# data[].attributes.body
Organization of the film was consistent and scenes were put in order.

# data[].attributes.body
Good projection, easy to understand, funny, but at times wind and cars were a little overpowering.

# data[].attributes.body
Spoke clearly, seemed confident in questions, hard to hear over background noises,

# data[].attributes.body
I like that he did a video and spoke about the aspects and organization of making the video

# data[].attributes.body
He pauses a lot and doesn't hold that sense of confidence like the other presenters

# data[].attributes.body
Small amount of movements

# data[].attributes.body
Hands in pockets, not very engaging. Does improve as he progresses. These video ones are harder to gauge on body language

# data[].attributes.body
There were some pauses in his speaking but he was able to answer the questions throughly.

# data[].attributes.body
He's looking more at Ms. Song than the audience. He didn't even stare at me.

# data[].attributes.body
Good use of stuffed animals, the idea of revolving the video around Religion was really creative.

# data[].attributes.body
The content of the video was funny and I liked how you two made use of what y'all had at home. The content was not only funny, but it was also a breakdown of what happened in the book.

# data[].attributes.body
He answered the questions fully, and went in-depth with them. The video, which focused on Pi and his father's relationship and Pi's spirituality, showed some understanding of the book. However, in the book, his father didn't really care too much about Pi and his different religions

# data[].attributes.body
Nathan spoke mostly to Ms. Song with the introduction. He was also very quiet and timid in his manner that he presented himself. This is evident in the way he was covering his chest and swaying. His transition to the video was one of the only acts of enthusiasm I saw.
The video did play a major part in his presentation and how he acted in the video. I feel like he should have cut the video more to include his projects, or took the long periods of transition to talk to the audience. The video was overall monotonous and overused the anti-humor too much. The bloopers reel was one of the more interactive and upbeat parts. Nathan himself didn't talk to the audience much but that's okay.

# data[].attributes.body
his dance at the beginning confused me. He also paused and said "uh" and "like" often which was distracting. However, he seemed pretty comfortable presenting otherwise.

# data[].attributes.body
Nathan had very short answers and wasn't directed towards the audience, fairly bland tone.