# data[].attributes.body
1. Educational Researcher
Source: Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley (2005)
This is a strong venue because it publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research that reaches a wide academic audience. It aligns with my research because my study focuses on educational practices and contributes to broader discussions in education. Publishing here would help share my findings with researchers and policymakers.

2. Action Research Journal
Source: Altrichter et al. (2008)
This journal is a good fit because it focuses specifically on practitioner research and real-world applications. It aligns with my research since my study involves practical implementation and reflection within an educational setting. This venue would allow my findings to reach educators who can directly apply them.

3. Teaching and Teacher Education
Source: Dana & Yendol-Hoppey (2020), Chapter 8
This venue is ideal because it focuses on teacher practices, development, and classroom-based research. It aligns with my study if it involves instructional strategies or improving teaching outcomes. Publishing here would connect my research to professionals interested in improving teaching and learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Middle School Journal: Middle School Journal publishes practitioner‑oriented, peer‑reviewed articles about theory and practice in grades 5–9 and explicitly seeks reports of successful programs, critical descriptions of teaching, and applications of research that address the developmental needs of young adolescents. Manuscripts are generally 10–20 double‑spaced pages including references, must connect to middle level philosophy, and need to be original, not under review elsewhere, and prepared according to their PDF “Submission Guidelines” and online author instructions before submission through their Editorial Manager system.

Journal of Teacher Action Research:

The Journal of Teacher Action Research focuses specifically on teacher‑led action research that positively impacts student learning and classroom practice, making it a good fit for your systematic, data‑rich study of seating, peer dynamics, and routines. It accepts empirical, classroom‑based manuscripts that clearly describe the context, research questions, methods (data collection and analysis), findings, and implications for practice, and submissions must be original, framed explicitly as action research, and prepared in line with the journal’s online “Submissions” guidelines before being uploaded through their submission portal.

Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A third strong option is the Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL), which publishes empirical and reflective studies on teaching and learning in higher and K–12 contexts when they are grounded in systematic inquiry and clearly connect data to instructional decisions. JoSoTL typically expects manuscripts that clearly articulate a research question, situate the work in relevant literature, describe methods (including data collection and analysis) in enough detail for readers to judge rigor, present findings with appropriate evidence, and discuss implications for teaching and learning; articles usually follow standard IMRaD‑style structure, use APA formatting, and are submitted through the journal’s online system after ensuring the work is original and not under review elsewhere.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Publication Venue: Teacher Inquiry Studies (Florida Journal of Educational Research)

Requirements for publishing:

Manuscripts must be original and peer‑reviewed reports of classroom inquiry conducted by current educators or collaborators.

Article length should be 2,000–4,000 words (including abstract, references, figures, etc.).

Use APA style, 12‑pt font, 1‑inch margins.

Include an abstract (max 150 words) and adhere to formatting rules.

Submission must include a cover letter specifying that it is for the Teacher Inquiry section and confirming ethics review or explaining why it is unnecessary.

2. Publication Venue: Journal of Practitioner Research

Requirements for Publishing:

Must be original, unpublished research clearly grounded in practitioner inquiry or similar traditions (teacher research, action research, etc.).

Manuscripts are peer‑reviewed using a double‑blind review process (reviewers don’t know authors’ identities).

Works should reflect practitioner research traditions, meaning the author is actively engaged in the research context, such as classroom or school practice.

Typically follows academic formatting standards (APA or as outlined in the journal’s author guidelines).

Open access: articles are freely available online, increasing the visibility and accessibility of research.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Educational Researcher – Publication Requirements

Source: Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley (2005)

Manuscripts must address significant issues in education and contribute to broader educational research conversations

Articles should be clearly written for a wide academic audience, not overly technical

Typically shorter in length compared to other journals (focus on concise, impactful arguments)

Must follow strict APA formatting and citation guidelines

Requires original research or strong conceptual analysis

Peer-reviewed process with revisions expected

2.  Action Research Journal – Publication Requirements

Source: Altrichter et al. (2008)

Focus on practitioner-based or action research conducted in real-world settings

Must clearly describe the research context, methods, and reflective process

Emphasis on practical implications and improvement of practice

Writing should connect theory with practice

Requires transparency in data collection and analysis

Peer-reviewed, with openness to iterative revisions

3.  Teaching and Teacher Education – Publication Requirements

Source: Dana & Yendol-Hoppey (2020), Chapter 8

Manuscripts must relate directly to teaching practices, teacher education, or professional development

Requires strong theoretical framework and connection to existing literature

Research must demonstrate clear implications for teaching and learning

Typically longer, in-depth research articles

Must follow detailed formatting and submission guidelines (often APA style)

Blind peer-review process with multiple rounds of revision

# data[].attributes.body
Tip 1: Write for Your Audience, Not for Complexity
Source: Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley (2005)
I learned that strong research writing should be clear and audience-focused rather than too complex. I chose this because it increases the chances that my research will actually be understood and used by my audience, whom I want to receive my message. In my study, I will ensure my language is simple and direct so that my target audience can apply my findings. But if at any point I must use complex vocabulary, I will make sure to give a quick definition for the word so that the audience can understand.

