# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Dilfuza Shayyrova

Writer:Alijan Rejepov

Your essay's has good ideas and Clear examples about fruits,vegetables and starches.I like how you shared your personal experience because it makes the essay more interesting.However,there are many grammar and spelling mistakes,so you should check your sentences carefully.Also,some transitions between paragraphs can be smoother. You have a clear conclusion and you summarize main idea well.

# data[].attributes.body
the essay’s author: Neva Melek Balcı

Peer Editor: Selin Nas Okcu

The main idea is relevant to the topic. Examples and supported details can be more. The essay is clear and ideas follow a logical order. The essay flows smoothly. Transitions and connectors are used appropriately. There is no problem with the vocabulary or grammar use.

# data[].attributes.body
Writer:İlayda Fatma CANTÜRK

Peer Editör: Emre ÇELİK

A. Content

1. The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic.

2. Ideas are explained, but more examples could be added.

3. The parts about “fun friends” and “situational friends” could be more developed.

B. Organization

1. The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

2. The thesis statement is understandable but could be stronger.

3. Most paragraphs have a clear topic sentence.

4. Ideas follow a logical order.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Ideas are generally connected logically.

2. More transition words could be used (such as “Moreover” or “For example”).

3. The essay flows fairly smoothly, but some sentences could connect better.

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Vocabulary is appropriate and clear.

2. Some words are repeated too often (“friends,” “friendship”).

3. More academic vocabulary could be used.

E. Grammar

1. Grammar mistakes do not make the essay difficult to understand.

2. Some sentence structures and article/preposition uses need improvement.

3. There are a few spelling and punctuation mistakes.

# data[].attributes.headline
Week 13 Classification Essay Peer Feedback

# data[].attributes.subject
Week 13 Classification Essay Peer Feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Writer: Selin Nas Okcu

Peer editor: Ismetcan Ayhan

The main idea is clear and understandable, but the hook could be improved. Overall, the flow of the sentences is clear and easy to follow. The word choices are simple and understandable, perhaps more academic vocabulary could have been used, but the flow and clarity are still good. In general, the ideas in the essay are clearly and logically presented, and the essay progresses in a coordinated way.

# data[].attributes.body
writer : Aynura Rozyyeva

Peer editor : Atageldı Gurbanov

The argumentative essay of my friend is well structured. It has the thesis statement that takes a clear position. Additionally, body paragraphs include reasons to support position. There are relevant connectors and well grammar usage. Except some grammar and content mistakes, overall essay is academically right.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Kamila Kurambayeva

Writer: Aylara

A. The main idea clear and relevant to the topic.

B. The essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

C. The essay flows smoothly from one paragraph to another, but try to use transitions like “Firstly”, “Next”.

D. Use a wider range vocabulary instead of repeating simple word like “group” “animal”.

E. There is a little grammar mistake, but it doesn’t make meaning difficult to understand.

The conclusions could be slightly stronger.

Overall, the essay is clear, organized and easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
writer ismetcan ayhan

peer editor neva melek balcı

a)

1.yes it is relevant

2.yes there are examples supported with details

3.no i dont think so

b)

1.yes it does

2.the thesis is clear

3.yes the topic sentences are there

4.yes they do

c)

1.yes

2.yes but there are a few of them

3.yes

d)

1.i think it is appropriate

2.yes

3.yes the topic sentences are very similar

e)

1. no it’s easy to understand

2.mostly yes

# data[].attributes.body
The essay's author: Aynura Rozyyeva

Peer Editor: Mehri Annamuradova

Great job on her draft! The categories make sense and follow the five-paragraph structure perfectly. Maybe it needs to double- check the gerund and infinitives in the third paragraph just to make sure they match the checklist. Also, nice use of transitions like " First" and " Second". Nice work!

# data[].attributes.body
Write: Kamila

Peer editor: Aylara

Content: The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. The essay explains the three types of animals with good examples and enough supporting details. However, some parts could include a little more explanation to make the information more interesting.

Organization: The essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The thesis statement is understandable, and each paragraph focuses on one type of animal. The ideas are presented in a logical order.

Cohesion and Coherence: The essay flows smoothly from one paragraph to another. Transitions and connectors are used appropriately, which helps connect the ideas clearly.

Vocabulary Use: The vocabulary is suitable for academic writing and easy to understand. Most words are used correctly, although there is some repetition of words like “animals” and “examples.”

Grammar: Grammar mistakes do not make the essay difficult to understand. Sentence structures and verb tenses are mostly correct, but a few sentences could be more varied. Overall, the essay is clear and effective.

# data[].attributes.body
Writer: Aziza Umbarova

Peer: Beyza Enki

Main idea is clearly stated.

On body paragraphs the idea is explained and supported with examples.

All paragraphs have topic sentence and thesis statement is clear.

More conjuctions can be used.

Vocabulary is appropriate.

There is no unnecessary repeating.

There are a few simple grammer mistakes.

In conclusion the thesis statement is restated.

# data[].attributes.body
Writer: Beyza Enki

Peer Editor: Aziza Umbarova

My feedback: The classification essay has a clear and understandable structure. The main idea, examples, and details support the topic well. The body paragraphs are organized smoothly, and the vocabulary is appropriate and effective.

However, there are some unnecessary details and a few off-topic sentences. Aside from these minor mistakes, the essay is suitable for a classification essay and meets the main requirements.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: İlayda Fatma Cantürk

Author: Emre Çelik

A. Content

1. Is the main idea clear and relevant to the topic? Yes, it is very clear and relevant to the topic.

2. Are ideas sufficiently explained and supported with examples or details? Yes, the author explains everything clearly

3. Are any parts unclear or underdeveloped? No, all parts are perfectly clear.

B. Organization

1. Does the essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?

Yes, the essay has a clear introduction, body and conclusion.

