# data[].attributes.body
1. historic events become important when the event impacts hundreds to thousands of people or when the government makes bad desicions that end up in war.
2. I think it should because it can show you how to make good desiscions.
3. the event should have noteworthy consequences because you have to learn from your mistakes.
4.the event can be dividing because people may not agree on how the situation was handled and how people were punished.
5.It depends on the situation. If the event involves multiple nations then yes it should have global repercussions.
6. 9/11 will be remebered for the next 100 years.
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. Kremlin decides to sit out because  he doesn't like the idea of russia celebrating the overthrownment of a ruler.
2.he likes that Western Europe influenced Russia.
3. I think that  “We live in historical schizophrenia,” means that you have negative events that have positive consequences.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historic event becomes important when it impacts the way people live in the future or present. A passing of a law could be a historic event because it could affect how people live, such as same-sex marriage.
2. Yes I think they can because good things can come out of it, like how to act or something symbolic.
3. The event should have consequences after because that can teach society lessons or it can make the community better. in order to have success you must fail at least once.
4. I think that a new event or law or something could bring society together but there are so many different opinions today that it just depends.
5. I think it is necessary because i order to keep another event like 9/11 from happening and involving other countries.
6. 9/11

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. Kremlin decides to sit out because  he thinks that is is going to divide russia and he wants russia to be unified together. They also don't want to prohibit the overthrowing of a ruler.
2. Kremlik likes the fact that they had been oppressed by europe.
3. It means that no one is normal, especially people who have schizophrenia and it symbolizes our world today or in the past and how it is not normal.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think what makes a historical event worthy of remembering is the effect it had on the people involved and how destructive it was.
2. I think the event should be symbolic because it can symbolize how not to act, and also it can be a symbol of the perseverance a country had after rebuilding after an event.
3.I think it should have noteworthy consequences because if it was an event sprung from hate, the people involved should be punished for their actions.
4. I think it depends on the event because sometimes the rebuilding of a city or country can bring people together in ways other things can not. However, if people disagree on a major topic (ex. gun rights) than it can be divisive and separate people.
5. I think there are situations in which it should have global reprocussions, and situations where it shouldn't. If the event resulted in some teaching or moral, the rest of the world should see it. However, in some situations I don't think the entire world should have to feel the effects one area did.
6. 9/11

1. The official reason is that the people are divided on the results of that year. The "more likely explanations" is that the ruler doesn't want his people celebrating overthrowing a ruler because it might spark ideas in them.
3. I think the phrase, "“We live in historical schizophrenia,” means that some things happen in response to a political event that don't match the event. For example, the czar does something negative, but gets positive responses to the issue. It means that some actions don't result in equal reactions.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historic event becomes important when it effects the out come of the future. A war is a historic event because it events what people do in the future and it also lets people learn from the past so they don't make the same mistakes and make the same success.
2. It depends on the event. If the event is good and represents something good then it should be symbolic. But if it is bad event in history then it should not be symbolic.
3. Yes, we need to document the good events to build off of them and document the bad things so we don't make the same mistakes in the future.
4. The event can be both based on what happens. If it is a struggle then the country will most likey become unified.
5. It is necessary because you don't want to have another world war involving multiple countries.
I think 9/11 because it makes the U.S. more aware for terririst  attacks making security more strict.

1. Kremlin plans to sit out from celebrating because he believes that it divides Russia. Putin also doesn't like the idea of the people overruling the ruler.
2. I think they want narrative because it helps the Russians become united and understand their history.
3. The older people are trying to explain to the younger people the ways it was before so that the younger people don't commit historic schizophrenia. I think the U.S. is facing historic schizophrenia too because younger people are beginning to think for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is important to remember if it made a huge change in a society such as a war or a presidential  election.
2.  Depending on the event, they can sometimes be symbolic or represent something deeper. They also sometimes relate to other historical events and prove something.
3. The event should have noteworthy consequences or effects so that we can study them and learn from them.
4.  I think it should unify but that would not happen because everyone has their opinions so it doesn't unify.
5. I don't think it should have global repercussions but I think it should effect a few smaller groups in the country.
6. I think 9/11 will be remembered in for the next 100 years