Tip 2: Start Writing Early and Revise Continuously
Source: How to Write and Publish Research Articles in Journals (video)
This tip emphasized starting the writing process early rather than waiting until everything is finished. I chose this because it helps improve organization and reduces last-minute stress. I will apply this by drafting sections of my paper throughout my research process.

Tip 3: Follow Journal Guidelines Carefully
Source: Natriello (1996)
I learned that not following submission guidelines can lead to rejection regardless of research quality. I chose this because it’s a simple but very important step that will make or break your chances at publication. For my study, I will review formatting, citation style, and submission requirements before submitting.

# data[].attributes.body
Tip 1: Know Your Audience and Tailor Your Message
Source: Conference Presentation Tips and Mistakes
I learned that understanding who will attend your presentation helps you focus on what content and language to use. I chose this because presenting research effectively depends on the connection that you have with your audience and the message you are trying to send them (can they relate, or is it something that does not affect/concern them?). For my study, I will emphasize the parts most relevant to my audience, which are educators or practitioners.

Tip 2: Practice and Time Your Presentation
Source: Dana & Yendol-Hoppey (2020), Chapter 8
This tip emphasizes rehearsing multiple times to ensure smooth delivery and proper timing. I chose this because a well-practiced presentation is easier to follow and makes a stronger impression. I will apply this by practicing speaking about my key points while giving only the important details in advance and adjusting slides to fit the allotted time.

Tip 3: Use Visuals to Support Key Points, Not Overwhelm
Source: How to Write and Publish Research Articles in Journals & Conference Presentation Tips and Mistakes
I learned that visuals should highlight main findings, not clutter the presentation. I chose this because clear visuals help the audience understand my research quickly, and too many words on one slide can be overwhelming for the audience. I will apply this by designing slides with concise graphs or diagrams and limiting text to only key points and details.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Journal Of Practitioner Research

Original, unpublished manuscripts only

Research must be practitioner‑focused (action research, teacher research, self‑study, etc.).

Human‑subjects research should have appropriate approval

Prepare as a single file

APA 7th edition formatting for text and references

Double‑spaced text, 1.5‑inch margins

Abstract required (100–150 words)

Include a title page with full author details

No author names in the main manuscript

Maximum length: 30 pages total (including references)

The cover letter must explain why the manuscript qualifies as practitioner research

Peer review; revisions may be requested

2. Practice: Contemporary Issues in Practitioner Education

Submissions should align with the journal’s interdisciplinary practitioner focus and contribute insight into practice, professional learning, or policy

Manuscripts are peer-reviewed before publication

Use the Taylor & Francis submission portal linked on the journal’s site

Follow the specific Instructions for Authors on the journal’s homepage

Typically, the journal either accepts format‑free submissions (T&F policy) or provides detailed layout/format templates per journal.

Include a clear cover letter explaining relevance and contribution to practitioner education.

3. Teaching and Teacher Education

Manuscripts must offer significant originality with contributions to theory, research, or practice in teaching and teacher education.

Research should be grounded in current international literature and demonstrate robust theoretical engagement.

Methods can be qualitative, quantitative, or mixed

Manuscripts that are just descriptive or lacking a theoretical context may be desk‑rejected.

Prepare manuscript according to Elsevier’s submission templates and journal style.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Journal of Practitioner Research https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpr/

Why this is a good site:

The Journal of Practitioner Research is a peer‑reviewed journal that specifically publishes research conducted by educators about their own practice (not just about others’ students or teachers). It focuses on action research, teacher inquiry, and other forms of systematic practitioner inquiry that are grounded in real classroom contexts. Articles in this journal feature studies where educators use research to improve teaching and learning in their own settings and share those insights with others.

How does this align with your research question?

My study explores “In what ways can I implement student‑centered, collaborative instructional strategies as a permanent substitute teacher while preserving students’ established classroom routines in traditionally structured classrooms?” I am conducting a systematic inquiry in my own classroom and practice to improve teaching and inform other educators. Journal of Practitioner Research encourages data-driven studies and descriptive practitioner inquiries like mine. Making this platform a strong fit for publishing my findings and reflections with a practitioner audience.

2. Practice: Contemporary Issues in Practitioner Education

Why this is a good site:

Practice is an international, peer‑reviewed journal that explores original, creative, and context‑based approaches to professional learning and practice, including research grounded in classroom and school settings. It encourages studies that examine instructional practices and professional development from the perspective of practitioners and professionals working in education.

How does this align with your research question?

My study looks at “In what ways can I implement student‑centered, collaborative instructional strategies as a permanent substitute teacher while keeping established classroom routines?” This journal would let me share practical ideas, reflections, and examples from my own classroom experiences. Practice values the voices of teachers and research done in real classroom settings. It is a good place for me to share what I learn. Publishing here would allow other educators to see how these strategies work in real classrooms and help improve teaching and learning.

https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rpra20

3. Teaching and Teacher Education https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/teaching-and-teacher-education

Why this is a good site:

Teaching and Teacher Education is a peer‑reviewed journal that contributes to what is known about teaching as a professional practice and about teacher education and development. It publishes high‑quality studies and conceptual work on instructional practices, teacher learning, collaboration, and professional growth across educational contexts. The journal seeks contributions that offer substantial new insights and are grounded in the current research literature, often with implications for broader teaching and teacher education communities.

How does this align with your research question?

