# data[].attributes.headline
Today, through this review I am going to share with you my sincere opinion of one of the newest movies from the “Thor” saga, Thor: Ragnarok is an action and adventure movie that also include a bit of comedy and a ton funny moments. As their predecessors, Thor: Ragnarok has Thor, the god of thunders as the main character with the interpretation of the charismatic star Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston as the eccentric god of lies, Loki.

# data[].attributes.subject
Today, through this review I am going to share with you my sincere opinion of one of the newest movies from the “Thor” saga, Thor: Ragnarok is an action and adventure movie that also include a bit of comedy and a ton funny moments. As their predecessors, Thor: Ragnarok has Thor, the god of thunders as the main character with the interpretation of the charismatic star Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston as the eccentric god of lies, Loki.

# data[].attributes.headline
As I already said, with this new movie of the MCU (Marvel Comic Universe) we had the opportunity to see some actors on their usual and natural role like Anthony Hopkins as Odin. But we also had the opportunity to see new actors that really fit the characters they represent on the movie. A perfect example of this is Tessa Thompson who, on the movie did a wonderful job, fitting completely on the character that she was representing, an obstinate and powerful Valkyrie that at the end decided by herself to help Thor with the objective of achieving her revenge.

# data[].attributes.subject
As I already said, with this new movie of the MCU (Marvel Comic Universe) we had the opportunity to see some actors on their usual and natural role like Anthony Hopkins as Odin. But we also had the opportunity to see new actors that really fit the characters they represent on the movie. A perfect example of this is Tessa Thompson who, on the movie did a wonderful job, fitting completely on the character that she was representing, an obstinate and powerful Valkyrie that at the end decided by herself to help Thor with the objective of achieving her revenge.

# data[].attributes.headline
Thor: Ragnarok’s plot is not really complicated, Thor, the super hero, is forced to face him´s dad dead and the huge loss of the Mjolnir, his most characteristic and powerful weapon, as things weren’t bad enough, Thor gets stuck on a crazy planet called Sakaar that is basically a huge trash can with the responsibility of escaping from his uncomfortable situation with Hulk, Loki and a new friend to go to Asgard and save his people form the Ragnarok that, paradoxically he is going to be forced to cause and activate to save Asgard, that, by odin’s own words is not a place, is the people.

# data[].attributes.subject
Thor: Ragnarok’s plot is not really complicated, Thor, the super hero, is forced to face him´s dad dead and the huge loss of the Mjolnir, his most characteristic and powerful weapon, as things weren’t bad enough, Thor gets stuck on a crazy planet called Sakaar that is basically a huge trash can with the responsibility of escaping from his uncomfortable situation with Hulk, Loki and a new friend to go to Asgard and save his people form the Ragnarok that, paradoxically he is going to be forced to cause and activate to save Asgard, that, by odin’s own words is not a place, is the people.

# data[].attributes.headline
In my opinion, Thor´s Ragnarock success can be principally supported on two very positive aspects that can define this movie, the first one is that, unlike other common super-hero movies, Thor: Ragnarock has a complete lack of seriousness that is only reserved for crucial drama moments that can also be interrupted by a funny or surprising comment that reduce the stress or the heat of the moment, another positive aspect of Thor: Ragnarok is the representation that it give us about the characters with actors that completely fit on them, obviously, all of this with a good moving sound track and some action scenes can build an incredible super hero movie.

# data[].attributes.subject
In my opinion, Thor´s Ragnarock success can be principally supported on two very positive aspects that can define this movie, the first one is that, unlike other common super-hero movies, Thor: Ragnarock has a complete lack of seriousness that is only reserved for crucial drama moments that can also be interrupted by a funny or surprising comment that reduce the stress or the heat of the moment, another positive aspect of Thor: Ragnarok is the representation that it give us about the characters with actors that completely fit on them, obviously, all of this with a good moving sound track and some action scenes can build an incredible super hero movie.

# data[].attributes.headline
Obviously, Thor: Ragnarok is not the perfect movie or something near to it, even this successful Marvel movie has some point that the critics or specifically some movie -related websites like Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic don’t like or that I found them really problematic, First, I don’t really find ok the development of some characters who play really important roles on the movie, because, unlike the Valkyrie who has a serious and confident background, the history of Hela, the dead god and the one who is supposed to be final villain to face is only explained on 2 or 3 minutes all along the complete movie, then, another point that some critics don’t really like about the movie is how the time is expended, with a really fun and enjoyable start some people don’t really understand why they feel kind of stuck on the middle of the plot and they even say that all the Sakaar part can be reduced by a little and they say that that time they earn from Sakaar argument can be added to the main purpose of the movie (defeating Hela) not only on the final battle and they even affirm that it can be used to give some characters a better background or support.

# data[].attributes.subject
Obviously, Thor: Ragnarok is not the perfect movie or something near to it, even this successful Marvel movie has some point that the critics or specifically some movie -related websites like Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic don’t like or that I found them really problematic, First, I don’t really find ok the development of some characters who play really important roles on the movie, because, unlike the Valkyrie who has a serious and confident background, the history of Hela, the dead god and the one who is supposed to be final villain to face is only explained on 2 or 3 minutes all along the complete movie, then, another point that some critics don’t really like about the movie is how the time is expended, with a really fun and enjoyable start some people don’t really understand why they feel kind of stuck on the middle of the plot and they even say that all the Sakaar part can be reduced by a little and they say that that time they earn from Sakaar argument can be added to the main purpose of the movie (defeating Hela) not only on the final battle and they even affirm that it can be used to give some characters a better background or support.

# data[].attributes.headline
To conclude, I can certainly affirm that despite some problems on the plotor character development/background I think that Thorg: Ragnarock is a move that is worth to watch if you want to have some fun or spend time with family o friends but is not really good if you are searching for real action and battle scenes because even though the movie include some, they are not a lot. Taking all the things that I said, my calificaton for Thor: Ragnarok is:

# data[].attributes.subject
To conclude, I can certainly affirm that despite some problems on the plotor character development/background I think that Thorg: Ragnarock is a move that is worth to watch if you want to have some fun or spend time with family o friends but is not really good if you are searching for real action and battle scenes because even though the movie include some, they are not a lot. Taking all the things that I said, my calificaton for Thor: Ragnarok is:

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/
https://www.metacritic.com/