# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Part of the problem, when invoking moral philosophy to solve the ethical problem of animal experimentation, is the tendency to try to resolve it using a single philosophical construct, be it utilitarianism, a rights‐based approach, or contractualism, or any other. Instead, an approach similar to that used to resolve ethical dilemmas in clinical practice may be more helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
Arguments on either side!

# data[].attributes.body
What are the three Rs of animal experimentation? Where does this come from

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2658312/
Make notes on the article

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.animal-ethics.org/utilitarianism/
Now summarize the argument

# data[].attributes.body
Can these be useful?

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animals-medical-experiments/
Summarize this viewpoint.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/
It is quite challenging...science is hard! But a useful case study! Make notes.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the infographic and then download it. Now edit it to show evidence that you can use to make arguments FOR and AGAINST using animals in experiments.

# data[].attributes.body
A Course from John Hopkins University
http://ocw.jhsph.edu/index.cfm/go/viewCourse/course/HumaneScience/coursePage/lectureNotes/