# data[].attributes.body
This is the official case of R. V. Tingle and Dunkley. This case is about who was murdered, the murder of Mr. Mitchell who was set up and planned by three men: Mr. Tingle, Mr. Dunkley and Hayles-Wilson. Mr. Wilson was the one who pulled the trigger and the other two who planned and encouraged him to kill Mr. Mitchell the victim. All three men are being charged with first degree. However, the defence is trying to prove that Mr. Tingle and Dunkley should not be charged because they did not pull the trigger but Mr. Wilson should since he was the one to pull the trigger.

# data[].attributes.body
This video centres the R. V. Tingle and Dunkley case of what exactly happen the night of the murder

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Shooting at TO community centre leaves Neeko Mitchell dead

# data[].attributes.body
This explains the two main elements in determining a crime/ murder. The mens rea (guilty mind) and actus rea (guilty act). Which talk about mens rea being the hardest to prove because it as to do with the mind, because we cannot tell what someone is thinking however, having motive and intent is a way of proving mens rea. Lastly, actus rea which is the easiest to prove it comes down to did they actually do it.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Elements of Crime (Mens Rea, Actus Reus)

# data[].attributes.headline
Transforming the Criminal Justice System

# data[].attributes.subject
Transforming the Criminal Justice System

# data[].attributes.body
This video is about a male victim who was murder. The process of this case took about 7 years but the justice system delayed the case just like many other cases causing the killer to walk free. While the Charter states that any person charged with an offence/murder has the right to be tried within a reasonable time.Due to the delay and rescheduling is causing murders to go free.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Transforming the Criminal Justice System: Court Delays

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about a guy who as been found guilty of first degree murder just like the three guys from the R. V. Tingle and Dunkley case. This person is charged with first degree murder of his father. Also just like the R. V. Tingle and Dunkley case he "planned and deliberate" killing of his father.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Dellen Millard has been found guilty of first-degree murder for a third time - in this case, for the death of his father, whose November, 2012, shooting was originally deemed a suicide by police.

Justice Maureen Forestell, who oversaw Mr. Millard's month-long trial in June, ruled Monday that the 33-year-old Toronto man had committed the "planned and deliberate" killing of his father six years ago - going so far as to set up a fake alibi to fool police.

Wayne Millard was found in bed with a bullet through his left eye on Nov. 29, 2012. A Smith and Wesson .32 revolver was found on top of a shopping bag next to the bed.

It was Dellen who had supposedly come across the body after staying at a friend's house the night before. But instead of calling police, he called his mother - despite the fact that his parents had been divorced for more than a decade. It was only after she arrived at her ex-husband's house that 911 was called.

The death was ruled a suicide. But when Dellen Millard was charged with first-degree murder in the death of a total stranger a year later, the case was reopened.

Police realized then that his alibi did not check out, and that the gun had been purchased illegally by Mr. Millard from a gun dealer months earlier. His DNA was on the grip.

On Monday, as Justice Forestell read out her decision, Mr. Millard hung his head in the prisoner's box. Applause broke out in the courtroom.

This is the 33-year-old's third first-degree murder conviction after three trials in as many years.

In 2016, he - along with his friend Mark Smich - was found guilty of murdering Tim Bosma, a 32-year-old Ancaster dad who went missing on May 6, 2013, after taking the two men on a test drive of the pickup truck he was selling online.

And last fall, he and Mr. Smich were found guilty of murdering Laura Babcock, a 23-year-old Toronto woman who disappeared in July, 2012 - months after Mr. Millard's girlfriend found out they had been sleeping together.

Those sentences are being served consecutively, meaning it will be 50 years before the men are eligible for parole. Both have filed appeals.

The Crown is seeking a consecutive sentence in this case as well. A sentencing hearing has been scheduled for Nov. 16.

During this trial, court heard that Mr. Millard had been unhappy about the way his father was running the family business, Millardair Inc. Wayne had recently had a 55,000-square-foot air hangar built at the Region of Waterloo International airport, where he hoped to convert their airplane-storage company into a maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) business.

He saw it as a legacy for his son. But Dellen wanted no part of it - and did not want his father pouring their money into a floundering business.

After Wayne died, court heard that Dellen fired the Millardair staff and started to shut down the business.

Outside the courthouse Monday, Crown attorney Ken Lockhart thanked the investigators and noted the verdict marked the end of a long saga for multiple families.

"We're very grateful for the many people who put in a lot of time, effort and heartache into these prosecutions," he told reporters.

Laura Babcock's parents, Clayton and Linda, attended the verdict along with Hank and Mary Bosma, Tim's parents.

"It's been proven that not only the Bosmas and ourselves lost a loved one, the Millard family must live with the fact that this heinous individual murdered his own father. We feel for Wayne's relatives, save for one," Clayton Babcock said to reporters outside the courthouse.

"For all those out there who believe that the sentence of an additional 25 years to Mr. Millard's 50 years is too harsh, we say you haven't dealt with this kind of sorrow. We live with a cloud of sadness and loss over us every day," he said.