1. The kremlin plans to sit out because Russia is too divided from the consequences from the war. The more believable reason is that president Putin doubts the war and he doesn't like the idea of it.
2.  Kremlin likes the narrative that they have been oppressed.
3. I agree that we live in historical schizophrenia because we have a world where some people are always going to make horrendous decisions such as terrorism.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If it made an impact on society, and if it were an experience where many countries were involved it would be remembered more maybe than if something happened to just one area.
2. NO, but if something symbolic comes out of it then thats good.
3. YES, if you want change you need to have after effects.
4. I think its good to unify people over a common cause but not for bad reasons.
5. If its a bad event maybe, but it should effect us and change our ways.
6.  9/11
__________________________________
1. Kremlin plans to sit out bc Putin dislikes the idea of revolution and does not want Russian's to be happy
2. Kremlin likes that they had been 'oppressed' by W Europe.
3. I think it means people are afraid to act and change things because they are afraid of the consequences bc they have seen things go poorly before and don't wanna see their country crash and burn.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  I think that if it effects people to this day in some way or another then it is worth remembering.  As long as it effects even one person then it is worth remembering.
2. For something to by truly symbolic it needs to shape the world or a nation in some way to change the way something or some peoples are. looked at. Sometimes an event can bring to the surface some ideas that are effecting a country in a negative way. Those moments when people see the problem and say never again, those moments are symbolic.
3. Yes, each different event can have different consequences, however I think that those consequences should not be decided with another countries best interest in mind.
4.  It depends on the reaction by the people. Events like 9/11 bring people together. The loss and sadness unified the nation, yet talk of terrorism can tear us apart and be very divisive.  People should be able to be unified by tragic events but also everyone will have an opinion.
5.  It depends on how if effected the world. An example form WWI might be France, most of the battles were fought in France, the french lost a lot of people and land. The French had a right to be mad at the Germans, it effected them.
6. I think it truly depends on how it shaped the world. If something happens and it truly changed the way people see the world, then yes people will remember. However I think little things that we see as very important now might not be later.

1.   Kremlin plans to sit out because of the fact that they do not agree with Putin. Putin does not like the idea of revolution.  Putin does not want to celebrate the overthrowing of a ruler because he does not agree with the ideas of revolution.
2.   Kremlin likes the narrative of being oppressed. They want Russia to be united and the Russian revolution wants division.
3. I think that historical schizophrenia means that people have lost touch with the reality of what has happened throughout history. Someone who is schizophrenic may have illusions, loss touch with reality and disorganized thoughts. I think that  historical schizophrenia may mean trying to change history in our minds in order to make it look better less gruesome, less painful. Make your people the victims not the bad guys. In some way the US have done that as well. When we think about things like watergate or desert storm. For me the biggest one that comes to mind though is the Colonization of the new world. We have changed history to make it seem like a good thing. Like europeans found a new world. It is not true there were people here before them and the europeans raped, killed and enslaved them. Now we celebrate people like Columbus.  We have changed the past in order to justify the death of entire populations.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes an event so important is based off how many people it affected and how it affected not only one country but the world.
2. Yes I think they can because they can relate to other aspects of life outside of war, or what ever the event was. These events can teach you important life lesson
3. It depends on what event it is and how many people get involved. In the end everyone is human and we need to forgive, but if it is something super bad such as the holocaust than, yes I do believe there needs to be consequences.
4. I think it all depends on the event. I feel that the really bad and important events it might have a global repercussion it all just depends.
5. Yes I believe that 9/11 will still be important and relevant 100 years from now.

1. Kremlin plans to sit out because Putin does not like the idea of celebrating that day that the ruler was over thrown.
2. Kremlin likes the narrative that they had been "oppressed" by western Europe, not by there own country.
3. I do agree with this because our society is never going to be normal and there will always be people that will make the world be in "Historical schizophrenia".

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historical event should be effective and impactful on their history. It should keep its importance even after many years has passed. Although, I don't think the date needs to be a positive day, it could be a negative time.
2. I think the event should be symbolic of the feeling portrayed on that dy. Either of hope, victory, happiness or even loss and pain. It doesn't have to represent something magical, just something important to that country's history.
3. I think consequence is an odd word, but I do believe that effects should come out of a holiday.
4. In a perfect world it should be unifying, but in reality every holiday has its divisions and places where people argue.
5. I think a holiday should be recognized by other countries but it doesn't need to be celebrated globally.
6. I think that 9/11 will be remembered in 100 years and beyond because it was so impactful on our society and how we went about our daily lives.

