# data[].attributes.body
Here are my numbers:
Mean: 680
Median: 60
Mode: 60
Range: 80

My numbers were about how much time I was outside every day biking.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean:38
Median:1
Mode:4
Range:8-1=7

When I visualized the data using the dot plot I can see that the zombies got the gnome bomb more than the plants did.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: I added 261 + 281 + 295 + 296 + 296 + 502 + 518 + 532 + 534 + 566 = 4081

Median: I already had my numbers ordered above.

261, 281, 295, 296, 296, 502, 518, 532, 534, 566. Since there is no middle number I added 296 & 502 and equaled 798. Then I divided 798 by 2 and got 399. 399 is my median.

Mode: 296 appeared twice while the other numbers appeared once so 296 is my Mode.

Range: My highest number is 566 and lowest is 261. 566 - 261 = 305. So my range is 305.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean:
22.84 - 16.2 mph, 18.02 - 21.4 mph, 20.64 - 17.1 mph, 19.27 - 18.9 mph, 18.77 - 19.7 mph, 16.82 - 22.5 mph, 17.63 - 21.7 mph, 15.49 - 24.3 mph, 17.78 - 21.9 mph, 16.24 - 23.1
20.68 mph per loop
18.35 seconds per loop

Median:
17.9 seconds
21.55 mph

Mode:
Nothing is my mode because no data point ever repeated more than once for both mph and seconds.

Range:
7.35 seconds
8.1 mph

I did this for little loops I created on my street and how long it took to go per loop. I wore a watch to measure my speed.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean   47.5
Median 45
Mode  45
Range 22
I recorded my jump ropes and used the data from it to get this.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: 0 ‘43 “76
Median: 0 ‘44 “01
Mode: 0 ‘42 “13
Range: 0 ‘03 “90
I recorded times for scores on a game I was playing. The times all stick in one area, which makes sense considering that the track has a limited high score.

Mean:201
Median:201
Mode:200
Range: 4
Since the objective of the game is to see how fast you get 200 points, it makes sense that the mode is, well, 200. But I noted the scores to see if I went over 200 occasionally, and I did.

After that, to organize my data, I put both the scores and times in charts. The x value is the round number, and the y value is the score/time. Then I connected the bars together.  The chart showed the progress and improvement of the different rounds, and it fluctuated quite a bit....

So the bar graph suited the purpose of tracking progress the best, while I would say  that a dot plot or box and whisker plot would be better for understanding the center easier.

For both scores and  times, I would say that the mean suited it best, since it was most centered. It wouldn’t make sense for me to use the mode times in my data, since my mode was also the lowest score on the table. A lot of information lay on the lesser side of the times median too.

It’s good that the range for scores is low. Typically, you are only supposed to have them see your time taken for 20l points, and if the range was high, that would mean there is something wrong with the game.

Sry for my horrible observations...

# data[].attributes.body
Mean 5
Median 5
mode 5
Range 2
The mean helps the question I had. The median was useful for the middlemost number. The mode is for them most common number. Range is for how much variability there is basically.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean

# data[].attributes.body
Mean - 43.4
Median - 27
Mode - 1
Range - 229

I can tell that people ignore single texts before about 30 start spamming their phone. People may have blocked me on the way but my little thingy that spams for me was useful for this type of situation.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: 18.8336
Median: 19.57
Range: 44.83
Mode: All values only appeared once.

The median, mode, mean, and range all can tell you the different parts the data can give you, like the average (mean) of the data, how often the sam data will show up (mode), the difference between the largest set and the smallest set of data (range), and the direct center of all the information (median).

The dot plot made a better visual for displaying data compared to the histogram because it is much easier to see the exact numbers/amounts of the data. Histograms tend to be more of an approximation.

I believe that the mean (average) is better suited towards my project because all my variables in my set of information are all completely different, and knowing what the average is for all the numbers comes in useful for much more situations.

# data[].attributes.body
mean: 8,760
median: 4800
dont have a mode
range: 40,370
and i didn't finish the dot plot thing.
ill say the range

# data[].attributes.body
Mean:5
Median:8
Mode:6
Range:3
I havent finished my dot plot though.

# data[].attributes.body
mean: 5
median: 10
mode: 8 and 2
range: 6
the mean the median mode and the range can tell you about the set of data, like the average the middle number the numbers that come up the most often and the difference between the largest and smallest number. The dot plot made more sense then the histogram because it was easier to see the data and easier to place the data.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean   3.6
Median 4
Mode  4
Range 3
I have not done my dot plot yet and I think mode best describes mine.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 22, my median is 2, and my mode is 2 and 3. My range is 5-0. Yes the dot plot made sense as a visual for my data. It is an easier way and it doesn't take long. I think that my mode represents my data because I have two modes or a bimodal which I think in important to this project.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean-17.7
Mode- 20,19
Median- 19,19
Range- 11
And yes it did

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: 44
Median: 4
Mode: 4
Range: 2-9=7
I also like using the dot plot like what Izzy said ''The dot plot is better because you don't really have to do anything but just put dots on top of each other" I agree because I like when things are simple in a big project so the simplicity of the dot plot takes away some of the stress

# data[].attributes.body
My data for how many basketball dribbles in a minute is Mean: 106.6, Median:104, Mode: I have no mode, Range 127-92=35. As you can see my range is far away from each other which means I am not that consistent in my dribbles. Sometimes I go slow and sometimes I go fast. This information helps the topic because it could help with the other two things such as dot plot and histogram.
The dot plot did make sense because it shows how much of a certain number there is. I think the dot plot works better because the histogram is almost the same thing as a dot plot but the dot plot requires a less amount of data to be shown.
I think my mean would best describe my center because it shows what average amount of dribbles is which in my opinion is the most important piece of information.

