# data[].attributes.body
Malcolm Gladwell begins The Tipping Point by mentioning that for ”Hush Puppies” “the Tipping Point came somewhere between late 1994 and early 1995.” This use of self-referential not only provides a good example of what Gladwell will analyze for the audience that has just started reading, but it also creates a special term out of the Tipping Point that will be structured and defined by the end of the text. Besides being the title, ”Tipping Point” is also a common phrase to refer to a specific action that changes an entire situation, which further provides information about the structure of Gladwell’s book. Furthermore, Gladwell starts outlining his narrative style by introducing Hush Puppies, which is typical of his journalistic style in most of his pieces where he incorporates several narratives to further his line of reasoning.

# data[].attributes.body
In the introduction, Gladwell creates an extended metaphor that will reappear throughout the text. He compares a wide-spread initiative against crime to a “virus” that “infected” people in New York providing a way to measure how quickly a situation has changed after a tipping point for an audience who has not understood the rapidity of the change. This metaphor grants the reader a measure of comparison and, although the book was written in 2000, it serves as a great reference due to the Covid-19 pandemic for readers after 2020 because they could understand the drastic effects of a virus. Since this will become an extended metaphor, we can expect words such as “virus,” “infect,” or “epidemic” to have the connotation of a large spread or change that Gladwell will employ to aid readers.

# data[].attributes.body
Before finishing the introduction to the first chapter, Gladwell utilizes a simile to intertwine two different narratives to further his line of reasoning about tipping points. He states that “these exceptional people … spread the word about Hush Puppies just as people like Gaetan Dugas and Nushawn Williams were able to spread HIV,” creating a connection between Hush Puppies and HIV to demonstrate how a few exceptional people were able to cause a disproportionate pandemic. Although Hush Puppies might be fairly unknown, the HIV epidemic is a relevant phenomenon and creating a simile between the two could emphasize their “infectious” nature. Gladwell also creates a special term—The Law of the Few—to define a repeated observation where few people tip a large scale pandemic. This Law will help Gladwell fulfill his purpose of describing the Tipping Point and how to identify it, which will also help his readers learn themselves how to take the Tipping Point and apply it to their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell concludes the first chapter with a rhetorical question asking how “three rules help us understand teenage smoking” and other examples, which introduces the three rules and also foreshadows what he will address later in the book. Since he directly addresses the audience and himself as a group, he encourages a learning environment similar to the classroom where even the teacher continues learning and synthesizes the lesson for his students. Thus, if the students take his examples as learning experiences they will further learn from his book which he composed as a journalist who also had to synthesize these narratives into a lesson for himself. Gladwell answers his rhetorical question by stating “the answers may surprise you.” This not only provides excitement for future narration, but also adds suspense since readers should not expect the result.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell introduces Paul Revere’s ride to incorporate it in his line of reasoning. By narrating his ride, Gladwell provides the readers with an accurate understanding of the story, and he highlights certain points like “he knocked on doors and spread the word” or “the news spread like a virus” to make a parallel with the spread after tipping point.  Furthermore, he also continues the extended metaphor of a “virus” to cue the readers that his actions spread the message, which highlights Revere as one of the exceptional people in “The Law of the Few.” Since he narrates this story with an extended metaphor, he also foreshadows the use of the story to highlight different caveats of the law.

# data[].attributes.body
When describing Tom Gau, a financial agent known for his irresistible attraction, he describes his personality saying, “It’s energy. It’s enthusiasm. It's charm. It’s likability. It’s all those things and yet something more.” By repeating “It’s,” Gladwell emphasizes each additional characteristic to demonstrate the attractiveness of Tom’s personality. However, he then states that there is “something more” that sets him apart from others. The audience can assume that the extra hidden characteristic will most likely lead to another hint for the characteristic of a Tipping Point, which creates suspense and anticipation. Gladwell chose to add this element to emphasize the importance of the tipping point in speaking regular people from exceptional phenoms like Tom Gau. Furthermore, repeating his characteristics to emphasize his likability builds a mountainous standard for Tom, so when Gladwell adds the extra length of ”something more” it leaves the readers curious to discover the true character. Gladwell does this on purpose as a journalist and as a writer to continue to hook his readers into the importance of the tipping point.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell then introduces a new chapter by relying on the same metaphor comparing the effects of a tipping point to the effects of an epidemic, using words such as “epidemic,” “agent of infection,” or “virus” to establish relatability for his readers. Using an extended metaphor would aid readers recognize the drastic effects of the tipping point because of its repeated use when describing the tipping point. Since readers recognize the comparison, Gladwell uses it to facilitate the introduction of a new special term. Thus, the reader could better understand the new term since Gladwell already established certain bases that readers could use as a crutch to first comprehend the concept.

