# data[].attributes.body
'DAt directur did one mighty fine job portrayin' 'dem characters. He still made Aunt Polley a crotchety strict old lady and still made Tom a slacker goof who plays hookey. It was like reading' the book on the big screen! WHOOOOOOOOEEEE!

# data[].attributes.body
BY JINGO! That ol' feller did quite the awful job showin' Aunt Polly, but not that feller Tom. My, Aunt Polly was not as mean/strict towards Tom in the book. That ol' feller only scolded Tom softly. For example ol' Polly scolded Tom about his shirt in the book,but in the movie she sent poor ol' Tom to his room without supper. As for Tom the director showed Tom to be a rapscallion. That feller barely listened in the book and movie.

# data[].attributes.body
WOW! That ol' director did an awful  job portayin' me. What was he thinkin'? Of course they do a mighty job doin' dear Aunt Polly! Did they forget 'bout me, Mark Twain. I was the main character. When I watched that dang movie I was very disappointed I was less aggressive than I was supposed to be. Aunt Polly was aggressive, more than me. Twas da' director trying to fool me. I gotta go lick some people. Ol' director did an awful job portayin' me.

# data[].attributes.body
O' my stars! Where do I get started 'bout how awful that director was at portrayin' ole Tom Sawyer. I mean he did a mighty fine job at potrayin' my dear Aunt Polly. But when I twas a finished watchin' that movie I had wet my trousers cuz I was laughin' so hard 'bout how bad that little clip was. The director had made Aunt Polly an aggressive ol' lady like I wanted her to be. But Tom was supposed ta be little moe' aggressive in his words. He was suppose to tell his peers 'bout how he was a gonna lick 'm. He was suppose ta be a lil' troublemaker. The tone to me didn't really seem like he was. That director did do one good thing 'bout Tom. Fact, two good things. He did make him sneaky and make him a mischiefious child.

# data[].attributes.body
'Da director did a fine job portrayin' Aunt Polly. She was just as pushy and mean in the film as I made her to be. Al' though Tom was not ye young boy I wanted him to be. I made Tom a crazy adventrus' child, but 'lil Tom did'nt go on those crazy adventures in the film. Though, ye can tell very well the relationship of the two. Like how ol' Aunt Polly knew ye was goin' to sneak out, but she caught 'im before he could. And how Aunt Polly predicted Tom was goin' to go a'swimming. 'Dis coulda' helped 'da reader understand Tom better, knowin' how other characters see him.

# data[].attributes.body
'Da director did a fine job portrayin' my character Aunt Polly she were old and d'splining like 'e was s'pposed to and she looked fine. But, Tom on 'e was just terrible he was n't adventurous like I said he was and did n't do some of 'da lines Tom said. He did n't play hooky. He also did n't even eat supper. That director messed up so much darn! Now I'm all worked up. By Jingo!

# data[].attributes.body
Da' director did a terrible job explaining Tom. Tom had to be expressed as this mischief child. An' da' director did a good job with 'scribing aunt Polly as she is a snapp' and mean aunt which she is. The directo' needs to work on Tom's characta'. BY JINGO!!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Da' director did a terrible job explaining Tom. Tom had to be expressed as this mischief child. Al'

# data[].attributes.body
"BY JINGO" 'da director did a horrific job potrayin' Tom and Polly. Tom ain't jumping out that window and he sure didn't sneak around like dat'. In contrary I think that director did a good job for the most part playing Aunt Polly.

# data[].attributes.body
"By Jingo" 'dat director did not do a good job at portrayin' ol' Tom Sawyer. 'Though he made a mighty fine character fo' Aunt Polly, I was tryin' to make her sound like some ol' fart. But Tom's characta' was Scary. I was AFEARED 'cuz 'da characta' was sooo different from 'da real ol' Tom Sawyer. Tom was adventurous, brave, and handsome ('cuz he was somewhat like me) in 'da book, ut in da' film he was all sneaky an' bad. 'Dis film was horrible an' I ain't neva' gonna' watch it AGAIN.

# data[].attributes.body
Da' director did a terrible job portrayin' Tom. Tom was supposed to be goin' on adventures but he didn't do nothin' like that in the movie. Aunt Polly was portrayed pretty well she was all snappy and mean like she was supposed to be. This directo' needs to do a betta' job on Toms characta'.

# data[].attributes.body
Da' director did not do a good job at a all. Tom t'was supposed ta be al' 'venturous , like yee' was in the book. Aunt Polly was 'xactly like the book she was an old crank that yelled at Tom for playin' hookey. Da' director needs ta do a WAY better job wit' Tom in ye movie. BY JINGO!!!

# data[].attributes.body
The director did not do a fine job at all. T''was supposed to be like Tom bein' all 'dveventurous, but he just bein' a bog ol' lia! Aunt Polly was 'exactly like she was in the book, all mean and spanky! Tom needed to be like 'ee was in the novel. By jingo!

# data[].attributes.body
'Da derector didn't do a good job at all o' portrayin' Tom. He made him seem rambunctious and sneaky. I like to thinka' Tom as adventurous. In 'da book, Tom plays hookie from school to be with al' his friends. In 'da film, Tom is just gettin' inta' trouble and not never gettin' away with nothin'. Now Aunt Polly was pert'ayed pretty good. In 'da book she was u'reasonable and mean ta Tom. She wa' also like 'dis in 'da film. 'Da derector needs ta work on gettin' Toms character righ'. By jingo!

# data[].attributes.body
y jingo thart there movie did a terrible job o' pertrayin my karkters because aut polly was s'pose ti be yuuuung nort old.