# data[].attributes.body
Since you told me that she is someone who lived through the time and actually went through this it makes me believe the document more.

# data[].attributes.body
The generosity of the Native Americans is interesting as the author is a prisoner. It seems as though they are taking good care of her despite taking her captive.

# data[].attributes.body
she may have had biases or an alterer motive when writing this

# data[].attributes.headline
I think is can be consider as a primary because it is author's own experience. But I am still not sure if the story has bias or misunderstandings. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think is can be consider as a primary because it is author's own experience. But I am still not sure if the story has bias or misunderstandings. 

# data[].attributes.body
This was interesting to me to read because Mary Rowlandson uses types of words and language that I am not particularly familiar with. It challenged me to analyze what she was writing about further and deeper.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm not sure. I think it depends on how you define reliable. If you mean reliable to her own POV then yes, but not for everyone's POV.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the source is reliable because it is a primary source, so it is her accounts of what happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Knowing that it was written by a women who was actually there and went through it I trust the document more. I think that I don't have to doubt as much that the information is false.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand that this is a first hand account as it is a primary source, meaning these are the thoughts and words of the individual that actually experienced this

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this source is reliable because it is a primary document based on the author's experiences.

# data[].attributes.body
She wrote this in the moment in her diary, so this is definitely a primary source. However, it is hard to know whether or not it is reliable

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it is reliable for her own point of view.

# data[].attributes.body
She is retelling her experiences in captivity

# data[].attributes.body
This is a primary source but how can we tell that the author is who they say they are, and how do we know that it was changed from journal article to text correctly?

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Rowlandson's account of her capture and treatment

# data[].attributes.body
The author is writing about her own experiences. She has been imprisoned by the Native Americans so she is journaling her thoughts and what has happened. It is clear from her writing that she is surprised at the generosity and kindness of those who have taken her captive.

# data[].attributes.body
Even though she is the one writing the interaction, how can we know if her biases influenced her during this time?

# data[].attributes.body
It is the authors perspective, retelling her own personal experience

# data[].attributes.body
The author's perspective was one that was experiencing the event itself. Mary Rowlandson was the one accounting these events that were recorded because she had a first account.

# data[].attributes.headline
The author has the perspective of someone being held captive.

# data[].attributes.subject
The author has the perspective of someone being held captive.

# data[].attributes.body
They author is in captivity

# data[].attributes.body
she is retelling of her capture

# data[].attributes.body
She is the person in captivity-- she wrote these journal entries

# data[].attributes.body
It may be reliable as it is a first hand account, but there could be biases present that have gone unchecked/undiscussed

# data[].attributes.headline
I notice there are several places said (unreadable text) I feel confuses about that part.

# data[].attributes.subject
I notice there are several places said (unreadable text) I feel confuses about that part.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this source seems reliable because it seems as though the person who wrote it was there and experiencing this.

# data[].attributes.body
The author is the person in the event

# data[].attributes.body
It is a primary source but how do we know if she is biased or lying about anything