# data[].attributes.body
Through the use of parallelism, Gladwell emphasizes Blue’s Clues' superiority compared to Sesame Street by highlighting the rigorousness of Blue Clues’ testing process for child engagement. For example, Gladwell mentioned that “while Sesame Street will typically only test a third of its episodes, Blue‘s Clues’ tests them all,” which ended a series of comparisons that each served as additional evidence towards Blue’s Clues’ superior ability to test for attention. Since each additional comparison provides more evidence towards Blue’s Clues’ strength, readers could continue to consume this until they observe a large gap between the two shows. Furthermore, readers may have grown up watching both shows, and they could have related to the fact that Blue’s Clues captivated more of their attention, so adding statistical significance to their personal observation may persuade them more of this fact.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell states that “it was simply inconceivable that someone could pull a gun on someone else on the subway and be called a hero for it” after introducing the story of Bernhard Goetz’s inexplicable mental outburst, and this statement serves to highlight the absurdity of the result. Gladwell chose to finish this introduction before moving on to the rest of the text to build suspense and to have a pause so that readers could truly comprehend the irony that a man who shot 4 teens for seemingly little reason was commended as a hero. As a journalist, Gladwell uses this to hook the reader into continuing the passage to truly understand the context behind this, and Gladwell uses this to his advantage to later explain the power of context—the title of the chapter. Narrating shocking and sensitive stories helps entice the reader to continue their absorption in the book, but it also helps Gladwell demonstrate that the Tipping Point is an event found in many different—and sometimes bizarre—stories, increasing the credibility of his claim.

# data[].attributes.body
While explaining Goetz’s reasons for his violent actions, Gladwell quotes him explaining that he “responded viciously and savagely … like a rat.” Having Goetz recount this story adds credibility since the direct quote reveals emotions only Goetz could recount. Gladwell then adds on to this stating that “Of course he did. He was in a rat hole.” The brief sentences add to the humor of the statement where Gladwell defends Goetz because of his environment. Furthermore, creating a metaphor comparing New York to a rat hole provides an additional humorous touch as a pun to respond to Goetz’s quote as readers may consider New York to be rat infested. Yet, more importantly, the metaphor delves into the dirtiness and trashiness of a rat hole, which can be compared to New York’s graffiti and lack of care that, Gladwell argues, pushed Goetz to commit such a terrible act. Having this metaphor as the end of the chapter also builds suspense since the readers would want to know how Gladwell defends Goetz’s actions through the “Power of Context,” an additional subgenre in the lesson of the Tipping Point, furthering Gladwell’s argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell entwines many different narratives to help elaborate upon the tipping point of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood. For example, he calls Methodist theologian John Wesley a “super Paul Revere” to demonstrate his ability of quickly spreading information to a variety of people. Gladwell alludes to the narrative he described in previous chapters to demonstrate this, facilitating the comprehension for the readers. He then incorporates both narratives of John Wesley and Paul Revere as he believed they explained “why the Ya-Ya Sisterhood tipped as well.” Instead of tackling a new subject with a blank slate, Gladwell incorporates many different stories to provide a crutch for his readers to build the story, and this ingenious approach to narration is typical of Gladwell’s style. Thus, with his tested style, many readers could understand the new story easier through the incorporation of previously learned lessons.

# data[].attributes.body
To help develop anticipation for a climax, Gladwell uses anaphora to emphasize the changes the owners of Airwalk instilled. He repeats the pronoun “they,” with each new sentence adding to the building anticipation that demonstrates the radical changes incurred. This use of anaphora leads to the climax, where Gladwell reveals that “under Lambesis’s direction, Airwalk exploded.” Utilizing a charged verb such as “exploded” provides accurate imagery for the growth company underwent. Since readers could visualize an explosion, associating a company growth with the quick fiery ball that many readers could imagine provides a useful measure of growth. Furthermore, the repetition of “they” could be interpreted as Gladwell charging a cannon with additional gunpowder, and the brief sentence stating that “Airwalk exploded” could be figuratively seen as the explosion out of a cannon.

# data[].attributes.body
Adding onto a previous story adds an extra level to the complex relationship of the factors that create a tipping point. Gladwell utilizes this strategy by explaining a “wonderful example … in Baltimore, the city whose problems with drugs and disease I talked about earlier in the book,” adding a figurative building block onto a story he explored near the beginning of the book. Gladwell expects his readers—or his students—to have learned more factors of a tipping point since the beginning of the text, and he now engages with the story to explore a complex side he may not have easily taught if he had not gone through all the other lessons first. This principle is similar to learning a basic lesson in a math class, learning more and more about other topics, and then reexploring the same simple lesson but with a new “toolbox” to approach it and add more levels to it. Readers would appreciate this method as they are eased into the subject, which would provide a better reading experience and help Gladwell further his point.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The use of a noose in the snap relates to how Micronesian teens used this as the primary method to commit suicide, as the issue became so diluted in teen society that kids as young as 11 were asphyxiating themselves to “try out hanging.”