2. Is the thesis statement clear? Yes, it is clear.

3. Does each paragraph have a clear topic sentence? Yes, all of them have a clear topic sentence.

4. Do ideas follow a logical order? Yes, they do.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Are ideas connected logically? Yes, they are connected logically.

2. Are transitions and connectors used appropriately? Yes, they are used appropriately.

3. Does the essay flow smoothly from one idea to another? Yes, it does flow smoothly.

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Is vocabulary appropriate for academic writing? Yes, it is appropriate for acafemic writing.

2. Are words used accurately and clearly? Yes, the words are used correctly.

3. Are there unnecessary repetitions? No, there are not unnecessary repetitions.

E. Grammar

1. Do grammar errors make meaning difficult to understand? No, they do not make meaning difficult to understand

2. Are verb tenses and sentence structures used correctly? Yes, they are used correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Writer: Selin Okcu

Peer Editor: Mina Ercan

1. The main idea is clear and coherent.

2. There are enough details and examples that make it easier to comprehend the topic.

3. Each topic is explained in detail with examples, nothing is underdeveloped.

4. The parts of the essay are clear and they follow a logical order.

5. Vocabulary may need some enhancements, using more advanced words instead of "very" can help the essay look more academic.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Aynura Rozyyeva

Writer: Mahri Annamuradova

Title: Categories for vacation planning

The classification essay about vacation planning written by my friend is well structured. The introduction classified categories for vacation planning. Each body paragraph explained a different category smoothly. There were used relevant vocabulary, connectors and information. Overall, if not to count a grammar mistake, the essay is academicly appropriate.

# data[].attributes.body
writer: neva melek balci

peer editor: eylul naz celik

The main idea is relevant to the topic

All ideas are explained and supported with details.

There are no unclear or underdeveloped parts.

﻿﻿﻿The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

The thesis statement is clear.

Topic sentences are clear.

Ideas follow a logical order

﻿﻿﻿Ideas are connected logically and the essay flows smoothly.

Transitions snd connector are used appropriately.

﻿﻿﻿There is no problem with the vocabulary use.

﻿﻿﻿There are no grammar mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
The essay’s author: Mina Ercan

Peer Editor: Selin Nas Okcu

The content is relevant to the topic, it is clear and flows. It can need more specific examples or supporting details because sentences are a little basic and can be improved. The organization is great and ideas are connected logically. Transitions and connectors are used correctly. Vocabulary use can be improved by using more academic words. I didn’t see any grammatical mistake.

# data[].attributes.headline
Week 13 Classification Essay Peer Feedback

# data[].attributes.subject
Week 13 Classification Essay Peer Feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Writer: Eylul Naz Celik

Peer editor: Ismetcan Ayhan

The hook in the introduction explains the topic clearly and effectively. The word choices in the body paragraphs are simple, understandable, and well-written. Describing the given headings adds a nice touch to the writing. Generally, the essay is clear and progresses in a coordinated and logical way.

# data[].attributes.body
writer : neva melek Balcı

peer editor : mina ercan

1. Main idea is clear and in unity with the essay

2. Yes, in body porgaphs, the idea is explained and supported

with examples.

3. All aspects mentioned in the thesis and explained clearly.

4, Yes, paragraphs start and finish accordingly to their role.

5. Thesis statement mentions both the advantages and disadvantages of the topics later explained in body paragraphs

6. They are clear.

7. The essay is written in a logical order.

8. Yes, they are connected without creating confusion.

9. The connection and logical order is satisfying overall.

10. Vocabulary is appropriate and clear. There one no repetitions.

11. There aren't any grammatical errors.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Neva Melek Balcı

1. Yes it is

2. Yes it is

3. No.

1. Yes. It has clear parts

2. Yes.

3. Yes the paragraphs all have clear topic sentences

4. Yes they follow a logical order.

1. Yes they are connected logically

2. Yes they're used appropriately

3. Yes it smoothly flows

D. 1. Yes it's appropriate and valid

2. Yes

3. No there isnt any repetitions

E

1. No they don't

2. Yes they are used correctly

# data[].attributes.body
Reaction Essay

In English, multiple adjectives preceding a noun follow a specific, generally inviolable order: Opinion, Size, Age, Shape, Color, Origin, Material, and Purpose. A common acronym is OASCOMP.

# data[].attributes.body
It combines summary with personal opinion, explaining not only what the original work is about but also how and why you react to it.

# data[].attributes.body
A reaction essay (also called a response essay) is an essay where you give your personal opinion, thoughts, and feelings about something you read, watched, or experienced.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Shahzad Arnamuratov

The essay's author: Atageldi Gurbanov

Overall, this essay presents clear and meaningful ideas about AI. Also the writer explores both sides of the topic, which makes it more interesting and thoughtful. I especially like the focus on efficiency and innovation. The essay shows good potential and a strong understanding of the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Shahzad Arnamuratov

The essay's author: Mehri Annamuratova

Honestly, I can see that this essay is well-written and clearly organized. The introduction provides a clear background and effectively presents the writer’s opinion. The ideas are expressed in a thoughtful and controlled manner. I found the third body paragraph particularly effective, especially the point that AI will not replace our jobs, which I strongly agree with. Overall, the essay is coherent and well-structured.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Selin Nas Okcu

The essay’s author: Eylül Çelik

The essay is well structured and easy to follow. The ideas are clear . Each paragraph supports the main argument with relevant examples and explanations. The organization is logical, and the transitions between ideas are smooth. In addition, the language is mostly accurate with only a one or two minor mistakes. Overall, it is a strong and effective essay, but it could be improved by adding more examples and making corrections of grammatical mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Eylul CELIK

The essay’s author: Selin Nas OKCU

The essay is well formed, the content is cleat and relevant to the topic, everything is clear and supported with details. The organisation is in the right order, ideas are connected logically.