"There'll be not a day in our lives when the loss of Laura, Tim, or Wayne, won't be felt."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dellen Millard found guilty of first-degree murder for a third time

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Dellen Millard has been found guilty of first-degree murder for a third time - in this case, for the death of his father, whose November, 2012, shooting was originally deemed a suicide by police.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is about Adam Picard who walks free on the eve of his first degree murder trial. Picard was found guilty of luring the victim to a hunting camp

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
'I hope he haunts your dreams' - Adam Picard found guilty of first-degree murder in killing Fouad Nayel

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Fouad Nayel's family was forced to relive a nightmare two years ago when Adam Picard walked free from the Ottawa courthouse on the eve of his first-degree murder trial. The nightmare ended Wednesday with one word from the jury - "Guilty" - bringing a swift end to a spiralling legal drama that tested the limits of Canada's court system and the patience of a grieving family.

# data[].attributes.body
This article is similar to the video of the delayed cases. This couple stated that they have lost faith in the justice system after the killer of their son gets to walk free. The judge threw out the case over the unreasonable delay.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
They had investigated the 2012 disappearance of their son themselves, tracking his telephone calls and identifying the prime suspect, then interviewing - even covertly tape recording - him. But eventually, the man they uncovered became a poster child for a new era in Canadian justice - in which even charges as serious as first-degree murder could be thrown out for unreasonable delay.

This week, after the charge was restored, an Ottawa jury convicted Adam Picard of first-degree murder. But that verdict, while a relief, did not restore Amine and Nicole Nayel's lost faith in Canadian justice.

Two years ago, a judge threw out the case over unreasonable delay. And though the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned that decision and ordered Mr. Picard to trial, the Nayels still feel a sense of horror at how the process unfolded.

"I used to be a believer in the court system," said Mr. Nayel, whose son, Fouad, was 28 when Mr. Picard shot him in the head and dumped his body in a wooded area in the Ottawa Valley. Now, "I think our justice system is broken, it's shattered. Things have to change."

Two years ago, Mr. Picard's trial was set to begin. But four months earlier, in a case called Jordan, the Supreme Court of Canada established new time limits for criminal proceedings: 30 months in superior court and 18 months in provincial court, from charge to completion. Soon after, an Alberta judge threw out a murder charge, prompting Lawrence Greenspon, then Mr. Picard's lawyer, to ask Ontario Superior Court Justice Julianne Parfett to do the same. By then, Mr. Picard had been in jail for about four years. (During that initial period of delay, Mr. Nayel had a heart attack and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.)

With jury selection under way, Justice Parfett threw out the case, citing the Supreme Court ruling in Jordan.

"It was as bad as when my son went missing," Mr. Nayel said in an interview. "There's a bitter taste in my mouth. For God's sake, we were there that day to pick the jury, and then she drops the bombshell."

Nicole Nayel, Fouad's mother, rounded up about 35 friends and relatives and protested in front of the courthouse. The urgent need to address court delay - and the possibility that more serious cases could be dismissed - began to be expressed widely. Eventually, the provinces and the federal government held special sessions on how to respond to Jordan, and Ottawa introduced sweeping legislation that included ending most preliminary hearings, a staple of the system for more than a century. (The hearings allow a court to determine whether enough evidence exists to send a case to trial.)

But none of that affected the six-year journey of the Nayels. Fouad, a construction worker, had gone to meet someone he did not name on Father's Day and did not come back. Ms. Nayel checked with his employer the next morning and he hadn't shown up. Immediately she went to police. Later, using her son's cellphone records - the contract was in her husband's name - she found several calls between her son and a particular number. She called the number and encountered Adam Picard, and set up a meeting where she taped his responses to her questions. (She said the tape undermined his credibility.)

The Nayels were in court eight months after Justice Parfett's dismissal of the case when the Ontario Court of Appeal in Toronto heard the Crown's appeal. The court eventually ruled that the judge had misinterpreted the Supreme Court's instructions on "transitional" cases - those already in the system when it made the Jordan ruling - by diminishing the importance of considering the seriousness of the offence when deciding whether a delay has been unreasonable. (In the Alberta case, the Court of Appeal later threw out the lower-court's ruling as well, and a jury trial is expected to begin next March.)

The Nayels were in court throughout Mr. Picard's six-week trial. Ms. Nayel says she supports the spirit of the Jordan ruling, but not its retroactive application.

And even apart from the dismissal of the case, she and her husband remain angry about other aspects of the system. For instance, during a preliminary hearing, she says she was crying - quietly - and was asked to leave the room. Yet when Mr. Picard's sister-in-law became emotional while testifying, she was shown kindness.

On the positive side, Mr. Nayel mentioned the work of prosecutors Dallas Mack and Louise Tansey: Like chess players, "they were always two steps ahead of the defence." He also praised Superior Court Justice Kevin Phillips, whom he described as exceptionally fair and accommodating to both the Crown and defence.

And both Nayels say they intend to honour their son by becoming advocates for victims in the criminal-justice system.

"I spent six years within the system," Ms. Nayel said. "At least make them equal - I'm not asking to be better. But they should have rights as much as the other ones."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Couple's faith in Canadian justice system lost, despite conviction in son's murder

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
They had investigated the 2012 disappearance of their son themselves, tracking his telephone calls and identifying the prime suspect, then interviewing - even covertly tape recording - him. But eventually, the man they uncovered became a poster child for a new era in Canadian justice - in which even charges as serious as first-degree murder could be thrown out for unreasonable delay.

# data[].attributes.body
This picture are people protesting against guns. Stating they want no more guns, no more gun related death.

# data[].attributes.body
This picture is of Bruce McArthur, who is a serial killer. He plead guilty to eight murders of gay me, he was sentence to life with no chance of parole for 25 years