributes.subject
The essence of the project is lost when its rushed through during the presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the administrative organization of this could have been stronger. The schedule made no sense because it did not factor in feedback, they did not divide the groups evenly by who showed up and it was ungodly hot in there. Additionally 4 minutes was not enough time to go over the entirety of the research, which meant a lot of the tutor feedback was things that someone had considered, but cut out of the presentation due to lack of time. That being said, the feedback we received was quite extensive and helpful otherwise!

# data[].attributes.body
· What was difficult?
To show and explain the research in compact way.

· How can I improve in the future?
Find the right heading and categorise the research, and clearly tell the point I was respond to this

# data[].attributes.body
Presenting a project that has been developing for over 12+ weeks and the enormous amount of data as well as the outcomes in under 4 mins was difficult for me to summarize. Contexts are essential for any project to look at and setting up a background for those along with the outcome in limited time has been challenging, especially when the project has multiple outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Creating a narrative that explained the reason behind the outcome. The last 9 weeks have been quite the journey in developing the concept so tying everything together was satisfying!

# data[].attributes.body
I thought it was difficult to make a presentation that was extensive enough within the time limit, I think I may have gone over a bit. However, I think I did well in creating a clear narrative around the project and communicating that in my slides without overloading them with text.