There are no significant vocabulary or  grammar errors instead of one mistake.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Aynura Rozyyeva

Author of the essay: Atageldi Gurbanov

My friend's essay about the benefits of AI based technologies on society is well structured. All the paragraphs have relevant to each other information. However, there is a little complexity in organization with counter argument,concession and refutation. Other than them the essay remains well.

# data[].attributes.body
Soft skills are personal qualities and social abilities that help you communicate, work with others, and manage your behavior effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Professor [Last Name],

I hope you are doing well. My name is [Your Name], and I am a student in your [Course Name] class.

I am writing to ask about [your question—e.g., the assignment deadline / a topic from class / an exam detail]. I would really appreciate it if you could clarify [specific point].

Thank you for your time and help.

Best regards,

[Your Name]

# data[].attributes.headline
Why Ai And Machine Learning Exploded Recently?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why Ai And Machine Learning Exploded Recently?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Way more data 📊
Phones, apps, social media, online shopping → massive data to train AI.
No data = no AI. Now we have too much.

2. Huge computing power 💻
Cloud + GPUs made training models fast and cheaper.
Before, it took months. Now it can take hours or days.

3. Breakthroughs in deep learning 🧠
New techniques (like transformers) suddenly made AI actually good at language, images, etc.

4. Big money from companies 💰
Companies like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI poured billions into AI → rapid progress.

5. Real-world usefulness 🚀
AI stopped being “cool experiment” and became:

Chatbots

Recommendation systems (Netflix, Spotify)

Self-driving tech

Fraud detection

Businesses saw profit → demand exploded.

6. Viral tools changed everything 🌍
When tools like ChatGPT came out, normal people started using AI daily → huge adoption spike.

# data[].attributes.body
The introduction should begin by introducing the general subject you are classifying. It needs to grab the reader's attention and provide a brief definition of the topic. The most important element is the thesis statement, which must explicitly list the specific categories you will discuss and clearly state the "principle of classification" (the logical criteria or "yardstick" you used to divide the subject).

Body Paragraphs

Each body paragraph should focus on one distinct category. Start with a clear topic sentence that identifies the category being discussed. Follow this with a detailed description of the category’s characteristics to show what makes it unique. You must provide concrete examples for every category to ensure the reader understands the classification. Remember to use transition words (e.g., "The first category," "Another type," "In contrast") to guide the reader smoothly from one category to the next and keep your argument coherent.

Conclusion

The conclusion serves to wrap up the essay by synthesizing your findings. Do not simply list the categories again; instead, explain how these groups contribute to a deeper, unified understanding of the entire topic. You should emphasize why your method of classification is useful and offer a final insight or a broader takeaway about the subject. This is your chance to leave the reader with a clear perspective on why this specific way of categorizing the topic matters.

# data[].attributes.body
A classification essay is a type of writing that categorizes and groups people, ideas, or objects into different types or classes based on shared characteristics, using organization, similarities, and clear examples to explain each category.

# data[].attributes.body
Summarizes the categories

Restates the thesis in different words

Explains why the classification is useful or important

# data[].attributes.body
✏️...An academic classification essay organizes complex topics into distinct, logical categories based on a single principle or criterion

# data[].attributes.body
A classification essay organizes a broad subject into distinct, logical categories based on shared characteristics. It breaks down complex topics into manageable groups, using a single principle of classification to help readers understand different types, varieties, or methods within that subject. The structure typically includes an introduction with a clear thesis, body paragraphs for each category, and a conclusion.

# data[].attributes.headline
 Classification Essay Definition                A classification essay is a type of writing that organizes people, ideas, or things into categories based on shared characteristics, and explains each category clearly.

# data[].attributes.subject
 Classification Essay Definition                A classification essay is a type of writing that organizes people, ideas, or things into categories based on shared characteristics, and explains each category clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
Some argue that euthanasia should remain illegal because it could be abused, leading to the "slippery slope" where vulnerable people are pressured to end their lives. It is true that the safety of the elderly and disabled must be a top priority in any medical system. However, this concern does not justify forcing terminally ill patients to suffer against their will. By implementing strict regulations, such as multiple doctor approvals and waiting periods, the risk of abuse is minimized. Legalization actually provides protection and transparency, ensuring that a patient’s choice is made freely and with dignity, rather than in secret or through trauma.

The question of whether euthanasia should be legal is a very difficult and emotional topic. Some people think that euthanasia should be legal because its main purpose is to end a patient’s extreme physical pain. This idea may be true because many terminal patients suffer a lot every day and, unfortunately, have no hope of medical recovery. They believe dying with dignity is a human right. However, others argue that euthanasia should not be allowed. They believe it is not right to end a human life under any circumstances. Furthermore, they suggest that there may be other medical treatments or better psychological support to help patients manage their pain without ending their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Some believe our personal information only stays with us. People may think what companies will do with our information. It can be true. However, companies using these information to brainwash us with advertise. Because we accept privacy contract, they collect our data, know our interest and show advertises according to that. In the end people buy thing they actually do not need.

