# data[].attributes.body
1. This book is set in the future where women gain their independence and individualism.
2.  Yes this source is credible because i is all fiction, so it can not give you fake facts.
3. No because there will be no real solid facts about it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This book is just a bunch of essays written by  Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, she has talked  at Ted Talks.
3. Yes because it all is in her point of view.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In December 2015, the Swedish Women's Lobby and publisher Albert Bonniers revealed the book is to be distributed to every 16-year-old high school student in Sweden, with the intention that it will "work as a stepping stone for a discussion about gender equality and feminism".

# data[].attributes.body
1. This source is about how even in poverty, there is sexism. There is sexism in any place.
2. This video is not very credible, it doesn't have solid facts.
3. It would be a good resource to show how the public is starting to see the sexism.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
STAND WITH WOMEN & GIRLS EVERYWHERE: http://bit.ly/2kpIUi7 There's nowhere on earth where women have the same opportunities as men - but it's women living in the poorest parts of the planet who are hit hardest by the injustice of gender inequality. We believe that none of us are equal until all of us are equal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Women in the 1970's Marching For their Rights 

# data[].attributes.subject
Women in the 1970's Marching For their Rights 

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is a march in the 1970's sponsored by the National Organization for Women in New York City.
2.  Yes it is credible because it is an old picture, you can not photo shop it.
3. Yes I would because it's credible.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This source is about real facts about the challenges women have in the USA.
2. I believe it is credible because it has solid facts that I have seen everywhere.
3. Yes I would use it in a research paper because it has real facts.

# data[].attributes.headline
People Trying to End Planned Parent Hood  

# data[].attributes.subject
People Trying to End Planned Parent Hood  

# data[].attributes.body
1. This source is about a someone trying to convince the public that Planned Parenthood is evil.
2. This source is kind of credible because it is mainly her own opinion.
3. No because it is just her opinion, no true solid facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Walker Wildmon Assistant to the President MORE
Ending the life of a child is anything but healthcare... - Walker Wildmon

When I was in high school I sat next to a young lady in class who quietly mentioned to her friend that she'd had an abortion. At the time I didn't completely grasp the heartache that she must have been experiencing though I could see the pain in her eyes. The only other detail I remember is her saying that it was painful. It was a haunting conversation that I remember to this day.

Recently, it has been reported that Planned Parenthood executives are making as much money as some professional athletes. For those who don't know, Planned Parenthood is America's largest abortion provider and is subsidized by roughly 500 million taxpayer dollars each year.

To be specific, Planned Parenthood's CEO, Cecile Richards, receives $957,952 a year in compensation. This is a shocking number. Planned Parenthood is portrayed by the media and liberals as vital to women's healthcare. Yet according to American's United for Life, Planned Parenthood performed 327,653 abortions in 2013 alone. What this reveals is that not only is Planned Parenthood committing cruel and evil acts, its bosses are well compensated for providing them.

One claim you'll hear regarding abortion is that it is only a small percentage of what Planned Parenthood provides. From a biblical prospective this is a non-starter. Killing as many as one child is one too many. Nonetheless, President Trump offered to allow Planned Parenthood to keep its federal funds if they would cease performing abortions. Their executives denied this offer claiming abortion was vital in order for their organization to continue. You'd think if abortion was such as small part of what Planned Parenthood does then its leaders wouldn't mind ceasing the practice in order to keep the federal funds coming in. But Planned Parenthood is absolutely committed to killing babies and misdirecting that reality by referring to it as women's healthcare.

Under virtually no scenario is abortion the provision of healthcare. We must not grant validity to such a falsehood. Ending the life of a child is anything but healthcare as women often suffer emotional and physical harm from having an abortion.

Our representatives in Congress are now debating a healthcare bill that could largely pull funds away from Planned Parenthood and shift them to real women's health clinics that don't perform abortions. A recent poll showed that 58% of likely voters oppose the government subsiding Planned Parenthood. With the majority of American's feeling this way, Congress has no excuse but to finally end the taxpayer funds to those who carry out the barbaric act that is abortion.

Over 1,000 baby lives are ended each day in Planned Parenthood facilities across America. This is terribly wrong and at a minimum we should stop sending our tax dollars to such an organization.