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: 2.8 Median: 2.5 Mode: 2 Range: 2. The dot plot is better because you don't really have to do anything but just put dots on top of each other. Also its more creative because in math its mostly just squares and lines. I think that my Mean best describes my data because the mean is how much minutes I take when I draw a quick drawing.

# data[].attributes.body
My data for juggling is:
Mean = 570 juggles
Median = 517 juggles
I didn't have a mode because I didn't get a number more than once.
Range = 1,027-324 = 703 juggles.From the data you can see how wide spread my data is so you can infer that my juggling consistency can be anywhere from low to very high. The fact that I also do not have a mode can also give you more facts to back that I am not a consistent juggler. I think that the dot plot is better because it is an easier way to write out the data. Either way the dot plot and the histogram will be not exactly precise since all my data is high and widely spread out. so pretty much the best thing that you can do is make a more calculated estimate. I think that an average would best explain the center of the data since it is the combined data that has been divided to find the closest center to the all the related data in my chart.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 10.3, My median 11, and my mode is also 11, my range is 15.I liked the dot plot better since its easier and I feel gives more information. Its is also more accurate since it gives you more of the exact amount and not more of an whole and large amount. It also let me see the middle number in the dot plot better.

# data[].attributes.body
What I did was how much back flips can I do with out falling in a row.
My median is 6, my mean is 5.4, my mode is six, my range is 7
In my opinion I perfer the histogram because it makes more sense to me.
I think that the median would be closest to the center.

# data[].attributes.body
My median is 24.8, the median is 24.5, my modes are 23,24,26, and my range is six. The mean tells me the average amount of pushups I do each round. As for the median, it shows me the in between score that I had got during the rounds. My modes showed me what score I had received the most. Finally, my range shows me the span of my scores, and the highest and lowest score. In my opinion, both the graphs show the frequency of each possible score, the range etc, but I like the  dot plot more because it shows the frequency and scores more clearer and easier than the histogram. I think the mean is the best because it shows the actual average amount of pushups per each round.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at my slideshow.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 2.7, My median is 2.5, My mode is 2.5 and my range is 6. For me I think a histogram is better because it feels more easier. Mode best describes my answer because there the same answer.

# data[].attributes.body
IMy mean is 116.7 and this is the average amount of times  of juggles i completed, My median is 109 because I added the middle numbers and divided them by two to get the median. Also, I do not have a mode because no number occurs twice. Finally, my range is 182 because I took my highest number or 207 juggles and subtracted it by 25 my lowest amount of juggles. I prefer a dot plot because they are more precise and this is because they can show all the individual numbers as compared to a histogram.  I believe that the mean best describes the average of juggles before it falls.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 1:31.6 sec, My median is 52.5 sec, and I don't have a mode because all my number are different so there isn't a actual mode, and my range is 2:10 sec. Well my topic is about seeing how long I can do a plank for so they tell what's my average plank, what my most common plank is and my range from my worst to my best plank.
I think the dot plot was more helpful because it was way more precise and helpful.
I think mean best describes my data the best because my median doesn't help to see any other of my data and my mode isn't a real mode and my range doesn't help that much either and mean you can find my average plank which is really helpful.

# data[].attributes.body
I am doin a video Check It out!!!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 9.9, range is 4, mode is 10, and median is 9.5. For my data a dot plot made sense as a visual for my data. A histogram works fine too. I think a dot plot works fine because the range is small and it is harder to do with a big range. Mean describes my data best because all my data is pretty close together so the average is best.

# data[].attributes.body
my mean is 5.8, my median is 5 , my mode is 5 and my range is 13. what they tell me about my topics is that I use a lot of colors for my coloring.  I think that the dot plot works better because it shows my data clear and the histogram not so much. and i think that the measure of center that best describes my data is the range because it shows the most colors I used.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 0.5, my median is 0, and my mode is 2. I like the dot plot better because it makes everything like more visible rather than the histogram.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 10.3, my median is 10, my mode is  7 and 10. I got 3 sevens and 3 tens so I have bimodal data. My range is 16. These statistics tell me that my skills are pretty is consistent with really good rounds about like 2 out 10 times. The dot plot did make sense as a visual and I think it works better than a histogram. A dot plot is more accurate than a histogram and it's easier to understand for me. I think that mean  is the best measure of center for me because it showed the average of my score.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 94.8 my median is 97.5 my mode is 96 and 104 and my range is 60. These tell me that my brother can be inconsistent. I think the histogram would work better because it's less percise and helps me see the big picture since the number I have are very spread out on the number line. I think the mean is most helpful because it shows my brothers most common time, or most normal time.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 33.7, my median is 33, my mode is 33 too, and my range is 11. I think the dot plot shows things more accurately so I think it is better than the histogram. I think the mean describes my data the best because it shows you the average and that is the approximate guess if each roll had the same total.

# data[].attributes.body
My mean is 10.9, my median is 12, my mode is 13 and 7, and my range is 15-7=8. The dotplot makes everything visually clear, so I think the dotplot works better. I think range works the best for my data because it shows the most backflips I did and the least.

# data[].attributes.body
my mean is 38.9, median is 39, mode is 36,39, and 41, and the range is 6. I liked the dot plot more because I can see each number. the histogram shows me clumps of data. I think the mean is the best one because you get the averages. The averages are some of the most important things in statistics.

# data[].attributes.body
My Mean is 8.5, Mode is 10, and Median is 9.5. In my opinion, I thought that the dot plot seemed to make more sense than the histogram because the histogram doesn't show the exact number of points. I think that the mean best describes my data because when I looked at the points I won for each games, 10 points was the most greater on the dot plot so my average had to be closer to 10 than the other numbers.