# data[].attributes.headline
Are social media bans in tutkiye justified or a violation of freedom

# data[].attributes.subject
Are social media bans in tutkiye justified or a violation of freedom

# data[].attributes.body
Some people argue that social media bans are justified to protect national security and publlic order they say falsse rumors, terrorist propaganda, and hate speech can spread quickly onlinecausing riots or panic. For instance during protests fake posts might encourage violence. The governments job is to keep citizens safe so temporary bans seem like a quick fix

it is true that harmful content exists on social media and Türkiye has the right to fight misinformation and threats. No country should allow dangerous lies to spread freely

However a full ban is too extreme and hurts innocent people. Instead of blocking everything, the government could remove only illegal posts or work with platforms to add fact checkers. many countries use these methods without shutting down all access a ban punishes everyone for the actions of a few which is unfair. thus the need for safety does not justify taking away basic freedoms

# data[].attributes.headline
Is medication necessary for the treatment of anxiety disorders?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is medication necessary for the treatment of anxiety disorders?

# data[].attributes.body
Anxiety treatment is highly individual, and medication is not always a requirement for healing. For some, medicine is a crucial tool to stabilize brain chemistry and manage severe physical symptoms, acting as a "bridge" to recovery.

​However, many find success through Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), which addresses the root causes by reshaping thought patterns. Lifestyle changes—such as mindfulness and regular exercise—also play a significant role. Ultimately, while medication can be life-changing for some, others heal effectively using only therapeutic and holistic strategies. The best approach depends on the individual's unique needs and professional guidance.

# data[].attributes.body
Some may argue that war can be justified in extreme situations, such as self-defense or the protection of innocent lives, suggesting that it is not always wrong. They believe that without war, nations would be left powerless against aggression and injustice. However, this argument fails to recognize that war, regardless of its intention, inevitably leads to irreversible destruction and suffering. Countless lives are lost, families are torn apart, and entire societies are left with deep psychological and economic scars. Even so-called “just” wars create cycles of violence that can last for generations. Additionally, non-violent alternatives such as diplomacy, negotiation, and international cooperation are often overlooked or abandoned too quickly. Therefore, even in extreme circumstances, war cannot be justified, as its devastating consequences prove that it is wrong at all costs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Standardized Testing: " Are exams like the SAT or TOEFL actual a fair way to measure a student's intelligence?"

# data[].attributes.subject
Standardized Testing: " Are exams like the SAT or TOEFL actual a fair way to measure a student's intelligence?"

# data[].attributes.body
(Postion statement)In my view, standardized tests are not a fair measurement of a student’s true intelligence. (Counter-argument)While some educators claim these exams are necessary because they provide a universal way to compare students from different backgrounds, ( Concession)I must admit that they do offer a quick metric for university admissions. (Refutation)However, these tests primarily measure a student's ability to memorize specific patterns or pay for expensive private tutoring. Therefore, they reflect financial privilege and test-taking strategies rather than a person's actual intellectual potential.

# data[].attributes.body
While critics argue that nationalism breeds xenophobia and sparks global conflict, one must concede that exclusive, ethnic-based identities have historically led to marginalization and war. However, these risks are a distortion of nationalism rather than its rule; in its civic form, nationalism provides the indispensable 'social glue' that sustains democracy and the welfare state. By fostering mutual trust and a shared sense of duty among strangers, nationalism remains the most effective framework for maintaining internal stability and driving collective national progress.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is Online Education Equivalent to Face-to-Face Education?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is Online Education Equivalent to Face-to-Face Education?

# data[].attributes.body
Online education has become increasingly common, especially after the pandemic. While some argue that it is as effective as traditional education, it is not fully equivalent due to differences in interaction, discipline, and social experience.

One major advantage of online education is flexibility. Students can access lessons anytime and learn at their own pace, which is especially helpful for working individuals. However, this freedom often leads to poor time management and reduced motivation.

Supporters claim that online education can be as effective as face-to-face learning when supported by technology. Conceding this point, online platforms do offer interactive tools such as live classes and group work. However, these interactions remain limited. Refuting this idea, real-time communication and deeper engagement are much stronger in physical classrooms.

In addition, face-to-face education provides better social and emotional development. Students build relationships, improve communication skills, and learn through direct interaction. These experiences are difficult to fully achieve in an online setting.

In conclusion, although online education offers flexibility and useful tools, it cannot fully replace the interaction and personal development provided by face-to-face education. Therefore, it should be seen as a supportive alternative rather than an equal one.

# data[].attributes.headline
The shift toward renewable energy is no longer a matter of environmental idealism but a practical necessity for global economic stability

# data[].attributes.subject
The shift toward renewable energy is no longer a matter of environmental idealism but a practical necessity for global economic stability

# data[].attributes.body
Body Paragraph 3: Economic Independence

Beyond environmental benefits, a transition to renewable energy provides a critical shield against geopolitical instability. Currently, global economies are at the mercy of volatile oil and gas prices, which fluctuate wildly due to foreign conflicts and supply chain disruptions. By harnessing domestic wind, solar, and geothermal power, a nation can achieve true energy sovereignty. This shift decentralizes the power grid and ensures that the cost of electricity is dictated by local infrastructure and technology rather than the unpredictable whims of international cartels or overseas wars. In the long run, this stability creates a more predictable environment for both businesses and households.