Although this journal is broader than strictly practitioner research venues, I see it as a good fit for my study because I investigate how student‑centered and collaborative instructional strategies can be implemented without disrupting established routines. I want to contribute to understanding effective teaching practices and teacher development. By situating my classroom inquiry within existing research, highlighting collaborative professional learning with colleagues, and discussing implications for teacher growth and instructional design, I can make my work relevant to this journal’s audience. Publishing here will allow me to extend the reach of my findings beyond practitioner circles to include researchers, teacher educators, and international practitioners.

# data[].attributes.body
Articles:

Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, Somekh (2008). Chap. 8 Making practitioners’ knowledge public.

Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., & Pressley, M. (2005). How to publish in scholarly journals. Educational researcher, 34(8), 14-20.

Natriello, G. (1996). Lessons for Young Scholars Seeking to Publish.

1. Connect the Research to the Existing Field and Literature

Strong research writing should connect the study to the broader professional conversation, in this case, education, and existing literature. I chose this because I want it to strengthen the importance of my research when writing my manuscript, as I will be referencing related research on instructional strategies and student engagement to show how my findings are improving my classroom practice.

2. Ensure that Claims are Backed by Evidence

Conclusions must be supported by strong evidence that is collected from the data. This is important for my study because I'm going to be analyzing multiple sources of classroom data, such as assessments and observation notes. When writing my article or manuscript, I want to make sure that my conclusions are directly supported by the data that I have gathered. I don't want anything to be misunderstood or misaligned, so I can maintain trustworthiness and credibility.

3. Select an Appropriate Journal and Follow the Submission Guidelines

You also need to choose a journal that is a fit for your manuscript. It should be a fit for your topic and the audience of your research. While publishing, you need to carefully follow the submission guidelines given by the Journal. I selected this idea because it's important when selecting the right publication venue, as you want to increase the chances of the work reaching multiple educators, so they can have the chance to benefit from it. So while preparing my manuscript, I will be reviewing different journals that I can publish through that focus on action research or practitioner inquiry. In addition to this, I need to make sure my manuscript or article follows all of the submission guidelines.

# data[].attributes.body
(Dana & Yendol-Hoppey (2020)

1. Align the manuscript with the journal's guidelines (Step-by-Step Guide Video)

Dana & Yendol-Hoppey stress the importance of knowing your audience and the journal’s rules. I chose this because following the guidelines increases the likelihood that my paper will be accepted. I will carefully read the journal’s submission guidelines, use APA formatting correctly, and ensure my content aligns with readers' expectations. Paying attention to these details shows professionalism and helps my research reach the right audience effectively. This applies to my research because my study focuses on classroom practice, and presenting it in a way that aligns with the journal’s expectations will help other educators and researchers clearly understand my findings and apply them in their own work.

2. Use data to tell a story.

Dana & Yendol-Hoppey suggest presenting your data to illustrate your journey of inquiry. I chose this because storytelling can make research more accessible and engaging, helping readers understand not just the results but the process and meaning behind them. For my research on classroom practice, I will structure my manuscript as a clear narrative: beginning with the problem I aimed to address, outlining the steps I took to investigate it, and highlighting the patterns and insights that emerged. This approach will help my audience follow my reasoning, see the connections between my actions and results, and understand how my study contributes to improving teaching practices. By turning my data into a story, I can help educators and researchers connect with my findings and apply them in practice.

3. (Natriello, 1996) Incorporating feedback from reviewers

The article emphasizes the importance of valuing, listening to, and incorporating feedback from reviewers and editors as a key part of the publishing process. I chose this strategy because most papers are not accepted on the first submission. While revisions require extra effort, they strengthen the quality of the research and increase the likelihood of publication. In my own work as a teacher-researcher, I often see rejection as a sign to quit. Through research, I have learned that critical feedback does not mean my work is not worth pursuing. It provides an opportunity to strenghten my work and revise my work to help it be more accessible and useful to others. By embracing feedback rather than avoiding it, I can refine my work, grow as an educator, and contribute meaningful knowledge that supports both my own learning and the broader teaching community.

# data[].attributes.body
Articles:

Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, Somekh (2008). Chap. 8 Making practitioners’ knowledge public.

Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., & Pressley, M. (2005). How to publish in scholarly journals. Educational researcher, 34(8), 14-20.

Natriello, G. (1996). Lessons for Young Scholars Seeking to Publish.

1. Clearly Communicate the Purpose and Key Findings

1. I chose this because in your research, you should clearly explain the purpose of your study and Main findings cuz without that, the audience will not understand the value of the work. So I want my audience to be able to easily understand what my study focuses on and why it matters. I would apply this by clearly explaining my research question, the strategies I used in the classroom, the key outcomes I aimed for, and what I observed.

2. Focus on the Most Important Information

1. This is an important tip because it tries to keep the message of being focused and avoiding sharing too much information all at once. The reason I selected this is that I want to make my presentation more effective and engaging, so instead of including every little piece of data from my study, I'm going to highlight the most meaningful and impactful pieces of evidence, this could be student assessments, engagement patterns, and reflections. All the sources that will be chosen will be the best illustrations of the impact of the strategies.

