# data[].attributes.body
There was a bill brought up to the congress, and this bill involved suing Saudi Arabia, because many citizens believe that Saudi Arabia caused 9/11.  However, Obama vetoed the bill. The congress had the complex majority necessary to overide Obama's vet. This case is about whether Americans should have the right to sue Saudi Arabia for the acts of terror on 9/11. A group named Al-Qaeda and leader, Osama Bin Laden planned and put the attacks into action. Since congress passed the law which allows American citizens to sue Saudi Arabia, and overrode the president, the Americans now have the right to sue the Saudi Arabians.

# data[].attributes.body
Liptak, Kevin. "Obama Vetoes 9/11 Lawsuit Bill." CNN. Cable News Network, 28 Sept. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

Tazamal, Mobashra. "If US Victims of Terror Can Sue Saudi Arabia, Can Victims of American Terrorism Sue the US?" Common Dreams. Middle East Eye, 04 Oct. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

Wikipedia. Wikipedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

"Kids." Bill Of Rights -. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

Chossudovsky, Michel. "Saudi Arabia’s Alleged Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks and the 28 Pages: “Red-Herring”, Propaganda Ploy." Global Research. GlobalResearch.ca, 14 Apr. 2014. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

Korte, Gregory. "Why Obama Doesn't Want 9/11 Families Suing Saudi Arabia." USA Today. Gannett, 24 Sept. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

"Presidential Vetoes | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives."Presidential Vetoes | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives. Office of the Historian, 29 Sept. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

Kim, Seung Min. "Congress Hands Obama First Veto Override." POLITICO. Politcio LLC, 28 Sept. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016.

# data[].attributes.body
The bill of rights, and the last 17 amendments of the constitution describe the rights every citizen has, as well as further describing some limitations of government, and our judicial system. The bill of rights relates to our case because it protected individual rights. In our case, congress gave the citizens the right to sue Saudi Arabia.

# data[].attributes.body
Articles 1, 2, and 3 describe our 3 branches of government; the judicial branch, executive branch, and legislative branch. Article 4 guarantees a republican government. Article 5 describes the process to amend the constitution.  Article 6 says that federal law and the constitution are  the supreme law of the land. Article 7 says that it took 9, out of the original thirteen states to ratify this document.

# data[].attributes.body
The constitution is the document that describes and forms our government. There are three parts to the constitution. The first part of the constitution is that preamble, the second part is the 7 articles, and third are the 27 amendments.

# data[].attributes.body
Popular sovereignty allows for the government to change, over the will of the people. This principle of popular sovereignty affected if whether suing Saudi Arabia was going to become a law or not, because even if the president vetoed the bill,the people had to have a say. Which meant that if the people pushed and lobbied for it, the bill would likely become a law. This relates to our case because even though the president didn't want this bill passed, the people wanted the bill passed, and it was.

# data[].attributes.body
A principle that affects this case is checks and balances. This principle allow two branches to check on the other branch. This allows them to make sure that they balance the power, and the other branch doesn't create or do anything unconstitutional. Therefore, this  principle gave president Obama to place a check on the congress by vetoing the bill. President Obama was given the power in Article 1 Section 7 which allowed him to veto a law proposed by congress. Then the Articles says that the congress can check the power by overriding the veto which also occurred in our case.

# data[].attributes.body
Separation of powers divides the amount of responsibilities and duties each branch of the government has. This relates to our case because the power was split among the branches. This principle is similar to checks in balances because the congress and executive branch balanced out and had different powers. This made sure there was no abuse of power.