Counter-Argument & Concession

Opponents of a rapid green transition argue that the intermittent nature of renewable energy—the fact that the sun does not always shine and the wind does not always blow—makes it an unreliable foundation for a modern power grid. They contend that the "intermittency gap" could lead to frequent blackouts or a reliance on expensive battery storage that is not yet scalable. It is certainly true that our current infrastructure was built for the steady, 24/7 combustion of fossil fuels, and transitioning to a variable energy source presents significant engineering and logistical hurdles that cannot be ignored.

Refutation

However, this argument fails to account for the rapid advancements in smart-grid technology and diversified energy portfolios. While a single solar farm may be intermittent, a nationwide "super-grid" that connects wind from the coasts, solar from the deserts, and hydroelectric power from the north can balance supply and demand in real-time. Furthermore, the cost of industrial-scale lithium-ion and solid-state batteries has plummeted by over 80% in the last decade, making storage a viable reality rather than a futuristic dream. Relying on the "unreliability" argument is a dated perspective that ignores the current pace of innovation; the risk is no longer in the technology’s failure, but in our hesitation to implement it.

# data[].attributes.headline
The impact of digital tools (such as search engines, reading software, and keyword scanning features) on academic reading and writing habits.

# data[].attributes.subject
The impact of digital tools (such as search engines, reading software, and keyword scanning features) on academic reading and writing habits.

# data[].attributes.body
Some scholars contend that digital tools cultivate superficial reading habits and impede deep textual comprehension.

Admittedly, these technologies can inadvertently promote skimming and keyword scanning rather than sustained, focused reading.

Nevertheless, this limitation arises primarily from user practices rather than inherent flaws in the technology itself. When employed judiciously—for instance, to locate relevant passages prior to close, offline analysis—digital tools augment rather than undermine academic reading.

Therefore, I maintain that digital tools are beneficial for scholarly work when used with intentionality and discipline, and their potential negative effects can be effectively mitigated through appropriate training and self-regulation.

# data[].attributes.body
Abortion is a controversial issue, but it has to be legal because it protects individual rights and public health. While some believe abortion is wrong because it ends a potential human life, keeping it legal prevents greater harm.

First, people have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. Pregnancy involves serious physical and emotional effects, and forcing someone to continue it removes their freedom of choice. Second, banning abortion does not stop it—it only makes it dangerous. Without legal access, people may turn to unsafe procedures that risk their lives.

Opponents argue that abortion is immoral because life begins at conception. This concern is valid and reflects respect for life. However, it does not outweigh the rights and safety of the pregnant person, who must carry the burden.

In conclusion, abortion has to be legal to protect freedom and ensure safe medical care.

# data[].attributes.body
I strongly believe that college should be completely free because it provides equal opportunities and benefits the economy. Admittedly, opponents argue that eliminating tuition is too expensive and would place a heavy tax burden on citizens. However, this perspective overlooks the massive long-term economic gains. Graduating without the burden of heavy student debt allows young people to participate in the economy right away. They can afford to buy homes or start businesses, which generates more wealth than the initial cost. Ultimately, providing free education creates a fairer society and builds the skilled workforce our future needs.

# data[].attributes.headline
Argumentative essay 3rd body sample / Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

# data[].attributes.subject
Argumentative essay 3rd body sample / Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

# data[].attributes.body
On the other hand, some people argue that animal testing is necessary for scientific and medical progress. They believe that testing on animals has helped develop important medicines and vaccines. It is true that some life-saving treatments were discovered through animal experiments. However, this does not justify the continued use of animals, especially when modern alternatives such as computer simulations and laboratory-grown cells are available. In addition, animal testing is often expensive and not always reliable for human results. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because safer, more ethical, and more effective methods can replace it in the future.

# data[].attributes.headline
Should animal testing be compleletly banned?

# data[].attributes.subject
Should animal testing be compleletly banned?

# data[].attributes.body
Many people argue that animal testing is necessary for scientific and medical progress, claiming that it helps ensure the safety of new treatments. It is true that animal experimentation has contributed to important discoveries in the past, and this cannot be completely ignored. However, this concession does not justify its continued use today. Animal testing often produces unreliable results due to biological differences between animals and humans. In addition, ethical concerns about animal suffering remain significant. With the development of advanced alternatives such as computer simulations and human cell-based testing, relying on animal testing is no longer the most effective or responsible choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Opponents often argue that artificial intelligence will inevitably replace English teachers due to its capacity for instant, accessible language tutoring. Admittedly, AI platforms are highly effective at correcting grammatical errors and providing continuous vocabulary practice. However, this perspective fundamentally ignores that language acquisition is a deeply human, social process. While algorithms excel at data processing, they completely lack the emotional intelligence, empathy, and cultural awareness necessary to motivate students or manage a complex classroom. Ultimately, true communicative competence requires authentic human connection. Therefore, AI will merely serve as a supplementary tool, proving that human educators remain absolutely essential and irreplaceable.

# data[].attributes.headline
Argumantative essay (Is climate change mainly caused by humans)

# data[].attributes.subject
Argumantative essay (Is climate change mainly caused by humans)

# data[].attributes.body
Although many people believe that climate change is mainly caused by human activities such as pollution and deforestation, this is partly true because humans do contribute to environmental problems. However, climate change is also influenced by natural factors like volcanic eruptions, solar activity, and long-term climate cycles. These natural processes have affected the Earth’s climate for thousands of years. Even though these factors play a role, human activities have significantly accelerated climate change in recent decades through industrialization and greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, while natural causes exist, climate change is mainly caused by humans today.