3. Make Practitioner Knowledge Accessible

1. Throughout this module, the emphasis is placed on the importance of sharing practitioner knowledge in ways that are understandable to all educators. So I chose this idea because my research comes directly from my classroom experience, so when presenting these findings, I'm going to focus on explaining these strategies I use, the context of my classroom, and how other teachers who have either similar costumes or different classrooms can also apply these similar approaches.

# data[].attributes.body
Two venues that I am considering for my practitioner inquiry research are Journal of Practitioner Research and Education Action Research. Both of these journals focus on a practitioner-based research style and support Educators to study and improve their own teaching practices

Journal of Practitioner Research:

Listed below are the requirements for publishing:

Manuscripts are usually around 3,000 to 7,000 words

There needs to be a focus on practitioner inquiry or teacher-led research

A clear explanation of methodology, findings, and contacts

Implications for classroom practice

References in APA style

Educational Action Research:

Listed below are the requirements for publishing:

The article should be around 6,000 to 8,000 words

Research should be involved in practitioner inquiry or action research

needs a clear research question, data analysis, and a methodology

There needs to be an emphasis on reflection of educational Improvement and practice

You need to follow the journal's APA/author formatting guidelines

# data[].attributes.body
(Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley, How to Publish in Scholarly Journals)

1. State the purpose and contribution early.

One key idea in this article is the emphasis on stating the study's purpose and how it will benefit the field at the beginning of a presentation. The article emphasizes that you must clearly explain what you set out to do and why it matters. I chose this presentation tip to emphasize and share because my research focuses on classroom practice, and it is important that my audience immediately understands its relevance. For example, I compare this strategy to setting the purpose for learning by emphasizing the objectives in the lessons we want our students to learn. We want our audience to fully grasp the what and why at the beginning of our presentation to stay engaged and understand the significance of our work upfront.

2. Connection of findings to the broader conversation

Stressing the importance of connecting research back to the professional problem is essential for showing the relevance and practical impact of your work. This connection links findings and strategies to the professional problem, showing your audience how this research can inform practice, guide decision-making, and lead to meaningful improvements in outcomes. In my presentation, I will explain how my findings relate to current educational practices and existing research, showing that my work contributes to improving education today.

# data[].attributes.body
Video: CHOOSING A PUBLICATION VENUE - Academic Publishing Demystified

Tip: Understand the Publication Platform

Why I Chose This: Considering I've never even thought about publishing anything, I had no idea where to start. This video explains that it's important to know the platforms you're wanting to publish on and understanding the specific guidelines that go along with each platform.

How I Will Apply This: Understanding that each platform may have different requirements or guidelines, I can cater my work to each platform to aid in the publication efforts of my work to get it to as many eyes as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
Youtube Video: Conference presentation tips and MISTAKES

Tip: Know Your Medium

Why I Chose This: The presenter explains the importance of knowing your medium and how much you need to be using slides based on when and where you're presenting.

How I'll Apply: Considering I'll be having to most likely record my presentation of my research, the video claims that keeping to about a slide every 30 seconds is a good ratio. I'll have to keep a natural flow and rhythm to ensure my audience doesn't get bored or sidetracked while I present my findings.

# data[].attributes.body
Youtube Video: Conference presentation tips and MISTAKES

Tip: Rely on presentation less

Why I Chose This: The video explains that people have become conditioned to read directly off of their slides as opposed to elaborating on their ideas organically. The tip is to use the presentation as a guideline, just showing figures or tables instead of blocks of text and filling them.

How I Will Apply This Tip: I like to think I'm a good presenter so I'll definitely use the idea of minimalist slides to make myself even better. It will also allow me to seem more confident in my research as my audience will have to listen to what I'm saying as opposed to just reading slides and drawing their own conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
First option Link: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpr/about.html

Submission Requirements: In terms of requirements, articles submitted to this journal must be based on practitioner inquiry or classroom-based research. The manuscript must clearly present a focused research question or problem of practice, along with detailed explanations of data collection methods such as observations, student work, or assessments. Authors are expected to explain how they analyzed their data and clearly present their findings, as well as discuss the implications for teaching and student learning. Submissions must follow APA 7th edition formatting and be well-organized with clear sections and headings. The journal also uses a blind peer-review process, meaning that no identifying information (your name or school) can be included in the manuscript. Overall, the writing must clearly connect the research to improving classroom instruction and student outcomes.

Second Potential Publication Venue: Voices of Practitioners (NAEYC)

Link: https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/vop

Submission Requirements: The requirements for this journal are slightly different because it focuses more on clarity and accessibility. Articles are typically limited to around 3,500 words and must clearly explain the purpose or research question, the classroom context, and the strategies used during the study. Authors are expected to describe their findings and explain how the results can be applied in real classroom settings. The writing should be clear, concise, and easy to understand, with minimal use of academic jargon. This journal also encourages the inclusion of real classroom examples, student work samples, or visuals to support the findings. Like many scholarly publications, it also uses a blind review process. Overall, the focus is on sharing research that has a direct and practical impact on teaching and learning.

# data[].attributes.body
First option: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpr/about.html

I would strongly consider this venue because it is specifically designed for teacher inquiry, action research, and practitioner-based studies conducted in real classroom settings. This makes it an excellent fit for my research on systematic progress monitoring and student reading growth. The journal emphasizes the importance of teachers as researchers and values studies that come directly from classroom practice. I also appreciate that it focuses on improving teaching and learning through reflection and data specifically how "teacher noticing" and real-time adjustments impact student outcomes which aligns with my goal of using anecdotal notes and student work to guide instruction. Additionally, this journal supports both new and experienced researchers, making it a realistic and appropriate option for my first publication.