America is and will be judged by God for the way we treat the most vulnerable among us. My prayer is that this generation will be remembered as the one that not only ended the taxpayer funds to abortion providers but ended the horrific practice altogether.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Walker Wildmon Assistant to the President MORE Ending the life of a child is anything but healthcare... - Walker Wildmon When I was in high school I sat next to a young lady in class who quietly mentioned to her friend that she'd had an abortion.

# data[].attributes.headline
Trump Ending Facilities  That Help Women 

# data[].attributes.subject
Trump Ending Facilities  That Help Women 

# data[].attributes.body
1. This resource is talking about Trump planning to end Planned Parenthood, a facility that helps women. 2.This may be a little biased, but it is credible.
3. Yes it would be a good resource if you wee writing things that are with this article.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
President Trump's 2018 budget proposal would bar Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers from receiving federal funds that help pay for health-care services for millions of Americans.

The budget, the "New Foundation for American Greatness," was released Tuesday, proposing to cut trillions of dollars in spending during the next decade. The budget is part of the Trump administration's effort to follow through on a campaign promise to exclude "certain entities that provide abortions, including Planned Parenthood" from participating in any Department of Health and Human Services programs, according to a fact sheet from the White House.

Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, called Trump's proposal "the worst budget for women and women's health in a generation."

"It singles out Planned Parenthood, guts programs designed to help women and their families put food on the table, get the medical care they need, and make ends meet," Laguens said in a statement. "From day one, women's health has been squarely in the crosshairs of this administration. ... If passed, this budget would undo decades of progress for women when it comes to their ability to access health care, to pursue their career and education goals, and to lead safe, productive lives."

[Congressional health-care bill 'defunds' Planned Parenthood]

Planned Parenthood and others were already excluded from using federal dollars to pay for most abortion services, except in instances of rape and incest or in situations in which a woman's life is in danger. It's spelled out in the Hyde Amendment, which Congress first approved in 1976 and has renewed each year. In a letter to antiabortion rights leaders during his presidential campaign, Trump criticized Hillary Clinton for wanting to repeal it and promised to make it "permanent law to protect taxpayers from having to pay for abortions."

The House of Representatives passed a health-care bill earlier this month that, if enacted, would temporarily ban Planned Parenthood from participating in the Medicaid program. But Trump's budget proposal would ensure that none of the federal funding from the Labor-HHS appropriations bill could go to the women's health organization.

Leading up to the budget proposal, more than 60 human rights and women's rights groups signed an open letter expressing concern that it would "strip away basic support for struggling families, reduce access to vital care and services, and disproportionately harm the health and well-being of people of color, immigrants, LGBTQ individuals, religious minorities, and low-income women and families."

Trump's proposal still must be approved by Congress. The White House could not immediately be reached for comment.
Read more: Trump proposes dramatic changes to federal government, slashing safety net programs that affect up to a fifth of Americans It's not just programs for the poor. Trump's budget calls for vast changes to government. President Trump's 'balanced' budget relies on $2,062,000,000,000 in mystery money

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Trump's budget proposal aims to cut all federal funds from Planned Parenthood

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
President Trump's 2018 budget proposal would bar Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers from receiving federal funds that help pay for health-care services for millions of Americans. The budget, the "New Foundation for American Greatness," was released Tuesday, proposing to cut trillions of dollars in spending during the next decade.

# data[].attributes.headline
Women in 2017 Still Marching for Their Rights 

# data[].attributes.subject
Women in 2017 Still Marching for Their Rights 

# data[].attributes.body
1. This resource is about the Women's March in Washington D.C.
2. It is credible because it is a picture.
3. This would be a good resource because it shows a lot.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is about Ashley Judd and her sharing about online abuse towards women a=have spiraled out of control.
2. This is credible because it is a TED talk.
3. Yes, because it gives you the facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ashley Judd: How online abuse of women has spiraled out of control

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Enough with online hate speech, sexual harassment and threats of violence against women and marginalized groups. It's time to take the global crisis of online abuse seriously. In this searching, powerful talk, Ashley Judd recounts her ongoing experience of being terrorized on social media for her unwavering activism and calls on citizens of the internet, the tech community, law enforcement and legislators to recognize the offline harm of online harassment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This resource is many reliable facts about women getting hurt and abused.

2. This is a very credible source because the website is trust worthy, and all the facts are cited at the bottom.
3. It would be a good resource since they are all unbiased facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Facts and figures: Ending violence against women

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Availability of data on violence against women and girls has increased significantly in recent years. Here are some facts and figures.