# data[].attributes.body
Although some people think the United Nations is useless, it actually plays an important role in maintaining peace, providing humanitarian aid, and encouraging cooperation between countries.Admittedly, the UN has weaknesses such as slow decision-making and political conflicts, which sometimes limit its effectiveness.
However, calling it completely unnecessary is unfair, as it still offers a unique platform for diplomacy and helps address global issues like health, poverty, and security.

# data[].attributes.body
Although a world without nuclear weapons is often seen as an ideal goal, it is unlikely to become reality in the near future. This is because countries prioritize their own security and power over global ideals, relying on nuclear weapons as a form of deterrence. While it is true that many organizations, such as the United Nations, promote disarmament for the sake of global safety, nations are often unwilling to give up such powerful tools due to fear and lack of trust. Therefore, despite ongoing discussions about peace, nuclear weapons are likely to remain a significant part of international relations for years to come.

# data[].attributes.headline
Brainwashed Women Supporting Their Abusive Male Acquaintances (Argumentative Essay 3rd Body Paragraph)

# data[].attributes.subject
Brainwashed Women Supporting Their Abusive Male Acquaintances (Argumentative Essay 3rd Body Paragraph)

# data[].attributes.body
Some argue that women who support abusive husbands or sons are responsible for enabling harmful behavior. While this is partly true, as their actions can allow abuse to continue, it ignores the role of upbringing and social conditioning. Many of these women were raised in environments where obedience to men and family loyalty were deeply ingrained values. Because of this, they may struggle to recognize abuse or feel unable to oppose it. Therefore, although their support can be harmful, they should also be seen as victims of the same system that shaped their beliefs, rather than being blamed entirely.

# data[].attributes.headline
Granted, social media platforms claim to connect people globally (Concession). Critics argue that these tools actually strengthen human bonds by removing geographical barriers (Counter Argument). Nonetheless, digital interaction is often a shallow substitute for face-to-face contact, as studies show a direct link between high screen time and increased feelings of isolation (Refutation)."

# data[].attributes.subject
Granted, social media platforms claim to connect people globally (Concession). Critics argue that these tools actually strengthen human bonds by removing geographical barriers (Counter Argument). Nonetheless, digital interaction is often a shallow substitute for face-to-face contact, as studies show a direct link between high screen time and increased feelings of isolation (Refutation)."

# data[].attributes.headline
The Ease of War Triggered by Political Disagreements

# data[].attributes.subject
The Ease of War Triggered by Political Disagreements

# data[].attributes.body
Some people believe war is sometimes necessary to protect a country. In some situations, governments may need to defend themselves. However, war always causes suffering and loss of life. Political problems should be solved through peaceful methods, not violence.

# data[].attributes.body
Third Body Paragraph (Concession, Counterargument, Refutation):

Admittedly, some argue that lying is always unethical and unnecessary, claiming that honesty should be upheld in all situations regardless of the consequences. They suggest that truth builds trust and that even difficult realities should be faced directly rather than avoided through deception. However, this perspective overlooks the complexity of human relationships and emotional well-being. In reality, people often lie to protect others from unnecessary harm, maintain social harmony, or avoid escalating conflicts. For example, small “white lies” can prevent hurt feelings or preserve important relationships without causing lasting damage. Therefore, while absolute honesty may seem ideal in theory, in practice, lying can serve as a practical and sometimes compassionate response to complicated social situations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Some people think online education is not effective because students cannot interact face to face. While this is partly true, online learning still offers flexibility and access to many resources. Therefore, it can be a useful alternative for many students.

# data[].attributes.subject
Some people think online education is not effective because students cannot interact face to face. While this is partly true, online learning still offers flexibility and access to many resources. Therefore, it can be a useful alternative for many students.

# data[].attributes.body
Some people think… (counter-argument)

While… (concession)

Therefore… (refutation )

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Peer editor : Emre ÇELİK  The essay’s author : İlayda Fatma CANTÜRK  The essay successfully meets all the requirements of the Editor’s Checklist. It is well-structured with five distinct paragraphs, including an introduction that provides a clear thesis statement identifying happiness as a result of internal and external causes. Each body paragraph begins with a strong topic sentence that defines a specific cause—achievement, social connection, and personal mindset—while using effective cause-and-effect connectors like "influenced by" and "increase." Furthermore, the conditional verbs are used correctly in the Present Simple tense to describe general truths, and the conclusion effectively restates the main causes to provide a solid summary.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Dilfuza Shayyrova

The essay's author: Barno Avezova

The cause and effect essay of my friend is well structured and organized. It has proper introduction as well as relevant background information and topic sentences in all paragraphs. The essay includes connestors which shows coherence between sentences. In conclusion, the concluding paragraph is restated appropriately.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor:Meryem karayılan

Writer of the essay:Nisanur Yılmaz

I found your essay to be highly informative, clear, and well-structured. It provides a great deal of insight into the topic. While the overall content is very successful, there are a few minor slips and careless mistakes that could be polished. Aside from those small details, it’s a very strong and engaging piece of writing.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Peer Activity : İlayda’s essay the essay successfully meets all the requirements of the Editor’s Checklist. It is well-structured with five distinct paragraphs, including an introduction that provides a clear thesis statement identifying happiness as a result of internal and external causes. Each body paragraph begins with a strong topic sentence that defines a specific cause—achievement, social connection, and personal mindset—while using effective cause-and-effect connectors like "influenced by" and "increase." Furthermore, the conditional verbs are used correctly in the Present Simple tense to describe general truths, and the conclusion effectively restates the main causes to provide a solid summary.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Babur Muradov

The essay writer: Barnohon Alyshırova

My comment: My friend's Cause and Effect essay titled "Psychological Causes of Happiness" is very well-written. I especially liked the body paragraphs – they clearly explained the psychological causes with logical order and strong examples. The background information in the introduction was clear. However, I think the conclusion could be slightly more detailed to leave a stronger final impression. Overall, it is still an impressive and well-organized essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor :Nisa Nur yılmaz

Writer : ceylin yavaş

Overall, the essay is well-organized and presents the main ideas clearly. The structure makes it easy to follow, and the points are expressed in a generally effective way. However, there are a few minor grammatical errors throughout the text. With some careful revision and editing, the essay could become even clearer and more polished.