Second Potential Publication Venue: Voices of Practitioners (NAEYC)

Second option:: https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/vop

I would also consider this venue because it focuses on sharing teacher research in a way that is practical, accessible, and directly useful for other educators, particularly those working with younger readers. This journal values real classroom experiences and highlights strategies like data-based decision-making in small groups that can be immediately applied in teaching. I like that it is written more for practitioners rather than strictly academic researchers, which makes it a strong match for my study on enhancing comprehension through flexible grouping. Since my research focuses on improving reading instruction and student engagement through progress monitoring, this venue would allow me to share my findings in a way that is easy for other teachers to understand and implement. It also emphasizes reflection and storytelling, which would allow me to describe my experience using video recordings and classroom observations to transform my literacy block in a meaningful way.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Journal of Practitioner Research
The Journal of Practitioner Research is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes studies conducted by educators examining their own teaching practice to improve student learning outcomes. The journal focuses on practitioner inquiry, action research, and teacher-led studies across PK–12 and higher education settings. Its audience includes pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, instructional leaders, and teacher educators interested in improving classroom practice through research. This journal is a strong fit because my study is a practitioner inquiry project examining how small-group instruction and progress monitoring influence student literacy growth. The journal specifically seeks research conducted by educators studying their own practice and using findings to improve instruction, which aligns directly with the purpose of my research design.

2. Teaching and Teacher Education is an international peer-reviewed journal focused on advancing knowledge related to teaching practices, teacher education, and professional development across all levels of education. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research that contributes to understanding teacher learning, instructional practices, and educational improvement within a global context. Its audience includes researchers, teacher educators, and professionals interested in improving teaching effectiveness and student outcomes. This journal is a good fit because my research explores instructional strategies that influence student learning and teacher decision-making. My study contributes to understanding how teachers can use progress monitoring and small-group instruction to improve literacy outcomes, which aligns with the journal’s focus on professional practice, teacher development, and evidence-based instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Journal of Practitioner Research (JPR)

Practitioner or action research focused on improving teaching practice

Clear research question and classroom context

Description of data collection and analysis

Findings connected to student learning

Implications for instructional practice

APA format

2. Action in Teacher Education:

Focus on teaching practice or teacher development

Clear purpose, research question, and literature support

Description of methods and results

Discussion of implications for education

APA format

Original research contribution

# data[].attributes.body
(YouTube Video: How to Write and Publish Research Articles in Journals: Start Writing Your Papers Faster!)

Tip: Identify the main message of your research before beginning the writing process

Why I chose this: The video explains that researchers should first determine the main message their data communicates before writing any section of the paper. Understanding the sequence of findings and organizing results logically helps create a clear direction for the study. Planning the structure ahead of time, such as outlining key data points or visuals, allows the writing process to be more efficient and ensures the research remains focused on the purpose of the study.

How it applies to my research: As the research partner, I will help organize the progress monitoring data, exit tickets, and student work collected from the small-group reading study to identify patterns in student growth. By working with the researcher to determine the key findings first, we can develop a clear explanation of how instructional strategies influenced student reading development. This process will help ensure the final paper remains aligned with the research question and presents the data in a logical and meaningful way.

# data[].attributes.body
(Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, & Somekh, 2008)

Tip: Share practitioner knowledge clearly so it can support professional learning

Why I chose this: The reading explains that practitioner research is most valuable when teachers communicate their findings in a clear and purposeful way. Research should not remain only in the classroom but should be shared so that others can learn from the results and reflect on their own teaching practices. Sharing findings helps build professional knowledge and supports collaboration among educators working toward improving student outcomes.

How it applies to my research: While looking at the small-group reading study, I will clearly present how progress monitoring supports student growth and helps identify learning needs. By sharing findings with colleagues and reflecting on the instructional strategies that my partner used, I can provide examples of how data-driven small-group instruction can improve literacy outcomes. Sharing these results allows other educators to consider using similar strategies in their own classrooms and contributes to ongoing professional learning.

# data[].attributes.body
First Potential Pulication Venue Requirements:

Journal of Practitioner Research (JPR)-

In terms of requirements, articles submitted to this journal must be based on practitioner inquiry or classroom-based research. The manuscript must clearly present a focused research question or problem of practice, along with detailed explanations of data collection methods such as observations, student work, or assessments. Authors are expected to explain how they analyzed their data and clearly present their findings, as well as discuss the implications for teaching and student learning. Submissions must follow APA 7th edition formatting and be well-organized with clear sections and headings. The journal also uses a blind peer-review process, meaning that no identifying information can be included in the manuscript. Overall, the writing must clearly connect the research to improving classroom instruction and student outcomes.

