# data[].attributes.body
The goal is to create an inclusive curriculum that integrates digital citizenship and health education to meet the unique needs of students with disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
How can we create an inclusive curriculum that combines digital citizenship and health education to meet the needs of students with disabilities?

# data[].attributes.body
In classrooms, students with disabilities face significant challenges due to the gaps in equity and innovation in our curriculum. The integration of digital citizenship and health education is inconsistent, leading to fragmented learning experiences (James, Weinstein, Mendoza, Robb, & Beroeva, 2019). Teachers often encounter accessibility issues, as many educational materials are not designed to accommodate diverse learning needs of all students (Haleem, Javaid, Qadri, & Suman, 2022). This lack of accessible resources means that students with disabilities are not given the same opportunities to engage with the curriculum as their peers, resulting in disparities in their educational outcomes (Gallego-Ortega & Rodríguez-Fuentes, 2021).

Social-emotional learning (SEL), a critical component for the development of students, and is not consistently implemented across classrooms. This inconsistency affects the social and emotional growth of students, impacting their overall well-being and academic performance (Connolly, 2021). Moreover, educators lack ongoing professional development, which hinders their ability to effectively teach and support a diverse group of students (Voulgarides, Fergus, & Thorius, 2017). Although some assistive technologies are available, their use in the classroom is sporadic and often depends on individual teachers rather than being part of a standardized approach (CDC, 2020). Additionally, existing health education curriculum often fail to accommodate the specific needs of students with disabilities, leading to disparities in health outcomes as noted in The Surgeon General’s Call to Action (2005). This gap is further exacerbated by a lack of clarity and consistency in physical education terminology and practices, as discussed by Lynch, Soukup, and Usher (2016).

Stakeholder engagement is another area that needs improvement. There is limited involvement from parents, community members, and local experts in the curriculum development process. This lack of engagement creates a disconnect between the curriculum and the actual needs and expectations of the students and their families. Without a comprehensive needs assessment, it is difficult to identify and address the specific gaps and requirements of our student population (Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 2023).

Overall, our current setting shows a need for a more cohesive, inclusive, and innovative approach to curriculum development and implementation. By addressing these issues, we can create a more equitable and effective learning environment for our students with disabilities, and in turn, all students .

# data[].attributes.body
The current state reflects a setting where students with disabilities face barriers to equitable health and wellness education. Teachers possess varying levels of understanding and acceptance of inclusive education practices, impacting their ability to effectively integrate students with disabilities. Health education often relies on traditional methods that do not adequately address the unique needs of these students, as highlighted by the CDC (2019) and Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities (2023). Additionally, the integration of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) into health education is inconsistent, despite its proven benefits in improving student outcomes (Connolly, 2021).

# data[].attributes.body
In the ideal state, all students, regardless of their abilities, have equitable access to comprehensive health and wellness education. Teachers exhibit positive and informed attitudes towards inclusive education, supported by continuous professional development and resources. Health education curriculum are adapted to meet the specific needs of students with disabilities, utilizing interactive and inclusive teaching methods as advocated by the CDC (2019). There is a seamless integration of SEL into health education, creating a supportive and effective learning environment. The overall educational system is reformed to address systemic inequities, considering cultural contexts and promoting holistic approaches to student well-being, aligning with recommendations from Voulgarides, Fergus, and Thorius (2017).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Administrators, Teachers, Parents, Students.

Resources: Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups.

Timeline: 1-2 months.

WHY: To identify gaps and understand specific needs to tailor the curriculum effectively (Gallego-Ortega & Rodríguez-Fuentes, 2021).

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Develop Inclusive Curriculum Framework

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Develop Inclusive Curriculum Framework

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Curriculum Developers, Special Education Teachers.

Resources: Research Materials, Planning Tools.

Timeline: 3-4 months.

WHY: To ensure the curriculum is comprehensive and addresses diverse learning needs (The Surgeon General’s Call to Action, 2005).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: IT Specialists, Teachers, Assistive Tech Experts.

Resources: Devices, Software, Training.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To provide tools that enhance learning experiences and accessibility for students with disabilities (Haleem, 2022).

# data[].attributes.headline
4. Professional Development for Teachers

# data[].attributes.subject
4. Professional Development for Teachers

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Educational Trainers, Teachers.

Resources: Workshops, Online Modules.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To equip teachers with necessary skills and knowledge for effective implementation of inclusive practices (Voulgarides, 2017).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: SEL Specialists, Teachers, Counselors.

Resources: SEL Curriculum, Training Materials.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To improve classroom climate and student outcomes by integrating social-emotional learning into health education (Connolly, 2021).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Curriculum Developers, Experts, Teachers.

Resources: Adaptation Tools, UDL Guidelines.

Timeline: 3-4 months.

WHY: To ensure materials are accessible and inclusive, meeting the diverse needs of all students (CDC, 2020).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Administrators, Teachers, Parents, Community.

Resources: Communication Platforms, Meeting Spaces.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To ensure collaboration and alignment between all parties involved, enhancing the curriculum’s effectiveness and relevance (Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities, 2023).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Administrators, Teachers, Students, Parents.

Resources: Evaluation Tools, Data Analysis Software.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To assess progress, make adjustments, and ensure the curriculum meets the intended goals (CDC, 2019).

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Digital Literacy Experts, Teachers.