# data[].attributes.body
I like to answer the questions about my peer’s essay, but sometimes I felt confused what should I do. But generally it was great, it helps to see on the mistakes in deferent ways.

# data[].attributes.body
Author :beyza enki
Peer editor:elif ceylin yavaş
Overall the essay is easy ti read.  writting in a simple and fluent languange there are some spellling mistakes most likely  missed due to not rereading
Could have used more academically fitting words but this version is not lacking either
In addition it would be good to add advice in conculusion paragraph

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Ismetcan Ayhan

The essay’s author: Neva Melek Balci

My comment:

The essay is really understandable and relevant to topic. I didn’t catch any unclear parts.

The organization of the essay is really good all clear and all logical.

For me the vocabulary language is a little bit under for academic writing.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Hasan Efe Öncü

The essay's author: Yusuf Emre Yıldız

My Comment: I think his essay is well written in a logical order. You can understand topic with ease. Every paragraph has topic. Some paragraphs lacks of cause and effect. In overall you can easily understand the whole topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Barno Avezova

The essay’s author: Dilfuza Shayyrova

My comment:

Dilfuza’s essay was clear and well organised.

The introduction part was written well, with all the necessary details such as hook, thesis statement and background information. She organised all three body paragraphs according to her introduction. The transition phrases were also used which was helpful while reading.

I would like to point out that there were some grammatical mistakes and the sentences seemed less complex. She also had to work on her conclusion part because it was a little off topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Yusuf Emre Yıldız

The Essay’s Author: Mehmet Baran Sakarya

My Comment: It has total of five paragraphs. It includes introduction, first body paragraph, second body paragraph, third body paragraph, and a conclusion. Word count is over 200 words. The topic is interesting and informative. Overall, it is a well-written essay in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Büşra Budak

Author: Şevval Elçi

My comment: I read Şevval's essay. I think her essay is well organized and structured. She explained everything step by step. She used so many examples in her essay. Her essay is very fluent and the conjunctions are used correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Author: Emre Çelik

Peer Editor: İlayda Fatma Cantürk

I read Emre's essay, and the main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. Since the ideas are sufficiently explained with supporting examples, the essay remains well developed and clear throughout. It has a distinct introduction, body, and conclusion, with the thesis statement clearly stated in the first paragraph. Every paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence, ensuring that the ideas follow a logical order. Because all points are connected logically and transitions like "in addition" and "for example" are used correctly, the essay flows very smoothly. The vocabulary is also appropriate for academic writing, as words are used accurately without unnecessary repetitions. Finally, any minor grammar errors do not make the text hard to understand because the verb tenses and sentence structures are used correctly. In conclusion, I liked Emre’s essay. It is easy to read and enjoyable.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Selin Nas Okcu

Author: Eylül Naz Çelik

My Comment: The essay is easy to follow and understand. The connection between cause and effects are clear. Even though the essay is clear, some words can be changed.

# data[].attributes.body
Ilayda’s essay is well organized and easy to follow. It has five clear paragraphs, beginning with an introduction that presents a general idea about happiness and its causes. Each body paragraph focuses on one main cause, and the topic sentences make this very clear. She also uses connectors effectively, which helps show the relationship between causes and effects. Her verb forms are mostly correct, especially the conditionals, making her writing sound more natural. In the end, her conclusion successfully restates the main idea in a different way and summarizes the causes she discussed. Overall, it is a thoughtful and well-structured essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Makar Makeyev

The essay’s author: Nil Gönülkırmaz

My comment:

A. Content

1. Yes, the main idea is clear. The essay is about what causes happiness, and it stays on topic the whole time.

2. Most ideas are explained with examples. For instance, the paragraph about relationships gives good details like emotional support and sharing experiences. But the last paragraph feels a bit short

3. The gratitude paragraph is the weakest. It feels underdeveloped compared to the others.

B. Organization

1. Yes, the essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

2. The thesis is clear: happiness comes from internal mindset and everyday experiences. Good.

3. Each paragraph has a topic sentence. “One important cause…”, “Another key factor…”, “Gratitude also plays…” — all clear.

4. The order is logical and makes sense.

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Ideas connect well to each other.

2. Transitions like “Another key factor” and “In conclusion” work nicely. No problems here.

3. The essay flows smoothly. It’s easy to read from beginning to end.

D. Vocabulary

1. The vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing. Words like “meaningful,” “perspective,” “genuine” sound good.

2. Words are used accurately and clearly.

3.