Second Potential Pulication Venue Requirements:

Voices of Practioners (NAEYC)-

The requirements for this journal are slightly different because it focuses more on clarity and accessibility. Articles are typically limited to around 3,500 words and must clearly explain the purpose or research question, the classroom context, and the strategies used during the study. Authors are expected to describe their findings and explain how the results can be applied in real classroom settings. The writing should be clear, concise, and easy to understand, with minimal use of academic jargon. This journal also encourages the inclusion of real classroom examples, student work samples, or visuals to support the findings. Like many scholarly publications, it also uses a blind review process. Overall, the focus is on sharing research that has a direct and practical impact on teaching and learning.

# data[].attributes.body
First Potential Publication Venue:

Journal of Practioner Research (JPR)-

I would strongly consider this venue because it is specifically designed for teacher inquiry, action research, and practitioner-based studies conducted in real classroom settings. This makes it an excellent fit for my research on progress monitoring and student reading growth. The journal emphasizes the importance of teachers as researchers and values studies that come directly from classroom practice. I also appreciate that it focuses on improving teaching and learning through reflection and data, which aligns with my goal of using student data to guide instruction. Additionally, this journal supports both new and experienced researchers, making it a realistic and appropriate option for my first publication.

Second Potential Publication Venue:

Voices of Practitioners (NAEYC)-

I would also consider this venue because it focuses on sharing teacher research in a way that is practical, accessible, and directly useful for other educators. This journal values real classroom experiences and highlights strategies that can be immediately applied in teaching. I like that it is written more for practitioners rather than strictly academic researchers, which makes it a strong match for my study. Since my research focuses on improving reading instruction and student engagement through progress monitoring, this venue would allow me to share my findings in a way that is easy for other teachers to understand and implement. It also emphasizes reflection and storytelling, which would allow me to describe my classroom experience in a meaningful way.

# data[].attributes.body
(Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2020)

Tip: Make your inquiry public through presenting and publishing.

Why I chose this: I chose this because it emphasized that research should not remain private, but instead be shared with others to promote collaboration and improvement in education. It reinforced the idea that sharing inquiry findings is an important part of professional growth and contributes to the broader teaching community.

How it applies to my research: I can share my findings with colleagues through professional development sessions, team meetings, or even conferences. By presenting or publishing my work, I can help other educators learn from my experiences and apply similar strategies to improve student outcomes in their own classrooms.

# data[].attributes.body
(Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, & Somekh, 2008)

Tip: Share practitioner knowledge to improve teaching practices.

Why I chose this: I chose this because it helped me recognize that the knowledge I gain from my own classroom research is valuable and worth sharing. It emphasized that teachers are not just practitioners, but also contributors to educational knowledge, and their insights can help improve teaching practices on a larger scale.

How it applies to my research: My study on student reading growth and progress monitoring can provide useful insights for other teachers facing similar challenges. I will focus on clearly presenting what I learned, what strategies were effective, and how my findings can be applied in other classrooms to support student learning.

# data[].attributes.body
(Klingner, Scanlon, Pressley, 2005)

Tip: Choose the right journal and understand its expectations

Why I chose this: I chose this because I did not fully realize how important it is to match your research to the appropriate audience and publication. This reading helped me understand that each journal has specific expectations, formats, and audiences, and submitting to the wrong one can reduce the chances of acceptance. It also showed me that strong researchers take time to review journal guidelines and previously published articles before submitting their work.

How it applies to my research: Since my study focuses on progress monitoring and reading in the classroom, I would intentionally choose an education-based or practitioner-focused journal. This will ensure my research reaches teachers and educators who can directly apply my findings to their own classrooms, making my work more meaningful and impactful.

# data[].attributes.body
First Potential Publication Venue:

Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research

I would consider this venue because it specifically focuses on teacher research and practitioner inquiry. This makes it a very strong fit for studies conducted by classroom teachers, such as myself. The journal heavily values research that comes directly from classroom practice and also highlights how teachers use inquiry to improve teaching and learning. Due to the fact that my study looks at instructional strategies and student engagement in my own classroom, it aligns closely with the purpose of this journal.

Second Potential Publication Venue:

Educational Action Research

I would consider this venue because it focuses specifically on practitioner-led studies and action research. This venue publishes research that looks to explore how educators investigate their own practice to improve learning outcomes and teaching strategies. My study involves implementing engagement strategies and analyzing classroom data, which fits well within the action research framework commonly published in this journal.

# data[].attributes.body
(Natriello, 1996)

Tip: Be clear, simple, and focused in your writing.

Why I chose this: I chose this because I often struggle with over-explaining or making my writing too complex, which can make it harder for readers to follow my ideas. This article reinforced the importance of writing in a way that is direct, organized, and easy to understand, especially for audiences who may not be familiar with my specific study.

How it applies to my research: In my study, I will focus on clearly explaining my data, methods, and findings using simple and concise language. This will help ensure that other teachers and educators can easily understand my results and apply my strategies in their own classrooms without confusion.

# data[].attributes.body
Journal of Practitioner Research (JPR)

Link: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jpr/about.html

Focus/Audience:
Practitioner research, teacher inquiry, and action research conducted by educators in real classroom settings.

Why this is a good fit for me:
This journal directly focuses on teacher-led research, which aligns perfectly with my study on enhancing reading comprehension in small-group instruction. My use of real classroom data, instructional strategies, and student outcomes fits exactly with what this journal publishes.

Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research

Link: https://newprairiepress.org/networks/

Focus/Audience:
Teacher research, practitioner inquiry, and action research aimed at improving classroom practice and professional learning.

