# data[].attributes.headline
Grouping Students who struggle with reading

# data[].attributes.subject
Grouping Students who struggle with reading

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
References

Click the "References" link above to hide these references.

Allington, R. L. (1980). Poor readers don't get to read much in reading groups. Language Arts, 57(8), 873-875.

Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1991). Grouping students for reading instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 88 5-910). New York: Longman.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.

Calfee, R., & Brown, R. (1979). Grouping students for instruction. In D. L. Duke (Ed.), Class-room management: Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 144-182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research- to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513-52 1.

Collins, J. (1997, October 2 7). How Johnny should read. Time, 2 1.

Come, B., & Fredericks, A. D. (1995). Family literacy in urban schools: Meeting the needs of at-risk children. The Reading Teacber, 48(7), 566-571.

Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J.J., & Hall, R. U. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 5 3 5- 542.

Elbaum, B. E., Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1997). Urban middleelementary students' perceptions of grouping formats for reading instruction. Elementary School Journal, 97(5), 475-500.

Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). A meta-analytic review of the effect of instructional grouping format on the reading outcomes of students with disabilities. In. R. Gersten, E. Schiller, J. S. Schumm, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Issues and researcb in special education (pp.105-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (199 1). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading "posse." Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123-138.

Flood, J., Lapp, D., Flood, S., & Nagel, G. (1992). Am I allowed to group? Using flexible patterns for effective instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45(8), 608-616.

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P G., & Simmons, D. C., (1997). Peerassisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Education Research journal, 34(l), 17 4-2 06.

Gambrell, L. B., Wilson, R. M. & Gantt, W. N. (198 1). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 74(6), 400-404.

Gelzheiser, L. M., & Meyers, J. (1991). Reading instruction by classroom, remedial, and resource room teachers. Journal of Special Education, 24, 512-526.

Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 466-476.

Goldenberg, C. (1993). Instructional conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46(4), 316-326.

Good, T. L., & Stipek, D. J. (1983). Individual differences in the classroom: A psychological perspective. In G. D. Fenstermacher & J. 1. Goodlad (Eds.), Individual differences and the common curriculum. Eighty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pan I (pp. 9-43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R.V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371-383.

Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An. examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 2 3 1-2 5 5.

Hunter, D. (1978). Student on-task behavior during second grade reading group meetings (Doctoral dissertation, University of MissouriColumbia, 197 8). Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 48 3 8A.

Jenkins, J. R., Mayhall, W. F., Pschka, C. M., & Jenkins, J. M. (1974). Comparing small group and tutorial instruction in resource rooms. Exceptional Children, 40, 245-2 5 1.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 43 7-447.

Juel, C. (199 1). Cross-age tutoring between student-athletes and at-risk children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 178-186.

Kirk, S. A., Kirk, W. D., & Minskoff, E. H. (198 5). Phonic remedial reading lessons. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy.

Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Cotten, P., & Forgan, J. W. (1998). Inclusion or pull-out: Which do students prefer? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 148-158.

Labo, L. D., & Teale, W. H. (1990). Cross-age reading: A strategy for helping poor readers. The Reading Teacher, 43(6), 362-369.

Lerner, J. W. (1997). Learning disabilities. Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Lloyd, J. (1980). Direct instruction: Effects on oral and written language comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 70-76.

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Appolonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 42 3 -45 8.

Lyon, G. R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10,S121-SI26.

Maheady, L. (1997). Preparing teachers for instructing multiple ability groups. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(4), 3 2 2-3 3 9.

Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23(l), 59-80.

McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., Haager, D., & Lee, 0. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 249-261.

McTighe, J., & Lyman, F. T. (1988). Cueing thinking in the classroom: The promise of theory-embedded tools. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 18-24.

Moody, S. W., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1997). Instructional grouping for reading: Teachers' views. Remedial and Special Education, 18(6), 347-356.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1995). NAEP 1994 reading. A first look-Findings from the national assessment of educational progress (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

O'Sullivan, P. J., Ysseldyke, J. E., Christenson, S. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (1990). Mildly handicapped elementary students' opportunity to learn during reading instruction in mainstream and special education settings. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 131-46.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-17 5.

Polloway, E. A., Cronin, M. E., & Patton, J. R. (1986). The efficacy of group versus one-to-one instruction: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 7(l), 22-30.

Radencich, M. C., & McKay, L. J. (1995). Flexible grouping for literacy in the elementary grades. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Rosenholtz, S. J., & Wilson, B. (1980). The effect of classroom structure on shared perceptions of ability. American Education Research Journal, 17, 75-82.

Schumm, J. S., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Making adaptations for mainstreamed students: General classroom teachers' perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 18-27.

Schumm, J. S., Vaughn, S., Gordon, J., & Rothlein, L. (1994). General education teachers' beliefs, skills, and practices in planning for mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 2 2 -3 7.

Schumn, J. S., Vaughn, S., & Sobol, M. C. (1997). "Are they getting it?": How to monitor student understanding in inclusive classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(3), 168-17 1.

Simmons, D., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Mathes, P., & Hodge, J. (1995). Teacher-directed reading instruction in the mainstream: A call for instructional reform. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11, 19-36.

S lavin, R. E. (198 3). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.

Slavin, R. E. (1987). Making chapter I make a difference. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 110-119.

Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1989). What works for students at risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 4-13.

Thorkildsen, T. A. (1993). Those who can, tutor: High-ability students' conceptions of fair ways to organize learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(l), 182-190.

Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Wotruba, J. W., & Algozzine, B. (1993). Instruction in special education classrooms under varying student- teacher ratios. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 305-320.

United States Department of Education. (1997). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

Vaughn, S., Moody, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 211- 226.

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Klingner, J. K., & Saumell, L. (1995). Students' views of instructional practices: Implications for inclusion. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(3), 2 3 6-248.

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Niarhos, F. J., & Gordon, J. (1993). Students' perceptions of two hypothetical teachers' instructional adaptations for low achievers. Elementary Scbool Journal, 94(l), 87-103.

Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.

Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 178-200.

Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. (1990). Mainstream experiences for learning disabled students (Project MELD): Preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176-185.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Grouping Students Who Struggle With Reading

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There are a variety of grouping formats that are effective for teaching reading to students with learning disabilities: whole class, small group, pairs, and one-on-one. Learn more about the research and implications for practice for using each format in the general education classroom.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
3 Ways to Build Self-Efficacy and Boost Your Resilience