Resources: Curriculum, Training Materials.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To equip students with essential skills for responsible and safe online behavior (James, 2019).

# data[].attributes.headline
10. Align with ISTE and Social Justice Standards

# data[].attributes.subject
10. Align with ISTE and Social Justice Standards

# data[].attributes.body
Participants: Curriculum Developers, Teachers, Administrators.

Resources: ISTE Standards, Social Justice Standards.

Timeline: Ongoing.

WHY: To ensure the curriculum aligns with recognized standards for technology integration and social justice, promoting a well-rounded educational experience (Teaching Tolerance Social Justice Standards).

# data[].attributes.body
1. Gallego-Ortega, J. L., & Rodríguez-Fuentes, A. (2021): Emphasizes the role of teachers' attitudes in successful inclusive education for students with disabilities. Improving teachers' knowledge and creating positive interactions can reduce stigma and enhance educational outcomes.

2. United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General. (2005): Highlights the need for equitable healthcare access and supportive environments to improve health outcomes for individuals with disabilities. The call to action advocates for better training for healthcare providers and improved accessibility standards.

3. Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities (2023): Provides tools to empower educators and families in promoting safety, well-being, and self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Emphasizes the importance of preventing abuse and neglect.

4. CDC. (2020): Advocates for inclusive physical education, ensuring all students have equal opportunities to participate by adapting teaching strategies and environments. Aligns with federal laws to promote non-discrimination.

5. Voulgarides, C. K., Fergus, E., & Thorius, K. A. K. (2017): Critiques existing policies like IDEA for not fully addressing disproportionality in special education. Calls for systemic reforms that consider cultural contexts and promote equity.

6. Lynch, T., Soukup, G. J., & Usher, W. (2016): Discusses the need for clarity and consistency in physical education terminology and methodologies. Advocates for a holistic approach integrating physical, mental, and emotional well-being.

7. James, C., Weinstein, E., Mendoza, K., Robb, J., & Beroeva, E. (2019): Addresses the need for digital literacy, equipping students with skills to navigate online spaces responsibly. Highlights the importance of digital citizenship education.

8. CDC. (2019): Outlines characteristics of effective health education curricula, emphasizing interactive methods that foster practical health skills and attitudes. Promotes culturally inclusive content and continuous learning experiences.

9. Connolly, M. (2021): Highlights the integration of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) into health education, improving classroom climate and student outcomes. Advocates for aligning SEL with health education standards to enhance educational practices.

# data[].attributes.body
Creating an inclusive curriculum for digital citizenship and health education tailored to students with disabilities is essential for bridging the equity gaps present in our current educational setting.

By conducting a thorough needs assessment, we can identify specific gaps and requirements, ensuring that curriculum development is responsive to the needs of our students. Developing an inclusive curriculum framework and integrating assistive technologies will provide students with disabilities the tools and opportunities necessary for equitable engagement with the curriculum.

Continuous professional development for teachers is critical to fostering positive attitudes and effective teaching strategies for inclusive education. Implementing Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) programs consistently across classrooms will support the holistic development of students, enhancing their well-being and academic performance.

Creating accessible learning materials and fostering stakeholder engagement will ensure that the curriculum is inclusive, responsive, and reflective of the diverse needs and expectations of students and their families. Continuous monitoring and evaluation will help in maintaining the effectiveness of the curriculum and ensuring that it evolves to meet emerging needs.

Promoting digital citizenship and aligning the curriculum with ISTE and Social Justice Standards will prepare students to navigate the digital world responsibly and ethically, contributing to their overall development and success. By adopting this cohesive, inclusive, and innovative approach, we can create a more equitable and effective learning environment, ultimately improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
1. CDC. (2019). Characteristics of effective health education curriculum - SHER. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/sher/characteristics/index.htm

2. CDC. (2020, June 24). Inclusive school physical education and physical activity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/physicalactivity/inclusion_pepa.htm

3. Connolly, M. (2021, August 3). Tips for teaching SEL in your skills-based health classroom. SHAPE America Blog. https://blog.shapeamerica.org/2021/08/tips-for-teaching-sel-in-your-skills-based-health-classroom/

4. Gallego-Ortega, J. L., & Rodríguez-Fuentes, A. (2021). Teaching attitudes towards students with disabilities. Mathematics, 9(14), 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9141637

5. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(3), 275–285. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000137

6. James, C., Weinstein, E., Mendoza, K., Robb, J., & Beroeva, E. (2019). Teaching digital citizens in today’s world: Research and insights behind the Common Sense Digital Citizenship Curriculum. Common Sense. https://www.commonsense.org/system/files/pdf/2021-08/common-sense-education-digital-citizenship-research-backgrounder.pdf

7. Lynch, T., Soukup, G. J., & Usher, W. (2016). “Physical education”, “health and physical education”, “physical literacy” and “health literacy”: Global nomenclature confusion. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217820

8. Resources for Health and Safety for Students with Disabilities. (2023, August 16). Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. https://dpi.wi.gov/sped/health-safety-disability

9. United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General. (2005). The Surgeon General’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities. United States. Office of the Surgeon General.

10. Voulgarides, C. K., Fergus, E., & Thorius, K. A. K. (2017). Pursuing equity: Disproportionality in special education and the reframing of technical solutions to address systemic inequities. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686947