1. The Kremlin plans to sit out of the 100th holiday of the Russian Revolution because Russia is too divided right now to celebrate its revolution. However, the more likely reason is because Vladimir Putin hates celebrating revolution.
2. The Kremlin narrative is because so many aggressors have come into the west and oppressed their people that now they want to put governments in to help them rebuild.
3. The older people are trying to explain to young citizens how to be a loyal member and not revolt and not create historical schizophrenia. I think that young people in the US have many ideas as well, and I believe that there is some but not as much as Russia is dealing with.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  If the event has a lot of effect on society. Or if a lot of work or effort was put into it
2. Sometimes a event can represent different ideas. But it should represent different people.
3. yes, the event should have many different outcomes and effects.
4. maybe not global repercussions but should effect many people
5. 9-11 will be important 20 years from now

6. Kremlin plan is to sit out bc Putin dosent approve of the  idea of revolution and does not want to see the Russian's happy and free
7. Kremlin likes that they had been influenced by W Europe.
3. It means people are afraid to act and change things because they are afraid of the outcomes bc they have witnessed their country in dark before and want to avoid their country's decline

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think if an historical event has impacted society in a major way then it is worthy to remember. Something that made present day society the way it is.
2.  I think that the event should represent different people's ides and show progress.
3. I think that the event should have memorable causes and effects.
4. I think the event should unify and divide people as long as it is memorable
5. I don' think global repercussions is necessary, but it should effect at least a small group of people.
6. In the past 20 years, I think 9-11 has been very impactful on society today and will continued to be learned/ studied about.

Article Questions-

1. The Kremlin plans to sit out because Putin doesn't want to celebrate the overthrow of any ruler, for he is one. The country is also too divided.
2. I think the Kremlin's preferred narrative in Russia history is that they want Russia to be united and the Russian Revolution wants it to be divided.
3. I think "historical schizophrenia" means that you've lost touch of reality . I don't know whether or not Russia characterizes with that. I think other countries can become in that state.

# data[].attributes.body
1) If the event made any impact or changed the society in anyway. Additionally, If the event is traumatic so we won't repeat those actions again.
2) I think the events can sometimes represent a deeper meaning or symbolic of something else, but I think in order for it to be remembered it has to change or impact the society in someway.
3)Yes, the event should effect of change our society in someway.
4) I think the event doesn't have to be unifying as long as it makes an impact. Also it can be divisive because that makes an impact or changes the society.
5) I don't think the event has to have consequences because it could change our society for the better, it all depends on the circumstance.
6) I think 9/11 will be remembered in 20 years, i was very traumatic and impacted our society.
Other questions:
1) The Kremlin plans to sit out of the was a national holiday that no longer will be celebrated because it is too divided.
2) I think the narrative is oppression by their country- they don't want division.
3) I think this means that everyone is stuck living in the past because "We live in historical schizophrenia" is a mental disorder.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If a historical event has a big impact on society, then it will be remembered for years to come. It had to have changed the world in either a positive or negative way (both will have to be strong events).
2. The event should represent a larger idea about the people. Normally, a historical event begins based off of a larger idea regarding the freedom of people or a place.
3. The event should have noteworthy effects because that way it will be remembered by a greater audience.
4. The event can be both unifying and divisive as long as it has some change (that way it will be memorable).
5. I don't think that it should have global repercussions, but it should effect at least a small group of people.
6.  I think that 9/11 is a very important event in our history because it effected so many people, and it will be remembered for a very long time.

Article:

1. The Kremlin plans to sit out because President Putin hates the idea of revolution/doesn't want division.
2. I think that they don't want division, but Russia has been surrounded by foreign attackers and "that the West strives to implant friendly governments everywhere".
3. I think that it means that the country is stuck in the past and what happened before (schizophrenia is a mental disorder), and they can't get out of what happened before. I do not specifically think that the US is like that, but I think that any country that feels like it is stuck in the past can be categorized with that phrase.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is usually remembered years later if it made a really big change in the society. If whatever the event was had a big effect on the world, then usually, it is memorable
2. The event should usually represent more than just one person and represent a big group of people
3. Yes, the event should have lasting effects and make some sort of change so that people remember it.
4. I think the event can be both unifying or divisive
5. 9-11 is an event that I think will be remembered for a while because it affected many people.

1. The Kremlin plans to sit out because
3. I'm not completely sure, but I think It means that everyone is living in the past and the issues in the past