Why this is a good fit for me:
This journal emphasizes practical classroom impact and teacher reflection, which strongly connects to my study. My focus on instructional strategies, student comprehension growth, and real-time classroom data aligns with the type of research this journal values.

Educational Action Research (Journal)

Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/reac20/current

Focus/Audience:
Action research and practitioner inquiry conducted by educators, with a focus on improving teaching practices and student learning.

Why this is a good fit for me:
This journal focuses on action research that improves classroom practice, which aligns with my study on enhancing reading comprehension through explicit strategy instruction. Although it is more formal and research-heavy, my use of multiple data sources (anecdotal notes, student work, and video recordings) and structured analysis would meet the expectations for strong evidence and methodology.

# data[].attributes.body
First Potential Publication Venue:

Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research

Publishing Requirements:

-Articles are usually between 3,000–6,000 words.

-Manuscripts should describe teacher-led inquiry or classroom-based research

-Authors need to clearly explain the context of the classroom or school setting

-The article should include different sections such as an introduction, methodology, findings, and implications for practice

-Submissions must follow APA formatting guidelines

-Authors need to demonstrate reflection on teaching practice and how the inquiry influenced instruction

Second Potential Publication Venue:

Educational Action Research

Publishing Requirements:

-Articles are usually between 6,000–8,000 words.

-Studies must demonstrate a clear action research cycle

-Authors should provide a detailed methodology and data analysis

-Manuscripts should show practical implications for how to improve educational practice

-Submissions need to follow APA or the journal's specific citation style

-Articles have to include literature connections and a discussion of findings within the broader research field

# data[].attributes.body
(Natriello, 1996)

Tip: Share your work with others to improve it

Why I chose this:

The article stresses the importance of getting feedback from colleagues before submitting work, and how it is one of the best ways to improve your work.

How this applies to my study:

I can apply this tip to my study by discussing my findings and strategies with colleagues at my school. Sharing what I am noticing about student engagement can help me get new ideas, identify blind spots, and refine my approach. This also aligns with my goal of using data not just for my own classroom, but to support collaborative conversations with other teachers.

# data[].attributes.body
(Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, & Somekh, 2008)

Tip: Connect findings to existing research and the larger field

Why I chose this:

The authors in this article highlight the importance of linking your own work to already existing literature and explaining how it contributes to a broader idea or conversation.

How this applies to my study:

As I have been recording my findings, I should connect what I have observed, such as the importance of pacing and student involvement, to existing research on engagement and instructional strategies. By doing this, I will be able to strengthen my study by showing that my findings are not just isolated to my classroom, but instead contribute to a larger understanding of effective teaching practices.

# data[].attributes.body
(Natriello, 1996)

Tip: Use feedback and criticism to improve your work.

Why I chose this:

Natriello emphasizes the importance of listening carefully to reviewers' comments and being open to revising your work as opposed to dismissing criticism. Sometimes, listening to criticism can improve your work more than you would ever imagine.

How this applies to my study:

In my research, I am collecting multiple forms of data, such as observations, student surveys, and behavior charts. I can treat this data as “feedback” on my teaching, and instead of assuming that my teaching strategies are effective, I can carefully examine what feedback my data is telling me, and notice the weaknesses and strengths in my instruction. For example, if my data shows that certain students are still disengaged, I should not ignore that but instead adjust my strategies.

# data[].attributes.body
(YouTube Video: How to Write and Publish Research Articles in Journals: Start Writing Your Papers Faster!)

Tip: Create your research story before writing
Why I chose this: The video emphasized that before writing any section of a research paper, you should clearly understand the “story” your data is telling. This means identifying your main findings first, organizing your results in a logical order, and thinking through how your research developed over time. Instead of jumping straight into writing, creating a clear outline of your results (like mapping out figures or key data points) helps ensure that your paper is focused, purposeful, and easier to write.

How it applies to my research: In my small group reading study, I will first organize my progress monitoring data, exit tickets, and student work to identify clear patterns in student growth. I will use this to build a “story” that shows how my instructional strategies impacted students’ reading development over time. By doing this before I start writing, I can make sure my paper clearly explains student progress, stays focused on my research question, and connects all of my data in a meaningful way.

# data[].attributes.body
(Natriello, 1996)

Tip: Understand your audience and write with purpose for publication
Why I chose this: The reading emphasized that successful research writing depends on understanding your audience and clearly communicating why your work matters. Researchers must think about what their audience needs to know and present their findings in a way that is meaningful and relevant.

How it applies to my research: In my small group reading study, I will focus on clearly explaining how progress monitoring impacts student reading growth in a way that other teachers can understand and apply. By keeping my audience in mind, I can ensure my research is practical, relevant, and useful for educators working in similar classroom settings.

# data[].attributes.body
(How to Write and Publish Research Articles in Journals Video)

Tip: Create a clear and logical research “story” when writing your paper

Why I chose this: The video explains that strong research writing should tell a clear story, including how the study developed, what was found, and what the findings mean. Without a clear story, writing can become confusing and disorganized.

How it applies to my research: For my study, I will make sure my manuscript clearly tells the story of how I identified a gap in my students’ comprehension, implemented specific strategies, and analyzed the results. By organizing my paper in a logical way and connecting each section, I can make my findings easier to understand and more impactful for others reading my research.

