# data[].attributes.body
Here you will find all the current stories being published in Britain

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Kiosko.net is a visual daily press directory that gives access to the world's largest news sites and displays a readable image taken from today's frontpage cover of each newspaper.

kiosko.net app for iPhone and iPad

Kiosko.net for iPhone. Access the front pages of major newspapers around the world. A visual experience and usability without precedents.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Newspapers in United Kingdom. Today's press covers. Kiosko.net

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Kiosko.net is a visual daily press directory that gives access to the world's largest news sites and displays a readable image taken from today's frontpage cover of each newspaper. kiosko.net app for iPhone and iPad Kiosko.net for iPhone. Access the front pages of major newspapers around the world.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Internet has transformed how everyone accesses news. Most people have a mobile phone able to shoot good quality video, record interviews etc. Multiple apps enable you to share by uploading onto YouTube, Facebook, Snap-chat and so on. Does this make you a 'citizen journalist'? You are connected to the world by your Twitter Feed, Blog, video platform. You are live to the world. What rules are there controlling what you upload? Why are you sharing this stuff? Do you want to affect  or influence what people think or believe? Is what you are sharing true or is it just propaganda? How do we know that with some editing skills, Photoshop you are just promoting a lie  for effect, that could be illegal racist, offensive, hate speech, blasphemous, obscene, encouraging or inciting violence and civil disorder. What you say could affect the democratic process - fake news - even though we are entitled to free speech, what does that mean? Are there limits? Should we be censored for our beliefs, for what we say and if so, by whom? The on-line digital world has changed the journalistic landscape for ever

# data[].attributes.subject
The Internet has transformed how everyone accesses news. Most people have a mobile phone able to shoot good quality video, record interviews etc. Multiple apps enable you to share by uploading onto YouTube, Facebook, Snap-chat and so on. Does this make you a 'citizen journalist'? You are connected to the world by your Twitter Feed, Blog, video platform. You are live to the world. What rules are there controlling what you upload? Why are you sharing this stuff? Do you want to affect  or influence what people think or believe? Is what you are sharing true or is it just propaganda? How do we know that with some editing skills, Photoshop you are just promoting a lie  for effect, that could be illegal racist, offensive, hate speech, blasphemous, obscene, encouraging or inciting violence and civil disorder. What you say could affect the democratic process - fake news - even though we are entitled to free speech, what does that mean? Are there limits? Should we be censored for our beliefs, for what we say and if so, by whom? The on-line digital world has changed the journalistic landscape for ever

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Citizen Journalism is Reshaping the World: Brian Conley at TEDxMidAtlantic

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Brian Conley is director of Small World News and has been involved in media literacy and media democracy work for more than ten years and has trained journalists and citizen media makers in a dozen countries.

# data[].attributes.headline
This article from the English newspaper the Guardian considers how social media is changing the news. This is required reading for you and it will help you understand the importance of how social; media could be changing or shaping how we think and understand our world.

# data[].attributes.subject
This article from the English newspaper the Guardian considers how social media is changing the news. This is required reading for you and it will help you understand the importance of how social; media could be changing or shaping how we think and understand our world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The morning of the Oxford Social Media Convention focused on the impact of social media. Especially interesting were the statements on the panel 'Breaking news: the changing relationships between blogs and mainstream media'.

Richard Sambrook, the director of the BBC Global News Division, said that the impact of social media was overestimated in the short term and underestimated in long term. Mainstream media are adopting social media especially with blogging and twitter, he admited, but nobody discusses the effects on the long term.

But what is the long term? One thing he is sure of is that new organisations don't own the news anymore. There is a transformation for the journalist from being the gatekeeper of information to sharing it in a public space. Therefore citizen journalism is something, Sambrook added, that has to be taken into account. However, he doesn't see the internet as a place where news come from - although Sky News has a Twitter correspondent researching the micro-blogging platform.

What he could see evolving though, was a new objectivity. Objectivity, he then pointed out, had always been an idea important for the news. For him it was once designed to deliver journalism that people can trust. But in the new media age transparency is what delivers trust. He stressed that news today still has to be accurate and fair, but it is as important for the readers, listeners and viewers to see how the news is produced, where the information comes from, and how it works. The emergence of news is as important, as the delivering of the news itself.

Information is not journalism, he explained further. You get a lot of things, when you open up Twitter in the morning, but not journalism. Journalism needs discipline, analysis, explanation and context, he pointed out, and therefore for him it is still a profession. The value that gets added with journalism is judgment, analysis and explanation - and that makes the difference. So journalism will stay - he was optimistic about that. However, journalists must understand one rule: if you believe you are in competition with the internet, find your way out. Collaboration, openness and link culture are rules, you can't deny at the moment, he said.

