# data[].attributes.body
1. Good level, a bit more detail than Monday and more information on your own research, so it was interesting!

2. There might be a link between heart failure and cognitive decline

3. Good illustrations! And very good and interesting explanation of how the connection between heart failure, glymphatic system and brain function.

4. You seemed ti lose your train of thought a couple of times. Perhaps it would have helped to practice more before the presentation?

# data[].attributes.body
Good level of the presentation.
You changes some illustrations from pevious presentation which made it even more clearer
Nice pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was a good level on the presentation. It was really helpful that you put a lot of time explaning the different system in the beginning.
2. That the brain dysfunction you see after heart failure can be becausa of the glymphatic system.
3. Most of the pictures was really good and explaning the problem.
4. The pictures with the brain and the lymphatic system had a lot of words that you didnt explain so it was a bit confusing.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Level was right for the audience (to my opinion)

2. The aim of your study was illustrated on one of the slides in a very nice way

3. Most of the pictures were super! On one of the slides you had a picture that you did not explain - leve out? Change to another?

4. Good job. Only suggestion to improvement I wrote above about that one picture...

/Arni

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good level.
2. Main message was clear
3. There were not to many graphs and it was easy to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I thought  you did a great job explaning a difficult subject so I could understand it. I thought it was a good level on the presentation.
2. That kaspase 1 can affect myoloproliferation in mice getting chemotherapy.
3. It was very good that you came bavk to your first slide. It made me feel that I learned something. Your pictures was also very clear and simply enough to understand without more background fact.
4. It would have been interesting to know the next step in the research and how this could be used clinically.
//Anette

# data[].attributes.body
Very nice explanation of a complicated subject. I think you explained in great detail all the images and graphs

Nice use of images and schematics.

Maybe a few words on how you will proceed with studying this mouse model.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Level was perfekt. Very clear and informative.

2. Quite clear main message (even though I don't think I fully understand how the KO mice can be a model for myelosuppression... :)

3. Illustrations were super. Nicely improved since Monday presentation.

4. Good job

/Arni

# data[].attributes.body
Detailed introduction of the topic and nice flow towards the aim and results of the study

The question about the recurrence percentage draws the attention of the audience

The flow in the beginning was a bit slow and had to be compensated by a faster flow towards the end which made it a bit difficult to follow

/Marios

# data[].attributes.body
1. I thought the level was a bit too high. Many concepts were unknown to me which caused some confusion.

2. Too many patients are classified as high risk patients and undergo surgery, without actually needing it.

3. Good picture to illustrate the T1 tumors.

4. The different criteria for low/high risk were a bit unclear. I think it would have helped to have them on a separate slide.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The level was a bit too advanced (for me at least). Sometimes difficult to follow.

2. I thought the main message was a bit difficult to identify

3. Some of the pictures were very good and illustrative and you explained them in a good way.

4. I tink your pictures were both the strength and the weakness of your presentation. Some of them were a bit chaotic and some had text that was too small. And at some times you talked for very long with the same slide - maybe possible to brake it up to more slides?

/Arni

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was mostly on a good level, I could follow most of the presentation. Some pictures were about harder to understand like the one with the criteria for further surgery.
2. That there is a low recurrence rate in T1 colon cancer
3. Nice pictures, especially in the beginning explaning the different stages of cancer.
4. It went a little bit fast at the end so I had a hard time following what was really the conclusion of the study.
// Anette

# data[].attributes.body
A nice presentation of a condition that I was not familiar with before and in 3 minutes you managed to cover everything about it.

Using the carved spine was very helpful for us to understand.

it was not very clear to me how the study is structured. Maybe a schematic would help

/Marios

# data[].attributes.body
1. The level of the presentation was good. Even though I didn't know anything about this disease beforehand I still understood everything.

2. This disease doesn't necessarily get worse with age, healthy old people have as much back pain as those with this disease.

3. I really liked how you showed the spine and the curve on paper, it was very easy to understand what you meant.

4. The set-up of the study was a bit difficult to follow, maybe some picture would have helped there.

# data[].attributes.body
You gave a good description of the symtoms and the 3 treatment options.
Main message was that both people with the disease and without the disease have backpain.
You showed us an illustration of the spine and showed how it looks like in people with the disease

# data[].attributes.body
1.Totally right level for me. I understood everything and it was not too simple.

2. Very clear. Sherman (?) Syndrome does not cause back pain in adulthood.

3. The drawings/pictures were very good and helped with the understanding. The structure was also good, classical but worked well.

4. For this kind of short video abstract I don't think there is much that you need to make better. Maybe you could put more enthusiasm in the way you present it.

/Arni

# data[].attributes.body
Nice presentation of the clinical characteristics and treatment options

The clinical example and the book that a patient wrote are helpful for us to understand what it means for patients to have this condition

You talked at a good pace, making pauses and changing your voice accordingly

i think you didn't have enough time to talk about your own project as you had done on Monday

# data[].attributes.body
1. The level of the presentation was good. It was a perfect level, I could understand everything and i learned a lot of new things.
2. If a patient has weird symtoms lika dizziness and weird sound think of this disease.
3. Very good pictures. It was easy to understand. Nice with exemples of patients with problems, it makes it a lot more interesting. Nice pace in the speaking.
4. A little bit annoing that you skipped a picture, otherwise i thought it was very good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The level was great. You continued to build on the last presentation and now answered some questions I had then.

2. If you have a patient with strange hearing or balance symptoms, it could be superior canal dehisence

3. Great figures that clearly showed what you were talking about. I also liked the story on how it was discovered.

4. Maybe time the talk beforehand so you don't need to skip slides during the presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Easy to follow, nice illustrations. I think it was really good with a short summary at the end of the presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How was the level of the presentation, in relation to your own knowledge?

2. What was the "main message"?

3. What worked well, and why? Give examples: illustrations, non-verbal communication, structure etc.

4. Feedforward - what could be improved, done differently for next presentation, and how? Give examples, suggestions, tips!

# data[].attributes.body
Fears
- What I am saying is not coherent enough
- Not being able to answer questions

Goals
- Feeling relaxed
- Confident
- Engage the audience

# data[].attributes.body
Fears
- to forget what I want to say
- not being able to answer a question

Goals
- be able to speak freely without having learned a text by heart
- answering questions to the point

# data[].attributes.body
FEARS
Nervous
Stage-fright
Stressed
Not knowing the answer

MY IDEAL
Speak freely
Easy to understand
Confident
Competent