# data[].attributes.body
(Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, & Somekh, 2008)

Tip: Make practitioner knowledge public through clear sharing and reflection
Why I chose this: The reading emphasized that practitioner research is valuable only when it is shared with others in a clear and meaningful way. It is not just about collecting data, but about communicating findings so they can inform practice, invite feedback, and contribute to a larger professional community.

How it applies to my research: In my small group reading study, I will clearly present my findings on how progress monitoring impacts student growth so that other teachers can understand and apply my strategies. By sharing my results with peers and reflecting on my practices, I can contribute to improving instruction not only in my classroom but also for other educators working with similar students.

# data[].attributes.body
Journal of Practitioner Research (JPR)

Accepts practitioner inquiry and action research studies conducted by teachers

Manuscripts typically 3,000–6,000 words

Must include:

Context of the classroom/school

Research question(s)

Methods (data collection + analysis)

Findings with evidence

Implications for practice

APA formatting is required

Peer-reviewed journal

Open-access (free to read and publish)

Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research

Accepts teacher inquiry and classroom-based research

Manuscripts typically 2,500–5,000 words

Must include:

Clear research question or wondering

Description of teaching context

Data collection and analysis methods

Findings supported with evidence

Reflection and implications for teaching

Writing should be clear and accessible for educators

APA style formatting

Peer-reviewed

Open-access journal

Educational Action Research (Journal)

Accepts action research and practitioner inquiry studies

Manuscripts typically 6,000–8,000 words

Must include:

Clear research problem and purpose

Connection to existing literature

Detailed methodology (data collection + analysis)

Findings supported by strong evidence

Discussion of implications for practice and future research

APA-style formatting (or journal-specific formatting guidelines)

Peer-reviewed, international journal

May require more formal academic writing compared to practitioner-focused journals

# data[].attributes.body
(Altrichter, Feldman, Posch, & Somekh, 2008)

Tip: Tailor your research presentation based on your audience

Why I chose this: Altrichter et al. (2008) emphasize that when sharing research, you must consider who your audience is because it determines the language, format, and level of detail you use.

How it applies to my research: For my study, I may share my findings with different audiences such as colleagues, administrators, or in a formal manuscript. When sharing with teachers, I will focus more on practical strategies and student outcomes, while a formal paper will include detailed explanations of my methods and data analysis. This will help ensure my research is both accessible and impactful.

# data[].attributes.body
(Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2020)

Tip: Use writing as a tool to clarify and deepen your thinking

Why I chose this: Dana & Yendol-Hoppey (2020) explain that writing is not just a final step, but a process that helps refine ideas, reveal new insights, and deepen understanding of your research.

How it applies to my research: For my study, writing my research brief and final manuscript will help me better understand my data and instructional decisions. As I organize my findings from anecdotal notes, student work, and video recordings, I will be able to clearly see patterns in student comprehension and strategy use, making my conclusions stronger and more meaningful.

# data[].attributes.headline
Journal of Practitioner Research Requirements:

# data[].attributes.subject
Journal of Practitioner Research Requirements:

# data[].attributes.body
APA format

Peer-reviewed

Focus on practitioner/teacher research

Includes action research and inquiry studies

Must connect research to classroom practice

# data[].attributes.body
(Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley, 2005)

Tip: Make sure your data is strong enough

Why I chose this: Klingner et al. (2005) explain that a common reason papers get rejected is due to a lack of data to support the claims being made.

How it applies to my research: For my study, I need to make sure I have enough data on student engagement and SSA performance before making any conclusions. This will help make my findings more accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
(Natriello, 1996)

Tip: Fully appreciate, listen, and take advantage of feedback from reviewers and editors

Why I chose this: The article emphasized the importance of responding to feedback as a critical part of the publishing process. Most papers are not accepted on the first submission, and although revisions call for extra work, they strengthen the quality of the research and increase the chances of publication.

How it applies to my research: As a teacher-researcher, I have used and will continue to implement feedback from my peers and professor to improve my study. It is important to remain professional and open-minded when receiving feedback. Collaboration allows us to strengthen our findings, and make our research stronger.

# data[].attributes.body
(Klingner, Scanlon, & Pressley, 2005)

Tip: Make sure your research is clear, well-organized, and easy to understand

Why I chose this: Klingner et al. (2005) emphasizes the importance of describing our results logically and clearly. As researchers, we want our readers to follow our findings easily. When we discuss or write our results in a way that is easy to understand, it creates an effective study that other teachers can implement into their practice.

How it applies to my research: When presenting my research, I will clearly organize my study, explain my methods and findings in a logical way. I will focus on my main findings. Doing this allows for teachers to fully understand my findings and actually use them in their own classrooms.

# data[].attributes.headline
Action in Teacher Education Requirements

# data[].attributes.subject
Action in Teacher Education Requirements

# data[].attributes.body
Research related to teaching and classroom practice

Must include abstract

Typically up to 35 pages

APA-style

Peer-reviewed

Accepts empirical research/pedagogical studies

Must include methods, results, and discussion

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?show=instructions&journalCode=uate20

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Submit your article to Action in Teacher Education

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How to submit your paper to Action in Teacher Education. Share your work with us to maximise your readership and make your mark in your area of research.