John Kelly, a columnist for the Washington Post, who has published a report on the rise, challenges and value of citizen journalism for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism explained further, saying that today the Huffington Post competes with the Washington Post not in terms of journalism, but in terms of its readers.

Social media for him are not only important for citizen journalism, but for reaching out to the readers as well. Mainstream media are exploring the use of social media to drive traffic; already 8% of the Daily Telegraph web traffic comes from social media. The Washington Post is rather slow with putting the work of citizen journalists in the paper, Kelly reported. There were only a few crowdsourcing projects and they were presented as special features. The section it is mostly used is sports, where they aggregate Twitter feeds of American Football players and display it.

The commentary editor of Reuters, Jonathan Ford, finally explained that it is quite hard for a news agency such as Reuters to take social media into account. And social media has developed in the financial sphere, too. Reuters, Kelly pointed out further, is interested in blogging to set up a community offering specific trade news and information - because in the financial community, social media has started to play a role. People such as the economy expert Paul Krugman or bankers who had already made it, he said, started to shared knowledge with the public and pulled them into a financial debate to regain trust. On Twitter this remark was live-commented by drgrahamwilson with the tweet: "Bankers using blogs to regain trust in themselves. In whose mind?"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How social networking is changing journalism

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The morning of the Oxford Social Media Convention focused on the impact of social media. Especially interesting were the statements on the panel 'Breaking news: the changing relationships between blogs and mainstream media'. Richard Sambrook, the director of the BBC Global News Division, said that the impact of social media was overestimated in the short term and underestimated in long term.

# data[].attributes.headline
This is an interesting web site that explores bias in news reporting and censorship and how the way news is presented can effect our view of the world.

# data[].attributes.subject
This is an interesting web site that explores bias in news reporting and censorship and how the way news is presented can effect our view of the world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
People in news media often come under attack for shoddy reporting, political bias or for promoting stories that fail to live up to the hype. While mistakes sometimes happen, common media myths can usually be struck down once all the facts are considered.

Reporters and Their Bosses Are Liberals

Reporters are sometimes accused of having a liberal media bias. The fact is, reporters usually reflect the communities in which they work.

They are taxpayers, parents, and homeowners like everyone else. Media executives are confronted with the same issues as those in other industries -- managing tight budgets, stockholders' expectations and coping with economic forces beyond their control.

News reporters do gravitate toward stories about change because change equals news. So when an elected leader of either political party proposes an overhaul of the system, that makes headlines. Someone else who supports the status quo will likely not get coverage. That is not a case of liberal bias. Conservatives who want to scrap the U.S. tax code would draw coverage, just as those who backed universal health care.

All News Coverage Has an Unethical Political Bias

Some of the cable news networks have become known for covering news with a political slant. Fox News Channel is widely seen as being conservative, while rival MSNBC is positioning itself on the other end of the spectrum.

There is nothing unethical about covering news from a political viewpoint, as long as the viewers are aware of that fact. Journalism ethics are breached when an attempt is made to hide this motivation from the audience. While the recent focus has been on television news coverage, newspapers have taken editorial positions for generations.

The political positions on the editorial page don't hinder accurate reporting of the bank robbery on the front page.

Viewers should make a distinction between a news broadcast and news commentary. Commentators such as Bill O'Reilly or Rachel Maddow are usually free to talk about their opinions, but their shows aren't considered straight news programming.

Reporters Don't Tell the Whole Story

Sometimes the whole story is impossible to get. There are still unanswered questions about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which brought many changes to news coverage. But that shouldn't prevent a reporter from having a story printed or broadcast about what is known at the time. News users expect immediate information.

In breaking news situations, some information turns out to be incorrect. That is an unfortunate byproduct of producing live coverage as events are unfolding. Viewers see raw information that comes from a variety of sources -- eyewitnesses can be wrong, investigations can be revised to include newly-found facts and emergency workers can sometimes not provide a clear picture of what's happening in a crisis.

Reporters are often accused of only telling one side of a story. That happens when the people involved in the other side refuse to talk.

A reporter must pursue getting the other side, but once the attempt is made, she can usually go ahead with the side that she has.

Think back to the Watergate scandal. If the Nixon Administration could have killed the story by simply refusing to talk, the nation would've never known what was happening inside the White House. The Washington Post was correct in presenting a well-researched, one-sided story based on information from the source called "Deep Throat" that was proven to be the truth.

Reporters Sensationalize the Facts

A newspaper headline which reads "Tempers Flare at City Council" is going to attract more readers than one that says "City Council Holds Its Regular Meeting". It's not sensationalism to accurately report the emotion involved in a story.

Where reporters sometimes go overboard is making the emotional hook the centerpiece of the story.

Facts are quickly replaced by the most flowery adjectives that can be found in a Thesaurus.

