# data[].attributes.body
We gave this a 4 because the IA was very well organized and coherent. The writer divided it into neat sections and explained the topic thoroughly.

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this a 3 because detailed math was presented throughout and was shown in different mediums (graphs, formulas, etc.)

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this a 2 because the writer did not give any particular reason behind choosing the topic they chose. They did not really express how the topic related to them.

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this a 2 because although there was a detailed reflection, it was mostly concentrated at the end of the IA with very little reflection throughout.

# data[].attributes.body
We gave this a 6 because the writer applied mathematics that is relevant to the course and shows very detailed understanding of it; the math procedures are also explained thoroughly as they are described.

# data[].attributes.body
We scored them a 4 bc the IA was easy to understand and follow along. They explained their topic clearly and it was organized.

# data[].attributes.body
We scored them a 3 because they included several different graphs and figures throughout the IA.

# data[].attributes.body
We scored them a 1 because the student did not include what the topic meant to them personally or why they chose the topic in the first place.

# data[].attributes.body
We scored them a 2 because the reflection was only given at the end of the IA. The student did not give a lot reflection after each section.

# data[].attributes.body
3
The student used multiple approaches and theories, including derivatives and limits, as well as disproving theoretical approaches (dividing by zero). He also provided formulas (although some were in the wrong form) and graphs.

# data[].attributes.body
3
Does a poor job explaining Zeno's Arrow Paradox and aim of the paper is confusing. The rest is well organized and easy to follow, however the student repeats himself a lot throughout the paper.

# data[].attributes.body
2
Although the student did do research on his topic, including looking at other theories and counters to the paradox, he does not show much personal involvement and does not explore his topic in a historical or global perspective, nor does he look into unfamiliar mathematics. However, he does show interest in his conclusion about furthering his research on this topic.

# data[].attributes.body
2
The student did a good job of reflecting throughout the IA, so much so that he ended up repeating himself in places.  I also appreciated that even though his IA is inconclusive, he still explains his process and the different theories/perspectives he came up with.  However, in his conclusion, he falsely states that he achieved his goal.

# data[].attributes.body
6
The student uses relevant math, such as slope, derivatives, limits, and infinity, and explains these concepts thoroughly.