E. Grammar

1. Grammar errors don’t block understanding — the meaning is always clear.

2. Verb tenses are consistent and sentence structures are mostly correct.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Aylara

Author: Kamila

I think that this essay has a clear main idea and is well organized with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The writer gives relevant reasons for happiness and uses some good examples. However, some ideas need more development, especially in the body paragraphs. There are also grammar and spelling mistakes that should be corrected to make the writing clearer. Overall, it is a good essay, but it can be improved with more detailed support and better language accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Elif Ece Kayisoglu

The essay’s author: Hasret Ozaslan

The introduction part was clear. However, when I read the body parts, I would like to see more examples. The topic was explained well, but the conclusion part could be developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Aynura Rozyyeva

The essay's author: Alijan Rejepov

The overall cause & effect essay was well structured and had appropriate and relevant information. Even though, there were some grammatical and vocabulary related mistakes, all paragraphs contain a topic sentence and background information. Moreover, essay includes connectors to show causes and effects. Finally,conclusion was restated appropriately.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Neva Melek Balcı

The essay's author: Ismetcan Ayhan

I think the grammar is suitable main idea is clear there is a lot examples about the idea the essay has five paragraphs with a clear introduction body and conclusion the thesis is clear and each paragraph has a clear topic sentence also the ideas follow a logical order transitions and connectors are used appropriately the vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing i think the verb tenses are used correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Kamila Kurambayeva

The essay’s author: Aylara Babakulyyeva

Her essay has a clear main idea and good organization with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The examples are relevant, but some ideas need more explanation. My feedback is that she can try to improve sentence clarity and grammar, and use more varied vocabulary. Overall, it’s a good and understandable essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Feedback

Peer Editor Barnohon Alyshırova

The Essay Author Aynura Rozyeva

I read my friend's Essay Cause and Effect essay on "Causes of Happiness" is very well-written. I especially liked the hook in the introduction – it was engaging and caught the reader's attention immediately. The background information was clear, the thesis statement was strong, and the causes were explained logically with good examples. The essay flows smoothly with almost no grammar mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor:Beyza Enki.

The essay's author:Meryem Karayılan

My comment:There is one paragraph missing.It does not have thesis statement.Every paragraph have topic sentence.Connectors are used nicely.Vocabulary is appropriate for academic writing and used well.There are some grammer mistakes.Also the page organization can be fixed.The topic is clear.Overall,the essay nicely written and the mistakes can be fixed.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Eylul Naz CELIK

The essay's author: Selin Nas OKCU

The essay is well formed but the word count is not enough, vocabulary is easy for an academic writing and there are not enough transitions and connectors.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Nil Gönülkırmaz

The essay’s author : Melike Celik

It’s very clear and easy to understand, and I like how she explained the causes of happiness step by step. If i had to suggest something, maybe she could add a few more specific examples or even something personal to make it more interesting. Also, trying different sentence structures or vocabulary could make it even better.

# data[].attributes.headline
Cause & Effect Essay (Peer Feedback)                  

# data[].attributes.subject
Cause & Effect Essay (Peer Feedback)                  

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor : Hasret Özaslan

The essay's author : Elif Ece Kayışoğlu

I think she explained the subject quite

successfully and in detail; I liked the way she explained it, everything was explained in order. The cohesion and coherence between sentences are very good . I don't like repetitive sentences, but I really liked that she always used different things

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor:Melike Çelik

While Makar’s essay is overall commendable, he could further enhance the cohesion and logical flow of his writing. Additionally, incorporating more sophisticated vocabulary would elevate the quality of his work.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer editor: Mehmet Baran Sakarya

The essay's writer: Özgürcan İnandım

My comment: The essay is well written and it's a really interesting topic. The main idea is clear and relevant to the topic. The ideas are sufficiently explained and supported by examples. None of the parts are unclear or underdeveloped. All of them are well explained.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Özgürcan İnandım

Essays Writer: Yusuf Emre Yıldız

I think his essay is overall well written. Some of the paragraphs are cut too short but they all have a clear topic and they are all following the main idea so you know what he was trying to tell when he was writing his essay.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer Editor: Aziza Umbarova.

The Essays Author: Halime Rümeysa Takas.

My comment:

The essay is clear and easy to understand. The causes are explained clearly with good examples. However, some parts use “I” language, which is not suitable for this type of essay. There is also some repetition of words like “important.” In addition, the second body paragraph needs a stronger concluding sentence. Overall, it is a good essay, but it can be improved with more formal language and better word choice.

# data[].attributes.body
peer editor: rumeysa

the essay's author:yagmur

my comment: I read Yagmur's essay. I think her essay is clear and easy to understand. I like the ideas and the examples. They support the topic well. I think there are some grammar mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
My comment:I read aziza’s essay and i think the essay has a good structure. I like the introduction and conclusion. I feel some sentences are a bit simple so they can be more detailed. I also think spelling should be checked but overall it was nice

the essays author: aziza

Peer editor: yagmur ezel

# data[].attributes.body
During peer review sessions, students should use the following checklist to guide their feedback. The aim is to provide constructive, clear, and helpful comments, focusing primarily on meaning and organization before language accuracy.

A. Content

1. Is the main idea clear and relevant to the topic?

2. Are ideas sufficiently explained and supported with examples or details?

3. Are any parts unclear or underdeveloped?

B. Organization

1. Does the essay have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion?

2. Is the thesis statement clear?

3. Does each paragraph have a clear topic sentence?

4. Do ideas follow a logical order?

C. Cohesion and Coherence

1. Are ideas connected logically?

2. Are transitions and connectors used appropriately?

3. Does the essay flow smoothly from one idea to another?

D. Vocabulary Use

1. Is vocabulary appropriate for academic writing?

2. Are words used accurately and clearly?

3. Are there unnecessary repetitions?

E. Grammar

1. Do grammar errors make meaning difficult to understand?

2. Are verb tenses and sentence structures used correctly?

Important: Peer reviewers are not expected to correct every grammar mistake. The main goal is to help the writer improve clarity, organization, and overall effectiveness.