# data[].attributes.body
Humans should stay home this article is more convincing because the evidence they give is more reasonable and it makes more sense to me in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.headline
I like the article "humans should stay at home & let robots take us to the stars" i like this article because it is interesting. One of the rhetorical questions is n paragraph 3 ,"Would you want to trust a scientific mission ?"

# data[].attributes.subject
I like the article "humans should stay at home & let robots take us to the stars" i like this article because it is interesting. One of the rhetorical questions is n paragraph 3 ,"Would you want to trust a scientific mission ?"

# data[].attributes.body
Humans should stay home and robots should take space I think this because it's saying that A Massachusetts Institute of Technology study guessed that agriculture would make too much oxygen for the small colony to support inside its dome and it cost a lot of money to build a rocket and it takes a long time to get there like 25 YEARS! That's a long time and so I think that humans should stay home and robots take space and I think this is more convincing because with robots the time and money can lower by A LOT

# data[].attributes.headline
HUMAN SHOULD STAY HOME AND LET ROBOTS TAKE TO THE STARS

# data[].attributes.subject
HUMAN SHOULD STAY HOME AND LET ROBOTS TAKE TO THE STARS

# data[].attributes.body
HUMAN SHOULD STAY HOME AND LET ROBOTS TAKE TO THE STARS was more convincing, It was more realistic and it say "Would you want to trust a scientific mission to the people who run reality TV?" and space expensive because Some of the best reasons to curtail space exploration come down to economics, human cost, and technology.

# data[].attributes.body
The article that is the most convincing in the second one. Humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars. I find the article more convincing because i feel like it had more facts and evidence that is more understandable. It had a rhetorical devices in the element of the argument like the one in paragraph 3. "Would you want to trust a scientific mission to people who run reality TV". I like this rhetorical question because it is a question that is meant to have a dramatic effect or make the point rather than getting an answer

# data[].attributes.body
I think "Human should stay home and let robots take to the stars'' is loaded language it was convincing like exploratory is loaded language so i like it it and it makes me more engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
I think humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars loaded language is the one I thought brought it out and made it more convincing  like exploratory is loaded language so i like it because i see words like that i get more engaged

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans Should Stay Home and Let Robots Take to the Stars

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans Should Stay Home and Let Robots Take to the Stars

# data[].attributes.body
Humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars was the more convincing of the two articles. I believe this because we need to rethink how we do space travel. The rhetorical devices the article uses that makes it more convincing is direct address because her use of direct address in helps get my attention and connect to this topic.

# data[].attributes.body
humans should stay home because  and let robots go to the stars it is so amazing and interesting  the edivece and reasoning is also that amazed me

# data[].attributes.body
I think humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars loaded language is the one I thought brought it out and made it more convincing  like exploratory is loaded language so i like it because i see words like that i get more engaged

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Humans should stay at home while robots should take to the stars is more convincing because I have to go to the store and get some rest and feel better soon and that is the only way I can get a ride to the airport on Friday

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.headline
noah make your statement bigger and then it would be better

# data[].attributes.subject
noah make your statement bigger and then it would be better

# data[].attributes.headline
I  think Humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars  was more convincing because it had counterarguments so it will show both sides but still will tell you what is right instead of the other one it just give one side  

# data[].attributes.subject
I  think Humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars  was more convincing because it had counterarguments so it will show both sides but still will tell you what is right instead of the other one it just give one side  

# data[].attributes.body
i think humans should stay home and let robots take care of it take to stars, because humans get bone loss and soemtimes cancer so i think they should le robots go for them so they dont get it and they will be safe and do reseach by controlling the robots

# data[].attributes.headline
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Humans should stay home, the article is more convincing because it has some reasonable evidence and reason and the direct address makes it more convincing.

# data[].attributes.headline
I find Humans should... As a great and good convincing article. I think this because the author gives great details and claim for every subject they write about. The elements that made it more convincing is rhetorical questions so the reader has time to think about the question and the articles purpose.

# data[].attributes.subject
I find Humans should... As a great and good convincing article. I think this because the author gives great details and claim for every subject they write about. The elements that made it more convincing is rhetorical questions so the reader has time to think about the question and the articles purpose.

# data[].attributes.body
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

# data[].attributes.headline
Some people suggest that the only way to get to Mars would be with the help of private companies. Because of this, the space exploration industry is made up not only of government agencies but also private companies headed by dreamers and people interested in profits over practicality.

# data[].attributes.subject
Some people suggest that the only way to get to Mars would be with the help of private companies. Because of this, the space exploration industry is made up not only of government agencies but also private companies headed by dreamers and people interested in profits over practicality.

# data[].attributes.body
Jasmine Teague

# data[].attributes.headline
i think humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars one was more convinceing because of the facts that it had thats wy i picked the second article

# data[].attributes.subject
i think humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars one was more convinceing because of the facts that it had thats wy i picked the second article

# data[].attributes.headline
humans should stay home and lets robots take to the stars is more convincing cuz it tells us why robots should do it, why its safer for us, and how cheaper it is for robots to do it.

# data[].attributes.subject
humans should stay home and lets robots take to the stars is more convincing cuz it tells us why robots should do it, why its safer for us, and how cheaper it is for robots to do it.

# data[].attributes.headline
humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars because it has all things that need to be there

# data[].attributes.subject
humans should stay home and let robots take to the stars because it has all things that need to be there

# data[].attributes.body
The article I find more interesting is "Humans should stay at home and let robots take to the stars". I picked that article because it was interesting and I liked it. One of the rhetorical devices is rhetorical question. An example is in paragraph 3 it said " Would you want to trust a scientific mission to people who run reality TV?".

# data[].attributes.body
humans Should Stay Home and Let Robots Take to the Stars, it made me think about it but the other did not As you might guess, the future of space exploration presents a very different picture, one where robots will replace humans as the better pilots and researchers.