Television is the usual culprit. Why it's widely known that television reaches the head through the heart, reporters leap to include the crying family members of a murder victim in their story. While their pain may be uncomfortable to watch, the alternative is a cold, sterile story about crime statistics that don't show the heartbreak that violence has on families.

Stories Are Called "Exclusive" When They're Not

Here's a typical scenario -- the president offers a one-on-one interview to ABC, CBS, and NBC. Each network will then tout its "exclusive" interview, even though the president sat down with all three.

It becomes a question of semantics whether these interviews are exclusive. CBS may have asked pointed questions about foreign policy that the other networks forgot to do. They may have gotten answers about education and health care instead.

In a perfect world, the networks would sit down and each take a topic with the president, then present their interviews together so that viewers could watch one network each night to get different information. In a competitive environment like network news, that will likely never happen.

Stories Fail to Live up to the Hype

Whether you're watching a local TV affiliate or a broadcast network, the reporting and promotion of news stories usually involve two different departments. A reporter will tell the promotion department the basic facts of the story, while the promotion producers create topical advertisements designed to get people to watch.

When the communication between the departments breaks down, the result can easily be a promo that doesn't accurately match the story. Viewers will be lured into watching a newscast to see a blockbuster report, only to be disappointed by the lackluster story they see.

Every news outlet has been burned by this problem. But if it happens too often, viewers will become wise to the carnival-barker promotion and ignore it.

Producing news quickly and accurately isn't easy. Mistakes happen on the air, online and in print. But media myths concerning bias and ethical lapses are usually just that -- myths, that aren't supported by the facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Learn How Media Myths Affect How the Public Views News Coverage

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
People in news media often come under attack for shoddy reporting, political bias or for promoting stories that fail to live up to the hype. While mistakes sometimes happen, common media myths can usually be struck down once all the facts are considered. Reporters are sometimes accused of having a liberal media bias.

# data[].attributes.headline
Analyse the content of the media you use. As Marshall McLuhan said "The medium is the message" BUT what is the message? do you agree with it? Do you disagree with it? Do you understand it? This is an interesting little video.

# data[].attributes.subject
Analyse the content of the media you use. As Marshall McLuhan said "The medium is the message" BUT what is the message? do you agree with it? Do you disagree with it? Do you understand it? This is an interesting little video.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
My name is Claire and this is my video answering the question, "How does mass media influence society?".

# data[].attributes.headline
Who decides what news to broadcast? Who decides the news agenda? Who decides what news the public wants to see? Does the content of news programmes affect your view of the world?

# data[].attributes.subject
Who decides what news to broadcast? Who decides the news agenda? Who decides what news the public wants to see? Does the content of news programmes affect your view of the world?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Alisa Miller: How the news distorts our worldview

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Alisa Miller, head of Public Radio International, talks about why -- though we want to know more about the world than ever -- the media is actually showing us less. Eye-opening stats and graphs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Watch and listen carefully to what David Kaye has to say about the problems facing journalists today

# data[].attributes.subject
Watch and listen carefully to what David Kaye has to say about the problems facing journalists today

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Video message by David Kaye - UNESCO Colloquium Journalism Under Fire: Challenges of our times

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Video message by David Kaye during UNESCO Colloquium Journalism Under Fire: Challenges of our times. David Kaye is the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression On March 23, the UNESCO Colloquium Journalism under fire: challenges of our time, featured lively debates from leading scholars journalists, and representatives of social media companies and media development organizations to discuss the contemporary challenges to journalism.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sometimes Humour helps understand complicated issues like press censorship and governments attempting to control media stories.

# data[].attributes.subject
Sometimes Humour helps understand complicated issues like press censorship and governments attempting to control media stories.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
WikiLeaks: the truth is out there - feat. Hillary Clinton & Alex Jones [RAP NEWS 6]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Cablegate has burst open. With a steady trickle of Diplomatic communiques leaking out every single day, the Book of Revelations is expanding dramatically. In all the hubbub, the global community is forced to ask questions of its leaders. Will the world ever be the same again?

# data[].attributes.headline
What do journalists do? Why are so many killed or in prison? Why are governments around the world trying to silence journalists? Watch this video to start your journalistic journey.

# data[].attributes.subject
What do journalists do? Why are so many killed or in prison? Why are governments around the world trying to silence journalists? Watch this video to start your journalistic journey.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Why Does Russia Hate The United States? http://testu.be/1O2xIhP Tim Pool's Youtube Channel youtube.com/timcast Subscribe! http://bitly.com/1iLOHml TestTube News sat down with digital journalist, Tim Pool to discuss how the 21st century changed journalism. Check out what he had to say. © 2015 Fusion Media Network, LLC.