# data[].attributes.body
Worldview:
Maintain peace and order and to support the principles of democracy, free markets and freedom.

Beliefs:
Should not be afraid to use our military to keep troublemakers in check and spread liberal democratic principles throughout the world

Policies:
Impose trade boycotts on countries that do not adopt U.S. political and economic principles

Arguments For:
As the events in Afghanistan and Iraq have shown, aggressive tyrants and oppressive regimes will be stopped only when the United States intervenes decisively to change these regimes.

Arguments Against:
Pressuring other governments to adopt U.S. democratic principles will spark international criticism that the United States is trying to control the world

# data[].attributes.headline
Future 3 : Build A More Cooperative World

# data[].attributes.subject
Future 3 : Build A More Cooperative World

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview: To live securely and peacefully in this interdependent world.

Beliefs: To have good global citizenship , respecting the fact that we do not own the Earth, actions effect everyone.

Policies: Working with allies,forgive debt in poor countries,establish regulations to protect developing economies

Arguments Against : losing international influence, fundamental values will clash, using too much money and leaving the U.S. without resources

Arguments For : Strengthening UN will put unpredictable powers under control, economic assistance will aid U.S. in the long run,international gives U.S. more say not powerless

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview: Focus on keeping ourselves as number one and keeping everyone in check.

Beliefs: Use economic and military aid to advance U.S trade and investment.

Policies: Maintain friendly relations with undemocratic governments.
Protect our economy and security interests at all costs. Keep power-hungry nations in check.

Arguments For: maintaining long standing military alliances will help protect U.S interests and put the system in firm ground. U.S involvement in areas that are in danger will reduce the possibility of war, with the U.S in charge they would be kept in check. With the U.S military stationed in different countries that will discourage other countries to expand their military.

Arguments Against:  Alliances with cruel leaders would be putting back human rights back away from democracy. Power schemes would collapse eventually. Issues around the world would distract politicians from issues that should have their focus at home.

# data[].attributes.body
[-.Worldview:
Maintain peace and order and to support the principles of democracy, free markets and freedom.

Beliefs:
Promote and protect US
Use military

Polices:
Use whatever means necessary to transform authoritarian states into democratic ones.
Promote US culture and values abroad

Against:
Not everyone believes the things the US does is the right thing
This would cause a lot of problems

# data[].attributes.body
Worldview: to focus on U.S issues and provide no aid to other countries.

Beliefs: no environmental restrictions.

Policies: We join other countries militarily only when our only when our security is threatened.
Resign our armed forces to focus on defending North America.

Arguments for: No more unnecessary conflicts
Would free up resources
U.S would be in a better position.
Encourage other leading powers to reduce their spending on defense and lower tensions worldwide.

Arguments Against: We cannot afford to break our alliances.
This would upset the worldwide balance of power.
We would not be able to spread our ideas of democracy and freedom.
We would not be able to defeat the next evil tyrant.
International terrorism can threaten any country at any time.