# data[].attributes.body
Therefore, how do these changes fir in with the second point brought up by Jacobs et al (2013)?

# data[].attributes.body
In my own context, recent changes to policy in feedback has changed the organisations identity, but for the better. Does this view reflect this?

# data[].attributes.body
'First,
organizational change can violate the organizational identity, which might have
detrimental effects on the organization’s legitimacy and performance. Second, to
predict such effects, a contingency perspective enables us to analyse the specific
external and internal conditions of organizations that facilitate both change success
and change failure. Third, the general patterns and mechanics apply to all change
processes.'

# data[].attributes.body
'This implies
that cure-all recipes to organizational change are bound to fail.'

# data[].attributes.body
An incredibly pertinent and recent framework for the consideration of identity within the context of change and leadership

# data[].attributes.body
Jacobs, G., van Witteloostuijn, A. and Christe-Zeyse, J. (2013) ‘A theoretical framework of organizational change’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 772–92.

# data[].attributes.body
My context has recently developed/is developing a new way of delivering impacting, meaningful and less time consuming ways of feedback. I am aiming to explore this 'innovation' and relate it to identity!

# data[].attributes.body
Hope Hailey, V. and Balogun, J. (2002) ‘Devising context sensitive approaches to change: the example of Glaxo Wellcome’, Long Range Planning, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 153–78.

# data[].attributes.headline
Examples of 'Innovations' in other's settings.

# data[].attributes.subject
Examples of 'Innovations' in other's settings.

# data[].attributes.body
Give your examples here!

# data[].attributes.body
Part 2

(2000 words)

Critically evaluate one particular innovation in your workplace or the setting you are familiar with, which resulted in a change (e.g. in practice, identity, attitudes, teaching, learning outcomes, etc.).

Your evaluation should include the factors that led to the change and the impact of the leadership actions. You should draw as widely as you can on relevant theoretical frameworks and concepts from the module (preferably with more than four sources), particularly from Section 4.

# data[].attributes.body
Include ideas that can be used and that are pertinent to the question at hand to this.

# data[].attributes.body
(1000 words)

Select one of the key concepts within the module (e.g. agency, identity, views of knowledge) that seems of most relevance to your professional context or the setting you are familiar with. Provide a summary that synthesises the main ideas associated with this key concept as it applies to your own professional context, drawing upon the work of key theorists. You should draw explicitly on your contributions to the TGF4 discussions.