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout his book, Gladwell explores many different topics, including many controversial subjects that may seem unrelated to a tipping point. This element of shock not only engages the reader, but also demonstrates that the lessons he teaches are applicable in many different sectors. For example, Gladwell explores the similarity between “the Micronesian teen suicide epidemic” and “the epidemic of teenage smoking in the West.” Both of these topics have a significant stigma around them, and using them to break down an argument may seem insensitive, yet it also adds an element of shock that Gladwell utilizes. Since readers may be taken aback by the use of the these topics, especially since they appear different, Gladwell takes advantage of their judgement to demonstrate that the laws of the tipping point can be applied to topics even as extreme as suicide and teen smoking.

# data[].attributes.body
Through the use of colloquialism and antithesis, Gladwell demonstrates that teen smoking was not an inherent societal problem, but simply a relation between a stereotypical group of people. He emphasizes that the idealized people “weren’t cool because they smoked. They smoked because they were cool.” The use of antithesis not only makes a catchy pair of sentences, but it also serves as a catalyst for the change in perspective Gladwell urges others to incur because of its simplicity and close but contrasting relation. Furthermore, using colloquial language with the word “cool” helps readers relate to the subject of “teen” smoking. Although the book is mostly formal and a researched work, the use of colloquialism would not degrade its credibility, but enhance it due to the relatability to the subject that could further persuade the reader of this change in perspective rather than maintaining the text formal.

# data[].attributes.body
In his conclusion, Gladwell shifts from describing different stories to making a call to action for humans to change perspectives, as “the theory of Tipping Points requires, however, that we reframe the way we think about the world.” Utilizing a first person point of view engages the readers to join together and change the way we think about change and how we measure scales. Gladwell wrote his book to enable readers to begin processing different tipping points and seeing similar patterns of exponential growth that were only due to small significant changes. He encourages readers to think about this growth as a result of slight differences, not as the large trend afterwards. Gladwell also had to change his thought process to write this book, and as an expert in human behavior he encourages others to follow this example.

# data[].attributes.body
Finally, Gladwell inspires readers to “look at the world around them,” and leaves a final inspirational message that with the “slightest push–in just the right place–it can be tipped,” a metaphor that appropriately concludes the book with a call to action. The metaphor comparing the world to a pushable object that can be tipped was the cliché comparison that readers have expected since the beginning of the novel. Yet, ending the journey through different stories with a relatable and well-known comparison could satisfy the reader since they are already aware of its message. Thus, with the message already in mind, readers would likely apply the lessons taught throughout the book to the world they “look at,” whether it's helping their family, or serving with their community, or even tip the world in a better direction against extreme climate change.

# data[].attributes.body
In his afterword, Gladwell recalls many of the reactions readers had towards his book, including a generous grant donation to many different libraries who took ideas from the novel and applied it to their community. He states that “none of the grants was more than a few thousand dollars, nor were the ideas themselves more than modest–but that was the point,” revealing his true purpose of helping communities all around with his lessons, even if it was a small change. Choosing to mention small grants and small changes could inspire more people reading to pursue their own tipping points. Gladwell chose to mention these, in contrast to many of the large-scale issues or events that he analyzed in his story, because it would inspire more people to do good in ways they could actually help, like in their local library. Gladwell wanted his readers to not feel overshadowed by the grand accomplishments of his story subjects, which would make his story more applicable for readers who, he assumes, are majoritarily not large conglomerates that can make immense change.

# data[].attributes.body
Gladwell, however, still relies on stigmatized topics to get his point across. When writing his book, school shootings became the newest teen “epidemic,” and he explores the trends tipping point. Gladwell believes that “teens as emotionally impoverished as Andy Williams” would not commit these horrible acts simply because of their home environment, and that “the difference is Columbine,” more specifically the idealization of the teens behind the act who served as martyrs for these emotionally troubled teens. Using Columbine and school shootings as examples for a tipping point adds credibility to Gladwell’s observations, since even developing trends after the publication of his original book follow the same rules he outlined. Furthermore, readers may also regard this topic similarly controversial to the Micronesian suicides or teen smoking, and utilizing an extreme example after exemplifying libraries demonstrates the broad range of applications the lessons of the Tipping Point has. Additionally, Gladwell continues to use diction such as “infected” and “epidemic” that continue the extended metaphor, granting readers a facilitated comprehension of the spread of the school shooting trend.

# data[].attributes.body
As one of his final examples, Gladwell returns to his classic style while talking about “Mavens,” a special term he has created to designate a passionate expert in a certain field. He mockingly questions “Who on earth could ever have a question about Ivory Soap?,” a rhetorical question in response to a company’s ingenious strategy to add a phone number to its packaging, and he later confirms that “soap Mavens” would be the ones to call. Using this example allows Gladwell to explore the commercial application of knowing the lessons of the Tipping Points, as companies who value Mavens who would give advice to Connectors, who in turn would spread their company name far and wide, have an advantage over their competitors. Throughout the book, Gladwell employed a variety of examples to demonstrate the Tipping Point’s range of applications, and adding this additional commercial example provides another interesting aspect of the rules. Furthermore, the example also demonstrates the usefulness of his special terms such as “Mavens” and “Connectors,” since readers who may have been doubtful of the usefulness of the terms could sway into appreciating them, furthering Gladwell’s credibility and the purpose of the Tipping Point.